diff --git a/src/HOL/Parity.thy b/src/HOL/Parity.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Parity.thy
+++ b/src/HOL/Parity.thy
@@ -1,1633 +1,1637 @@
 (*  Title:      HOL/Parity.thy
     Author:     Jeremy Avigad
     Author:     Jacques D. Fleuriot
 *)
 
 section \<open>Parity in rings and semirings\<close>
 
 theory Parity
   imports Euclidean_Division
 begin
 
 subsection \<open>Ring structures with parity and \<open>even\<close>/\<open>odd\<close> predicates\<close>
 
 class semiring_parity = comm_semiring_1 + semiring_modulo +
   assumes even_iff_mod_2_eq_zero: "2 dvd a \<longleftrightarrow> a mod 2 = 0"
     and odd_iff_mod_2_eq_one: "\<not> 2 dvd a \<longleftrightarrow> a mod 2 = 1"
     and odd_one [simp]: "\<not> 2 dvd 1"
 begin
 
 abbreviation even :: "'a \<Rightarrow> bool"
   where "even a \<equiv> 2 dvd a"
 
 abbreviation odd :: "'a \<Rightarrow> bool"
   where "odd a \<equiv> \<not> 2 dvd a"
 
 lemma parity_cases [case_names even odd]:
   assumes "even a \<Longrightarrow> a mod 2 = 0 \<Longrightarrow> P"
   assumes "odd a \<Longrightarrow> a mod 2 = 1 \<Longrightarrow> P"
   shows P
   using assms by (cases "even a")
     (simp_all add: even_iff_mod_2_eq_zero [symmetric] odd_iff_mod_2_eq_one [symmetric])
 
 lemma odd_of_bool_self [simp]:
   \<open>odd (of_bool p) \<longleftrightarrow> p\<close>
   by (cases p) simp_all
 
 lemma not_mod_2_eq_0_eq_1 [simp]:
   "a mod 2 \<noteq> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> a mod 2 = 1"
   by (cases a rule: parity_cases) simp_all
 
 lemma not_mod_2_eq_1_eq_0 [simp]:
   "a mod 2 \<noteq> 1 \<longleftrightarrow> a mod 2 = 0"
   by (cases a rule: parity_cases) simp_all
 
 lemma evenE [elim?]:
   assumes "even a"
   obtains b where "a = 2 * b"
   using assms by (rule dvdE)
 
 lemma oddE [elim?]:
   assumes "odd a"
   obtains b where "a = 2 * b + 1"
 proof -
   have "a = 2 * (a div 2) + a mod 2"
     by (simp add: mult_div_mod_eq)
   with assms have "a = 2 * (a div 2) + 1"
     by (simp add: odd_iff_mod_2_eq_one)
   then show ?thesis ..
 qed
 
 lemma mod_2_eq_odd:
   "a mod 2 = of_bool (odd a)"
   by (auto elim: oddE simp add: even_iff_mod_2_eq_zero)
 
 lemma of_bool_odd_eq_mod_2:
   "of_bool (odd a) = a mod 2"
   by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma even_mod_2_iff [simp]:
   \<open>even (a mod 2) \<longleftrightarrow> even a\<close>
   by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma mod2_eq_if:
   "a mod 2 = (if even a then 0 else 1)"
   by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma even_zero [simp]:
   "even 0"
   by (fact dvd_0_right)
 
 lemma odd_even_add:
   "even (a + b)" if "odd a" and "odd b"
 proof -
   from that obtain c d where "a = 2 * c + 1" and "b = 2 * d + 1"
     by (blast elim: oddE)
   then have "a + b = 2 * c + 2 * d + (1 + 1)"
     by (simp only: ac_simps)
   also have "\<dots> = 2 * (c + d + 1)"
     by (simp add: algebra_simps)
   finally show ?thesis ..
 qed
 
 lemma even_add [simp]:
   "even (a + b) \<longleftrightarrow> (even a \<longleftrightarrow> even b)"
   by (auto simp add: dvd_add_right_iff dvd_add_left_iff odd_even_add)
 
 lemma odd_add [simp]:
   "odd (a + b) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> (odd a \<longleftrightarrow> odd b)"
   by simp
 
 lemma even_plus_one_iff [simp]:
   "even (a + 1) \<longleftrightarrow> odd a"
   by (auto simp add: dvd_add_right_iff intro: odd_even_add)
 
 lemma even_mult_iff [simp]:
   "even (a * b) \<longleftrightarrow> even a \<or> even b" (is "?P \<longleftrightarrow> ?Q")
 proof
   assume ?Q
   then show ?P
     by auto
 next
   assume ?P
   show ?Q
   proof (rule ccontr)
     assume "\<not> (even a \<or> even b)"
     then have "odd a" and "odd b"
       by auto
     then obtain r s where "a = 2 * r + 1" and "b = 2 * s + 1"
       by (blast elim: oddE)
     then have "a * b = (2 * r + 1) * (2 * s + 1)"
       by simp
     also have "\<dots> = 2 * (2 * r * s + r + s) + 1"
       by (simp add: algebra_simps)
     finally have "odd (a * b)"
       by simp
     with \<open>?P\<close> show False
       by auto
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma even_numeral [simp]: "even (numeral (Num.Bit0 n))"
 proof -
   have "even (2 * numeral n)"
     unfolding even_mult_iff by simp
   then have "even (numeral n + numeral n)"
     unfolding mult_2 .
   then show ?thesis
     unfolding numeral.simps .
 qed
 
 lemma odd_numeral [simp]: "odd (numeral (Num.Bit1 n))"
 proof
   assume "even (numeral (num.Bit1 n))"
   then have "even (numeral n + numeral n + 1)"
     unfolding numeral.simps .
   then have "even (2 * numeral n + 1)"
     unfolding mult_2 .
   then have "2 dvd numeral n * 2 + 1"
     by (simp add: ac_simps)
   then have "2 dvd 1"
     using dvd_add_times_triv_left_iff [of 2 "numeral n" 1] by simp
   then show False by simp
 qed
 
 lemma odd_numeral_BitM [simp]:
   \<open>odd (numeral (Num.BitM w))\<close>
   by (cases w) simp_all
 
 lemma even_power [simp]: "even (a ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> even a \<and> n > 0"
   by (induct n) auto
 
 lemma mask_eq_sum_exp:
   \<open>2 ^ n - 1 = (\<Sum>m\<in>{q. q < n}. 2 ^ m)\<close>
 proof -
   have *: \<open>{q. q < Suc m} = insert m {q. q < m}\<close> for m
     by auto
   have \<open>2 ^ n = (\<Sum>m\<in>{q. q < n}. 2 ^ m) + 1\<close>
     by (induction n) (simp_all add: ac_simps mult_2 *)
   then have \<open>2 ^ n - 1 = (\<Sum>m\<in>{q. q < n}. 2 ^ m) + 1 - 1\<close>
     by simp
   then show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma mask_eq_seq_sum:
   \<open>2 ^ n - 1 = ((\<lambda>k. 1 + k * 2) ^^ n) 0\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>2 ^ n = ((\<lambda>k. 1 + k * 2) ^^ n) 0 + 1\<close>
     by (induction n) (simp_all add: ac_simps mult_2)
   then show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 end
 
 class ring_parity = ring + semiring_parity
 begin
 
 subclass comm_ring_1 ..
 
 lemma even_minus:
   "even (- a) \<longleftrightarrow> even a"
   by (fact dvd_minus_iff)
 
 lemma even_diff [simp]:
   "even (a - b) \<longleftrightarrow> even (a + b)"
   using even_add [of a "- b"] by simp
 
 end
 
 
 subsection \<open>Special case: euclidean rings containing the natural numbers\<close>
 
 context unique_euclidean_semiring_with_nat
 begin
 
 subclass semiring_parity
 proof
   show "2 dvd a \<longleftrightarrow> a mod 2 = 0" for a
     by (fact dvd_eq_mod_eq_0)
   show "\<not> 2 dvd a \<longleftrightarrow> a mod 2 = 1" for a
   proof
     assume "a mod 2 = 1"
     then show "\<not> 2 dvd a"
       by auto
   next
     assume "\<not> 2 dvd a"
     have eucl: "euclidean_size (a mod 2) = 1"
     proof (rule order_antisym)
       show "euclidean_size (a mod 2) \<le> 1"
         using mod_size_less [of 2 a] by simp
       show "1 \<le> euclidean_size (a mod 2)"
         using \<open>\<not> 2 dvd a\<close> by (simp add: Suc_le_eq dvd_eq_mod_eq_0)
     qed 
     from \<open>\<not> 2 dvd a\<close> have "\<not> of_nat 2 dvd division_segment a * of_nat (euclidean_size a)"
       by simp
     then have "\<not> of_nat 2 dvd of_nat (euclidean_size a)"
       by (auto simp only: dvd_mult_unit_iff' is_unit_division_segment)
     then have "\<not> 2 dvd euclidean_size a"
       using of_nat_dvd_iff [of 2] by simp
     then have "euclidean_size a mod 2 = 1"
       by (simp add: semidom_modulo_class.dvd_eq_mod_eq_0)
     then have "of_nat (euclidean_size a mod 2) = of_nat 1"
       by simp
     then have "of_nat (euclidean_size a) mod 2 = 1"
       by (simp add: of_nat_mod)
     from \<open>\<not> 2 dvd a\<close> eucl
     show "a mod 2 = 1"
       by (auto intro: division_segment_eq_iff simp add: division_segment_mod)
   qed
   show "\<not> is_unit 2"
   proof (rule notI)
     assume "is_unit 2"
     then have "of_nat 2 dvd of_nat 1"
       by simp
     then have "is_unit (2::nat)"
       by (simp only: of_nat_dvd_iff)
     then show False
       by simp
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma even_of_nat [simp]:
   "even (of_nat a) \<longleftrightarrow> even a"
 proof -
   have "even (of_nat a) \<longleftrightarrow> of_nat 2 dvd of_nat a"
     by simp
   also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> even a"
     by (simp only: of_nat_dvd_iff)
   finally show ?thesis .
 qed
 
 lemma even_succ_div_two [simp]:
   "even a \<Longrightarrow> (a + 1) div 2 = a div 2"
   by (cases "a = 0") (auto elim!: evenE dest: mult_not_zero)
 
 lemma odd_succ_div_two [simp]:
   "odd a \<Longrightarrow> (a + 1) div 2 = a div 2 + 1"
   by (auto elim!: oddE simp add: add.assoc)
 
 lemma even_two_times_div_two:
   "even a \<Longrightarrow> 2 * (a div 2) = a"
   by (fact dvd_mult_div_cancel)
 
 lemma odd_two_times_div_two_succ [simp]:
   "odd a \<Longrightarrow> 2 * (a div 2) + 1 = a"
   using mult_div_mod_eq [of 2 a]
   by (simp add: even_iff_mod_2_eq_zero)
 
 lemma coprime_left_2_iff_odd [simp]:
   "coprime 2 a \<longleftrightarrow> odd a"
 proof
   assume "odd a"
   show "coprime 2 a"
   proof (rule coprimeI)
     fix b
     assume "b dvd 2" "b dvd a"
     then have "b dvd a mod 2"
       by (auto intro: dvd_mod)
     with \<open>odd a\<close> show "is_unit b"
       by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
   qed
 next
   assume "coprime 2 a"
   show "odd a"
   proof (rule notI)
     assume "even a"
     then obtain b where "a = 2 * b" ..
     with \<open>coprime 2 a\<close> have "coprime 2 (2 * b)"
       by simp
     moreover have "\<not> coprime 2 (2 * b)"
       by (rule not_coprimeI [of 2]) simp_all
     ultimately show False
       by blast
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma coprime_right_2_iff_odd [simp]:
   "coprime a 2 \<longleftrightarrow> odd a"
   using coprime_left_2_iff_odd [of a] by (simp add: ac_simps)
 
 end
 
 context unique_euclidean_ring_with_nat
 begin
 
 subclass ring_parity ..
 
 lemma minus_1_mod_2_eq [simp]:
   "- 1 mod 2 = 1"
   by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma minus_1_div_2_eq [simp]:
   "- 1 div 2 = - 1"
 proof -
   from div_mult_mod_eq [of "- 1" 2]
   have "- 1 div 2 * 2 = - 1 * 2"
     using add_implies_diff by fastforce
   then show ?thesis
     using mult_right_cancel [of 2 "- 1 div 2" "- 1"] by simp
 qed
 
 end
 
 
 subsection \<open>Instance for \<^typ>\<open>nat\<close>\<close>
 
 instance nat :: unique_euclidean_semiring_with_nat
   by standard (simp_all add: dvd_eq_mod_eq_0)
 
 lemma even_Suc_Suc_iff [simp]:
   "even (Suc (Suc n)) \<longleftrightarrow> even n"
   using dvd_add_triv_right_iff [of 2 n] by simp
 
 lemma even_Suc [simp]: "even (Suc n) \<longleftrightarrow> odd n"
   using even_plus_one_iff [of n] by simp
 
 lemma even_diff_nat [simp]:
   "even (m - n) \<longleftrightarrow> m < n \<or> even (m + n)" for m n :: nat
 proof (cases "n \<le> m")
   case True
   then have "m - n + n * 2 = m + n" by (simp add: mult_2_right)
   moreover have "even (m - n) \<longleftrightarrow> even (m - n + n * 2)" by simp
   ultimately have "even (m - n) \<longleftrightarrow> even (m + n)" by (simp only:)
   then show ?thesis by auto
 next
   case False
   then show ?thesis by simp
 qed
 
 lemma odd_pos:
   "odd n \<Longrightarrow> 0 < n" for n :: nat
   by (auto elim: oddE)
 
 lemma Suc_double_not_eq_double:
   "Suc (2 * m) \<noteq> 2 * n"
 proof
   assume "Suc (2 * m) = 2 * n"
   moreover have "odd (Suc (2 * m))" and "even (2 * n)"
     by simp_all
   ultimately show False by simp
 qed
 
 lemma double_not_eq_Suc_double:
   "2 * m \<noteq> Suc (2 * n)"
   using Suc_double_not_eq_double [of n m] by simp
 
 lemma odd_Suc_minus_one [simp]: "odd n \<Longrightarrow> Suc (n - Suc 0) = n"
   by (auto elim: oddE)
 
 lemma even_Suc_div_two [simp]:
   "even n \<Longrightarrow> Suc n div 2 = n div 2"
   using even_succ_div_two [of n] by simp
 
 lemma odd_Suc_div_two [simp]:
   "odd n \<Longrightarrow> Suc n div 2 = Suc (n div 2)"
   using odd_succ_div_two [of n] by simp
 
 lemma odd_two_times_div_two_nat [simp]:
   assumes "odd n"
   shows "2 * (n div 2) = n - (1 :: nat)"
 proof -
   from assms have "2 * (n div 2) + 1 = n"
     by (rule odd_two_times_div_two_succ)
   then have "Suc (2 * (n div 2)) - 1 = n - 1"
     by simp
   then show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma not_mod2_eq_Suc_0_eq_0 [simp]:
   "n mod 2 \<noteq> Suc 0 \<longleftrightarrow> n mod 2 = 0"
   using not_mod_2_eq_1_eq_0 [of n] by simp
 
 lemma odd_card_imp_not_empty:
   \<open>A \<noteq> {}\<close> if \<open>odd (card A)\<close>
   using that by auto
 
 lemma nat_induct2 [case_names 0 1 step]:
   assumes "P 0" "P 1" and step: "\<And>n::nat. P n \<Longrightarrow> P (n + 2)"
   shows "P n"
 proof (induct n rule: less_induct)
   case (less n)
   show ?case
   proof (cases "n < Suc (Suc 0)")
     case True
     then show ?thesis
       using assms by (auto simp: less_Suc_eq)
   next
     case False
     then obtain k where k: "n = Suc (Suc k)"
       by (force simp: not_less nat_le_iff_add)
     then have "k<n"
       by simp
     with less assms have "P (k+2)"
       by blast
     then show ?thesis
       by (simp add: k)
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma mask_eq_sum_exp_nat:
   \<open>2 ^ n - Suc 0 = (\<Sum>m\<in>{q. q < n}. 2 ^ m)\<close>
   using mask_eq_sum_exp [where ?'a = nat] by simp
 
 context semiring_parity
 begin
 
 lemma even_sum_iff:
   \<open>even (sum f A) \<longleftrightarrow> even (card {a\<in>A. odd (f a)})\<close> if \<open>finite A\<close>
 using that proof (induction A)
   case empty
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case (insert a A)
   moreover have \<open>{b \<in> insert a A. odd (f b)} = (if odd (f a) then {a} else {}) \<union> {b \<in> A. odd (f b)}\<close>
     by auto
   ultimately show ?case
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma even_prod_iff:
   \<open>even (prod f A) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>a\<in>A. even (f a))\<close> if \<open>finite A\<close>
   using that by (induction A) simp_all
 
 lemma even_mask_iff [simp]:
   \<open>even (2 ^ n - 1) \<longleftrightarrow> n = 0\<close>
 proof (cases \<open>n = 0\<close>)
   case True
   then show ?thesis
     by simp
 next
   case False
   then have \<open>{a. a = 0 \<and> a < n} = {0}\<close>
     by auto
   then show ?thesis
     by (auto simp add: mask_eq_sum_exp even_sum_iff)
 qed
 
 end
 
 
 subsection \<open>Parity and powers\<close>
 
 context ring_1
 begin
 
 lemma power_minus_even [simp]: "even n \<Longrightarrow> (- a) ^ n = a ^ n"
   by (auto elim: evenE)
 
 lemma power_minus_odd [simp]: "odd n \<Longrightarrow> (- a) ^ n = - (a ^ n)"
   by (auto elim: oddE)
 
 lemma uminus_power_if:
   "(- a) ^ n = (if even n then a ^ n else - (a ^ n))"
   by auto
 
 lemma neg_one_even_power [simp]: "even n \<Longrightarrow> (- 1) ^ n = 1"
   by simp
 
 lemma neg_one_odd_power [simp]: "odd n \<Longrightarrow> (- 1) ^ n = - 1"
   by simp
 
 lemma neg_one_power_add_eq_neg_one_power_diff: "k \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> (- 1) ^ (n + k) = (- 1) ^ (n - k)"
   by (cases "even (n + k)") auto
 
 lemma minus_one_power_iff: "(- 1) ^ n = (if even n then 1 else - 1)"
   by (induct n) auto
 
 end
 
 context linordered_idom
 begin
 
 lemma zero_le_even_power: "even n \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> a ^ n"
   by (auto elim: evenE)
 
 lemma zero_le_odd_power: "odd n \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> a ^ n \<longleftrightarrow> 0 \<le> a"
   by (auto simp add: power_even_eq zero_le_mult_iff elim: oddE)
 
 lemma zero_le_power_eq: "0 \<le> a ^ n \<longleftrightarrow> even n \<or> odd n \<and> 0 \<le> a"
   by (auto simp add: zero_le_even_power zero_le_odd_power)
 
 lemma zero_less_power_eq: "0 < a ^ n \<longleftrightarrow> n = 0 \<or> even n \<and> a \<noteq> 0 \<or> odd n \<and> 0 < a"
 proof -
   have [simp]: "0 = a ^ n \<longleftrightarrow> a = 0 \<and> n > 0"
     unfolding power_eq_0_iff [of a n, symmetric] by blast
   show ?thesis
     unfolding less_le zero_le_power_eq by auto
 qed
 
 lemma power_less_zero_eq [simp]: "a ^ n < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> odd n \<and> a < 0"
   unfolding not_le [symmetric] zero_le_power_eq by auto
 
 lemma power_le_zero_eq: "a ^ n \<le> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> n > 0 \<and> (odd n \<and> a \<le> 0 \<or> even n \<and> a = 0)"
   unfolding not_less [symmetric] zero_less_power_eq by auto
 
 lemma power_even_abs: "even n \<Longrightarrow> \<bar>a\<bar> ^ n = a ^ n"
   using power_abs [of a n] by (simp add: zero_le_even_power)
 
 lemma power_mono_even:
   assumes "even n" and "\<bar>a\<bar> \<le> \<bar>b\<bar>"
   shows "a ^ n \<le> b ^ n"
 proof -
   have "0 \<le> \<bar>a\<bar>" by auto
   with \<open>\<bar>a\<bar> \<le> \<bar>b\<bar>\<close> have "\<bar>a\<bar> ^ n \<le> \<bar>b\<bar> ^ n"
     by (rule power_mono)
   with \<open>even n\<close> show ?thesis
     by (simp add: power_even_abs)
 qed
 
 lemma power_mono_odd:
   assumes "odd n" and "a \<le> b"
   shows "a ^ n \<le> b ^ n"
 proof (cases "b < 0")
   case True
   with \<open>a \<le> b\<close> have "- b \<le> - a" and "0 \<le> - b" by auto
   then have "(- b) ^ n \<le> (- a) ^ n" by (rule power_mono)
   with \<open>odd n\<close> show ?thesis by simp
 next
   case False
   then have "0 \<le> b" by auto
   show ?thesis
   proof (cases "a < 0")
     case True
     then have "n \<noteq> 0" and "a \<le> 0" using \<open>odd n\<close> [THEN odd_pos] by auto
     then have "a ^ n \<le> 0" unfolding power_le_zero_eq using \<open>odd n\<close> by auto
     moreover from \<open>0 \<le> b\<close> have "0 \<le> b ^ n" by auto
     ultimately show ?thesis by auto
   next
     case False
     then have "0 \<le> a" by auto
     with \<open>a \<le> b\<close> show ?thesis
       using power_mono by auto
   qed
 qed
 
 text \<open>Simplify, when the exponent is a numeral\<close>
 
 lemma zero_le_power_eq_numeral [simp]:
   "0 \<le> a ^ numeral w \<longleftrightarrow> even (numeral w :: nat) \<or> odd (numeral w :: nat) \<and> 0 \<le> a"
   by (fact zero_le_power_eq)
 
 lemma zero_less_power_eq_numeral [simp]:
   "0 < a ^ numeral w \<longleftrightarrow>
     numeral w = (0 :: nat) \<or>
     even (numeral w :: nat) \<and> a \<noteq> 0 \<or>
     odd (numeral w :: nat) \<and> 0 < a"
   by (fact zero_less_power_eq)
 
 lemma power_le_zero_eq_numeral [simp]:
   "a ^ numeral w \<le> 0 \<longleftrightarrow>
     (0 :: nat) < numeral w \<and>
     (odd (numeral w :: nat) \<and> a \<le> 0 \<or> even (numeral w :: nat) \<and> a = 0)"
   by (fact power_le_zero_eq)
 
 lemma power_less_zero_eq_numeral [simp]:
   "a ^ numeral w < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> odd (numeral w :: nat) \<and> a < 0"
   by (fact power_less_zero_eq)
 
 lemma power_even_abs_numeral [simp]:
   "even (numeral w :: nat) \<Longrightarrow> \<bar>a\<bar> ^ numeral w = a ^ numeral w"
   by (fact power_even_abs)
 
 end
 
 context unique_euclidean_semiring_with_nat
 begin
 
 lemma even_mask_div_iff':
   \<open>even ((2 ^ m - 1) div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>even ((2 ^ m - 1) div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> even (of_nat ((2 ^ m - Suc 0) div 2 ^ n))\<close>
     by (simp only: of_nat_div) (simp add: of_nat_diff)
   also have \<open>\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> even ((2 ^ m - Suc 0) div 2 ^ n)\<close>
     by simp
   also have \<open>\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n\<close>
   proof (cases \<open>m \<le> n\<close>)
     case True
     then show ?thesis
       by (simp add: Suc_le_lessD)
   next
     case False
     then obtain r where r: \<open>m = n + Suc r\<close>
       using less_imp_Suc_add by fastforce
     from r have \<open>{q. q < m} \<inter> {q. 2 ^ n dvd (2::nat) ^ q} = {q. n \<le> q \<and> q < m}\<close>
       by (auto simp add: dvd_power_iff_le)
     moreover from r have \<open>{q. q < m} \<inter> {q. \<not> 2 ^ n dvd (2::nat) ^ q} = {q. q < n}\<close>
       by (auto simp add: dvd_power_iff_le)
     moreover from False have \<open>{q. n \<le> q \<and> q < m \<and> q \<le> n} = {n}\<close>
       by auto
     then have \<open>odd ((\<Sum>a\<in>{q. n \<le> q \<and> q < m}. 2 ^ a div (2::nat) ^ n) + sum ((^) 2) {q. q < n} div 2 ^ n)\<close>
       by (simp_all add: euclidean_semiring_cancel_class.power_diff_power_eq semiring_parity_class.even_sum_iff not_less mask_eq_sum_exp_nat [symmetric])
     ultimately have \<open>odd (sum ((^) (2::nat)) {q. q < m} div 2 ^ n)\<close>
       by (subst euclidean_semiring_cancel_class.sum_div_partition) simp_all
     with False show ?thesis
       by (simp add: mask_eq_sum_exp_nat)
   qed
   finally show ?thesis .
 qed
 
 end
 
 
 subsection \<open>Instance for \<^typ>\<open>int\<close>\<close>
 
 lemma even_diff_iff:
   "even (k - l) \<longleftrightarrow> even (k + l)" for k l :: int
   by (fact even_diff)
 
 lemma even_abs_add_iff:
   "even (\<bar>k\<bar> + l) \<longleftrightarrow> even (k + l)" for k l :: int
   by simp
 
 lemma even_add_abs_iff:
   "even (k + \<bar>l\<bar>) \<longleftrightarrow> even (k + l)" for k l :: int
   by simp
 
 lemma even_nat_iff: "0 \<le> k \<Longrightarrow> even (nat k) \<longleftrightarrow> even k"
   by (simp add: even_of_nat [of "nat k", where ?'a = int, symmetric])
 
 lemma zdiv_zmult2_eq:
   \<open>a div (b * c) = (a div b) div c\<close> if \<open>c \<ge> 0\<close> for a b c :: int
 proof (cases \<open>b \<ge> 0\<close>)
   case True
   with that show ?thesis
     using div_mult2_eq' [of a \<open>nat b\<close> \<open>nat c\<close>] by simp
 next
   case False
   with that show ?thesis
     using div_mult2_eq' [of \<open>- a\<close> \<open>nat (- b)\<close> \<open>nat c\<close>] by simp
 qed
 
 lemma zmod_zmult2_eq:
   \<open>a mod (b * c) = b * (a div b mod c) + a mod b\<close> if \<open>c \<ge> 0\<close> for a b c :: int
 proof (cases \<open>b \<ge> 0\<close>)
   case True
   with that show ?thesis
     using mod_mult2_eq' [of a \<open>nat b\<close> \<open>nat c\<close>] by simp
 next
   case False
   with that show ?thesis
     using mod_mult2_eq' [of \<open>- a\<close> \<open>nat (- b)\<close> \<open>nat c\<close>] by simp
 qed
 
 
 subsection \<open>Abstract bit structures\<close>
 
 class semiring_bits = semiring_parity +
   assumes bits_induct [case_names stable rec]:
     \<open>(\<And>a. a div 2 = a \<Longrightarrow> P a)
      \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>a b. P a \<Longrightarrow> (of_bool b + 2 * a) div 2 = a \<Longrightarrow> P (of_bool b + 2 * a))
         \<Longrightarrow> P a\<close>
   assumes bits_div_0 [simp]: \<open>0 div a = 0\<close>
     and bits_div_by_1 [simp]: \<open>a div 1 = a\<close>
     and bits_mod_div_trivial [simp]: \<open>a mod b div b = 0\<close>
     and even_succ_div_2 [simp]: \<open>even a \<Longrightarrow> (1 + a) div 2 = a div 2\<close>
     and even_mask_div_iff: \<open>even ((2 ^ m - 1) div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ n = 0 \<or> m \<le> n\<close>
     and exp_div_exp_eq: \<open>2 ^ m div 2 ^ n = of_bool (2 ^ m \<noteq> 0 \<and> m \<ge> n) * 2 ^ (m - n)\<close>
     and div_exp_eq: \<open>a div 2 ^ m div 2 ^ n = a div 2 ^ (m + n)\<close>
     and mod_exp_eq: \<open>a mod 2 ^ m mod 2 ^ n = a mod 2 ^ min m n\<close>
     and mult_exp_mod_exp_eq: \<open>m \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> (a * 2 ^ m) mod (2 ^ n) = (a mod 2 ^ (n - m)) * 2 ^ m\<close>
     and div_exp_mod_exp_eq: \<open>a div 2 ^ n mod 2 ^ m = a mod (2 ^ (n + m)) div 2 ^ n\<close>
     and even_mult_exp_div_exp_iff: \<open>even (a * 2 ^ m div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> m > n \<or> 2 ^ n = 0 \<or> (m \<le> n \<and> even (a div 2 ^ (n - m)))\<close>
 begin
 
 lemma bits_div_by_0 [simp]:
   \<open>a div 0 = 0\<close>
   by (metis add_cancel_right_right bits_mod_div_trivial mod_mult_div_eq mult_not_zero)
 
 lemma bits_1_div_2 [simp]:
   \<open>1 div 2 = 0\<close>
   using even_succ_div_2 [of 0] by simp
 
 lemma bits_1_div_exp [simp]:
   \<open>1 div 2 ^ n = of_bool (n = 0)\<close>
   using div_exp_eq [of 1 1] by (cases n) simp_all
 
 lemma even_succ_div_exp [simp]:
   \<open>(1 + a) div 2 ^ n = a div 2 ^ n\<close> if \<open>even a\<close> and \<open>n > 0\<close>
 proof (cases n)
   case 0
   with that show ?thesis
     by simp
 next
   case (Suc n)
   with \<open>even a\<close> have \<open>(1 + a) div 2 ^ Suc n = a div 2 ^ Suc n\<close>
   proof (induction n)
     case 0
     then show ?case
       by simp
   next
     case (Suc n)
     then show ?case
       using div_exp_eq [of _ 1 \<open>Suc n\<close>, symmetric]
       by simp
   qed
   with Suc show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma even_succ_mod_exp [simp]:
   \<open>(1 + a) mod 2 ^ n = 1 + (a mod 2 ^ n)\<close> if \<open>even a\<close> and \<open>n > 0\<close>
   using div_mult_mod_eq [of \<open>1 + a\<close> \<open>2 ^ n\<close>] that
   apply simp
   by (metis local.add.left_commute local.add_left_cancel local.div_mult_mod_eq)
 
 lemma bits_mod_by_1 [simp]:
   \<open>a mod 1 = 0\<close>
   using div_mult_mod_eq [of a 1] by simp
 
 lemma bits_mod_0 [simp]:
   \<open>0 mod a = 0\<close>
   using div_mult_mod_eq [of 0 a] by simp
 
 lemma bits_one_mod_two_eq_one [simp]:
   \<open>1 mod 2 = 1\<close>
   by (simp add: mod2_eq_if)
 
 definition bit :: \<open>'a \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> bool\<close>
   where \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> odd (a div 2 ^ n)\<close>
 
 lemma bit_0 [simp]:
   \<open>bit a 0 \<longleftrightarrow> odd a\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_def)
 
 lemma bit_Suc:
   \<open>bit a (Suc n) \<longleftrightarrow> bit (a div 2) n\<close>
   using div_exp_eq [of a 1 n] by (simp add: bit_def)
 
 lemma bit_rec:
   \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> (if n = 0 then odd a else bit (a div 2) (n - 1))\<close>
   by (cases n) (simp_all add: bit_Suc)
 
 lemma bit_0_eq [simp]:
   \<open>bit 0 = bot\<close>
   by (simp add: fun_eq_iff bit_def)
 
 context
   fixes a
   assumes stable: \<open>a div 2 = a\<close>
 begin
 
 lemma bits_stable_imp_add_self:
   \<open>a + a mod 2 = 0\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>a div 2 * 2 + a mod 2 = a\<close>
     by (fact div_mult_mod_eq)
   then have \<open>a * 2 + a mod 2 = a\<close>
     by (simp add: stable)
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: mult_2_right ac_simps)
 qed
 
 lemma stable_imp_bit_iff_odd:
   \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> odd a\<close>
   by (induction n) (simp_all add: stable bit_Suc)
 
 end
 
 lemma bit_iff_idd_imp_stable:
   \<open>a div 2 = a\<close> if \<open>\<And>n. bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> odd a\<close>
 using that proof (induction a rule: bits_induct)
   case (stable a)
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case (rec a b)
   from rec.prems [of 1] have [simp]: \<open>b = odd a\<close>
     by (simp add: rec.hyps bit_Suc)
   from rec.hyps have hyp: \<open>(of_bool (odd a) + 2 * a) div 2 = a\<close>
     by simp
   have \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> odd a\<close> for n
     using rec.prems [of \<open>Suc n\<close>] by (simp add: hyp bit_Suc)
   then have \<open>a div 2 = a\<close>
     by (rule rec.IH)
   then have \<open>of_bool (odd a) + 2 * a = 2 * (a div 2) + of_bool (odd a)\<close>
     by (simp add: ac_simps)
   also have \<open>\<dots> = a\<close>
     using mult_div_mod_eq [of 2 a]
     by (simp add: of_bool_odd_eq_mod_2)
   finally show ?case
     using \<open>a div 2 = a\<close> by (simp add: hyp)
 qed
 
 lemma exp_eq_0_imp_not_bit:
   \<open>\<not> bit a n\<close> if \<open>2 ^ n = 0\<close>
   using that by (simp add: bit_def)
 
 lemma bit_eqI:
   \<open>a = b\<close> if \<open>\<And>n. 2 ^ n \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> bit b n\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> bit b n\<close> for n
   proof (cases \<open>2 ^ n = 0\<close>)
     case True
     then show ?thesis
       by (simp add: exp_eq_0_imp_not_bit)
   next
     case False
     then show ?thesis
       by (rule that)
   qed
   then show ?thesis proof (induction a arbitrary: b rule: bits_induct)
     case (stable a)
     from stable(2) [of 0] have **: \<open>even b \<longleftrightarrow> even a\<close>
       by simp
     have \<open>b div 2 = b\<close>
     proof (rule bit_iff_idd_imp_stable)
       fix n
       from stable have *: \<open>bit b n \<longleftrightarrow> bit a n\<close>
         by simp
       also have \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> odd a\<close>
         using stable by (simp add: stable_imp_bit_iff_odd)
       finally show \<open>bit b n \<longleftrightarrow> odd b\<close>
         by (simp add: **)
     qed
     from ** have \<open>a mod 2 = b mod 2\<close>
       by (simp add: mod2_eq_if)
     then have \<open>a mod 2 + (a + b) = b mod 2 + (a + b)\<close>
       by simp
     then have \<open>a + a mod 2 + b = b + b mod 2 + a\<close>
       by (simp add: ac_simps)
     with \<open>a div 2 = a\<close> \<open>b div 2 = b\<close> show ?case
       by (simp add: bits_stable_imp_add_self)
   next
     case (rec a p)
     from rec.prems [of 0] have [simp]: \<open>p = odd b\<close>
       by simp
     from rec.hyps have \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> bit (b div 2) n\<close> for n
       using rec.prems [of \<open>Suc n\<close>] by (simp add: bit_Suc)
     then have \<open>a = b div 2\<close>
       by (rule rec.IH)
     then have \<open>2 * a = 2 * (b div 2)\<close>
       by simp
     then have \<open>b mod 2 + 2 * a = b mod 2 + 2 * (b div 2)\<close>
       by simp
     also have \<open>\<dots> = b\<close>
       by (fact mod_mult_div_eq)
     finally show ?case
       by (auto simp add: mod2_eq_if)
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma bit_eq_iff:
   \<open>a = b \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>n. bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> bit b n)\<close>
   by (auto intro: bit_eqI)
 
 lemma bit_exp_iff:
   \<open>bit (2 ^ m) n \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ m \<noteq> 0 \<and> m = n\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_def exp_div_exp_eq)
 
 lemma bit_1_iff:
   \<open>bit 1 n \<longleftrightarrow> 1 \<noteq> 0 \<and> n = 0\<close>
   using bit_exp_iff [of 0 n] by simp
 
 lemma bit_2_iff:
   \<open>bit 2 n \<longleftrightarrow> 2 \<noteq> 0 \<and> n = 1\<close>
   using bit_exp_iff [of 1 n] by auto
 
 lemma even_bit_succ_iff:
   \<open>bit (1 + a) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit a n \<or> n = 0\<close> if \<open>even a\<close>
   using that by (cases \<open>n = 0\<close>) (simp_all add: bit_def)
 
 lemma odd_bit_iff_bit_pred:
   \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> bit (a - 1) n \<or> n = 0\<close> if \<open>odd a\<close>
 proof -
   from \<open>odd a\<close> obtain b where \<open>a = 2 * b + 1\<close> ..
   moreover have \<open>bit (2 * b) n \<or> n = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> bit (1 + 2 * b) n\<close>
     using even_bit_succ_iff by simp
   ultimately show ?thesis by (simp add: ac_simps)
 qed
 
 lemma bit_double_iff:
   \<open>bit (2 * a) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit a (n - 1) \<and> n \<noteq> 0 \<and> 2 ^ n \<noteq> 0\<close>
   using even_mult_exp_div_exp_iff [of a 1 n]
   by (cases n, auto simp add: bit_def ac_simps)
 
 lemma bit_eq_rec:
   \<open>a = b \<longleftrightarrow> (even a \<longleftrightarrow> even b) \<and> a div 2 = b div 2\<close> (is \<open>?P = ?Q\<close>)
 proof
   assume ?P
   then show ?Q
     by simp
 next
   assume ?Q
   then have \<open>even a \<longleftrightarrow> even b\<close> and \<open>a div 2 = b div 2\<close>
     by simp_all
   show ?P
   proof (rule bit_eqI)
     fix n
     show \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> bit b n\<close>
     proof (cases n)
       case 0
       with \<open>even a \<longleftrightarrow> even b\<close> show ?thesis
         by simp
     next
       case (Suc n)
       moreover from \<open>a div 2 = b div 2\<close> have \<open>bit (a div 2) n = bit (b div 2) n\<close>
         by simp
       ultimately show ?thesis
         by (simp add: bit_Suc)
     qed
   qed
 qed
 
+lemma bit_mod_2_iff [simp]:
+  \<open>bit (a mod 2) n \<longleftrightarrow> n = 0 \<and> odd a\<close>
+  by (cases a rule: parity_cases) (simp_all add: bit_def)
+
 lemma bit_mask_iff:
   \<open>bit (2 ^ m - 1) n \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ n \<noteq> 0 \<and> n < m\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_def even_mask_div_iff not_le)
 
 lemma bit_Numeral1_iff [simp]:
   \<open>bit (numeral Num.One) n \<longleftrightarrow> n = 0\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_rec)
 
 end
 
 lemma nat_bit_induct [case_names zero even odd]:
   "P n" if zero: "P 0"
     and even: "\<And>n. P n \<Longrightarrow> n > 0 \<Longrightarrow> P (2 * n)"
     and odd: "\<And>n. P n \<Longrightarrow> P (Suc (2 * n))"
 proof (induction n rule: less_induct)
   case (less n)
   show "P n"
   proof (cases "n = 0")
     case True with zero show ?thesis by simp
   next
     case False
     with less have hyp: "P (n div 2)" by simp
     show ?thesis
     proof (cases "even n")
       case True
       then have "n \<noteq> 1"
         by auto
       with \<open>n \<noteq> 0\<close> have "n div 2 > 0"
         by simp
       with \<open>even n\<close> hyp even [of "n div 2"] show ?thesis
         by simp
     next
       case False
       with hyp odd [of "n div 2"] show ?thesis
         by simp
     qed
   qed
 qed
 
 instance nat :: semiring_bits
 proof
   show \<open>P n\<close> if stable: \<open>\<And>n. n div 2 = n \<Longrightarrow> P n\<close>
     and rec: \<open>\<And>n b. P n \<Longrightarrow> (of_bool b + 2 * n) div 2 = n \<Longrightarrow> P (of_bool b + 2 * n)\<close>
     for P and n :: nat
   proof (induction n rule: nat_bit_induct)
     case zero
     from stable [of 0] show ?case
       by simp
   next
     case (even n)
     with rec [of n False] show ?case
       by simp
   next
     case (odd n)
     with rec [of n True] show ?case
       by simp
   qed
   show \<open>q mod 2 ^ m mod 2 ^ n = q mod 2 ^ min m n\<close>
     for q m n :: nat
     apply (auto simp add: less_iff_Suc_add power_add mod_mod_cancel split: split_min_lin)
     apply (metis div_mult2_eq mod_div_trivial mod_eq_self_iff_div_eq_0 mod_mult_self2_is_0 power_commutes)
     done
   show \<open>(q * 2 ^ m) mod (2 ^ n) = (q mod 2 ^ (n - m)) * 2 ^ m\<close> if \<open>m \<le> n\<close>
     for q m n :: nat
     using that
     apply (auto simp add: mod_mod_cancel div_mult2_eq power_add mod_mult2_eq le_iff_add split: split_min_lin)
     apply (simp add: mult.commute)
     done
   show \<open>even ((2 ^ m - (1::nat)) div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ n = (0::nat) \<or> m \<le> n\<close>
     for m n :: nat
     using even_mask_div_iff' [where ?'a = nat, of m n] by simp
   show \<open>even (q * 2 ^ m div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> n < m \<or> (2::nat) ^ n = 0 \<or> m \<le> n \<and> even (q div 2 ^ (n - m))\<close>
     for m n q r :: nat
     apply (auto simp add: not_less power_add ac_simps dest!: le_Suc_ex)
     apply (metis (full_types) dvd_mult dvd_mult_imp_div dvd_power_iff_le not_less not_less_eq order_refl power_Suc)
     done
 qed (auto simp add: div_mult2_eq mod_mult2_eq power_add power_diff)
 
 lemma int_bit_induct [case_names zero minus even odd]:
   "P k" if zero_int: "P 0"
     and minus_int: "P (- 1)"
     and even_int: "\<And>k. P k \<Longrightarrow> k \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> P (k * 2)"
     and odd_int: "\<And>k. P k \<Longrightarrow> k \<noteq> - 1 \<Longrightarrow> P (1 + (k * 2))" for k :: int
 proof (cases "k \<ge> 0")
   case True
   define n where "n = nat k"
   with True have "k = int n"
     by simp
   then show "P k"
   proof (induction n arbitrary: k rule: nat_bit_induct)
     case zero
     then show ?case
       by (simp add: zero_int)
   next
     case (even n)
     have "P (int n * 2)"
       by (rule even_int) (use even in simp_all)
     with even show ?case
       by (simp add: ac_simps)
   next
     case (odd n)
     have "P (1 + (int n * 2))"
       by (rule odd_int) (use odd in simp_all)
     with odd show ?case
       by (simp add: ac_simps)
   qed
 next
   case False
   define n where "n = nat (- k - 1)"
   with False have "k = - int n - 1"
     by simp
   then show "P k"
   proof (induction n arbitrary: k rule: nat_bit_induct)
     case zero
     then show ?case
       by (simp add: minus_int)
   next
     case (even n)
     have "P (1 + (- int (Suc n) * 2))"
       by (rule odd_int) (use even in \<open>simp_all add: algebra_simps\<close>)
     also have "\<dots> = - int (2 * n) - 1"
       by (simp add: algebra_simps)
     finally show ?case
       using even by simp
   next
     case (odd n)
     have "P (- int (Suc n) * 2)"
       by (rule even_int) (use odd in \<open>simp_all add: algebra_simps\<close>)
     also have "\<dots> = - int (Suc (2 * n)) - 1"
       by (simp add: algebra_simps)
     finally show ?case
       using odd by simp
   qed
 qed
 
 instance int :: semiring_bits
 proof
   show \<open>P k\<close> if stable: \<open>\<And>k. k div 2 = k \<Longrightarrow> P k\<close>
     and rec: \<open>\<And>k b. P k \<Longrightarrow> (of_bool b + 2 * k) div 2 = k \<Longrightarrow> P (of_bool b + 2 * k)\<close>
     for P and k :: int
   proof (induction k rule: int_bit_induct)
     case zero
     from stable [of 0] show ?case
       by simp
   next
     case minus
     from stable [of \<open>- 1\<close>] show ?case
       by simp
   next
     case (even k)
     with rec [of k False] show ?case
       by (simp add: ac_simps)
   next
     case (odd k)
     with rec [of k True] show ?case
       by (simp add: ac_simps)
   qed
   show \<open>(2::int) ^ m div 2 ^ n = of_bool ((2::int) ^ m \<noteq> 0 \<and> n \<le> m) * 2 ^ (m - n)\<close>
     for m n :: nat
   proof (cases \<open>m < n\<close>)
     case True
     then have \<open>n = m + (n - m)\<close>
       by simp
     then have \<open>(2::int) ^ m div 2 ^ n = (2::int) ^ m div 2 ^ (m + (n - m))\<close>
       by simp
     also have \<open>\<dots> = (2::int) ^ m div (2 ^ m * 2 ^ (n - m))\<close>
       by (simp add: power_add)
     also have \<open>\<dots> = (2::int) ^ m div 2 ^ m div 2 ^ (n - m)\<close>
       by (simp add: zdiv_zmult2_eq)
     finally show ?thesis using \<open>m < n\<close> by simp
   next
     case False
     then show ?thesis
       by (simp add: power_diff)
   qed
   show \<open>k mod 2 ^ m mod 2 ^ n = k mod 2 ^ min m n\<close>
     for m n :: nat and k :: int
     using mod_exp_eq [of \<open>nat k\<close> m n]
     apply (auto simp add: mod_mod_cancel zdiv_zmult2_eq power_add zmod_zmult2_eq le_iff_add split: split_min_lin)
      apply (auto simp add: less_iff_Suc_add mod_mod_cancel power_add)
     apply (simp only: flip: mult.left_commute [of \<open>2 ^ m\<close>])
     apply (subst zmod_zmult2_eq) apply simp_all
     done
   show \<open>(k * 2 ^ m) mod (2 ^ n) = (k mod 2 ^ (n - m)) * 2 ^ m\<close>
     if \<open>m \<le> n\<close> for m n :: nat and k :: int
     using that
     apply (auto simp add: power_add zmod_zmult2_eq le_iff_add split: split_min_lin)
     apply (simp add: ac_simps)
     done
   show \<open>even ((2 ^ m - (1::int)) div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ n = (0::int) \<or> m \<le> n\<close>
     for m n :: nat
     using even_mask_div_iff' [where ?'a = int, of m n] by simp
   show \<open>even (k * 2 ^ m div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> n < m \<or> (2::int) ^ n = 0 \<or> m \<le> n \<and> even (k div 2 ^ (n - m))\<close>
     for m n :: nat and k l :: int
     apply (auto simp add: not_less power_add ac_simps dest!: le_Suc_ex)
     apply (metis Suc_leI dvd_mult dvd_mult_imp_div dvd_power_le dvd_refl power.simps(2))
     done
 qed (auto simp add: zdiv_zmult2_eq zmod_zmult2_eq power_add power_diff not_le)
 
 class semiring_bit_shifts = semiring_bits +
   fixes push_bit :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>
   assumes push_bit_eq_mult: \<open>push_bit n a = a * 2 ^ n\<close>
   fixes drop_bit :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>
   assumes drop_bit_eq_div: \<open>drop_bit n a = a div 2 ^ n\<close>
 begin
 
 definition take_bit :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>
   where take_bit_eq_mod: \<open>take_bit n a = a mod 2 ^ n\<close>
 
 text \<open>
   Logically, \<^const>\<open>push_bit\<close>,
   \<^const>\<open>drop_bit\<close> and \<^const>\<open>take_bit\<close> are just aliases; having them
   as separate operations makes proofs easier, otherwise proof automation
   would fiddle with concrete expressions \<^term>\<open>2 ^ n\<close> in a way obfuscating the basic
   algebraic relationships between those operations.
   Having
   \<^const>\<open>push_bit\<close> and \<^const>\<open>drop_bit\<close> as definitional class operations
   takes into account that specific instances of these can be implemented
   differently wrt. code generation.
 \<close>
 
 lemma bit_iff_odd_drop_bit:
   \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> odd (drop_bit n a)\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_def drop_bit_eq_div)
 
 lemma even_drop_bit_iff_not_bit:
   \<open>even (drop_bit n a) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> bit a n\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_iff_odd_drop_bit)
 
 lemma div_push_bit_of_1_eq_drop_bit:
   \<open>a div push_bit n 1 = drop_bit n a\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult drop_bit_eq_div)
 
 lemma bits_ident:
   "push_bit n (drop_bit n a) + take_bit n a = a"
   using div_mult_mod_eq by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult take_bit_eq_mod drop_bit_eq_div)
 
 lemma push_bit_push_bit [simp]:
   "push_bit m (push_bit n a) = push_bit (m + n) a"
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult power_add ac_simps)
 
 lemma push_bit_0_id [simp]:
   "push_bit 0 = id"
   by (simp add: fun_eq_iff push_bit_eq_mult)
 
 lemma push_bit_of_0 [simp]:
   "push_bit n 0 = 0"
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult)
 
 lemma push_bit_of_1:
   "push_bit n 1 = 2 ^ n"
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult)
 
 lemma push_bit_Suc [simp]:
   "push_bit (Suc n) a = push_bit n (a * 2)"
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult ac_simps)
 
 lemma push_bit_double:
   "push_bit n (a * 2) = push_bit n a * 2"
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult ac_simps)
 
 lemma push_bit_add:
   "push_bit n (a + b) = push_bit n a + push_bit n b"
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult algebra_simps)
 
 lemma take_bit_0 [simp]:
   "take_bit 0 a = 0"
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 
 lemma take_bit_Suc:
-  \<open>take_bit (Suc n) a = take_bit n (a div 2) * 2 + of_bool (odd a)\<close>
+  \<open>take_bit (Suc n) a = take_bit n (a div 2) * 2 + a mod 2\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>take_bit (Suc n) (a div 2 * 2 + of_bool (odd a)) = take_bit n (a div 2) * 2 + of_bool (odd a)\<close>
     using even_succ_mod_exp [of \<open>2 * (a div 2)\<close> \<open>Suc n\<close>]
       mult_exp_mod_exp_eq [of 1 \<open>Suc n\<close> \<open>a div 2\<close>]
     by (auto simp add: take_bit_eq_mod ac_simps)
   then show ?thesis
     using div_mult_mod_eq [of a 2] by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
 qed
 
 lemma take_bit_rec:
-  \<open>take_bit n a = (if n = 0 then 0 else take_bit (n - 1) (a div 2) * 2 + of_bool (odd a))\<close>
+  \<open>take_bit n a = (if n = 0 then 0 else take_bit (n - 1) (a div 2) * 2 + a mod 2)\<close>
   by (cases n) (simp_all add: take_bit_Suc)
 
 lemma take_bit_Suc_0 [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit (Suc 0) a = a mod 2\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 
 lemma take_bit_of_0 [simp]:
   "take_bit n 0 = 0"
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 
 lemma take_bit_of_1 [simp]:
   "take_bit n 1 = of_bool (n > 0)"
   by (cases n) (simp_all add: take_bit_Suc)
 
 lemma drop_bit_of_0 [simp]:
   "drop_bit n 0 = 0"
   by (simp add: drop_bit_eq_div)
 
 lemma drop_bit_of_1 [simp]:
   "drop_bit n 1 = of_bool (n = 0)"
   by (simp add: drop_bit_eq_div)
 
 lemma drop_bit_0 [simp]:
   "drop_bit 0 = id"
   by (simp add: fun_eq_iff drop_bit_eq_div)
 
 lemma drop_bit_Suc:
   "drop_bit (Suc n) a = drop_bit n (a div 2)"
   using div_exp_eq [of a 1] by (simp add: drop_bit_eq_div)
 
 lemma drop_bit_rec:
   "drop_bit n a = (if n = 0 then a else drop_bit (n - 1) (a div 2))"
   by (cases n) (simp_all add: drop_bit_Suc)
 
 lemma drop_bit_half:
   "drop_bit n (a div 2) = drop_bit n a div 2"
   by (induction n arbitrary: a) (simp_all add: drop_bit_Suc)
 
 lemma drop_bit_of_bool [simp]:
   "drop_bit n (of_bool b) = of_bool (n = 0 \<and> b)"
   by (cases n) simp_all
 
 lemma take_bit_eq_0_imp_dvd:
   "take_bit n a = 0 \<Longrightarrow> 2 ^ n dvd a"
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod mod_0_imp_dvd)
 
 lemma even_take_bit_eq [simp]:
   \<open>even (take_bit n a) \<longleftrightarrow> n = 0 \<or> even a\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_rec [of n a])
 
 lemma take_bit_take_bit [simp]:
   "take_bit m (take_bit n a) = take_bit (min m n) a"
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod mod_exp_eq ac_simps)
 
 lemma drop_bit_drop_bit [simp]:
   "drop_bit m (drop_bit n a) = drop_bit (m + n) a"
   by (simp add: drop_bit_eq_div power_add div_exp_eq ac_simps)
 
 lemma push_bit_take_bit:
   "push_bit m (take_bit n a) = take_bit (m + n) (push_bit m a)"
   apply (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult take_bit_eq_mod power_add ac_simps)
   using mult_exp_mod_exp_eq [of m \<open>m + n\<close> a] apply (simp add: ac_simps power_add)
   done
 
 lemma take_bit_push_bit:
   "take_bit m (push_bit n a) = push_bit n (take_bit (m - n) a)"
 proof (cases "m \<le> n")
   case True
   then show ?thesis
     apply (simp add:)
     apply (simp_all add: push_bit_eq_mult take_bit_eq_mod)
     apply (auto dest!: le_Suc_ex simp add: power_add ac_simps)
     using mult_exp_mod_exp_eq [of m m \<open>a * 2 ^ n\<close> for n]
     apply (simp add: ac_simps)
     done
 next
   case False
   then show ?thesis
     using push_bit_take_bit [of n "m - n" a]
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma take_bit_drop_bit:
   "take_bit m (drop_bit n a) = drop_bit n (take_bit (m + n) a)"
   by (simp add: drop_bit_eq_div take_bit_eq_mod ac_simps div_exp_mod_exp_eq)
 
 lemma drop_bit_take_bit:
   "drop_bit m (take_bit n a) = take_bit (n - m) (drop_bit m a)"
 proof (cases "m \<le> n")
   case True
   then show ?thesis
     using take_bit_drop_bit [of "n - m" m a] by simp
 next
   case False
   then obtain q where \<open>m = n + q\<close>
     by (auto simp add: not_le dest: less_imp_Suc_add)
   then have \<open>drop_bit m (take_bit n a) = 0\<close>
     using div_exp_eq [of \<open>a mod 2 ^ n\<close> n q]
     by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod drop_bit_eq_div)
   with False show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma even_push_bit_iff [simp]:
   \<open>even (push_bit n a) \<longleftrightarrow> n \<noteq> 0 \<or> even a\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult) auto
 
 lemma bit_push_bit_iff:
   \<open>bit (push_bit m a) n \<longleftrightarrow> n \<ge> m \<and> 2 ^ n \<noteq> 0 \<and> (n < m \<or> bit a (n - m))\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_def push_bit_eq_mult even_mult_exp_div_exp_iff)
 
 lemma bit_drop_bit_eq:
   \<open>bit (drop_bit n a) = bit a \<circ> (+) n\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_def fun_eq_iff ac_simps flip: drop_bit_eq_div)
 
 lemma bit_take_bit_iff:
   \<open>bit (take_bit m a) n \<longleftrightarrow> n < m \<and> bit a n\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_def drop_bit_take_bit not_le flip: drop_bit_eq_div)
 
 lemma stable_imp_drop_bit_eq:
   \<open>drop_bit n a = a\<close>
   if \<open>a div 2 = a\<close>
   by (induction n) (simp_all add: that drop_bit_Suc)
 
 lemma stable_imp_take_bit_eq:
   \<open>take_bit n a = (if even a then 0 else 2 ^ n - 1)\<close>
     if \<open>a div 2 = a\<close>
 proof (rule bit_eqI)
   fix m
   assume \<open>2 ^ m \<noteq> 0\<close>
   with that show \<open>bit (take_bit n a) m \<longleftrightarrow> bit (if even a then 0 else 2 ^ n - 1) m\<close>
     by (simp add: bit_take_bit_iff bit_mask_iff stable_imp_bit_iff_odd)
 qed
 
 end
 
 instantiation nat :: semiring_bit_shifts
 begin
 
 definition push_bit_nat :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat\<close>
   where \<open>push_bit_nat n m = m * 2 ^ n\<close>
 
 definition drop_bit_nat :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat\<close>
   where \<open>drop_bit_nat n m = m div 2 ^ n\<close>
 
 instance proof
   show \<open>push_bit n m = m * 2 ^ n\<close> for n m :: nat
     by (simp add: push_bit_nat_def)
   show \<open>drop_bit n m = m div 2 ^ n\<close> for n m :: nat
     by (simp add: drop_bit_nat_def)
 qed
 
 end
 
 instantiation int :: semiring_bit_shifts
 begin
 
 definition push_bit_int :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int\<close>
   where \<open>push_bit_int n k = k * 2 ^ n\<close>
 
 definition drop_bit_int :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int\<close>
   where \<open>drop_bit_int n k = k div 2 ^ n\<close>
 
 instance proof
   show \<open>push_bit n k = k * 2 ^ n\<close> for n :: nat and k :: int
     by (simp add: push_bit_int_def)
   show \<open>drop_bit n k = k div 2 ^ n\<close> for n :: nat and k :: int
     by (simp add: drop_bit_int_def)
 qed
 
 end
 
 lemma bit_push_bit_iff_nat:
   \<open>bit (push_bit m q) n \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n \<and> bit q (n - m)\<close> for q :: nat
   by (auto simp add: bit_push_bit_iff)
 
 lemma bit_push_bit_iff_int:
   \<open>bit (push_bit m k) n \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n \<and> bit k (n - m)\<close> for k :: int
   by (auto simp add: bit_push_bit_iff)
 
 class unique_euclidean_semiring_with_bit_shifts =
   unique_euclidean_semiring_with_nat + semiring_bit_shifts
 begin
 
 lemma take_bit_of_exp [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit m (2 ^ n) = of_bool (n < m) * 2 ^ n\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod exp_mod_exp)
 
 lemma take_bit_of_2 [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit n 2 = of_bool (2 \<le> n) * 2\<close>
   using take_bit_of_exp [of n 1] by simp
 
 lemma take_bit_of_mask:
   \<open>take_bit m (2 ^ n - 1) = 2 ^ min m n - 1\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod mask_mod_exp)
 
 lemma push_bit_eq_0_iff [simp]:
   "push_bit n a = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> a = 0"
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult)
 
 lemma push_bit_numeral [simp]:
   "push_bit (numeral l) (numeral k) = push_bit (pred_numeral l) (numeral (Num.Bit0 k))"
   by (simp only: numeral_eq_Suc power_Suc numeral_Bit0 [of k] mult_2 [symmetric]) (simp add: ac_simps)
 
 lemma push_bit_of_nat:
   "push_bit n (of_nat m) = of_nat (push_bit n m)"
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult Parity.push_bit_eq_mult)
 
 lemma take_bit_add:
   "take_bit n (take_bit n a + take_bit n b) = take_bit n (a + b)"
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod mod_simps)
 
 lemma take_bit_eq_0_iff:
   "take_bit n a = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ n dvd a"
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod mod_eq_0_iff_dvd)
 
 lemma take_bit_of_1_eq_0_iff [simp]:
   "take_bit n 1 = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> n = 0"
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 
 lemma take_bit_Suc_bit0 [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit (Suc n) (numeral (Num.Bit0 k)) = take_bit n (numeral k) * 2\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_Suc numeral_Bit0_div_2)
 
 lemma take_bit_Suc_bit1 [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit (Suc n) (numeral (Num.Bit1 k)) = take_bit n (numeral k) * 2 + 1\<close>
-  by (simp add: take_bit_Suc numeral_Bit1_div_2)
+  by (simp add: take_bit_Suc numeral_Bit1_div_2 mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma take_bit_numeral_bit0 [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit (numeral l) (numeral (Num.Bit0 k)) = take_bit (pred_numeral l) (numeral k) * 2\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_rec numeral_Bit0_div_2)
 
 lemma take_bit_numeral_bit1 [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit (numeral l) (numeral (Num.Bit1 k)) = take_bit (pred_numeral l) (numeral k) * 2 + 1\<close>
-  by (simp add: take_bit_rec numeral_Bit1_div_2)
+  by (simp add: take_bit_rec numeral_Bit1_div_2 mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma take_bit_of_nat:
   "take_bit n (of_nat m) = of_nat (take_bit n m)"
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod Parity.take_bit_eq_mod of_nat_mod [of m "2 ^ n"])
 
 lemma drop_bit_Suc_bit0 [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit (Suc n) (numeral (Num.Bit0 k)) = drop_bit n (numeral k)\<close>
   by (simp add: drop_bit_Suc numeral_Bit0_div_2)
 
 lemma drop_bit_Suc_bit1 [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit (Suc n) (numeral (Num.Bit1 k)) = drop_bit n (numeral k)\<close>
   by (simp add: drop_bit_Suc numeral_Bit1_div_2)
 
 lemma drop_bit_numeral_bit0 [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit (numeral l) (numeral (Num.Bit0 k)) = drop_bit (pred_numeral l) (numeral k)\<close>
   by (simp add: drop_bit_rec numeral_Bit0_div_2)
 
 lemma drop_bit_numeral_bit1 [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit (numeral l) (numeral (Num.Bit1 k)) = drop_bit (pred_numeral l) (numeral k)\<close>
   by (simp add: drop_bit_rec numeral_Bit1_div_2)
 
 lemma drop_bit_of_nat:
   "drop_bit n (of_nat m) = of_nat (drop_bit n m)"
   by (simp add: drop_bit_eq_div Parity.drop_bit_eq_div of_nat_div [of m "2 ^ n"])
 
 lemma bit_of_nat_iff_bit [simp]:
   \<open>bit (of_nat m) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit m n\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>even (m div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> even (of_nat (m div 2 ^ n))\<close>
     by simp
   also have \<open>of_nat (m div 2 ^ n) = of_nat m div of_nat (2 ^ n)\<close>
     by (simp add: of_nat_div)
   finally show ?thesis
     by (simp add: bit_def semiring_bits_class.bit_def)
 qed
 
 lemma of_nat_push_bit:
   \<open>of_nat (push_bit m n) = push_bit m (of_nat n)\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult semiring_bit_shifts_class.push_bit_eq_mult)
 
 lemma of_nat_drop_bit:
   \<open>of_nat (drop_bit m n) = drop_bit m (of_nat n)\<close>
   by (simp add: drop_bit_eq_div semiring_bit_shifts_class.drop_bit_eq_div of_nat_div)
 
 lemma of_nat_take_bit:
   \<open>of_nat (take_bit m n) = take_bit m (of_nat n)\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod semiring_bit_shifts_class.take_bit_eq_mod of_nat_mod)
 
 lemma bit_push_bit_iff_of_nat_iff:
   \<open>bit (push_bit m (of_nat r)) n \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n \<and> bit (of_nat r) (n - m)\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_push_bit_iff)
 
 end
 
 instance nat :: unique_euclidean_semiring_with_bit_shifts ..
 
 instance int :: unique_euclidean_semiring_with_bit_shifts ..
 
 lemma bit_nat_iff [simp]:
   \<open>bit (nat k) n \<longleftrightarrow> k > 0 \<and> bit k n\<close>
 proof (cases \<open>k > 0\<close>)
   case True
   moreover define m where \<open>m = nat k\<close>
   ultimately have \<open>k = int m\<close>
     by simp
   then show ?thesis
     by (auto intro: ccontr)
 next
   case False
   then show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma not_exp_less_eq_0_int [simp]:
   \<open>\<not> 2 ^ n \<le> (0::int)\<close>
   by (simp add: power_le_zero_eq)
 
 lemma half_nonnegative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>k div 2 \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k \<ge> 0\<close> for k :: int
 proof (cases \<open>k \<ge> 0\<close>)
   case True
   then show ?thesis
     by (auto simp add: divide_int_def sgn_1_pos)
 next
   case False
   then show ?thesis
     apply (auto simp add: divide_int_def not_le elim!: evenE)
     apply (simp only: minus_mult_right)
     apply (subst nat_mult_distrib)
      apply simp_all
     done
 qed
 
 lemma half_negative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>k div 2 < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k < 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (subst Not_eq_iff [symmetric]) (simp add: not_less)
 
 lemma push_bit_of_Suc_0 [simp]:
   "push_bit n (Suc 0) = 2 ^ n"
   using push_bit_of_1 [where ?'a = nat] by simp
 
 lemma take_bit_of_Suc_0 [simp]:
   "take_bit n (Suc 0) = of_bool (0 < n)"
   using take_bit_of_1 [where ?'a = nat] by simp
 
 lemma drop_bit_of_Suc_0 [simp]:
   "drop_bit n (Suc 0) = of_bool (n = 0)"
   using drop_bit_of_1 [where ?'a = nat] by simp
 
 lemma take_bit_eq_self:
   \<open>take_bit n m = m\<close> if \<open>m < 2 ^ n\<close> for n m :: nat
   using that by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 
 lemma push_bit_minus_one:
   "push_bit n (- 1 :: int) = - (2 ^ n)"
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult)
 
 lemma minus_1_div_exp_eq_int:
   \<open>- 1 div (2 :: int) ^ n = - 1\<close>
   by (induction n) (use div_exp_eq [symmetric, of \<open>- 1 :: int\<close> 1] in \<open>simp_all add: ac_simps\<close>)
 
 lemma drop_bit_minus_one [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit n (- 1 :: int) = - 1\<close>
   by (simp add: drop_bit_eq_div minus_1_div_exp_eq_int)
 
 lemma take_bit_minus:
   "take_bit n (- (take_bit n k)) = take_bit n (- k)"
     for k :: int
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod mod_minus_eq)
 
 lemma take_bit_diff:
   "take_bit n (take_bit n k - take_bit n l) = take_bit n (k - l)"
     for k l :: int
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod mod_diff_eq)
 
 lemma take_bit_nonnegative [simp]:
   "take_bit n k \<ge> 0"
     for k :: int
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 
 lemma take_bit_minus_small_eq:
   \<open>take_bit n (- k) = 2 ^ n - k\<close> if \<open>0 < k\<close> \<open>k \<le> 2 ^ n\<close> for k :: int
 proof -
   define m where \<open>m = nat k\<close>
   with that have \<open>k = int m\<close> and \<open>0 < m\<close> and \<open>m \<le> 2 ^ n\<close>
     by simp_all
   have \<open>(2 ^ n - m) mod 2 ^ n = 2 ^ n - m\<close>
     using \<open>0 < m\<close> by simp
   then have \<open>int ((2 ^ n - m) mod 2 ^ n) = int (2 ^ n - m)\<close>
     by simp
   then have \<open>(2 ^ n - int m) mod 2 ^ n = 2 ^ n - int m\<close>
     using \<open>m \<le> 2 ^ n\<close> by (simp only: of_nat_mod of_nat_diff) simp
   with \<open>k = int m\<close> have \<open>(2 ^ n - k) mod 2 ^ n = 2 ^ n - k\<close>
     by simp
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 qed
 
 lemma drop_bit_push_bit_int:
   \<open>drop_bit m (push_bit n k) = drop_bit (m - n) (push_bit (n - m) k)\<close> for k :: int
   by (cases \<open>m \<le> n\<close>) (auto simp add: mult.left_commute [of _ \<open>2 ^ n\<close>] mult.commute [of _ \<open>2 ^ n\<close>] mult.assoc
     mult.commute [of k] drop_bit_eq_div push_bit_eq_mult not_le power_add dest!: le_Suc_ex less_imp_Suc_add)
 
 lemma push_bit_nonnegative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>push_bit n k \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k \<ge> 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult zero_le_mult_iff)
 
 lemma push_bit_negative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>push_bit n k < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k < 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (subst Not_eq_iff [symmetric]) (simp add: not_less)
 
 lemma drop_bit_nonnegative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit n k \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k \<ge> 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (induction n) (simp_all add: drop_bit_Suc drop_bit_half)
 
 lemma drop_bit_negative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit n k < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k < 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (subst Not_eq_iff [symmetric]) (simp add: not_less)
 
 end
diff --git a/src/HOL/Set_Interval.thy b/src/HOL/Set_Interval.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Set_Interval.thy
+++ b/src/HOL/Set_Interval.thy
@@ -1,2517 +1,2517 @@
 (*  Title:      HOL/Set_Interval.thy
     Author:     Tobias Nipkow, Clemens Ballarin, Jeremy Avigad
 
 lessThan, greaterThan, atLeast, atMost and two-sided intervals
 
 Modern convention: Ixy stands for an interval where x and y
 describe the lower and upper bound and x,y : {c,o,i}
 where c = closed, o = open, i = infinite.
 Examples: Ico = {_ ..< _} and Ici = {_ ..}
 *)
 
 section \<open>Set intervals\<close>
 
 theory Set_Interval
 imports Divides
 begin
 
 (* Belongs in Finite_Set but 2 is not available there *)
 lemma card_2_iff: "card S = 2 \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x y. S = {x,y} \<and> x \<noteq> y)"
   by (auto simp: card_Suc_eq numeral_eq_Suc)
 
 lemma card_2_iff': "card S = 2 \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x\<in>S. \<exists>y\<in>S. x \<noteq> y \<and> (\<forall>z\<in>S. z = x \<or> z = y))"
   by (auto simp: card_Suc_eq numeral_eq_Suc)
 
 context ord
 begin
 
 definition
   lessThan    :: "'a => 'a set" ("(1{..<_})") where
   "{..<u} == {x. x < u}"
 
 definition
   atMost      :: "'a => 'a set" ("(1{.._})") where
   "{..u} == {x. x \<le> u}"
 
 definition
   greaterThan :: "'a => 'a set" ("(1{_<..})") where
   "{l<..} == {x. l<x}"
 
 definition
   atLeast     :: "'a => 'a set" ("(1{_..})") where
   "{l..} == {x. l\<le>x}"
 
 definition
   greaterThanLessThan :: "'a => 'a => 'a set"  ("(1{_<..<_})") where
   "{l<..<u} == {l<..} Int {..<u}"
 
 definition
   atLeastLessThan :: "'a => 'a => 'a set"      ("(1{_..<_})") where
   "{l..<u} == {l..} Int {..<u}"
 
 definition
   greaterThanAtMost :: "'a => 'a => 'a set"    ("(1{_<.._})") where
   "{l<..u} == {l<..} Int {..u}"
 
 definition
   atLeastAtMost :: "'a => 'a => 'a set"        ("(1{_.._})") where
   "{l..u} == {l..} Int {..u}"
 
 end
 
 
 text\<open>A note of warning when using \<^term>\<open>{..<n}\<close> on type \<^typ>\<open>nat\<close>: it is equivalent to \<^term>\<open>{0::nat..<n}\<close> but some lemmas involving
 \<^term>\<open>{m..<n}\<close> may not exist in \<^term>\<open>{..<n}\<close>-form as well.\<close>
 
 syntax (ASCII)
   "_UNION_le"   :: "'a => 'a => 'b set => 'b set"       ("(3UN _<=_./ _)" [0, 0, 10] 10)
   "_UNION_less" :: "'a => 'a => 'b set => 'b set"       ("(3UN _<_./ _)" [0, 0, 10] 10)
   "_INTER_le"   :: "'a => 'a => 'b set => 'b set"       ("(3INT _<=_./ _)" [0, 0, 10] 10)
   "_INTER_less" :: "'a => 'a => 'b set => 'b set"       ("(3INT _<_./ _)" [0, 0, 10] 10)
 
 syntax (latex output)
   "_UNION_le"   :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a => 'b set => 'b set"       ("(3\<Union>(\<open>unbreakable\<close>_ \<le> _)/ _)" [0, 0, 10] 10)
   "_UNION_less" :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a => 'b set => 'b set"       ("(3\<Union>(\<open>unbreakable\<close>_ < _)/ _)" [0, 0, 10] 10)
   "_INTER_le"   :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a => 'b set => 'b set"       ("(3\<Inter>(\<open>unbreakable\<close>_ \<le> _)/ _)" [0, 0, 10] 10)
   "_INTER_less" :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a => 'b set => 'b set"       ("(3\<Inter>(\<open>unbreakable\<close>_ < _)/ _)" [0, 0, 10] 10)
 
 syntax
   "_UNION_le"   :: "'a => 'a => 'b set => 'b set"       ("(3\<Union>_\<le>_./ _)" [0, 0, 10] 10)
   "_UNION_less" :: "'a => 'a => 'b set => 'b set"       ("(3\<Union>_<_./ _)" [0, 0, 10] 10)
   "_INTER_le"   :: "'a => 'a => 'b set => 'b set"       ("(3\<Inter>_\<le>_./ _)" [0, 0, 10] 10)
   "_INTER_less" :: "'a => 'a => 'b set => 'b set"       ("(3\<Inter>_<_./ _)" [0, 0, 10] 10)
 
 translations
   "\<Union>i\<le>n. A" \<rightleftharpoons> "\<Union>i\<in>{..n}. A"
   "\<Union>i<n. A" \<rightleftharpoons> "\<Union>i\<in>{..<n}. A"
   "\<Inter>i\<le>n. A" \<rightleftharpoons> "\<Inter>i\<in>{..n}. A"
   "\<Inter>i<n. A" \<rightleftharpoons> "\<Inter>i\<in>{..<n}. A"
 
 
 subsection \<open>Various equivalences\<close>
 
 lemma (in ord) lessThan_iff [iff]: "(i \<in> lessThan k) = (i<k)"
 by (simp add: lessThan_def)
 
 lemma Compl_lessThan [simp]:
     "!!k:: 'a::linorder. -lessThan k = atLeast k"
   by (auto simp add: lessThan_def atLeast_def)
 
 lemma single_Diff_lessThan [simp]: "!!k:: 'a::preorder. {k} - lessThan k = {k}"
   by auto
 
 lemma (in ord) greaterThan_iff [iff]: "(i \<in> greaterThan k) = (k<i)"
   by (simp add: greaterThan_def)
 
 lemma Compl_greaterThan [simp]:
     "!!k:: 'a::linorder. -greaterThan k = atMost k"
   by (auto simp add: greaterThan_def atMost_def)
 
 lemma Compl_atMost [simp]: "!!k:: 'a::linorder. -atMost k = greaterThan k"
   apply (subst Compl_greaterThan [symmetric])
   apply (rule double_complement)
   done
 
 lemma (in ord) atLeast_iff [iff]: "(i \<in> atLeast k) = (k<=i)"
 by (simp add: atLeast_def)
 
 lemma Compl_atLeast [simp]: "!!k:: 'a::linorder. -atLeast k = lessThan k"
   by (auto simp add: lessThan_def atLeast_def)
 
 lemma (in ord) atMost_iff [iff]: "(i \<in> atMost k) = (i<=k)"
 by (simp add: atMost_def)
 
 lemma atMost_Int_atLeast: "!!n:: 'a::order. atMost n Int atLeast n = {n}"
 by (blast intro: order_antisym)
 
 lemma (in linorder) lessThan_Int_lessThan: "{ a <..} \<inter> { b <..} = { max a b <..}"
   by auto
 
 lemma (in linorder) greaterThan_Int_greaterThan: "{..< a} \<inter> {..< b} = {..< min a b}"
   by auto
 
 subsection \<open>Logical Equivalences for Set Inclusion and Equality\<close>
 
 lemma atLeast_empty_triv [simp]: "{{}..} = UNIV"
   by auto
 
 lemma atMost_UNIV_triv [simp]: "{..UNIV} = UNIV"
   by auto
 
 lemma atLeast_subset_iff [iff]:
      "(atLeast x \<subseteq> atLeast y) = (y \<le> (x::'a::preorder))"
 by (blast intro: order_trans)
 
 lemma atLeast_eq_iff [iff]:
      "(atLeast x = atLeast y) = (x = (y::'a::order))"
 by (blast intro: order_antisym order_trans)
 
 lemma greaterThan_subset_iff [iff]:
      "(greaterThan x \<subseteq> greaterThan y) = (y \<le> (x::'a::linorder))"
   unfolding greaterThan_def by (auto simp: linorder_not_less [symmetric])
 
 lemma greaterThan_eq_iff [iff]:
      "(greaterThan x = greaterThan y) = (x = (y::'a::linorder))"
   by (auto simp: elim!: equalityE)
 
 lemma atMost_subset_iff [iff]: "(atMost x \<subseteq> atMost y) = (x \<le> (y::'a::preorder))"
   by (blast intro: order_trans)
 
 lemma atMost_eq_iff [iff]: "(atMost x = atMost y) = (x = (y::'a::order))"
   by (blast intro: order_antisym order_trans)
 
 lemma lessThan_subset_iff [iff]:
      "(lessThan x \<subseteq> lessThan y) = (x \<le> (y::'a::linorder))"
   unfolding lessThan_def by (auto simp: linorder_not_less [symmetric])
 
 lemma lessThan_eq_iff [iff]:
      "(lessThan x = lessThan y) = (x = (y::'a::linorder))"
   by (auto simp: elim!: equalityE)
 
 lemma lessThan_strict_subset_iff:
   fixes m n :: "'a::linorder"
   shows "{..<m} < {..<n} \<longleftrightarrow> m < n"
   by (metis leD lessThan_subset_iff linorder_linear not_less_iff_gr_or_eq psubset_eq)
 
 lemma (in linorder) Ici_subset_Ioi_iff: "{a ..} \<subseteq> {b <..} \<longleftrightarrow> b < a"
   by auto
 
 lemma (in linorder) Iic_subset_Iio_iff: "{.. a} \<subseteq> {..< b} \<longleftrightarrow> a < b"
   by auto
 
 lemma (in preorder) Ioi_le_Ico: "{a <..} \<subseteq> {a ..}"
   by (auto intro: less_imp_le)
 
 subsection \<open>Two-sided intervals\<close>
 
 context ord
 begin
 
 lemma greaterThanLessThan_iff [simp]: "(i \<in> {l<..<u}) = (l < i \<and> i < u)"
   by (simp add: greaterThanLessThan_def)
 
 lemma atLeastLessThan_iff [simp]: "(i \<in> {l..<u}) = (l \<le> i \<and> i < u)"
   by (simp add: atLeastLessThan_def)
 
 lemma greaterThanAtMost_iff [simp]: "(i \<in> {l<..u}) = (l < i \<and> i \<le> u)"
   by (simp add: greaterThanAtMost_def)
 
 lemma atLeastAtMost_iff [simp]: "(i \<in> {l..u}) = (l \<le> i \<and> i \<le> u)"
   by (simp add: atLeastAtMost_def)
 
 text \<open>The above four lemmas could be declared as iffs. Unfortunately this
 breaks many proofs. Since it only helps blast, it is better to leave them
 alone.\<close>
 
 lemma greaterThanLessThan_eq: "{ a <..< b} = { a <..} \<inter> {..< b }"
   by auto
 
 lemma (in order) atLeastLessThan_eq_atLeastAtMost_diff:
   "{a..<b} = {a..b} - {b}"
   by (auto simp add: atLeastLessThan_def atLeastAtMost_def)
 
 lemma (in order) greaterThanAtMost_eq_atLeastAtMost_diff:
   "{a<..b} = {a..b} - {a}"
   by (auto simp add: greaterThanAtMost_def atLeastAtMost_def)
 
 end
 
 subsubsection\<open>Emptyness, singletons, subset\<close>
 
 context preorder
 begin
 
 lemma atLeastatMost_empty_iff[simp]:
   "{a..b} = {} \<longleftrightarrow> (\<not> a \<le> b)"
   by auto (blast intro: order_trans)
 
 lemma atLeastatMost_empty_iff2[simp]:
   "{} = {a..b} \<longleftrightarrow> (\<not> a \<le> b)"
   by auto (blast intro: order_trans)
 
 lemma atLeastLessThan_empty_iff[simp]:
   "{a..<b} = {} \<longleftrightarrow> (\<not> a < b)"
   by auto (blast intro: le_less_trans)
 
 lemma atLeastLessThan_empty_iff2[simp]:
   "{} = {a..<b} \<longleftrightarrow> (\<not> a < b)"
   by auto (blast intro: le_less_trans)
 
 lemma greaterThanAtMost_empty_iff[simp]: "{k<..l} = {} \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> k < l"
   by auto (blast intro: less_le_trans)
 
 lemma greaterThanAtMost_empty_iff2[simp]: "{} = {k<..l} \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> k < l"
   by auto (blast intro: less_le_trans)
 
 lemma atLeastatMost_subset_iff[simp]:
   "{a..b} \<le> {c..d} \<longleftrightarrow> (\<not> a \<le> b) \<or> c \<le> a \<and> b \<le> d"
   unfolding atLeastAtMost_def atLeast_def atMost_def
   by (blast intro: order_trans)
 
 lemma atLeastatMost_psubset_iff:
   "{a..b} < {c..d} \<longleftrightarrow>
    ((\<not> a \<le> b) \<or> c \<le> a \<and> b \<le> d \<and> (c < a \<or> b < d)) \<and> c \<le> d"
   by(simp add: psubset_eq set_eq_iff less_le_not_le)(blast intro: order_trans)
 
 lemma atLeastAtMost_subseteq_atLeastLessThan_iff:
   "{a..b} \<subseteq> {c ..< d} \<longleftrightarrow> (a \<le> b \<longrightarrow> c \<le> a \<and> b < d)" 
   by auto (blast intro: local.order_trans local.le_less_trans elim: )+
 
 lemma Icc_subset_Ici_iff[simp]:
   "{l..h} \<subseteq> {l'..} = (\<not> l\<le>h \<or> l\<ge>l')"
   by(auto simp: subset_eq intro: order_trans)
 
 lemma Icc_subset_Iic_iff[simp]:
   "{l..h} \<subseteq> {..h'} = (\<not> l\<le>h \<or> h\<le>h')"
   by(auto simp: subset_eq intro: order_trans)
 
 lemma not_Ici_eq_empty[simp]: "{l..} \<noteq> {}"
   by(auto simp: set_eq_iff)
 
 lemma not_Iic_eq_empty[simp]: "{..h} \<noteq> {}"
   by(auto simp: set_eq_iff)
 
 lemmas not_empty_eq_Ici_eq_empty[simp] = not_Ici_eq_empty[symmetric]
 lemmas not_empty_eq_Iic_eq_empty[simp] = not_Iic_eq_empty[symmetric]
 
 end
 
 context order
 begin
 
 lemma atLeastatMost_empty[simp]:
   "b < a \<Longrightarrow> {a..b} = {}"
   by(auto simp: atLeastAtMost_def atLeast_def atMost_def)
 
 lemma atLeastLessThan_empty[simp]:
   "b \<le> a \<Longrightarrow> {a..<b} = {}"
   by(auto simp: atLeastLessThan_def)
 
 lemma greaterThanAtMost_empty[simp]: "l \<le> k ==> {k<..l} = {}"
   by(auto simp:greaterThanAtMost_def greaterThan_def atMost_def)
 
 lemma greaterThanLessThan_empty[simp]:"l \<le> k ==> {k<..<l} = {}"
   by(auto simp:greaterThanLessThan_def greaterThan_def lessThan_def)
 
 lemma atLeastAtMost_singleton [simp]: "{a..a} = {a}"
   by (auto simp add: atLeastAtMost_def atMost_def atLeast_def)
 
 lemma atLeastAtMost_singleton': "a = b \<Longrightarrow> {a .. b} = {a}" by simp
 
 lemma Icc_eq_Icc[simp]:
   "{l..h} = {l'..h'} = (l=l' \<and> h=h' \<or> \<not> l\<le>h \<and> \<not> l'\<le>h')"
   by(simp add: order_class.eq_iff)(auto intro: order_trans)
 
 lemma atLeastAtMost_singleton_iff[simp]:
   "{a .. b} = {c} \<longleftrightarrow> a = b \<and> b = c"
 proof
   assume "{a..b} = {c}"
   hence *: "\<not> (\<not> a \<le> b)" unfolding atLeastatMost_empty_iff[symmetric] by simp
   with \<open>{a..b} = {c}\<close> have "c \<le> a \<and> b \<le> c" by auto
   with * show "a = b \<and> b = c" by auto
 qed simp
 
 end
 
 context no_top
 begin
 
 (* also holds for no_bot but no_top should suffice *)
 lemma not_UNIV_le_Icc[simp]: "\<not> UNIV \<subseteq> {l..h}"
 using gt_ex[of h] by(auto simp: subset_eq less_le_not_le)
 
 lemma not_UNIV_le_Iic[simp]: "\<not> UNIV \<subseteq> {..h}"
 using gt_ex[of h] by(auto simp: subset_eq less_le_not_le)
 
 lemma not_Ici_le_Icc[simp]: "\<not> {l..} \<subseteq> {l'..h'}"
 using gt_ex[of h']
 by(auto simp: subset_eq less_le)(blast dest:antisym_conv intro: order_trans)
 
 lemma not_Ici_le_Iic[simp]: "\<not> {l..} \<subseteq> {..h'}"
 using gt_ex[of h']
 by(auto simp: subset_eq less_le)(blast dest:antisym_conv intro: order_trans)
 
 end
 
 context no_bot
 begin
 
 lemma not_UNIV_le_Ici[simp]: "\<not> UNIV \<subseteq> {l..}"
 using lt_ex[of l] by(auto simp: subset_eq less_le_not_le)
 
 lemma not_Iic_le_Icc[simp]: "\<not> {..h} \<subseteq> {l'..h'}"
 using lt_ex[of l']
 by(auto simp: subset_eq less_le)(blast dest:antisym_conv intro: order_trans)
 
 lemma not_Iic_le_Ici[simp]: "\<not> {..h} \<subseteq> {l'..}"
 using lt_ex[of l']
 by(auto simp: subset_eq less_le)(blast dest:antisym_conv intro: order_trans)
 
 end
 
 
 context no_top
 begin
 
 (* also holds for no_bot but no_top should suffice *)
 lemma not_UNIV_eq_Icc[simp]: "\<not> UNIV = {l'..h'}"
 using gt_ex[of h'] by(auto simp: set_eq_iff  less_le_not_le)
 
 lemmas not_Icc_eq_UNIV[simp] = not_UNIV_eq_Icc[symmetric]
 
 lemma not_UNIV_eq_Iic[simp]: "\<not> UNIV = {..h'}"
 using gt_ex[of h'] by(auto simp: set_eq_iff  less_le_not_le)
 
 lemmas not_Iic_eq_UNIV[simp] = not_UNIV_eq_Iic[symmetric]
 
 lemma not_Icc_eq_Ici[simp]: "\<not> {l..h} = {l'..}"
 unfolding atLeastAtMost_def using not_Ici_le_Iic[of l'] by blast
 
 lemmas not_Ici_eq_Icc[simp] = not_Icc_eq_Ici[symmetric]
 
 (* also holds for no_bot but no_top should suffice *)
 lemma not_Iic_eq_Ici[simp]: "\<not> {..h} = {l'..}"
 using not_Ici_le_Iic[of l' h] by blast
 
 lemmas not_Ici_eq_Iic[simp] = not_Iic_eq_Ici[symmetric]
 
 end
 
 context no_bot
 begin
 
 lemma not_UNIV_eq_Ici[simp]: "\<not> UNIV = {l'..}"
 using lt_ex[of l'] by(auto simp: set_eq_iff  less_le_not_le)
 
 lemmas not_Ici_eq_UNIV[simp] = not_UNIV_eq_Ici[symmetric]
 
 lemma not_Icc_eq_Iic[simp]: "\<not> {l..h} = {..h'}"
 unfolding atLeastAtMost_def using not_Iic_le_Ici[of h'] by blast
 
 lemmas not_Iic_eq_Icc[simp] = not_Icc_eq_Iic[symmetric]
 
 end
 
 
 context dense_linorder
 begin
 
 lemma greaterThanLessThan_empty_iff[simp]:
   "{ a <..< b } = {} \<longleftrightarrow> b \<le> a"
   using dense[of a b] by (cases "a < b") auto
 
 lemma greaterThanLessThan_empty_iff2[simp]:
   "{} = { a <..< b } \<longleftrightarrow> b \<le> a"
   using dense[of a b] by (cases "a < b") auto
 
 lemma atLeastLessThan_subseteq_atLeastAtMost_iff:
   "{a ..< b} \<subseteq> { c .. d } \<longleftrightarrow> (a < b \<longrightarrow> c \<le> a \<and> b \<le> d)"
   using dense[of "max a d" "b"]
   by (force simp: subset_eq Ball_def not_less[symmetric])
 
 lemma greaterThanAtMost_subseteq_atLeastAtMost_iff:
   "{a <.. b} \<subseteq> { c .. d } \<longleftrightarrow> (a < b \<longrightarrow> c \<le> a \<and> b \<le> d)"
   using dense[of "a" "min c b"]
   by (force simp: subset_eq Ball_def not_less[symmetric])
 
 lemma greaterThanLessThan_subseteq_atLeastAtMost_iff:
   "{a <..< b} \<subseteq> { c .. d } \<longleftrightarrow> (a < b \<longrightarrow> c \<le> a \<and> b \<le> d)"
   using dense[of "a" "min c b"] dense[of "max a d" "b"]
   by (force simp: subset_eq Ball_def not_less[symmetric])
 
 lemma greaterThanLessThan_subseteq_greaterThanLessThan:
   "{a <..< b} \<subseteq> {c <..< d} \<longleftrightarrow> (a < b \<longrightarrow> a \<ge> c \<and> b \<le> d)"
   using dense[of "a" "min c b"] dense[of "max a d" "b"]
   by (force simp: subset_eq Ball_def not_less[symmetric])
 
 lemma greaterThanAtMost_subseteq_atLeastLessThan_iff:
   "{a <.. b} \<subseteq> { c ..< d } \<longleftrightarrow> (a < b \<longrightarrow> c \<le> a \<and> b < d)"
   using dense[of "a" "min c b"]
   by (force simp: subset_eq Ball_def not_less[symmetric])
 
 lemma greaterThanLessThan_subseteq_atLeastLessThan_iff:
   "{a <..< b} \<subseteq> { c ..< d } \<longleftrightarrow> (a < b \<longrightarrow> c \<le> a \<and> b \<le> d)"
   using dense[of "a" "min c b"] dense[of "max a d" "b"]
   by (force simp: subset_eq Ball_def not_less[symmetric])
 
 lemma greaterThanLessThan_subseteq_greaterThanAtMost_iff:
   "{a <..< b} \<subseteq> { c <.. d } \<longleftrightarrow> (a < b \<longrightarrow> c \<le> a \<and> b \<le> d)"
   using dense[of "a" "min c b"] dense[of "max a d" "b"]
   by (force simp: subset_eq Ball_def not_less[symmetric])
 
 end
 
 context no_top
 begin
 
 lemma greaterThan_non_empty[simp]: "{x <..} \<noteq> {}"
   using gt_ex[of x] by auto
 
 end
 
 context no_bot
 begin
 
 lemma lessThan_non_empty[simp]: "{..< x} \<noteq> {}"
   using lt_ex[of x] by auto
 
 end
 
 lemma (in linorder) atLeastLessThan_subset_iff:
   "{a..<b} \<subseteq> {c..<d} \<Longrightarrow> b \<le> a \<or> c\<le>a \<and> b\<le>d"
   apply (auto simp:subset_eq Ball_def not_le)
   apply(frule_tac x=a in spec)
   apply(erule_tac x=d in allE)
   apply (auto simp: )
   done
 
 lemma atLeastLessThan_inj:
   fixes a b c d :: "'a::linorder"
   assumes eq: "{a ..< b} = {c ..< d}" and "a < b" "c < d"
   shows "a = c" "b = d"
 using assms by (metis atLeastLessThan_subset_iff eq less_le_not_le antisym_conv2 subset_refl)+
 
 lemma atLeastLessThan_eq_iff:
   fixes a b c d :: "'a::linorder"
   assumes "a < b" "c < d"
   shows "{a ..< b} = {c ..< d} \<longleftrightarrow> a = c \<and> b = d"
   using atLeastLessThan_inj assms by auto
 
 lemma (in linorder) Ioc_inj: "{a <.. b} = {c <.. d} \<longleftrightarrow> (b \<le> a \<and> d \<le> c) \<or> a = c \<and> b = d"
   by (metis eq_iff greaterThanAtMost_empty_iff2 greaterThanAtMost_iff le_cases not_le)
 
 lemma (in order) Iio_Int_singleton: "{..<k} \<inter> {x} = (if x < k then {x} else {})"
   by auto
 
 lemma (in linorder) Ioc_subset_iff: "{a<..b} \<subseteq> {c<..d} \<longleftrightarrow> (b \<le> a \<or> c \<le> a \<and> b \<le> d)"
   by (auto simp: subset_eq Ball_def) (metis less_le not_less)
 
 lemma (in order_bot) atLeast_eq_UNIV_iff: "{x..} = UNIV \<longleftrightarrow> x = bot"
 by (auto simp: set_eq_iff intro: le_bot)
 
 lemma (in order_top) atMost_eq_UNIV_iff: "{..x} = UNIV \<longleftrightarrow> x = top"
 by (auto simp: set_eq_iff intro: top_le)
 
 lemma (in bounded_lattice) atLeastAtMost_eq_UNIV_iff:
   "{x..y} = UNIV \<longleftrightarrow> (x = bot \<and> y = top)"
 by (auto simp: set_eq_iff intro: top_le le_bot)
 
 lemma Iio_eq_empty_iff: "{..< n::'a::{linorder, order_bot}} = {} \<longleftrightarrow> n = bot"
   by (auto simp: set_eq_iff not_less le_bot)
 
 lemma lessThan_empty_iff: "{..< n::nat} = {} \<longleftrightarrow> n = 0"
   by (simp add: Iio_eq_empty_iff bot_nat_def)
 
 lemma mono_image_least:
   assumes f_mono: "mono f" and f_img: "f ` {m ..< n} = {m' ..< n'}" "m < n"
   shows "f m = m'"
 proof -
   from f_img have "{m' ..< n'} \<noteq> {}"
     by (metis atLeastLessThan_empty_iff image_is_empty)
   with f_img have "m' \<in> f ` {m ..< n}" by auto
   then obtain k where "f k = m'" "m \<le> k" by auto
   moreover have "m' \<le> f m" using f_img by auto
   ultimately show "f m = m'"
     using f_mono by (auto elim: monoE[where x=m and y=k])
 qed
 
 
 subsection \<open>Infinite intervals\<close>
 
 context dense_linorder
 begin
 
 lemma infinite_Ioo:
   assumes "a < b"
   shows "\<not> finite {a<..<b}"
 proof
   assume fin: "finite {a<..<b}"
   moreover have ne: "{a<..<b} \<noteq> {}"
     using \<open>a < b\<close> by auto
   ultimately have "a < Max {a <..< b}" "Max {a <..< b} < b"
     using Max_in[of "{a <..< b}"] by auto
   then obtain x where "Max {a <..< b} < x" "x < b"
     using dense[of "Max {a<..<b}" b] by auto
   then have "x \<in> {a <..< b}"
     using \<open>a < Max {a <..< b}\<close> by auto
   then have "x \<le> Max {a <..< b}"
     using fin by auto
   with \<open>Max {a <..< b} < x\<close> show False by auto
 qed
 
 lemma infinite_Icc: "a < b \<Longrightarrow> \<not> finite {a .. b}"
   using greaterThanLessThan_subseteq_atLeastAtMost_iff[of a b a b] infinite_Ioo[of a b]
   by (auto dest: finite_subset)
 
 lemma infinite_Ico: "a < b \<Longrightarrow> \<not> finite {a ..< b}"
   using greaterThanLessThan_subseteq_atLeastLessThan_iff[of a b a b] infinite_Ioo[of a b]
   by (auto dest: finite_subset)
 
 lemma infinite_Ioc: "a < b \<Longrightarrow> \<not> finite {a <.. b}"
   using greaterThanLessThan_subseteq_greaterThanAtMost_iff[of a b a b] infinite_Ioo[of a b]
   by (auto dest: finite_subset)
 
 lemma infinite_Ioo_iff [simp]: "infinite {a<..<b} \<longleftrightarrow> a < b"
   using not_less_iff_gr_or_eq by (fastforce simp: infinite_Ioo)
 
 lemma infinite_Icc_iff [simp]: "infinite {a .. b} \<longleftrightarrow> a < b"
   using not_less_iff_gr_or_eq by (fastforce simp: infinite_Icc)
 
 lemma infinite_Ico_iff [simp]: "infinite {a..<b} \<longleftrightarrow> a < b"
   using not_less_iff_gr_or_eq by (fastforce simp: infinite_Ico)
 
 lemma infinite_Ioc_iff [simp]: "infinite {a<..b} \<longleftrightarrow> a < b"
   using not_less_iff_gr_or_eq by (fastforce simp: infinite_Ioc)
 
 end
 
 lemma infinite_Iio: "\<not> finite {..< a :: 'a :: {no_bot, linorder}}"
 proof
   assume "finite {..< a}"
   then have *: "\<And>x. x < a \<Longrightarrow> Min {..< a} \<le> x"
     by auto
   obtain x where "x < a"
     using lt_ex by auto
 
   obtain y where "y < Min {..< a}"
     using lt_ex by auto
   also have "Min {..< a} \<le> x"
     using \<open>x < a\<close> by fact
   also note \<open>x < a\<close>
   finally have "Min {..< a} \<le> y"
     by fact
   with \<open>y < Min {..< a}\<close> show False by auto
 qed
 
 lemma infinite_Iic: "\<not> finite {.. a :: 'a :: {no_bot, linorder}}"
   using infinite_Iio[of a] finite_subset[of "{..< a}" "{.. a}"]
   by (auto simp: subset_eq less_imp_le)
 
 lemma infinite_Ioi: "\<not> finite {a :: 'a :: {no_top, linorder} <..}"
 proof
   assume "finite {a <..}"
   then have *: "\<And>x. a < x \<Longrightarrow> x \<le> Max {a <..}"
     by auto
 
   obtain y where "Max {a <..} < y"
     using gt_ex by auto
 
   obtain x where x: "a < x"
     using gt_ex by auto
   also from x have "x \<le> Max {a <..}"
     by fact
   also note \<open>Max {a <..} < y\<close>
   finally have "y \<le> Max { a <..}"
     by fact
   with \<open>Max {a <..} < y\<close> show False by auto
 qed
 
 lemma infinite_Ici: "\<not> finite {a :: 'a :: {no_top, linorder} ..}"
   using infinite_Ioi[of a] finite_subset[of "{a <..}" "{a ..}"]
   by (auto simp: subset_eq less_imp_le)
 
 subsubsection \<open>Intersection\<close>
 
 context linorder
 begin
 
 lemma Int_atLeastAtMost[simp]: "{a..b} Int {c..d} = {max a c .. min b d}"
 by auto
 
 lemma Int_atLeastAtMostR1[simp]: "{..b} Int {c..d} = {c .. min b d}"
 by auto
 
 lemma Int_atLeastAtMostR2[simp]: "{a..} Int {c..d} = {max a c .. d}"
 by auto
 
 lemma Int_atLeastAtMostL1[simp]: "{a..b} Int {..d} = {a .. min b d}"
 by auto
 
 lemma Int_atLeastAtMostL2[simp]: "{a..b} Int {c..} = {max a c .. b}"
 by auto
 
 lemma Int_atLeastLessThan[simp]: "{a..<b} Int {c..<d} = {max a c ..< min b d}"
 by auto
 
 lemma Int_greaterThanAtMost[simp]: "{a<..b} Int {c<..d} = {max a c <.. min b d}"
 by auto
 
 lemma Int_greaterThanLessThan[simp]: "{a<..<b} Int {c<..<d} = {max a c <..< min b d}"
 by auto
 
 lemma Int_atMost[simp]: "{..a} \<inter> {..b} = {.. min a b}"
   by (auto simp: min_def)
 
 lemma Ioc_disjoint: "{a<..b} \<inter> {c<..d} = {} \<longleftrightarrow> b \<le> a \<or> d \<le> c \<or> b \<le> c \<or> d \<le> a"
   by auto
 
 end
 
 context complete_lattice
 begin
 
 lemma
   shows Sup_atLeast[simp]: "Sup {x ..} = top"
     and Sup_greaterThanAtLeast[simp]: "x < top \<Longrightarrow> Sup {x <..} = top"
     and Sup_atMost[simp]: "Sup {.. y} = y"
     and Sup_atLeastAtMost[simp]: "x \<le> y \<Longrightarrow> Sup { x .. y} = y"
     and Sup_greaterThanAtMost[simp]: "x < y \<Longrightarrow> Sup { x <.. y} = y"
   by (auto intro!: Sup_eqI)
 
 lemma
   shows Inf_atMost[simp]: "Inf {.. x} = bot"
     and Inf_atMostLessThan[simp]: "top < x \<Longrightarrow> Inf {..< x} = bot"
     and Inf_atLeast[simp]: "Inf {x ..} = x"
     and Inf_atLeastAtMost[simp]: "x \<le> y \<Longrightarrow> Inf { x .. y} = x"
     and Inf_atLeastLessThan[simp]: "x < y \<Longrightarrow> Inf { x ..< y} = x"
   by (auto intro!: Inf_eqI)
 
 end
 
 lemma
   fixes x y :: "'a :: {complete_lattice, dense_linorder}"
   shows Sup_lessThan[simp]: "Sup {..< y} = y"
     and Sup_atLeastLessThan[simp]: "x < y \<Longrightarrow> Sup { x ..< y} = y"
     and Sup_greaterThanLessThan[simp]: "x < y \<Longrightarrow> Sup { x <..< y} = y"
     and Inf_greaterThan[simp]: "Inf {x <..} = x"
     and Inf_greaterThanAtMost[simp]: "x < y \<Longrightarrow> Inf { x <.. y} = x"
     and Inf_greaterThanLessThan[simp]: "x < y \<Longrightarrow> Inf { x <..< y} = x"
   by (auto intro!: Inf_eqI Sup_eqI intro: dense_le dense_le_bounded dense_ge dense_ge_bounded)
 
 subsection \<open>Intervals of natural numbers\<close>
 
 subsubsection \<open>The Constant \<^term>\<open>lessThan\<close>\<close>
 
 lemma lessThan_0 [simp]: "lessThan (0::nat) = {}"
 by (simp add: lessThan_def)
 
 lemma lessThan_Suc: "lessThan (Suc k) = insert k (lessThan k)"
 by (simp add: lessThan_def less_Suc_eq, blast)
 
 text \<open>The following proof is convenient in induction proofs where
 new elements get indices at the beginning. So it is used to transform
 \<^term>\<open>{..<Suc n}\<close> to \<^term>\<open>0::nat\<close> and \<^term>\<open>{..< n}\<close>.\<close>
 
 lemma zero_notin_Suc_image [simp]: "0 \<notin> Suc ` A"
   by auto
 
 lemma lessThan_Suc_eq_insert_0: "{..<Suc n} = insert 0 (Suc ` {..<n})"
   by (auto simp: image_iff less_Suc_eq_0_disj)
 
 lemma lessThan_Suc_atMost: "lessThan (Suc k) = atMost k"
 by (simp add: lessThan_def atMost_def less_Suc_eq_le)
 
 lemma atMost_Suc_eq_insert_0: "{.. Suc n} = insert 0 (Suc ` {.. n})"
   unfolding lessThan_Suc_atMost[symmetric] lessThan_Suc_eq_insert_0[of "Suc n"] ..
 
 lemma UN_lessThan_UNIV: "(\<Union>m::nat. lessThan m) = UNIV"
 by blast
 
 subsubsection \<open>The Constant \<^term>\<open>greaterThan\<close>\<close>
 
 lemma greaterThan_0: "greaterThan 0 = range Suc"
   unfolding greaterThan_def
   by (blast dest: gr0_conv_Suc [THEN iffD1])
 
 lemma greaterThan_Suc: "greaterThan (Suc k) = greaterThan k - {Suc k}"
   unfolding greaterThan_def
   by (auto elim: linorder_neqE)
 
 lemma INT_greaterThan_UNIV: "(\<Inter>m::nat. greaterThan m) = {}"
   by blast
 
 subsubsection \<open>The Constant \<^term>\<open>atLeast\<close>\<close>
 
 lemma atLeast_0 [simp]: "atLeast (0::nat) = UNIV"
 by (unfold atLeast_def UNIV_def, simp)
 
 lemma atLeast_Suc: "atLeast (Suc k) = atLeast k - {k}"
   unfolding atLeast_def by (auto simp: order_le_less Suc_le_eq)
 
 lemma atLeast_Suc_greaterThan: "atLeast (Suc k) = greaterThan k"
   by (auto simp add: greaterThan_def atLeast_def less_Suc_eq_le)
 
 lemma UN_atLeast_UNIV: "(\<Union>m::nat. atLeast m) = UNIV"
   by blast
 
 subsubsection \<open>The Constant \<^term>\<open>atMost\<close>\<close>
 
 lemma atMost_0 [simp]: "atMost (0::nat) = {0}"
   by (simp add: atMost_def)
 
 lemma atMost_Suc: "atMost (Suc k) = insert (Suc k) (atMost k)"
   unfolding atMost_def by (auto simp add: less_Suc_eq order_le_less)
 
 lemma UN_atMost_UNIV: "(\<Union>m::nat. atMost m) = UNIV"
   by blast
 
 subsubsection \<open>The Constant \<^term>\<open>atLeastLessThan\<close>\<close>
 
 text\<open>The orientation of the following 2 rules is tricky. The lhs is
 defined in terms of the rhs.  Hence the chosen orientation makes sense
 in this theory --- the reverse orientation complicates proofs (eg
 nontermination). But outside, when the definition of the lhs is rarely
 used, the opposite orientation seems preferable because it reduces a
 specific concept to a more general one.\<close>
 
 lemma atLeast0LessThan [code_abbrev]: "{0::nat..<n} = {..<n}"
   by(simp add:lessThan_def atLeastLessThan_def)
 
 lemma atLeast0AtMost [code_abbrev]: "{0..n::nat} = {..n}"
   by(simp add:atMost_def atLeastAtMost_def)
 
 lemma lessThan_atLeast0: "{..<n} = {0::nat..<n}"
   by (simp add: atLeast0LessThan)
 
 lemma atMost_atLeast0: "{..n} = {0::nat..n}"
   by (simp add: atLeast0AtMost)
 
 lemma atLeastLessThan0: "{m..<0::nat} = {}"
   by (simp add: atLeastLessThan_def)
 
 lemma atLeast0_lessThan_Suc: "{0..<Suc n} = insert n {0..<n}"
   by (simp add: atLeast0LessThan lessThan_Suc)
 
 lemma atLeast0_lessThan_Suc_eq_insert_0: "{0..<Suc n} = insert 0 (Suc ` {0..<n})"
   by (simp add: atLeast0LessThan lessThan_Suc_eq_insert_0)
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>The Constant \<^term>\<open>atLeastAtMost\<close>\<close>
 
 lemma Icc_eq_insert_lb_nat: "m \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> {m..n} = insert m {Suc m..n}"
 by auto
 
 lemma atLeast0_atMost_Suc:
   "{0..Suc n} = insert (Suc n) {0..n}"
   by (simp add: atLeast0AtMost atMost_Suc)
 
 lemma atLeast0_atMost_Suc_eq_insert_0:
   "{0..Suc n} = insert 0 (Suc ` {0..n})"
   by (simp add: atLeast0AtMost atMost_Suc_eq_insert_0)
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Intervals of nats with \<^term>\<open>Suc\<close>\<close>
 
 text\<open>Not a simprule because the RHS is too messy.\<close>
 lemma atLeastLessThanSuc:
     "{m..<Suc n} = (if m \<le> n then insert n {m..<n} else {})"
 by (auto simp add: atLeastLessThan_def)
 
 lemma atLeastLessThan_singleton [simp]: "{m..<Suc m} = {m}"
 by (auto simp add: atLeastLessThan_def)
 
 lemma atLeastLessThanSuc_atLeastAtMost: "{l..<Suc u} = {l..u}"
   by (simp add: lessThan_Suc_atMost atLeastAtMost_def atLeastLessThan_def)
 
 lemma atLeastSucAtMost_greaterThanAtMost: "{Suc l..u} = {l<..u}"
   by (simp add: atLeast_Suc_greaterThan atLeastAtMost_def
       greaterThanAtMost_def)
 
 lemma atLeastSucLessThan_greaterThanLessThan: "{Suc l..<u} = {l<..<u}"
   by (simp add: atLeast_Suc_greaterThan atLeastLessThan_def
     greaterThanLessThan_def)
 
 lemma atLeastAtMostSuc_conv: "m \<le> Suc n \<Longrightarrow> {m..Suc n} = insert (Suc n) {m..n}"
   by auto
 
 lemma atLeastAtMost_insertL: "m \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> insert m {Suc m..n} = {m ..n}"
   by auto
 
 text \<open>The analogous result is useful on \<^typ>\<open>int\<close>:\<close>
 (* here, because we don't have an own int section *)
 lemma atLeastAtMostPlus1_int_conv:
   "m \<le> 1+n \<Longrightarrow> {m..1+n} = insert (1+n) {m..n::int}"
   by (auto intro: set_eqI)
 
 lemma atLeastLessThan_add_Un: "i \<le> j \<Longrightarrow> {i..<j+k} = {i..<j} \<union> {j..<j+k::nat}"
   by (induct k) (simp_all add: atLeastLessThanSuc)
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Intervals and numerals\<close>
 
 lemma lessThan_nat_numeral:  \<comment> \<open>Evaluation for specific numerals\<close>
   "lessThan (numeral k :: nat) = insert (pred_numeral k) (lessThan (pred_numeral k))"
   by (simp add: numeral_eq_Suc lessThan_Suc)
 
 lemma atMost_nat_numeral:  \<comment> \<open>Evaluation for specific numerals\<close>
   "atMost (numeral k :: nat) = insert (numeral k) (atMost (pred_numeral k))"
   by (simp add: numeral_eq_Suc atMost_Suc)
 
 lemma atLeastLessThan_nat_numeral:  \<comment> \<open>Evaluation for specific numerals\<close>
   "atLeastLessThan m (numeral k :: nat) =
      (if m \<le> (pred_numeral k) then insert (pred_numeral k) (atLeastLessThan m (pred_numeral k))
                  else {})"
   by (simp add: numeral_eq_Suc atLeastLessThanSuc)
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Image\<close>
 
 context linordered_semidom
 begin
 
 lemma image_add_atLeast[simp]: "plus k ` {i..} = {k + i..}"
 proof -
   have "n = k + (n - k)" if "i + k \<le> n" for n
   proof -
     have "n = (n - (k + i)) + (k + i)" using that
       by (metis add_commute le_add_diff_inverse)
     then show "n = k + (n - k)"
       by (metis local.add_diff_cancel_left' add_assoc add_commute)
   qed
   then show ?thesis
     by (fastforce simp: add_le_imp_le_diff add.commute)
 qed
 
 lemma image_add_atLeastAtMost [simp]:
   "plus k ` {i..j} = {i + k..j + k}" (is "?A = ?B")
 proof
   show "?A \<subseteq> ?B"
     by (auto simp add: ac_simps)
 next
   show "?B \<subseteq> ?A"
   proof
     fix n
     assume "n \<in> ?B"
     then have "i \<le> n - k"
       by (simp add: add_le_imp_le_diff)
     have "n = n - k + k"
     proof -
       from \<open>n \<in> ?B\<close> have "n = n - (i + k) + (i + k)"
         by simp
       also have "\<dots> = n - k - i + i + k"
         by (simp add: algebra_simps)
       also have "\<dots> = n - k + k"
         using \<open>i \<le> n - k\<close> by simp
       finally show ?thesis .
     qed
     moreover have "n - k \<in> {i..j}"
       using \<open>n \<in> ?B\<close>
       by (auto simp: add_le_imp_le_diff add_le_add_imp_diff_le)
     ultimately show "n \<in> ?A"
       by (simp add: ac_simps) 
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma image_add_atLeastAtMost' [simp]:
   "(\<lambda>n. n + k) ` {i..j} = {i + k..j + k}"
   by (simp add: add.commute [of _ k])
 
 lemma image_add_atLeastLessThan [simp]:
   "plus k ` {i..<j} = {i + k..<j + k}"
   by (simp add: image_set_diff atLeastLessThan_eq_atLeastAtMost_diff ac_simps)
 
 lemma image_add_atLeastLessThan' [simp]:
   "(\<lambda>n. n + k) ` {i..<j} = {i + k..<j + k}"
   by (simp add: add.commute [of _ k])
 
 lemma image_add_greaterThanAtMost[simp]: "(+) c ` {a<..b} = {c + a<..c + b}"
   by (simp add: image_set_diff greaterThanAtMost_eq_atLeastAtMost_diff ac_simps)
 
 end
 
 context ordered_ab_group_add
 begin
 
 lemma
   fixes x :: 'a
   shows image_uminus_greaterThan[simp]: "uminus ` {x<..} = {..<-x}"
   and image_uminus_atLeast[simp]: "uminus ` {x..} = {..-x}"
 proof safe
   fix y assume "y < -x"
   hence *:  "x < -y" using neg_less_iff_less[of "-y" x] by simp
   have "- (-y) \<in> uminus ` {x<..}"
     by (rule imageI) (simp add: *)
   thus "y \<in> uminus ` {x<..}" by simp
 next
   fix y assume "y \<le> -x"
   have "- (-y) \<in> uminus ` {x..}"
     by (rule imageI) (insert \<open>y \<le> -x\<close>[THEN le_imp_neg_le], simp)
   thus "y \<in> uminus ` {x..}" by simp
 qed simp_all
 
 lemma
   fixes x :: 'a
   shows image_uminus_lessThan[simp]: "uminus ` {..<x} = {-x<..}"
   and image_uminus_atMost[simp]: "uminus ` {..x} = {-x..}"
 proof -
   have "uminus ` {..<x} = uminus ` uminus ` {-x<..}"
     and "uminus ` {..x} = uminus ` uminus ` {-x..}" by simp_all
   thus "uminus ` {..<x} = {-x<..}" and "uminus ` {..x} = {-x..}"
     by (simp_all add: image_image
         del: image_uminus_greaterThan image_uminus_atLeast)
 qed
 
 lemma
   fixes x :: 'a
   shows image_uminus_atLeastAtMost[simp]: "uminus ` {x..y} = {-y..-x}"
   and image_uminus_greaterThanAtMost[simp]: "uminus ` {x<..y} = {-y..<-x}"
   and image_uminus_atLeastLessThan[simp]: "uminus ` {x..<y} = {-y<..-x}"
   and image_uminus_greaterThanLessThan[simp]: "uminus ` {x<..<y} = {-y<..<-x}"
   by (simp_all add: atLeastAtMost_def greaterThanAtMost_def atLeastLessThan_def
       greaterThanLessThan_def image_Int[OF inj_uminus] Int_commute)
 
 lemma image_add_atMost[simp]: "(+) c ` {..a} = {..c + a}"
   by (auto intro!: image_eqI[where x="x - c" for x] simp: algebra_simps)
 
 end
 
 lemma image_Suc_atLeastAtMost [simp]:
   "Suc ` {i..j} = {Suc i..Suc j}"
   using image_add_atLeastAtMost [of 1 i j]
     by (simp only: plus_1_eq_Suc) simp
 
 lemma image_Suc_atLeastLessThan [simp]:
   "Suc ` {i..<j} = {Suc i..<Suc j}"
   using image_add_atLeastLessThan [of 1 i j]
     by (simp only: plus_1_eq_Suc) simp
 
 corollary image_Suc_atMost:
   "Suc ` {..n} = {1..Suc n}"
   by (simp add: atMost_atLeast0 atLeastLessThanSuc_atLeastAtMost)
 
 corollary image_Suc_lessThan:
   "Suc ` {..<n} = {1..n}"
   by (simp add: lessThan_atLeast0 atLeastLessThanSuc_atLeastAtMost)
 
 lemma image_diff_atLeastAtMost [simp]:
   fixes d::"'a::linordered_idom" shows "((-) d ` {a..b}) = {d-b..d-a}"
   apply auto
   apply (rule_tac x="d-x" in rev_image_eqI, auto)
   done
 
 lemma image_diff_atLeastLessThan [simp]:
   fixes a b c::"'a::linordered_idom"
   shows "(-) c ` {a..<b} = {c - b<..c - a}"
 proof -
   have "(-) c ` {a..<b} = (+) c ` uminus ` {a ..<b}"
     unfolding image_image by simp
   also have "\<dots> = {c - b<..c - a}" by simp
   finally show ?thesis by simp
 qed
 
 lemma image_minus_const_greaterThanAtMost[simp]:
   fixes a b c::"'a::linordered_idom"
   shows "(-) c ` {a<..b} = {c - b..<c - a}"
 proof -
   have "(-) c ` {a<..b} = (+) c ` uminus ` {a<..b}"
     unfolding image_image by simp
   also have "\<dots> = {c - b..<c - a}" by simp
   finally show ?thesis by simp
 qed
 
 lemma image_minus_const_atLeast[simp]:
   fixes a c::"'a::linordered_idom"
   shows "(-) c ` {a..} = {..c - a}"
 proof -
   have "(-) c ` {a..} = (+) c ` uminus ` {a ..}"
     unfolding image_image by simp
   also have "\<dots> = {..c - a}" by simp
   finally show ?thesis by simp
 qed
 
 lemma image_minus_const_AtMost[simp]:
   fixes b c::"'a::linordered_idom"
   shows "(-) c ` {..b} = {c - b..}"
 proof -
   have "(-) c ` {..b} = (+) c ` uminus ` {..b}"
     unfolding image_image by simp
   also have "\<dots> = {c - b..}" by simp
   finally show ?thesis by simp
 qed
 
 lemma image_minus_const_atLeastAtMost' [simp]:
   "(\<lambda>t. t-d)`{a..b} = {a-d..b-d}" for d::"'a::linordered_idom"
   by (metis (no_types, lifting) diff_conv_add_uminus image_add_atLeastAtMost' image_cong)
 
 context linordered_field
 begin
 
 lemma image_mult_atLeastAtMost [simp]:
   "((*) d ` {a..b}) = {d*a..d*b}" if "d>0"
   using that
   by (auto simp: field_simps mult_le_cancel_right intro: rev_image_eqI [where x="x/d" for x])
 
 lemma image_divide_atLeastAtMost [simp]:
   "((\<lambda>c. c / d) ` {a..b}) = {a/d..b/d}" if "d>0"
 proof -
   from that have "inverse d > 0"
     by simp
   with image_mult_atLeastAtMost [of "inverse d" a b]
   have "(*) (inverse d) ` {a..b} = {inverse d * a..inverse d * b}"
     by blast
   moreover have "(*) (inverse d) = (\<lambda>c. c / d)"
     by (simp add: fun_eq_iff field_simps)
   ultimately show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma image_mult_atLeastAtMost_if:
   "(*) c ` {x .. y} =
     (if c > 0 then {c * x .. c * y} else if x \<le> y then {c * y .. c * x} else {})"
 proof (cases "c = 0 \<or> x > y")
   case True
   then show ?thesis
     by auto
 next
   case False
   then have "x \<le> y"
     by auto
   from False consider "c < 0"| "c > 0"
     by (auto simp add: neq_iff)
   then show ?thesis
   proof cases
     case 1
     have "(*) c ` {x..y} = {c * y..c * x}"
     proof (rule set_eqI)
       fix d
       from 1 have "inj (\<lambda>z. z / c)"
         by (auto intro: injI)
       then have "d \<in> (*) c ` {x..y} \<longleftrightarrow> d / c \<in> (\<lambda>z. z div c) ` (*) c ` {x..y}"
         by (subst inj_image_mem_iff) simp_all
       also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> d / c \<in> {x..y}"
         using 1 by (simp add: image_image)
       also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> d \<in> {c * y..c * x}"
         by (auto simp add: field_simps 1)
       finally show "d \<in> (*) c ` {x..y} \<longleftrightarrow> d \<in> {c * y..c * x}" .
     qed
     with \<open>x \<le> y\<close> show ?thesis
       by auto
   qed (simp add: mult_left_mono_neg)
 qed
 
 lemma image_mult_atLeastAtMost_if':
   "(\<lambda>x. x * c) ` {x..y} =
     (if x \<le> y then if c > 0 then {x * c .. y * c} else {y * c .. x * c} else {})"
   using image_mult_atLeastAtMost_if [of c x y] by (auto simp add: ac_simps)
 
 lemma image_affinity_atLeastAtMost:
   "((\<lambda>x. m * x + c) ` {a..b}) = (if {a..b} = {} then {}
             else if 0 \<le> m then {m * a + c .. m * b + c}
             else {m * b + c .. m * a + c})"
 proof -
   have *: "(\<lambda>x. m * x + c) = ((\<lambda>x. x + c) \<circ> (*) m)"
     by (simp add: fun_eq_iff)
   show ?thesis by (simp only: * image_comp [symmetric] image_mult_atLeastAtMost_if)
     (auto simp add: mult_le_cancel_left)
 qed
 
 lemma image_affinity_atLeastAtMost_diff:
   "((\<lambda>x. m*x - c) ` {a..b}) = (if {a..b}={} then {}
             else if 0 \<le> m then {m*a - c .. m*b - c}
             else {m*b - c .. m*a - c})"
   using image_affinity_atLeastAtMost [of m "-c" a b]
   by simp
 
 lemma image_affinity_atLeastAtMost_div:
   "((\<lambda>x. x/m + c) ` {a..b}) = (if {a..b}={} then {}
             else if 0 \<le> m then {a/m + c .. b/m + c}
             else {b/m + c .. a/m + c})"
   using image_affinity_atLeastAtMost [of "inverse m" c a b]
   by (simp add: field_class.field_divide_inverse algebra_simps inverse_eq_divide)
 
 lemma image_affinity_atLeastAtMost_div_diff:
   "((\<lambda>x. x/m - c) ` {a..b}) = (if {a..b}={} then {}
             else if 0 \<le> m then {a/m - c .. b/m - c}
             else {b/m - c .. a/m - c})"
   using image_affinity_atLeastAtMost_diff [of "inverse m" c a b]
   by (simp add: field_class.field_divide_inverse algebra_simps inverse_eq_divide)
 
 end
 
 lemma atLeast1_lessThan_eq_remove0:
   "{Suc 0..<n} = {..<n} - {0}"
   by auto
 
 lemma atLeast1_atMost_eq_remove0:
   "{Suc 0..n} = {..n} - {0}"
   by auto
 
 lemma image_add_int_atLeastLessThan:
     "(\<lambda>x. x + (l::int)) ` {0..<u-l} = {l..<u}"
   apply (auto simp add: image_def)
   apply (rule_tac x = "x - l" in bexI)
   apply auto
   done
 
 lemma image_minus_const_atLeastLessThan_nat:
   fixes c :: nat
   shows "(\<lambda>i. i - c) ` {x ..< y} =
       (if c < y then {x - c ..< y - c} else if x < y then {0} else {})"
     (is "_ = ?right")
 proof safe
   fix a assume a: "a \<in> ?right"
   show "a \<in> (\<lambda>i. i - c) ` {x ..< y}"
   proof cases
     assume "c < y" with a show ?thesis
       by (auto intro!: image_eqI[of _ _ "a + c"])
   next
     assume "\<not> c < y" with a show ?thesis
       by (auto intro!: image_eqI[of _ _ x] split: if_split_asm)
   qed
 qed auto
 
 lemma image_int_atLeastLessThan:
   "int ` {a..<b} = {int a..<int b}"
   by (auto intro!: image_eqI [where x = "nat x" for x])
 
 lemma image_int_atLeastAtMost:
   "int ` {a..b} = {int a..int b}"
   by (auto intro!: image_eqI [where x = "nat x" for x])
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Finiteness\<close>
 
 lemma finite_lessThan [iff]: fixes k :: nat shows "finite {..<k}"
   by (induct k) (simp_all add: lessThan_Suc)
 
 lemma finite_atMost [iff]: fixes k :: nat shows "finite {..k}"
   by (induct k) (simp_all add: atMost_Suc)
 
 lemma finite_greaterThanLessThan [iff]:
   fixes l :: nat shows "finite {l<..<u}"
   by (simp add: greaterThanLessThan_def)
 
 lemma finite_atLeastLessThan [iff]:
   fixes l :: nat shows "finite {l..<u}"
   by (simp add: atLeastLessThan_def)
 
 lemma finite_greaterThanAtMost [iff]:
   fixes l :: nat shows "finite {l<..u}"
   by (simp add: greaterThanAtMost_def)
 
 lemma finite_atLeastAtMost [iff]:
   fixes l :: nat shows "finite {l..u}"
   by (simp add: atLeastAtMost_def)
 
 text \<open>A bounded set of natural numbers is finite.\<close>
 lemma bounded_nat_set_is_finite: "(\<forall>i\<in>N. i < (n::nat)) \<Longrightarrow> finite N"
   by (rule finite_subset [OF _ finite_lessThan]) auto
 
 text \<open>A set of natural numbers is finite iff it is bounded.\<close>
 lemma finite_nat_set_iff_bounded:
   "finite(N::nat set) = (\<exists>m. \<forall>n\<in>N. n<m)" (is "?F = ?B")
 proof
   assume f:?F  show ?B
     using Max_ge[OF \<open>?F\<close>, simplified less_Suc_eq_le[symmetric]] by blast
 next
   assume ?B show ?F using \<open>?B\<close> by(blast intro:bounded_nat_set_is_finite)
 qed
 
 lemma finite_nat_set_iff_bounded_le: "finite(N::nat set) = (\<exists>m. \<forall>n\<in>N. n\<le>m)"
   unfolding finite_nat_set_iff_bounded
   by (blast dest:less_imp_le_nat le_imp_less_Suc)
 
 lemma finite_less_ub:
      "!!f::nat=>nat. (!!n. n \<le> f n) ==> finite {n. f n \<le> u}"
 by (rule_tac B="{..u}" in finite_subset, auto intro: order_trans)
 
 lemma bounded_Max_nat:
   fixes P :: "nat \<Rightarrow> bool"
   assumes x: "P x" and M: "\<And>x. P x \<Longrightarrow> x \<le> M"
   obtains m where "P m" "\<And>x. P x \<Longrightarrow> x \<le> m"
 proof -
   have "finite {x. P x}"
     using M finite_nat_set_iff_bounded_le by auto
   then have "Max {x. P x} \<in> {x. P x}"
     using Max_in x by auto
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: \<open>finite {x. P x}\<close> that)
 qed
 
 
 text\<open>Any subset of an interval of natural numbers the size of the
 subset is exactly that interval.\<close>
 
 lemma subset_card_intvl_is_intvl:
   assumes "A \<subseteq> {k..<k + card A}"
   shows "A = {k..<k + card A}"
 proof (cases "finite A")
   case True
   from this and assms show ?thesis
   proof (induct A rule: finite_linorder_max_induct)
     case empty thus ?case by auto
   next
     case (insert b A)
     hence *: "b \<notin> A" by auto
     with insert have "A \<le> {k..<k + card A}" and "b = k + card A"
       by fastforce+
     with insert * show ?case by auto
   qed
 next
   case False
   with assms show ?thesis by simp
 qed
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Proving Inclusions and Equalities between Unions\<close>
 
 lemma UN_le_eq_Un0:
   "(\<Union>i\<le>n::nat. M i) = (\<Union>i\<in>{1..n}. M i) \<union> M 0" (is "?A = ?B")
 proof
   show "?A \<subseteq> ?B"
   proof
     fix x assume "x \<in> ?A"
     then obtain i where i: "i\<le>n" "x \<in> M i" by auto
     show "x \<in> ?B"
     proof(cases i)
       case 0 with i show ?thesis by simp
     next
       case (Suc j) with i show ?thesis by auto
     qed
   qed
 next
   show "?B \<subseteq> ?A" by fastforce
 qed
 
 lemma UN_le_add_shift:
   "(\<Union>i\<le>n::nat. M(i+k)) = (\<Union>i\<in>{k..n+k}. M i)" (is "?A = ?B")
 proof
   show "?A \<subseteq> ?B" by fastforce
 next
   show "?B \<subseteq> ?A"
   proof
     fix x assume "x \<in> ?B"
     then obtain i where i: "i \<in> {k..n+k}" "x \<in> M(i)" by auto
     hence "i-k\<le>n \<and> x \<in> M((i-k)+k)" by auto
     thus "x \<in> ?A" by blast
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma UN_le_add_shift_strict:
   "(\<Union>i<n::nat. M(i+k)) = (\<Union>i\<in>{k..<n+k}. M i)" (is "?A = ?B")
 proof
   show "?B \<subseteq> ?A"
   proof
     fix x assume "x \<in> ?B"
     then obtain i where i: "i \<in> {k..<n+k}" "x \<in> M(i)" by auto
     then have "i - k < n \<and> x \<in> M((i-k) + k)" by auto
     then show "x \<in> ?A" using UN_le_add_shift by blast
   qed
 qed (fastforce)
 
 lemma UN_UN_finite_eq: "(\<Union>n::nat. \<Union>i\<in>{0..<n}. A i) = (\<Union>n. A n)"
   by (auto simp add: atLeast0LessThan)
 
 lemma UN_finite_subset:
   "(\<And>n::nat. (\<Union>i\<in>{0..<n}. A i) \<subseteq> C) \<Longrightarrow> (\<Union>n. A n) \<subseteq> C"
   by (subst UN_UN_finite_eq [symmetric]) blast
 
 lemma UN_finite2_subset:
   assumes "\<And>n::nat. (\<Union>i\<in>{0..<n}. A i) \<subseteq> (\<Union>i\<in>{0..<n + k}. B i)"
   shows "(\<Union>n. A n) \<subseteq> (\<Union>n. B n)"
 proof (rule UN_finite_subset, rule)
   fix n and a
   from assms have "(\<Union>i\<in>{0..<n}. A i) \<subseteq> (\<Union>i\<in>{0..<n + k}. B i)" .
   moreover assume "a \<in> (\<Union>i\<in>{0..<n}. A i)"
   ultimately have "a \<in> (\<Union>i\<in>{0..<n + k}. B i)" by blast
   then show "a \<in> (\<Union>i. B i)" by (auto simp add: UN_UN_finite_eq)
 qed
 
 lemma UN_finite2_eq:
   "(\<And>n::nat. (\<Union>i\<in>{0..<n}. A i) = (\<Union>i\<in>{0..<n + k}. B i)) \<Longrightarrow>
     (\<Union>n. A n) = (\<Union>n. B n)"
   apply (rule subset_antisym [OF UN_finite_subset UN_finite2_subset])
    apply auto
   apply (force simp add: atLeastLessThan_add_Un [of 0])+
   done
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Cardinality\<close>
 
 lemma card_lessThan [simp]: "card {..<u} = u"
   by (induct u, simp_all add: lessThan_Suc)
 
 lemma card_atMost [simp]: "card {..u} = Suc u"
   by (simp add: lessThan_Suc_atMost [THEN sym])
 
 lemma card_atLeastLessThan [simp]: "card {l..<u} = u - l"
 proof -
   have "{l..<u} = (\<lambda>x. x + l) ` {..<u-l}"
     apply (auto simp add: image_def atLeastLessThan_def lessThan_def)
     apply (rule_tac x = "x - l" in exI)
     apply arith
     done
   then have "card {l..<u} = card {..<u-l}"
     by (simp add: card_image inj_on_def)
   then show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma card_atLeastAtMost [simp]: "card {l..u} = Suc u - l"
   by (subst atLeastLessThanSuc_atLeastAtMost [THEN sym], simp)
 
 lemma card_greaterThanAtMost [simp]: "card {l<..u} = u - l"
   by (subst atLeastSucAtMost_greaterThanAtMost [THEN sym], simp)
 
 lemma card_greaterThanLessThan [simp]: "card {l<..<u} = u - Suc l"
   by (subst atLeastSucLessThan_greaterThanLessThan [THEN sym], simp)
 
 lemma subset_eq_atLeast0_lessThan_finite:
   fixes n :: nat
   assumes "N \<subseteq> {0..<n}"
   shows "finite N"
   using assms finite_atLeastLessThan by (rule finite_subset)
 
 lemma subset_eq_atLeast0_atMost_finite:
   fixes n :: nat
   assumes "N \<subseteq> {0..n}"
   shows "finite N"
   using assms finite_atLeastAtMost by (rule finite_subset)
 
 lemma ex_bij_betw_nat_finite:
   "finite M \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>h. bij_betw h {0..<card M} M"
   apply(drule finite_imp_nat_seg_image_inj_on)
   apply(auto simp:atLeast0LessThan[symmetric] lessThan_def[symmetric] card_image bij_betw_def)
   done
 
 lemma ex_bij_betw_finite_nat:
   "finite M \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>h. bij_betw h M {0..<card M}"
   by (blast dest: ex_bij_betw_nat_finite bij_betw_inv)
 
 lemma finite_same_card_bij:
   "finite A \<Longrightarrow> finite B \<Longrightarrow> card A = card B \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>h. bij_betw h A B"
   apply(drule ex_bij_betw_finite_nat)
   apply(drule ex_bij_betw_nat_finite)
   apply(auto intro!:bij_betw_trans)
   done
 
 lemma ex_bij_betw_nat_finite_1:
   "finite M \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>h. bij_betw h {1 .. card M} M"
   by (rule finite_same_card_bij) auto
 
 lemma bij_betw_iff_card:
   assumes "finite A" "finite B"
   shows "(\<exists>f. bij_betw f A B) \<longleftrightarrow> (card A = card B)"
 proof
   assume "card A = card B"
   moreover obtain f where "bij_betw f A {0 ..< card A}"
     using assms ex_bij_betw_finite_nat by blast
   moreover obtain g where "bij_betw g {0 ..< card B} B"
     using assms ex_bij_betw_nat_finite by blast
   ultimately have "bij_betw (g \<circ> f) A B"
     by (auto simp: bij_betw_trans)
   thus "(\<exists>f. bij_betw f A B)" by blast
 qed (auto simp: bij_betw_same_card)
 
 lemma subset_eq_atLeast0_lessThan_card:
   fixes n :: nat
   assumes "N \<subseteq> {0..<n}"
   shows "card N \<le> n"
 proof -
   from assms finite_lessThan have "card N \<le> card {0..<n}"
     using card_mono by blast
   then show ?thesis by simp
 qed
 
 text \<open>Relational version of @{thm [source] card_inj_on_le}:\<close>
 lemma card_le_if_inj_on_rel:
 assumes "finite B"
   "\<And>a. a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>b. b\<in>B \<and> r a b"
   "\<And>a1 a2 b. \<lbrakk> a1 \<in> A;  a2 \<in> A;  b \<in> B;  r a1 b;  r a2 b \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> a1 = a2"
 shows "card A \<le> card B"
 proof -
   let ?P = "\<lambda>a b. b \<in> B \<and> r a b"
   let ?f = "\<lambda>a. SOME b. ?P a b"
   have 1: "?f ` A \<subseteq> B"  by (auto intro: someI2_ex[OF assms(2)])
   have "inj_on ?f A"
   proof (auto simp: inj_on_def)
     fix a1 a2 assume asms: "a1 \<in> A" "a2 \<in> A" "?f a1 = ?f a2"
     have 0: "?f a1 \<in> B" using "1" \<open>a1 \<in> A\<close> by blast
     have 1: "r a1 (?f a1)" using someI_ex[OF assms(2)[OF \<open>a1 \<in> A\<close>]] by blast
     have 2: "r a2 (?f a1)" using someI_ex[OF assms(2)[OF \<open>a2 \<in> A\<close>]] asms(3) by auto
     show "a1 = a2" using assms(3)[OF asms(1,2) 0 1 2] .
   qed
   with 1 show ?thesis using card_inj_on_le[of ?f A B] assms(1) by simp
 qed
 
 
 subsection \<open>Intervals of integers\<close>
 
 lemma atLeastLessThanPlusOne_atLeastAtMost_int: "{l..<u+1} = {l..(u::int)}"
   by (auto simp add: atLeastAtMost_def atLeastLessThan_def)
 
 lemma atLeastPlusOneAtMost_greaterThanAtMost_int: "{l+1..u} = {l<..(u::int)}"
   by (auto simp add: atLeastAtMost_def greaterThanAtMost_def)
 
 lemma atLeastPlusOneLessThan_greaterThanLessThan_int:
     "{l+1..<u} = {l<..<u::int}"
   by (auto simp add: atLeastLessThan_def greaterThanLessThan_def)
 
 subsubsection \<open>Finiteness\<close>
 
 lemma image_atLeastZeroLessThan_int: "0 \<le> u ==>
     {(0::int)..<u} = int ` {..<nat u}"
   unfolding image_def lessThan_def
   apply auto
   apply (rule_tac x = "nat x" in exI)
   apply (auto simp add: zless_nat_eq_int_zless [THEN sym])
   done
 
 lemma finite_atLeastZeroLessThan_int: "finite {(0::int)..<u}"
 proof (cases "0 \<le> u")
   case True
   then show ?thesis
     by (auto simp: image_atLeastZeroLessThan_int)
 qed auto
 
 lemma finite_atLeastLessThan_int [iff]: "finite {l..<u::int}"
   by (simp only: image_add_int_atLeastLessThan [symmetric, of l] finite_imageI finite_atLeastZeroLessThan_int)
 
 lemma finite_atLeastAtMost_int [iff]: "finite {l..(u::int)}"
   by (subst atLeastLessThanPlusOne_atLeastAtMost_int [THEN sym], simp)
 
 lemma finite_greaterThanAtMost_int [iff]: "finite {l<..(u::int)}"
   by (subst atLeastPlusOneAtMost_greaterThanAtMost_int [THEN sym], simp)
 
 lemma finite_greaterThanLessThan_int [iff]: "finite {l<..<u::int}"
   by (subst atLeastPlusOneLessThan_greaterThanLessThan_int [THEN sym], simp)
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Cardinality\<close>
 
 lemma card_atLeastZeroLessThan_int: "card {(0::int)..<u} = nat u"
 proof (cases "0 \<le> u")
   case True
   then show ?thesis
     by (auto simp: image_atLeastZeroLessThan_int card_image inj_on_def)    
 qed auto
 
 lemma card_atLeastLessThan_int [simp]: "card {l..<u} = nat (u - l)"
 proof -
   have "card {l..<u} = card {0..<u-l}"
     apply (subst image_add_int_atLeastLessThan [symmetric])
     apply (rule card_image)
     apply (simp add: inj_on_def)
     done
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: card_atLeastZeroLessThan_int)
 qed
 
 lemma card_atLeastAtMost_int [simp]: "card {l..u} = nat (u - l + 1)"
   apply (subst atLeastLessThanPlusOne_atLeastAtMost_int [THEN sym])
   apply (auto simp add: algebra_simps)
   done
 
 lemma card_greaterThanAtMost_int [simp]: "card {l<..u} = nat (u - l)"
   by (subst atLeastPlusOneAtMost_greaterThanAtMost_int [THEN sym], simp)
 
 lemma card_greaterThanLessThan_int [simp]: "card {l<..<u} = nat (u - (l + 1))"
   by (subst atLeastPlusOneLessThan_greaterThanLessThan_int [THEN sym], simp)
 
 lemma finite_M_bounded_by_nat: "finite {k. P k \<and> k < (i::nat)}"
 proof -
   have "{k. P k \<and> k < i} \<subseteq> {..<i}" by auto
   with finite_lessThan[of "i"] show ?thesis by (simp add: finite_subset)
 qed
 
 lemma card_less:
   assumes zero_in_M: "0 \<in> M"
   shows "card {k \<in> M. k < Suc i} \<noteq> 0"
 proof -
   from zero_in_M have "{k \<in> M. k < Suc i} \<noteq> {}" by auto
   with finite_M_bounded_by_nat show ?thesis by (auto simp add: card_eq_0_iff)
 qed
 
 lemma card_less_Suc2: 
   assumes "0 \<notin> M" shows "card {k. Suc k \<in> M \<and> k < i} = card {k \<in> M. k < Suc i}"
 proof -
   have *: "\<lbrakk>j \<in> M; j < Suc i\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> j - Suc 0 < i \<and> Suc (j - Suc 0) \<in> M \<and> Suc 0 \<le> j" for j
     by (cases j) (use assms in auto)
   show ?thesis
   proof (rule card_bij_eq)
     show "inj_on Suc {k. Suc k \<in> M \<and> k < i}"
       by force
     show "inj_on (\<lambda>x. x - Suc 0) {k \<in> M. k < Suc i}"
       by (rule inj_on_diff_nat) (use * in blast)
   qed (use * in auto)
 qed
 
 lemma card_less_Suc:
   assumes "0 \<in> M"
     shows "Suc (card {k. Suc k \<in> M \<and> k < i}) = card {k \<in> M. k < Suc i}"
 proof -
   have "Suc (card {k. Suc k \<in> M \<and> k < i}) = Suc (card {k. Suc k \<in> M - {0} \<and> k < i})"
     by simp
   also have "\<dots> = Suc (card {k \<in> M - {0}. k < Suc i})"
     apply (subst card_less_Suc2)
     using assms by auto
   also have "\<dots> = Suc (card ({k \<in> M. k < Suc i} - {0}))"
     by (force intro: arg_cong [where f=card])
   also have "\<dots> = card (insert 0 ({k \<in> M. k < Suc i} - {0}))"
     by (simp add: card_insert)
   also have "... = card {k \<in> M. k < Suc i}"
     using assms
     by (force simp add: intro: arg_cong [where f=card])
   finally show ?thesis.
 qed
 
 
 subsection \<open>Lemmas useful with the summation operator sum\<close>
 
 text \<open>For examples, see Algebra/poly/UnivPoly2.thy\<close>
 
 subsubsection \<open>Disjoint Unions\<close>
 
 text \<open>Singletons and open intervals\<close>
 
 lemma ivl_disj_un_singleton:
   "{l::'a::linorder} Un {l<..} = {l..}"
   "{..<u} Un {u::'a::linorder} = {..u}"
   "(l::'a::linorder) < u ==> {l} Un {l<..<u} = {l..<u}"
   "(l::'a::linorder) < u ==> {l<..<u} Un {u} = {l<..u}"
   "(l::'a::linorder) \<le> u ==> {l} Un {l<..u} = {l..u}"
   "(l::'a::linorder) \<le> u ==> {l..<u} Un {u} = {l..u}"
 by auto
 
 text \<open>One- and two-sided intervals\<close>
 
 lemma ivl_disj_un_one:
   "(l::'a::linorder) < u ==> {..l} Un {l<..<u} = {..<u}"
   "(l::'a::linorder) \<le> u ==> {..<l} Un {l..<u} = {..<u}"
   "(l::'a::linorder) \<le> u ==> {..l} Un {l<..u} = {..u}"
   "(l::'a::linorder) \<le> u ==> {..<l} Un {l..u} = {..u}"
   "(l::'a::linorder) \<le> u ==> {l<..u} Un {u<..} = {l<..}"
   "(l::'a::linorder) < u ==> {l<..<u} Un {u..} = {l<..}"
   "(l::'a::linorder) \<le> u ==> {l..u} Un {u<..} = {l..}"
   "(l::'a::linorder) \<le> u ==> {l..<u} Un {u..} = {l..}"
 by auto
 
 text \<open>Two- and two-sided intervals\<close>
 
 lemma ivl_disj_un_two:
   "[| (l::'a::linorder) < m; m \<le> u |] ==> {l<..<m} Un {m..<u} = {l<..<u}"
   "[| (l::'a::linorder) \<le> m; m < u |] ==> {l<..m} Un {m<..<u} = {l<..<u}"
   "[| (l::'a::linorder) \<le> m; m \<le> u |] ==> {l..<m} Un {m..<u} = {l..<u}"
   "[| (l::'a::linorder) \<le> m; m < u |] ==> {l..m} Un {m<..<u} = {l..<u}"
   "[| (l::'a::linorder) < m; m \<le> u |] ==> {l<..<m} Un {m..u} = {l<..u}"
   "[| (l::'a::linorder) \<le> m; m \<le> u |] ==> {l<..m} Un {m<..u} = {l<..u}"
   "[| (l::'a::linorder) \<le> m; m \<le> u |] ==> {l..<m} Un {m..u} = {l..u}"
   "[| (l::'a::linorder) \<le> m; m \<le> u |] ==> {l..m} Un {m<..u} = {l..u}"
 by auto
 
 lemma ivl_disj_un_two_touch:
   "[| (l::'a::linorder) < m; m < u |] ==> {l<..m} Un {m..<u} = {l<..<u}"
   "[| (l::'a::linorder) \<le> m; m < u |] ==> {l..m} Un {m..<u} = {l..<u}"
   "[| (l::'a::linorder) < m; m \<le> u |] ==> {l<..m} Un {m..u} = {l<..u}"
   "[| (l::'a::linorder) \<le> m; m \<le> u |] ==> {l..m} Un {m..u} = {l..u}"
 by auto
 
 lemmas ivl_disj_un = ivl_disj_un_singleton ivl_disj_un_one ivl_disj_un_two ivl_disj_un_two_touch
 
 subsubsection \<open>Disjoint Intersections\<close>
 
 text \<open>One- and two-sided intervals\<close>
 
 lemma ivl_disj_int_one:
   "{..l::'a::order} Int {l<..<u} = {}"
   "{..<l} Int {l..<u} = {}"
   "{..l} Int {l<..u} = {}"
   "{..<l} Int {l..u} = {}"
   "{l<..u} Int {u<..} = {}"
   "{l<..<u} Int {u..} = {}"
   "{l..u} Int {u<..} = {}"
   "{l..<u} Int {u..} = {}"
   by auto
 
 text \<open>Two- and two-sided intervals\<close>
 
 lemma ivl_disj_int_two:
   "{l::'a::order<..<m} Int {m..<u} = {}"
   "{l<..m} Int {m<..<u} = {}"
   "{l..<m} Int {m..<u} = {}"
   "{l..m} Int {m<..<u} = {}"
   "{l<..<m} Int {m..u} = {}"
   "{l<..m} Int {m<..u} = {}"
   "{l..<m} Int {m..u} = {}"
   "{l..m} Int {m<..u} = {}"
   by auto
 
 lemmas ivl_disj_int = ivl_disj_int_one ivl_disj_int_two
 
 subsubsection \<open>Some Differences\<close>
 
 lemma ivl_diff[simp]:
  "i \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> {i..<m} - {i..<n} = {n..<(m::'a::linorder)}"
 by(auto)
 
 lemma (in linorder) lessThan_minus_lessThan [simp]:
   "{..< n} - {..< m} = {m ..< n}"
   by auto
 
 lemma (in linorder) atLeastAtMost_diff_ends:
   "{a..b} - {a, b} = {a<..<b}"
   by auto
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Some Subset Conditions\<close>
 
 lemma ivl_subset [simp]: "({i..<j} \<subseteq> {m..<n}) = (j \<le> i \<or> m \<le> i \<and> j \<le> (n::'a::linorder))"
   using linorder_class.le_less_linear[of i n]
   apply (auto simp: linorder_not_le)
    apply (force intro: leI)+
   done
 
 lemma obtain_subset_with_card_n:
   assumes "n \<le> card S"
   obtains T where "T \<subseteq> S" "card T = n" "finite T"
 proof -
   obtain n' where "card S = n + n'" 
     by (metis assms le_add_diff_inverse)
   with that show thesis
   proof (induct n' arbitrary: S)
     case 0 
     then show ?case
       by (cases "finite S") auto
   next
     case Suc 
     then show ?case 
       by (simp add: card_Suc_eq) (metis subset_insertI2)
   qed
 qed
 
 subsection \<open>Generic big monoid operation over intervals\<close>
 
 context semiring_char_0
 begin
 
 lemma inj_on_of_nat [simp]:
   "inj_on of_nat N"
   by rule simp
 
 lemma bij_betw_of_nat [simp]:
   "bij_betw of_nat N A \<longleftrightarrow> of_nat ` N = A"
   by (simp add: bij_betw_def)
 
 end
 
 context comm_monoid_set
 begin
 
 lemma atLeastLessThan_reindex:
   "F g {h m..<h n} = F (g \<circ> h) {m..<n}"
   if "bij_betw h {m..<n} {h m..<h n}" for m n ::nat
 proof -
   from that have "inj_on h {m..<n}" and "h ` {m..<n} = {h m..<h n}"
     by (simp_all add: bij_betw_def)
   then show ?thesis
     using reindex [of h "{m..<n}" g] by simp
 qed
 
 lemma atLeastAtMost_reindex:
   "F g {h m..h n} = F (g \<circ> h) {m..n}"
   if "bij_betw h {m..n} {h m..h n}" for m n ::nat
 proof -
   from that have "inj_on h {m..n}" and "h ` {m..n} = {h m..h n}"
     by (simp_all add: bij_betw_def)
   then show ?thesis
     using reindex [of h "{m..n}" g] by simp
 qed
 
 lemma atLeastLessThan_shift_bounds:
   "F g {m + k..<n + k} = F (g \<circ> plus k) {m..<n}"
   for m n k :: nat
   using atLeastLessThan_reindex [of "plus k" m n g]
   by (simp add: ac_simps)
 
 lemma atLeastAtMost_shift_bounds:
   "F g {m + k..n + k} = F (g \<circ> plus k) {m..n}"
   for m n k :: nat
   using atLeastAtMost_reindex [of "plus k" m n g]
   by (simp add: ac_simps)
 
 lemma atLeast_Suc_lessThan_Suc_shift:
   "F g {Suc m..<Suc n} = F (g \<circ> Suc) {m..<n}"
   using atLeastLessThan_shift_bounds [of _ _ 1]
   by (simp add: plus_1_eq_Suc)
 
 lemma atLeast_Suc_atMost_Suc_shift:
   "F g {Suc m..Suc n} = F (g \<circ> Suc) {m..n}"
   using atLeastAtMost_shift_bounds [of _ _ 1]
   by (simp add: plus_1_eq_Suc)
 
 lemma atLeast_int_lessThan_int_shift:
   "F g {int m..<int n} = F (g \<circ> int) {m..<n}"
   by (rule atLeastLessThan_reindex)
     (simp add: image_int_atLeastLessThan)
 
 lemma atLeast_int_atMost_int_shift:
   "F g {int m..int n} = F (g \<circ> int) {m..n}"
   by (rule atLeastAtMost_reindex)
     (simp add: image_int_atLeastAtMost)
 
 lemma atLeast0_lessThan_Suc:
   "F g {0..<Suc n} = F g {0..<n} \<^bold>* g n"
   by (simp add: atLeast0_lessThan_Suc ac_simps)
 
 lemma atLeast0_atMost_Suc:
   "F g {0..Suc n} = F g {0..n} \<^bold>* g (Suc n)"
   by (simp add: atLeast0_atMost_Suc ac_simps)
 
 lemma atLeast0_lessThan_Suc_shift:
   "F g {0..<Suc n} = g 0 \<^bold>* F (g \<circ> Suc) {0..<n}"
   by (simp add: atLeast0_lessThan_Suc_eq_insert_0 atLeast_Suc_lessThan_Suc_shift)
 
 lemma atLeast0_atMost_Suc_shift:
   "F g {0..Suc n} = g 0 \<^bold>* F (g \<circ> Suc) {0..n}"
   by (simp add: atLeast0_atMost_Suc_eq_insert_0 atLeast_Suc_atMost_Suc_shift)
 
 lemma atLeast_Suc_lessThan:
   "F g {m..<n} = g m \<^bold>* F g {Suc m..<n}" if "m < n"
 proof -
   from that have "{m..<n} = insert m {Suc m..<n}"
     by auto
   then show ?thesis by simp
 qed
 
 lemma atLeast_Suc_atMost:
   "F g {m..n} = g m \<^bold>* F g {Suc m..n}" if "m \<le> n"
 proof -
   from that have "{m..n} = insert m {Suc m..n}"
     by auto
   then show ?thesis by simp
 qed
 
 lemma ivl_cong:
   "a = c \<Longrightarrow> b = d \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>x. c \<le> x \<Longrightarrow> x < d \<Longrightarrow> g x = h x)
     \<Longrightarrow> F g {a..<b} = F h {c..<d}"
   by (rule cong) simp_all
 
 lemma atLeastLessThan_shift_0:
   fixes m n p :: nat
   shows "F g {m..<n} = F (g \<circ> plus m) {0..<n - m}"
   using atLeastLessThan_shift_bounds [of g 0 m "n - m"]
   by (cases "m \<le> n") simp_all
 
 lemma atLeastAtMost_shift_0:
   fixes m n p :: nat
   assumes "m \<le> n"
   shows "F g {m..n} = F (g \<circ> plus m) {0..n - m}"
   using assms atLeastAtMost_shift_bounds [of g 0 m "n - m"] by simp
 
 lemma atLeastLessThan_concat:
   fixes m n p :: nat
   shows "m \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> n \<le> p \<Longrightarrow> F g {m..<n} \<^bold>* F g {n..<p} = F g {m..<p}"
   by (simp add: union_disjoint [symmetric] ivl_disj_un)
 
 lemma atLeastLessThan_rev:
   "F g {n..<m} = F (\<lambda>i. g (m + n - Suc i)) {n..<m}"
   by (rule reindex_bij_witness [where i="\<lambda>i. m + n - Suc i" and j="\<lambda>i. m + n - Suc i"], auto)
 
 lemma atLeastAtMost_rev:
   fixes n m :: nat
   shows "F g {n..m} = F (\<lambda>i. g (m + n - i)) {n..m}"
   by (rule reindex_bij_witness [where i="\<lambda>i. m + n - i" and j="\<lambda>i. m + n - i"]) auto
 
 lemma atLeastLessThan_rev_at_least_Suc_atMost:
   "F g {n..<m} = F (\<lambda>i. g (m + n - i)) {Suc n..m}"
   unfolding atLeastLessThan_rev [of g n m]
   by (cases m) (simp_all add: atLeast_Suc_atMost_Suc_shift atLeastLessThanSuc_atLeastAtMost)
 
 end
 
 
 subsection \<open>Summation indexed over intervals\<close>
 
 syntax (ASCII)
   "_from_to_sum" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"  ("(SUM _ = _.._./ _)" [0,0,0,10] 10)
   "_from_upto_sum" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"  ("(SUM _ = _..<_./ _)" [0,0,0,10] 10)
   "_upt_sum" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"  ("(SUM _<_./ _)" [0,0,10] 10)
   "_upto_sum" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"  ("(SUM _<=_./ _)" [0,0,10] 10)
 
 syntax (latex_sum output)
   "_from_to_sum" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"
  ("(3\<^latex>\<open>$\\sum_{\<close>_ = _\<^latex>\<open>}^{\<close>_\<^latex>\<open>}$\<close> _)" [0,0,0,10] 10)
   "_from_upto_sum" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"
  ("(3\<^latex>\<open>$\\sum_{\<close>_ = _\<^latex>\<open>}^{<\<close>_\<^latex>\<open>}$\<close> _)" [0,0,0,10] 10)
   "_upt_sum" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"
  ("(3\<^latex>\<open>$\\sum_{\<close>_ < _\<^latex>\<open>}$\<close> _)" [0,0,10] 10)
   "_upto_sum" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"
  ("(3\<^latex>\<open>$\\sum_{\<close>_ \<le> _\<^latex>\<open>}$\<close> _)" [0,0,10] 10)
 
 syntax
   "_from_to_sum" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"  ("(3\<Sum>_ = _.._./ _)" [0,0,0,10] 10)
   "_from_upto_sum" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"  ("(3\<Sum>_ = _..<_./ _)" [0,0,0,10] 10)
   "_upt_sum" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"  ("(3\<Sum>_<_./ _)" [0,0,10] 10)
   "_upto_sum" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"  ("(3\<Sum>_\<le>_./ _)" [0,0,10] 10)
 
 translations
   "\<Sum>x=a..b. t" == "CONST sum (\<lambda>x. t) {a..b}"
   "\<Sum>x=a..<b. t" == "CONST sum (\<lambda>x. t) {a..<b}"
   "\<Sum>i\<le>n. t" == "CONST sum (\<lambda>i. t) {..n}"
   "\<Sum>i<n. t" == "CONST sum (\<lambda>i. t) {..<n}"
 
 text\<open>The above introduces some pretty alternative syntaxes for
 summation over intervals:
 \begin{center}
 \begin{tabular}{lll}
 Old & New & \LaTeX\\
 @{term[source]"\<Sum>x\<in>{a..b}. e"} & \<^term>\<open>\<Sum>x=a..b. e\<close> & @{term[mode=latex_sum]"\<Sum>x=a..b. e"}\\
 @{term[source]"\<Sum>x\<in>{a..<b}. e"} & \<^term>\<open>\<Sum>x=a..<b. e\<close> & @{term[mode=latex_sum]"\<Sum>x=a..<b. e"}\\
 @{term[source]"\<Sum>x\<in>{..b}. e"} & \<^term>\<open>\<Sum>x\<le>b. e\<close> & @{term[mode=latex_sum]"\<Sum>x\<le>b. e"}\\
 @{term[source]"\<Sum>x\<in>{..<b}. e"} & \<^term>\<open>\<Sum>x<b. e\<close> & @{term[mode=latex_sum]"\<Sum>x<b. e"}
 \end{tabular}
 \end{center}
 The left column shows the term before introduction of the new syntax,
 the middle column shows the new (default) syntax, and the right column
 shows a special syntax. The latter is only meaningful for latex output
 and has to be activated explicitly by setting the print mode to
 \<open>latex_sum\<close> (e.g.\ via \<open>mode = latex_sum\<close> in
 antiquotations). It is not the default \LaTeX\ output because it only
 works well with italic-style formulae, not tt-style.
 
 Note that for uniformity on \<^typ>\<open>nat\<close> it is better to use
 \<^term>\<open>\<Sum>x::nat=0..<n. e\<close> rather than \<open>\<Sum>x<n. e\<close>: \<open>sum\<close> may
 not provide all lemmas available for \<^term>\<open>{m..<n}\<close> also in the
 special form for \<^term>\<open>{..<n}\<close>.\<close>
 
 text\<open>This congruence rule should be used for sums over intervals as
 the standard theorem @{text[source]sum.cong} does not work well
 with the simplifier who adds the unsimplified premise \<^term>\<open>x\<in>B\<close> to
 the context.\<close>
 
 context comm_monoid_set
 begin
 
 lemma zero_middle:
   assumes "1 \<le> p" "k \<le> p"
   shows "F (\<lambda>j. if j < k then g j else if j = k then \<^bold>1 else h (j - Suc 0)) {..p}
        = F (\<lambda>j. if j < k then g j else h j) {..p - Suc 0}"  (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
 proof -
   have [simp]: "{..p - Suc 0} \<inter> {j. j < k} = {..<k}" "{..p - Suc 0} \<inter> - {j. j < k} = {k..p - Suc 0}"
     using assms by auto
   have "?lhs = F g {..<k} \<^bold>* F (\<lambda>j. if j = k then \<^bold>1 else h (j - Suc 0)) {k..p}"
     using union_disjoint [of "{..<k}" "{k..p}"] assms
     by (simp add: ivl_disj_int_one ivl_disj_un_one)
   also have "\<dots> = F g {..<k} \<^bold>* F (\<lambda>j.  h (j - Suc 0)) {Suc k..p}"
     by (simp add: atLeast_Suc_atMost [of k p] assms)
   also have "\<dots> = F g {..<k} \<^bold>* F h {k .. p - Suc 0}"
     using reindex [of Suc "{k..p - Suc 0}"] assms by simp
   also have "\<dots> = ?rhs"
     by (simp add: If_cases)
   finally show ?thesis .
 qed
 
 lemma atMost_Suc [simp]:
   "F g {..Suc n} = F g {..n} \<^bold>* g (Suc n)"
   by (simp add: atMost_Suc ac_simps)
 
 lemma lessThan_Suc [simp]:
   "F g {..<Suc n} = F g {..<n} \<^bold>* g n"
   by (simp add: lessThan_Suc ac_simps)
 
 lemma cl_ivl_Suc [simp]:
   "F g {m..Suc n} = (if Suc n < m then \<^bold>1 else F g {m..n} \<^bold>* g(Suc n))"
   by (auto simp: ac_simps atLeastAtMostSuc_conv)
 
 lemma op_ivl_Suc [simp]:
   "F g {m..<Suc n} = (if n < m then \<^bold>1 else F g {m..<n} \<^bold>* g(n))"
   by (auto simp: ac_simps atLeastLessThanSuc)
 
 lemma head:
   fixes n :: nat
   assumes mn: "m \<le> n"
   shows "F g {m..n} = g m \<^bold>* F g {m<..n}" (is "?lhs = ?rhs")
 proof -
   from mn
   have "{m..n} = {m} \<union> {m<..n}"
     by (auto intro: ivl_disj_un_singleton)
   hence "?lhs = F g ({m} \<union> {m<..n})"
     by (simp add: atLeast0LessThan)
   also have "\<dots> = ?rhs" by simp
   finally show ?thesis .
 qed
 
 lemma ub_add_nat: 
   assumes "(m::nat) \<le> n + 1"
   shows "F g {m..n + p} = F g {m..n} \<^bold>* F g {n + 1..n + p}"
 proof-
   have "{m .. n+p} = {m..n} \<union> {n+1..n+p}" using \<open>m \<le> n+1\<close> by auto
   thus ?thesis by (auto simp: ivl_disj_int union_disjoint atLeastSucAtMost_greaterThanAtMost)
 qed
 
 lemma nat_group: 
   fixes k::nat shows "F (\<lambda>m. F g {m * k ..< m*k + k}) {..<n} = F g {..< n * k}"
 proof (cases k)
   case (Suc l)
   then have "k > 0"
     by auto
   then show ?thesis
     by (induct n) (simp_all add: atLeastLessThan_concat add.commute atLeast0LessThan[symmetric])
 qed auto   
 
 lemma triangle_reindex:
   fixes n :: nat
   shows "F (\<lambda>(i,j). g i j) {(i,j). i+j < n} = F (\<lambda>k. F (\<lambda>i. g i (k - i)) {..k}) {..<n}"
   apply (simp add: Sigma)
   apply (rule reindex_bij_witness[where j="\<lambda>(i, j). (i+j, i)" and i="\<lambda>(k, i). (i, k - i)"])
   apply auto
   done
 
 lemma triangle_reindex_eq:
   fixes n :: nat
   shows "F (\<lambda>(i,j). g i j) {(i,j). i+j \<le> n} = F (\<lambda>k. F (\<lambda>i. g i (k - i)) {..k}) {..n}"
 using triangle_reindex [of g "Suc n"]
 by (simp only: Nat.less_Suc_eq_le lessThan_Suc_atMost)
 
 lemma nat_diff_reindex: "F (\<lambda>i. g (n - Suc i)) {..<n} = F g {..<n}"
   by (rule reindex_bij_witness[where i="\<lambda>i. n - Suc i" and j="\<lambda>i. n - Suc i"]) auto
 
 lemma shift_bounds_nat_ivl:
   "F g {m+k..<n+k} = F (\<lambda>i. g(i + k)){m..<n::nat}"
 by (induct "n", auto simp: atLeastLessThanSuc)
 
 lemma shift_bounds_cl_nat_ivl:
   "F g {m+k..n+k} = F (\<lambda>i. g(i + k)){m..n::nat}"
   by (rule reindex_bij_witness[where i="\<lambda>i. i + k" and j="\<lambda>i. i - k"]) auto
 
 corollary shift_bounds_cl_Suc_ivl:
   "F g {Suc m..Suc n} = F (\<lambda>i. g(Suc i)){m..n}"
 by (simp add: shift_bounds_cl_nat_ivl[where k="Suc 0", simplified])
 
 corollary Suc_reindex_ivl: "m \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> F g {m..n} \<^bold>* g (Suc n) = g m \<^bold>* F (\<lambda>i. g (Suc i)) {m..n}"
   by (simp add: assoc atLeast_Suc_atMost flip: shift_bounds_cl_Suc_ivl)
 
 corollary shift_bounds_Suc_ivl:
   "F g {Suc m..<Suc n} = F (\<lambda>i. g(Suc i)){m..<n}"
 by (simp add: shift_bounds_nat_ivl[where k="Suc 0", simplified])
 
 lemma atMost_Suc_shift:
   shows "F g {..Suc n} = g 0 \<^bold>* F (\<lambda>i. g (Suc i)) {..n}"
 proof (induct n)
   case 0 show ?case by simp
 next
   case (Suc n) note IH = this
   have "F g {..Suc (Suc n)} = F g {..Suc n} \<^bold>* g (Suc (Suc n))"
     by (rule atMost_Suc)
   also have "F g {..Suc n}  = g 0 \<^bold>* F (\<lambda>i. g (Suc i)) {..n}"
     by (rule IH)
   also have "g 0 \<^bold>* F (\<lambda>i. g (Suc i)) {..n} \<^bold>* g (Suc (Suc n)) =
              g 0 \<^bold>* (F (\<lambda>i. g (Suc i)) {..n} \<^bold>* g (Suc (Suc n)))"
     by (rule assoc)
   also have "F (\<lambda>i. g (Suc i)) {..n} \<^bold>* g (Suc (Suc n)) = F (\<lambda>i. g (Suc i)) {..Suc n}"
     by (rule atMost_Suc [symmetric])
   finally show ?case .
 qed
 
 lemma lessThan_Suc_shift:
   "F g {..<Suc n} = g 0 \<^bold>* F (\<lambda>i. g (Suc i)) {..<n}"
   by (induction n) (simp_all add: ac_simps)
 
 lemma atMost_shift:
   "F g {..n} = g 0 \<^bold>* F (\<lambda>i. g (Suc i)) {..<n}"
   by (metis atLeast0AtMost atLeast0LessThan atLeastLessThanSuc_atLeastAtMost 
        atLeastSucAtMost_greaterThanAtMost le0 head shift_bounds_Suc_ivl)
 
 lemma last_plus: 
   fixes n::nat  shows "m \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> F g {m..n} = g n \<^bold>* F g {m..<n}"
   by (cases n) (auto simp: atLeastLessThanSuc_atLeastAtMost commute)
 
 lemma nested_swap:
      "F (\<lambda>i. F (\<lambda>j. a i j) {0..<i}) {0..n} = F (\<lambda>j. F (\<lambda>i. a i j) {Suc j..n}) {0..<n}"
   by (induction n) (auto simp: distrib)
 
 lemma nested_swap':
      "F (\<lambda>i. F (\<lambda>j. a i j) {..<i}) {..n} = F (\<lambda>j. F (\<lambda>i. a i j) {Suc j..n}) {..<n}"
   by (induction n) (auto simp: distrib)
 
 lemma atLeast1_atMost_eq:
   "F g {Suc 0..n} = F (\<lambda>k. g (Suc k)) {..<n}"
 proof -
   have "F g {Suc 0..n} = F g (Suc ` {..<n})"
     by (simp add: image_Suc_lessThan)
   also have "\<dots> = F (\<lambda>k. g (Suc k)) {..<n}"
     by (simp add: reindex)
   finally show ?thesis .
 qed
 
 lemma atLeastLessThan_Suc: "a \<le> b \<Longrightarrow> F g {a..<Suc b} = F g {a..<b} \<^bold>* g b"
   by (simp add: atLeastLessThanSuc commute)
 
 lemma nat_ivl_Suc':
   assumes "m \<le> Suc n"
   shows   "F g {m..Suc n} = g (Suc n) \<^bold>* F g {m..n}"
 proof -
   from assms have "{m..Suc n} = insert (Suc n) {m..n}" by auto
   also have "F g \<dots> = g (Suc n) \<^bold>* F g {m..n}" by simp
   finally show ?thesis .
 qed
 
 lemma in_pairs: "F g {2*m..Suc(2*n)} = F (\<lambda>i. g(2*i) \<^bold>* g(Suc(2*i))) {m..n}"
 proof (induction n)
   case 0
   show ?case
     by (cases "m=0") auto
 next
   case (Suc n)
   then show ?case
     by (auto simp: assoc split: if_split_asm)
 qed
 
 lemma in_pairs_0: "F g {..Suc(2*n)} = F (\<lambda>i. g(2*i) \<^bold>* g(Suc(2*i))) {..n}"
   using in_pairs [of _ 0 n] by (simp add: atLeast0AtMost)
 
 end
 
 lemma sum_natinterval_diff:
   fixes f:: "nat \<Rightarrow> ('a::ab_group_add)"
   shows  "sum (\<lambda>k. f k - f(k + 1)) {(m::nat) .. n} =
           (if m \<le> n then f m - f(n + 1) else 0)"
 by (induct n, auto simp add: algebra_simps not_le le_Suc_eq)
 
 lemma sum_diff_nat_ivl:
   fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::ab_group_add"
   shows "\<lbrakk> m \<le> n; n \<le> p \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> sum f {m..<p} - sum f {m..<n} = sum f {n..<p}"
   using sum.atLeastLessThan_concat [of m n p f,symmetric]
   by (simp add: ac_simps)
 
 lemma sum_diff_distrib: "\<forall>x. Q x \<le> P x  \<Longrightarrow> (\<Sum>x<n. P x) - (\<Sum>x<n. Q x) = (\<Sum>x<n. P x - Q x :: nat)"
   by (subst sum_subtractf_nat) auto
 
 
 context unique_euclidean_semiring_with_bit_shifts
 begin
 
 lemma take_bit_sum:
   "take_bit n a = (\<Sum>k = 0..<n. push_bit k (of_bool (bit a k)))"
   for n :: nat
 proof (induction n arbitrary: a)
   case 0
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case (Suc n)
   have "(\<Sum>k = 0..<Suc n. push_bit k (of_bool (bit a k))) = 
     of_bool (odd a) + (\<Sum>k = Suc 0..<Suc n. push_bit k (of_bool (bit a k)))"
     by (simp add: sum.atLeast_Suc_lessThan ac_simps)
   also have "(\<Sum>k = Suc 0..<Suc n. push_bit k (of_bool (bit a k)))
     = (\<Sum>k = 0..<n. push_bit k (of_bool (bit (a div 2) k))) * 2"
     by (simp only: sum.atLeast_Suc_lessThan_Suc_shift) (simp add: sum_distrib_right push_bit_double drop_bit_Suc bit_Suc)
   finally show ?case
-    using Suc [of "a div 2"] by (simp add: ac_simps take_bit_Suc)
+    using Suc [of "a div 2"] by (simp add: ac_simps take_bit_Suc mod_2_eq_odd)
 qed
 
 end
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Shifting bounds\<close>
 
 context comm_monoid_add
 begin
 
 context
   fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a"
   assumes "f 0 = 0"
 begin
 
 lemma sum_shift_lb_Suc0_0_upt:
   "sum f {Suc 0..<k} = sum f {0..<k}"
 proof (cases k)
   case 0
   then show ?thesis
     by simp
 next
   case (Suc k)
   moreover have "{0..<Suc k} = insert 0 {Suc 0..<Suc k}"
     by auto
   ultimately show ?thesis
     using \<open>f 0 = 0\<close> by simp
 qed
 
 lemma sum_shift_lb_Suc0_0: "sum f {Suc 0..k} = sum f {0..k}"
 proof (cases k)
   case 0
   with \<open>f 0 = 0\<close> show ?thesis
     by simp
 next
   case (Suc k)
   moreover have "{0..Suc k} = insert 0 {Suc 0..Suc k}"
     by auto
   ultimately show ?thesis
     using \<open>f 0 = 0\<close> by simp
 qed
 
 end
 
 end
 
 lemma sum_Suc_diff:
   fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::ab_group_add"
   assumes "m \<le> Suc n"
   shows "(\<Sum>i = m..n. f(Suc i) - f i) = f (Suc n) - f m"
 using assms by (induct n) (auto simp: le_Suc_eq)
 
 lemma sum_Suc_diff':
   fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::ab_group_add"
   assumes "m \<le> n"
   shows "(\<Sum>i = m..<n. f (Suc i) - f i) = f n - f m"
 using assms by (induct n) (auto simp: le_Suc_eq)
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Telescoping\<close>
 
 lemma sum_telescope:
   fixes f::"nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::ab_group_add"
   shows "sum (\<lambda>i. f i - f (Suc i)) {.. i} = f 0 - f (Suc i)"
   by (induct i) simp_all
 
 lemma sum_telescope'':
   assumes "m \<le> n"
   shows   "(\<Sum>k\<in>{Suc m..n}. f k - f (k - 1)) = f n - (f m :: 'a :: ab_group_add)"
   by (rule dec_induct[OF assms]) (simp_all add: algebra_simps)
 
 lemma sum_lessThan_telescope:
   "(\<Sum>n<m. f (Suc n) - f n :: 'a :: ab_group_add) = f m - f 0"
   by (induction m) (simp_all add: algebra_simps)
 
 lemma sum_lessThan_telescope':
   "(\<Sum>n<m. f n - f (Suc n) :: 'a :: ab_group_add) = f 0 - f m"
   by (induction m) (simp_all add: algebra_simps)
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>The formula for geometric sums\<close>
 
 lemma sum_power2: "(\<Sum>i=0..<k. (2::nat)^i) = 2^k-1"
 by (induction k) (auto simp: mult_2)
 
 lemma geometric_sum:
   assumes "x \<noteq> 1"
   shows "(\<Sum>i<n. x ^ i) = (x ^ n - 1) / (x - 1::'a::field)"
 proof -
   from assms obtain y where "y = x - 1" and "y \<noteq> 0" by simp_all
   moreover have "(\<Sum>i<n. (y + 1) ^ i) = ((y + 1) ^ n - 1) / y"
     by (induct n) (simp_all add: field_simps \<open>y \<noteq> 0\<close>)
   ultimately show ?thesis by simp
 qed
 
 lemma diff_power_eq_sum:
   fixes y :: "'a::{comm_ring,monoid_mult}"
   shows
     "x ^ (Suc n) - y ^ (Suc n) =
       (x - y) * (\<Sum>p<Suc n. (x ^ p) * y ^ (n - p))"
 proof (induct n)
   case (Suc n)
   have "x ^ Suc (Suc n) - y ^ Suc (Suc n) = x * (x * x^n) - y * (y * y ^ n)"
     by simp
   also have "... = y * (x ^ (Suc n) - y ^ (Suc n)) + (x - y) * (x * x^n)"
     by (simp add: algebra_simps)
   also have "... = y * ((x - y) * (\<Sum>p<Suc n. (x ^ p) * y ^ (n - p))) + (x - y) * (x * x^n)"
     by (simp only: Suc)
   also have "... = (x - y) * (y * (\<Sum>p<Suc n. (x ^ p) * y ^ (n - p))) + (x - y) * (x * x^n)"
     by (simp only: mult.left_commute)
   also have "... = (x - y) * (\<Sum>p<Suc (Suc n). x ^ p * y ^ (Suc n - p))"
     by (simp add: field_simps Suc_diff_le sum_distrib_right sum_distrib_left)
   finally show ?case .
 qed simp
 
 corollary power_diff_sumr2: \<comment> \<open>\<open>COMPLEX_POLYFUN\<close> in HOL Light\<close>
   fixes x :: "'a::{comm_ring,monoid_mult}"
   shows   "x^n - y^n = (x - y) * (\<Sum>i<n. y^(n - Suc i) * x^i)"
 using diff_power_eq_sum[of x "n - 1" y]
 by (cases "n = 0") (simp_all add: field_simps)
 
 lemma power_diff_1_eq:
   fixes x :: "'a::{comm_ring,monoid_mult}"
   shows "n \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> x^n - 1 = (x - 1) * (\<Sum>i<n. (x^i))"
 using diff_power_eq_sum [of x _ 1]
   by (cases n) auto
 
 lemma one_diff_power_eq':
   fixes x :: "'a::{comm_ring,monoid_mult}"
   shows "n \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> 1 - x^n = (1 - x) * (\<Sum>i<n. x^(n - Suc i))"
 using diff_power_eq_sum [of 1 _ x]
   by (cases n) auto
 
 lemma one_diff_power_eq:
   fixes x :: "'a::{comm_ring,monoid_mult}"
   shows "n \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> 1 - x^n = (1 - x) * (\<Sum>i<n. x^i)"
 by (metis one_diff_power_eq' [of n x] sum.nat_diff_reindex)
 
 lemma sum_gp_basic:
   fixes x :: "'a::{comm_ring,monoid_mult}"
   shows "(1 - x) * (\<Sum>i\<le>n. x^i) = 1 - x^Suc n"
   by (simp only: one_diff_power_eq [of "Suc n" x] lessThan_Suc_atMost)
 
 lemma sum_power_shift:
   fixes x :: "'a::{comm_ring,monoid_mult}"
   assumes "m \<le> n"
   shows "(\<Sum>i=m..n. x^i) = x^m * (\<Sum>i\<le>n-m. x^i)"
 proof -
   have "(\<Sum>i=m..n. x^i) = x^m * (\<Sum>i=m..n. x^(i-m))"
     by (simp add: sum_distrib_left power_add [symmetric])
   also have "(\<Sum>i=m..n. x^(i-m)) = (\<Sum>i\<le>n-m. x^i)"
     using \<open>m \<le> n\<close> by (intro sum.reindex_bij_witness[where j="\<lambda>i. i - m" and i="\<lambda>i. i + m"]) auto
   finally show ?thesis .
 qed
 
 lemma sum_gp_multiplied:
   fixes x :: "'a::{comm_ring,monoid_mult}"
   assumes "m \<le> n"
   shows "(1 - x) * (\<Sum>i=m..n. x^i) = x^m - x^Suc n"
 proof -
   have  "(1 - x) * (\<Sum>i=m..n. x^i) = x^m * (1 - x) * (\<Sum>i\<le>n-m. x^i)"
     by (metis mult.assoc mult.commute assms sum_power_shift)
   also have "... =x^m * (1 - x^Suc(n-m))"
     by (metis mult.assoc sum_gp_basic)
   also have "... = x^m - x^Suc n"
     using assms
     by (simp add: algebra_simps) (metis le_add_diff_inverse power_add)
   finally show ?thesis .
 qed
 
 lemma sum_gp:
   fixes x :: "'a::{comm_ring,division_ring}"
   shows   "(\<Sum>i=m..n. x^i) =
                (if n < m then 0
                 else if x = 1 then of_nat((n + 1) - m)
                 else (x^m - x^Suc n) / (1 - x))"
 using sum_gp_multiplied [of m n x] apply auto
 by (metis eq_iff_diff_eq_0 mult.commute nonzero_divide_eq_eq)
 
 
 subsubsection\<open>Geometric progressions\<close>
 
 lemma sum_gp0:
   fixes x :: "'a::{comm_ring,division_ring}"
   shows "(\<Sum>i\<le>n. x^i) = (if x = 1 then of_nat(n + 1) else (1 - x^Suc n) / (1 - x))"
   using sum_gp_basic[of x n]
   by (simp add: mult.commute field_split_simps)
 
 lemma sum_power_add:
   fixes x :: "'a::{comm_ring,monoid_mult}"
   shows "(\<Sum>i\<in>I. x^(m+i)) = x^m * (\<Sum>i\<in>I. x^i)"
   by (simp add: sum_distrib_left power_add)
 
 lemma sum_gp_offset:
   fixes x :: "'a::{comm_ring,division_ring}"
   shows   "(\<Sum>i=m..m+n. x^i) =
        (if x = 1 then of_nat n + 1 else x^m * (1 - x^Suc n) / (1 - x))"
   using sum_gp [of x m "m+n"]
   by (auto simp: power_add algebra_simps)
 
 lemma sum_gp_strict:
   fixes x :: "'a::{comm_ring,division_ring}"
   shows "(\<Sum>i<n. x^i) = (if x = 1 then of_nat n else (1 - x^n) / (1 - x))"
   by (induct n) (auto simp: algebra_simps field_split_simps)
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>The formulae for arithmetic sums\<close>
 
 context comm_semiring_1
 begin
 
 lemma double_gauss_sum:
   "2 * (\<Sum>i = 0..n. of_nat i) = of_nat n * (of_nat n + 1)"
   by (induct n) (simp_all add: sum.atLeast0_atMost_Suc algebra_simps left_add_twice)
 
 lemma double_gauss_sum_from_Suc_0:
   "2 * (\<Sum>i = Suc 0..n. of_nat i) = of_nat n * (of_nat n + 1)"
 proof -
   have "sum of_nat {Suc 0..n} = sum of_nat (insert 0 {Suc 0..n})"
     by simp
   also have "\<dots> = sum of_nat {0..n}"
     by (cases n) (simp_all add: atLeast0_atMost_Suc_eq_insert_0)
   finally show ?thesis
     by (simp add: double_gauss_sum)
 qed
 
 lemma double_arith_series:
   "2 * (\<Sum>i = 0..n. a + of_nat i * d) = (of_nat n + 1) * (2 * a + of_nat n * d)"
 proof -
   have "(\<Sum>i = 0..n. a + of_nat i * d) = ((\<Sum>i = 0..n. a) + (\<Sum>i = 0..n. of_nat i * d))"
     by (rule sum.distrib)
   also have "\<dots> = (of_nat (Suc n) * a + d * (\<Sum>i = 0..n. of_nat i))"
     by (simp add: sum_distrib_left algebra_simps)
   finally show ?thesis
     by (simp add: algebra_simps double_gauss_sum left_add_twice)
 qed
 
 end
 
 context unique_euclidean_semiring_with_nat
 begin
 
 lemma gauss_sum:
   "(\<Sum>i = 0..n. of_nat i) = of_nat n * (of_nat n + 1) div 2"
   using double_gauss_sum [of n, symmetric] by simp
 
 lemma gauss_sum_from_Suc_0:
   "(\<Sum>i = Suc 0..n. of_nat i) = of_nat n * (of_nat n + 1) div 2"
   using double_gauss_sum_from_Suc_0 [of n, symmetric] by simp
 
 lemma arith_series:
   "(\<Sum>i = 0..n. a + of_nat i * d) = (of_nat n + 1) * (2 * a + of_nat n * d) div 2"
   using double_arith_series [of a d n, symmetric] by simp
 
 end
 
 lemma gauss_sum_nat:
   "\<Sum>{0..n} = (n * Suc n) div 2"
   using gauss_sum [of n, where ?'a = nat] by simp
 
 lemma arith_series_nat:
   "(\<Sum>i = 0..n. a + i * d) = Suc n * (2 * a + n * d) div 2"
   using arith_series [of a d n] by simp
 
 lemma Sum_Icc_int:
   "\<Sum>{m..n} = (n * (n + 1) - m * (m - 1)) div 2"
   if "m \<le> n" for m n :: int
 using that proof (induct i \<equiv> "nat (n - m)" arbitrary: m n)
   case 0
   then have "m = n"
     by arith
   then show ?case
     by (simp add: algebra_simps mult_2 [symmetric])
 next
   case (Suc i)
   have 0: "i = nat((n-1) - m)" "m \<le> n-1" using Suc(2,3) by arith+
   have "\<Sum> {m..n} = \<Sum> {m..1+(n-1)}" by simp
   also have "\<dots> = \<Sum> {m..n-1} + n" using \<open>m \<le> n\<close>
     by(subst atLeastAtMostPlus1_int_conv) simp_all
   also have "\<dots> = ((n-1)*(n-1+1) - m*(m-1)) div 2 + n"
     by(simp add: Suc(1)[OF 0])
   also have "\<dots> = ((n-1)*(n-1+1) - m*(m-1) + 2*n) div 2" by simp
   also have "\<dots> = (n*(n+1) - m*(m-1)) div 2"
     by (simp add: algebra_simps mult_2_right)
   finally show ?case .
 qed
 
 lemma Sum_Icc_nat:
   "\<Sum>{m..n} = (n * (n + 1) - m * (m - 1)) div 2" for m n :: nat
 proof (cases "m \<le> n")
   case True
   then have *: "m * (m - 1) \<le> n * (n + 1)"
     by (meson diff_le_self order_trans le_add1 mult_le_mono)
   have "int (\<Sum>{m..n}) = (\<Sum>{int m..int n})"
     by (simp add: sum.atLeast_int_atMost_int_shift)
   also have "\<dots> = (int n * (int n + 1) - int m * (int m - 1)) div 2"
     using \<open>m \<le> n\<close> by (simp add: Sum_Icc_int)
   also have "\<dots> = int ((n * (n + 1) - m * (m - 1)) div 2)"
     using le_square * by (simp add: algebra_simps of_nat_div of_nat_diff)
   finally show ?thesis
     by (simp only: of_nat_eq_iff)
 next
   case False
   then show ?thesis
     by (auto dest: less_imp_Suc_add simp add: not_le algebra_simps)
 qed
 
 lemma Sum_Ico_nat: 
   "\<Sum>{m..<n} = (n * (n - 1) - m * (m - 1)) div 2" for m n :: nat
   by (cases n) (simp_all add: atLeastLessThanSuc_atLeastAtMost Sum_Icc_nat)
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Division remainder\<close>
 
 lemma range_mod:
   fixes n :: nat
   assumes "n > 0"
   shows "range (\<lambda>m. m mod n) = {0..<n}" (is "?A = ?B")
 proof (rule set_eqI)
   fix m
   show "m \<in> ?A \<longleftrightarrow> m \<in> ?B"
   proof
     assume "m \<in> ?A"
     with assms show "m \<in> ?B"
       by auto
   next
     assume "m \<in> ?B"
     moreover have "m mod n \<in> ?A"
       by (rule rangeI)
     ultimately show "m \<in> ?A"
       by simp
   qed
 qed
 
 
 subsection \<open>Products indexed over intervals\<close>
 
 syntax (ASCII)
   "_from_to_prod" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"  ("(PROD _ = _.._./ _)" [0,0,0,10] 10)
   "_from_upto_prod" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"  ("(PROD _ = _..<_./ _)" [0,0,0,10] 10)
   "_upt_prod" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"  ("(PROD _<_./ _)" [0,0,10] 10)
   "_upto_prod" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"  ("(PROD _<=_./ _)" [0,0,10] 10)
 
 syntax (latex_prod output)
   "_from_to_prod" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"
  ("(3\<^latex>\<open>$\\prod_{\<close>_ = _\<^latex>\<open>}^{\<close>_\<^latex>\<open>}$\<close> _)" [0,0,0,10] 10)
   "_from_upto_prod" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"
  ("(3\<^latex>\<open>$\\prod_{\<close>_ = _\<^latex>\<open>}^{<\<close>_\<^latex>\<open>}$\<close> _)" [0,0,0,10] 10)
   "_upt_prod" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"
  ("(3\<^latex>\<open>$\\prod_{\<close>_ < _\<^latex>\<open>}$\<close> _)" [0,0,10] 10)
   "_upto_prod" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"
  ("(3\<^latex>\<open>$\\prod_{\<close>_ \<le> _\<^latex>\<open>}$\<close> _)" [0,0,10] 10)
 
 syntax
   "_from_to_prod" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"  ("(3\<Prod>_ = _.._./ _)" [0,0,0,10] 10)
   "_from_upto_prod" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"  ("(3\<Prod>_ = _..<_./ _)" [0,0,0,10] 10)
   "_upt_prod" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"  ("(3\<Prod>_<_./ _)" [0,0,10] 10)
   "_upto_prod" :: "idt \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"  ("(3\<Prod>_\<le>_./ _)" [0,0,10] 10)
 
 translations
   "\<Prod>x=a..b. t" \<rightleftharpoons> "CONST prod (\<lambda>x. t) {a..b}"
   "\<Prod>x=a..<b. t" \<rightleftharpoons> "CONST prod (\<lambda>x. t) {a..<b}"
   "\<Prod>i\<le>n. t" \<rightleftharpoons> "CONST prod (\<lambda>i. t) {..n}"
   "\<Prod>i<n. t" \<rightleftharpoons> "CONST prod (\<lambda>i. t) {..<n}"
 
 lemma prod_int_plus_eq: "prod int {i..i+j} =  \<Prod>{int i..int (i+j)}"
   by (induct j) (auto simp add: atLeastAtMostSuc_conv atLeastAtMostPlus1_int_conv)
 
 lemma prod_int_eq: "prod int {i..j} =  \<Prod>{int i..int j}"
 proof (cases "i \<le> j")
   case True
   then show ?thesis
     by (metis le_iff_add prod_int_plus_eq)
 next
   case False
   then show ?thesis
     by auto
 qed
 
 subsection \<open>Efficient folding over intervals\<close>
 
 function fold_atLeastAtMost_nat where
   [simp del]: "fold_atLeastAtMost_nat f a (b::nat) acc =
                  (if a > b then acc else fold_atLeastAtMost_nat f (a+1) b (f a acc))"
 by pat_completeness auto
 termination by (relation "measure (\<lambda>(_,a,b,_). Suc b - a)") auto
 
 lemma fold_atLeastAtMost_nat:
   assumes "comp_fun_commute f"
   shows   "fold_atLeastAtMost_nat f a b acc = Finite_Set.fold f acc {a..b}"
 using assms
 proof (induction f a b acc rule: fold_atLeastAtMost_nat.induct, goal_cases)
   case (1 f a b acc)
   interpret comp_fun_commute f by fact
   show ?case
   proof (cases "a > b")
     case True
     thus ?thesis by (subst fold_atLeastAtMost_nat.simps) auto
   next
     case False
     with 1 show ?thesis
       by (subst fold_atLeastAtMost_nat.simps)
          (auto simp: atLeastAtMost_insertL[symmetric] fold_fun_left_comm)
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma sum_atLeastAtMost_code:
   "sum f {a..b} = fold_atLeastAtMost_nat (\<lambda>a acc. f a + acc) a b 0"
 proof -
   have "comp_fun_commute (\<lambda>a. (+) (f a))"
     by unfold_locales (auto simp: o_def add_ac)
   thus ?thesis
     by (simp add: sum.eq_fold fold_atLeastAtMost_nat o_def)
 qed
 
 lemma prod_atLeastAtMost_code:
   "prod f {a..b} = fold_atLeastAtMost_nat (\<lambda>a acc. f a * acc) a b 1"
 proof -
   have "comp_fun_commute (\<lambda>a. (*) (f a))"
     by unfold_locales (auto simp: o_def mult_ac)
   thus ?thesis
     by (simp add: prod.eq_fold fold_atLeastAtMost_nat o_def)
 qed
 
 (* TODO: Add support for folding over more kinds of intervals here *)
 
 end
diff --git a/src/HOL/String.thy b/src/HOL/String.thy
--- a/src/HOL/String.thy
+++ b/src/HOL/String.thy
@@ -1,829 +1,829 @@
 (* Author: Tobias Nipkow, Florian Haftmann, TU Muenchen *)
 
 section \<open>Character and string types\<close>
 
 theory String
 imports Enum
 begin
 
 subsection \<open>Strings as list of bytes\<close>
 
 text \<open>
   When modelling strings, we follow the approach given
   in \<^url>\<open>https://utf8everywhere.org/\<close>:
 
   \<^item> Strings are a list of bytes (8 bit).
 
   \<^item> Byte values from 0 to 127 are US-ASCII.
 
   \<^item> Byte values from 128 to 255 are uninterpreted blobs.
 \<close>
 
 subsubsection \<open>Bytes as datatype\<close>
 
 context unique_euclidean_semiring_with_bit_shifts
 begin
 
 lemma bit_horner_sum_iff:
   \<open>bit (foldr (\<lambda>b k. of_bool b + k * 2) bs 0) n \<longleftrightarrow> n < length bs \<and> bs ! n\<close>
 proof (induction bs arbitrary: n)
   case Nil
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case (Cons b bs)
   show ?case
   proof (cases n)
     case 0
     then show ?thesis
       by simp
   next
     case (Suc m)
     with bit_rec [of _ n] Cons.prems Cons.IH [of m]
     show ?thesis by simp
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma take_bit_horner_sum_eq:
   \<open>take_bit n (foldr (\<lambda>b k. of_bool b + k * 2) bs 0) = foldr (\<lambda>b k. of_bool b + k * 2) (take n bs) 0\<close>
 proof (induction bs arbitrary: n)
   case Nil
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case (Cons b bs)
   show ?case
   proof (cases n)
     case 0
     then show ?thesis
       by simp
   next
     case (Suc m)
     with take_bit_rec [of n] Cons.prems Cons.IH [of m]
     show ?thesis by (simp add: ac_simps)
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma (in semiring_bit_shifts) take_bit_eq_horner_sum:
   \<open>take_bit n a = foldr (\<lambda>b k. of_bool b + k * 2) (map (bit a) [0..<n]) 0\<close>
 proof (induction a arbitrary: n rule: bits_induct)
   case (stable a)
   have *: \<open>((\<lambda>k. k * 2) ^^ n) 0 = 0\<close>
     by (induction n) simp_all
   from stable have \<open>bit a = (\<lambda>_. odd a)\<close>
     by (simp add: stable_imp_bit_iff_odd fun_eq_iff)
   then have \<open>map (bit a) [0..<n] = replicate n (odd a)\<close>
     by (simp add: map_replicate_const)
   with stable show ?case
     by (simp add: stable_imp_take_bit_eq mask_eq_seq_sum *)
 next
   case (rec a b)
   show ?case
   proof (cases n)
     case 0
     then show ?thesis
       by simp
   next
     case (Suc m)
     have \<open>map (bit (of_bool b + 2 * a)) [0..<Suc m] = b # map (bit (of_bool b + 2 * a)) [Suc 0..<Suc m]\<close>
       by (simp only: upt_conv_Cons) simp
     also have \<open>\<dots> = b # map (bit a) [0..<m]\<close>
       by (simp only: flip: map_Suc_upt) (simp add: bit_Suc rec.hyps)
     finally show ?thesis
-      using Suc rec.IH [of m] by (simp add: take_bit_Suc rec.hyps, simp add: ac_simps)
+      using Suc rec.IH [of m] by (simp add: take_bit_Suc rec.hyps, simp add: ac_simps mod_2_eq_odd)
   qed
 qed
 
 end
 
 datatype char =
   Char (digit0: bool) (digit1: bool) (digit2: bool) (digit3: bool)
        (digit4: bool) (digit5: bool) (digit6: bool) (digit7: bool)
 
 context comm_semiring_1
 begin
 
 definition of_char :: \<open>char \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>
   where \<open>of_char c = foldr (\<lambda>b k. of_bool b + k * 2) 
     [digit0 c, digit1 c, digit2 c, digit3 c, digit4 c, digit5 c, digit6 c, digit7 c] 0\<close>
 
 lemma of_char_Char [simp]:
   \<open>of_char (Char b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 b7) =
     foldr (\<lambda>b k. of_bool b + k * 2) [b0, b1, b2, b3, b4, b5, b6, b7] 0\<close>
   by (simp add: of_char_def)
 
 end
 
 context unique_euclidean_semiring_with_bit_shifts
 begin
 
 definition char_of :: \<open>'a \<Rightarrow> char\<close>
   where \<open>char_of n = Char (odd n) (bit n 1) (bit n 2) (bit n 3) (bit n 4) (bit n 5) (bit n 6) (bit n 7)\<close>
 
 lemma char_of_take_bit_eq:
   \<open>char_of (take_bit n m) = char_of m\<close> if \<open>n \<ge> 8\<close>
   using that by (simp add: char_of_def bit_take_bit_iff)
 
 lemma char_of_char [simp]:
   \<open>char_of (of_char c) = c\<close>
   by (simp only: of_char_def char_of_def bit_horner_sum_iff) simp
 
 lemma char_of_comp_of_char [simp]:
   "char_of \<circ> of_char = id"
   by (simp add: fun_eq_iff)
 
 lemma inj_of_char:
   \<open>inj of_char\<close>
 proof (rule injI)
   fix c d
   assume "of_char c = of_char d"
   then have "char_of (of_char c) = char_of (of_char d)"
     by simp
   then show "c = d"
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma of_char_eqI:
   \<open>c = d\<close> if \<open>of_char c = of_char d\<close>
   using that inj_of_char by (simp add: inj_eq)
 
 lemma of_char_eq_iff [simp]:
   \<open>of_char c = of_char d \<longleftrightarrow> c = d\<close>
   by (auto intro: of_char_eqI)
 
 lemma of_char_of [simp]:
   \<open>of_char (char_of a) = a mod 256\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>[0..<8] = [0, Suc 0, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 :: nat]\<close>
     by (simp add: upt_eq_Cons_conv)
   then have \<open>[odd a, bit a 1, bit a 2, bit a 3, bit a 4, bit a 5, bit a 6, bit a 7] = map (bit a) [0..<8]\<close>
     by simp
   then have \<open>of_char (char_of a) = take_bit 8 a\<close>
     by (simp only: char_of_def of_char_def char.sel take_bit_eq_horner_sum)
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 qed
 
 lemma char_of_mod_256 [simp]:
   \<open>char_of (n mod 256) = char_of n\<close>
   by (rule of_char_eqI) simp
 
 lemma of_char_mod_256 [simp]:
   \<open>of_char c mod 256 = of_char c\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>of_char (char_of (of_char c)) mod 256 = of_char (char_of (of_char c))\<close>
     by (simp only: of_char_of) simp
   then show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma char_of_quasi_inj [simp]:
   \<open>char_of m = char_of n \<longleftrightarrow> m mod 256 = n mod 256\<close> (is \<open>?P \<longleftrightarrow> ?Q\<close>)
 proof
   assume ?Q
   then show ?P
     by (auto intro: of_char_eqI)
 next
   assume ?P
   then have \<open>of_char (char_of m) = of_char (char_of n)\<close>
     by simp
   then show ?Q
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma char_of_eq_iff:
   \<open>char_of n = c \<longleftrightarrow> take_bit 8 n = of_char c\<close>
   by (auto intro: of_char_eqI simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 
 lemma char_of_nat [simp]:
   \<open>char_of (of_nat n) = char_of n\<close>
   by (simp add: char_of_def String.char_of_def drop_bit_of_nat)
 
 end
 
 lemma inj_on_char_of_nat [simp]:
   "inj_on char_of {0::nat..<256}"
   by (rule inj_onI) simp
 
 lemma nat_of_char_less_256 [simp]:
   "of_char c < (256 :: nat)"
 proof -
   have "of_char c mod (256 :: nat) < 256"
     by arith
   then show ?thesis by simp
 qed
 
 lemma range_nat_of_char:
   "range of_char = {0::nat..<256}"
 proof (rule; rule)
   fix n :: nat
   assume "n \<in> range of_char"
   then show "n \<in> {0..<256}"
     by auto
 next
   fix n :: nat
   assume "n \<in> {0..<256}"
   then have "n = of_char (char_of n)"
     by simp
   then show "n \<in> range of_char"
     by (rule range_eqI)
 qed
 
 lemma UNIV_char_of_nat:
   "UNIV = char_of ` {0::nat..<256}"
 proof -
   have "range (of_char :: char \<Rightarrow> nat) = of_char ` char_of ` {0::nat..<256}"
     by (auto simp add: range_nat_of_char intro!: image_eqI)
   with inj_of_char [where ?'a = nat] show ?thesis 
     by (simp add: inj_image_eq_iff)
 qed
 
 lemma card_UNIV_char:
   "card (UNIV :: char set) = 256"
   by (auto simp add: UNIV_char_of_nat card_image)
 
 context
   includes lifting_syntax integer.lifting natural.lifting
 begin
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   \<open>(pcr_integer ===> (=)) char_of char_of\<close>
   by (unfold char_of_def) transfer_prover
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   \<open>((=) ===> pcr_integer) of_char of_char\<close>
   by (unfold of_char_def) transfer_prover
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   \<open>(pcr_natural ===> (=)) char_of char_of\<close>
   by (unfold char_of_def) transfer_prover
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   \<open>((=) ===> pcr_natural) of_char of_char\<close>
   by (unfold of_char_def) transfer_prover
 
 end
 
 lifting_update integer.lifting
 lifting_forget integer.lifting
 
 lifting_update natural.lifting
 lifting_forget natural.lifting
 
 syntax
   "_Char" :: "str_position \<Rightarrow> char"    ("CHR _")
   "_Char_ord" :: "num_const \<Rightarrow> char"   ("CHR _")
 
 type_synonym string = "char list"
 
 syntax
   "_String" :: "str_position \<Rightarrow> string"    ("_")
 
 ML_file \<open>Tools/string_syntax.ML\<close>
 
 instantiation char :: enum
 begin
 
 definition
   "Enum.enum = [
     CHR 0x00, CHR 0x01, CHR 0x02, CHR 0x03,
     CHR 0x04, CHR 0x05, CHR 0x06, CHR 0x07,
     CHR 0x08, CHR 0x09, CHR ''\<newline>'', CHR 0x0B,
     CHR 0x0C, CHR 0x0D, CHR 0x0E, CHR 0x0F,
     CHR 0x10, CHR 0x11, CHR 0x12, CHR 0x13,
     CHR 0x14, CHR 0x15, CHR 0x16, CHR 0x17,
     CHR 0x18, CHR 0x19, CHR 0x1A, CHR 0x1B,
     CHR 0x1C, CHR 0x1D, CHR 0x1E, CHR 0x1F,
     CHR '' '', CHR ''!'', CHR 0x22, CHR ''#'',
     CHR ''$'', CHR ''%'', CHR ''&'', CHR 0x27,
     CHR ''('', CHR '')'', CHR ''*'', CHR ''+'',
     CHR '','', CHR ''-'', CHR ''.'', CHR ''/'',
     CHR ''0'', CHR ''1'', CHR ''2'', CHR ''3'',
     CHR ''4'', CHR ''5'', CHR ''6'', CHR ''7'',
     CHR ''8'', CHR ''9'', CHR '':'', CHR '';'',
     CHR ''<'', CHR ''='', CHR ''>'', CHR ''?'',
     CHR ''@'', CHR ''A'', CHR ''B'', CHR ''C'',
     CHR ''D'', CHR ''E'', CHR ''F'', CHR ''G'',
     CHR ''H'', CHR ''I'', CHR ''J'', CHR ''K'',
     CHR ''L'', CHR ''M'', CHR ''N'', CHR ''O'',
     CHR ''P'', CHR ''Q'', CHR ''R'', CHR ''S'',
     CHR ''T'', CHR ''U'', CHR ''V'', CHR ''W'',
     CHR ''X'', CHR ''Y'', CHR ''Z'', CHR ''['',
     CHR 0x5C, CHR '']'', CHR ''^'', CHR ''_'',
     CHR 0x60, CHR ''a'', CHR ''b'', CHR ''c'',
     CHR ''d'', CHR ''e'', CHR ''f'', CHR ''g'',
     CHR ''h'', CHR ''i'', CHR ''j'', CHR ''k'',
     CHR ''l'', CHR ''m'', CHR ''n'', CHR ''o'',
     CHR ''p'', CHR ''q'', CHR ''r'', CHR ''s'',
     CHR ''t'', CHR ''u'', CHR ''v'', CHR ''w'',
     CHR ''x'', CHR ''y'', CHR ''z'', CHR ''{'',
     CHR ''|'', CHR ''}'', CHR ''~'', CHR 0x7F,
     CHR 0x80, CHR 0x81, CHR 0x82, CHR 0x83,
     CHR 0x84, CHR 0x85, CHR 0x86, CHR 0x87,
     CHR 0x88, CHR 0x89, CHR 0x8A, CHR 0x8B,
     CHR 0x8C, CHR 0x8D, CHR 0x8E, CHR 0x8F,
     CHR 0x90, CHR 0x91, CHR 0x92, CHR 0x93,
     CHR 0x94, CHR 0x95, CHR 0x96, CHR 0x97,
     CHR 0x98, CHR 0x99, CHR 0x9A, CHR 0x9B,
     CHR 0x9C, CHR 0x9D, CHR 0x9E, CHR 0x9F,
     CHR 0xA0, CHR 0xA1, CHR 0xA2, CHR 0xA3,
     CHR 0xA4, CHR 0xA5, CHR 0xA6, CHR 0xA7,
     CHR 0xA8, CHR 0xA9, CHR 0xAA, CHR 0xAB,
     CHR 0xAC, CHR 0xAD, CHR 0xAE, CHR 0xAF,
     CHR 0xB0, CHR 0xB1, CHR 0xB2, CHR 0xB3,
     CHR 0xB4, CHR 0xB5, CHR 0xB6, CHR 0xB7,
     CHR 0xB8, CHR 0xB9, CHR 0xBA, CHR 0xBB,
     CHR 0xBC, CHR 0xBD, CHR 0xBE, CHR 0xBF,
     CHR 0xC0, CHR 0xC1, CHR 0xC2, CHR 0xC3,
     CHR 0xC4, CHR 0xC5, CHR 0xC6, CHR 0xC7,
     CHR 0xC8, CHR 0xC9, CHR 0xCA, CHR 0xCB,
     CHR 0xCC, CHR 0xCD, CHR 0xCE, CHR 0xCF,
     CHR 0xD0, CHR 0xD1, CHR 0xD2, CHR 0xD3,
     CHR 0xD4, CHR 0xD5, CHR 0xD6, CHR 0xD7,
     CHR 0xD8, CHR 0xD9, CHR 0xDA, CHR 0xDB,
     CHR 0xDC, CHR 0xDD, CHR 0xDE, CHR 0xDF,
     CHR 0xE0, CHR 0xE1, CHR 0xE2, CHR 0xE3,
     CHR 0xE4, CHR 0xE5, CHR 0xE6, CHR 0xE7,
     CHR 0xE8, CHR 0xE9, CHR 0xEA, CHR 0xEB,
     CHR 0xEC, CHR 0xED, CHR 0xEE, CHR 0xEF,
     CHR 0xF0, CHR 0xF1, CHR 0xF2, CHR 0xF3,
     CHR 0xF4, CHR 0xF5, CHR 0xF6, CHR 0xF7,
     CHR 0xF8, CHR 0xF9, CHR 0xFA, CHR 0xFB,
     CHR 0xFC, CHR 0xFD, CHR 0xFE, CHR 0xFF]"
 
 definition
   "Enum.enum_all P \<longleftrightarrow> list_all P (Enum.enum :: char list)"
 
 definition
   "Enum.enum_ex P \<longleftrightarrow> list_ex P (Enum.enum :: char list)"
 
 lemma enum_char_unfold:
   "Enum.enum = map char_of [0..<256]"
 proof -
   have "map (of_char :: char \<Rightarrow> nat) Enum.enum = [0..<256]"
     by (simp add: enum_char_def of_char_def upt_conv_Cons_Cons numeral_2_eq_2 [symmetric])
   then have "map char_of (map (of_char :: char \<Rightarrow> nat) Enum.enum) =
     map char_of [0..<256]"
     by simp
   then show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 instance proof
   show UNIV: "UNIV = set (Enum.enum :: char list)"
     by (simp add: enum_char_unfold UNIV_char_of_nat atLeast0LessThan)
   show "distinct (Enum.enum :: char list)"
     by (auto simp add: enum_char_unfold distinct_map intro: inj_onI)
   show "\<And>P. Enum.enum_all P \<longleftrightarrow> Ball (UNIV :: char set) P"
     by (simp add: UNIV enum_all_char_def list_all_iff)
   show "\<And>P. Enum.enum_ex P \<longleftrightarrow> Bex (UNIV :: char set) P"
     by (simp add: UNIV enum_ex_char_def list_ex_iff)
 qed
 
 end
 
 lemma linorder_char:
   "class.linorder (\<lambda>c d. of_char c \<le> (of_char d :: nat)) (\<lambda>c d. of_char c < (of_char d :: nat))"
   by standard auto
 
 text \<open>Optimized version for execution\<close>
 
 definition char_of_integer :: "integer \<Rightarrow> char"
   where [code_abbrev]: "char_of_integer = char_of"
 
 definition integer_of_char :: "char \<Rightarrow> integer"
   where [code_abbrev]: "integer_of_char = of_char"
 
 lemma char_of_integer_code [code]:
   "char_of_integer k = (let
      (q0, b0) = bit_cut_integer k;
      (q1, b1) = bit_cut_integer q0;
      (q2, b2) = bit_cut_integer q1;
      (q3, b3) = bit_cut_integer q2;
      (q4, b4) = bit_cut_integer q3;
      (q5, b5) = bit_cut_integer q4;
      (q6, b6) = bit_cut_integer q5;
      (_, b7) = bit_cut_integer q6
     in Char b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 b7)"
   by (simp add: bit_cut_integer_def char_of_integer_def char_of_def div_mult2_numeral_eq bit_iff_odd_drop_bit drop_bit_eq_div)
 
 lemma integer_of_char_code [code]:
   "integer_of_char (Char b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 b7) =
     ((((((of_bool b7 * 2 + of_bool b6) * 2 +
       of_bool b5) * 2 + of_bool b4) * 2 +
         of_bool b3) * 2 + of_bool b2) * 2 +
           of_bool b1) * 2 + of_bool b0"
   by (simp add: integer_of_char_def of_char_def)
 
 
 subsection \<open>Strings as dedicated type for target language code generation\<close>
 
 subsubsection \<open>Logical specification\<close>
 
 context
 begin
 
 qualified definition ascii_of :: "char \<Rightarrow> char"
   where "ascii_of c = Char (digit0 c) (digit1 c) (digit2 c) (digit3 c) (digit4 c) (digit5 c) (digit6 c) False"
 
 qualified lemma ascii_of_Char [simp]:
   "ascii_of (Char b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 b7) = Char b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 False"
   by (simp add: ascii_of_def)
 
 qualified lemma not_digit7_ascii_of [simp]:
   "\<not> digit7 (ascii_of c)"
   by (simp add: ascii_of_def)
 
 qualified lemma ascii_of_idem:
   "ascii_of c = c" if "\<not> digit7 c"
   using that by (cases c) simp
 
 qualified lemma char_of_ascii_of [simp]:
   "of_char (ascii_of c) = take_bit 7 (of_char c :: nat)"
   by (cases c) (simp only: ascii_of_Char of_char_Char take_bit_horner_sum_eq, simp)
 
 qualified typedef literal = "{cs. \<forall>c\<in>set cs. \<not> digit7 c}"
   morphisms explode Abs_literal
 proof
   show "[] \<in> {cs. \<forall>c\<in>set cs. \<not> digit7 c}"
     by simp
 qed
 
 qualified setup_lifting type_definition_literal
 
 qualified lift_definition implode :: "string \<Rightarrow> literal"
   is "map ascii_of"
   by auto
 
 qualified lemma implode_explode_eq [simp]:
   "String.implode (String.explode s) = s"
 proof transfer
   fix cs
   show "map ascii_of cs = cs" if "\<forall>c\<in>set cs. \<not> digit7 c"
     using that
       by (induction cs) (simp_all add: ascii_of_idem)
 qed
 
 qualified lemma explode_implode_eq [simp]:
   "String.explode (String.implode cs) = map ascii_of cs"
   by transfer rule
 
 end
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Syntactic representation\<close>
 
 text \<open>
   Logical ground representations for literals are:
 
   \<^enum> \<open>0\<close> for the empty literal;
 
   \<^enum> \<open>Literal b0 \<dots> b6 s\<close> for a literal starting with one
     character and continued by another literal.
 
   Syntactic representations for literals are:
 
   \<^enum> Printable text as string prefixed with \<open>STR\<close>;
 
   \<^enum> A single ascii value as numerical hexadecimal value prefixed with \<open>STR\<close>.
 \<close>
 
 instantiation String.literal :: zero
 begin
 
 context
 begin
 
 qualified lift_definition zero_literal :: String.literal
   is Nil
   by simp
 
 instance ..
 
 end
 
 end
 
 context
 begin
 
 qualified abbreviation (output) empty_literal :: String.literal
   where "empty_literal \<equiv> 0"
 
 qualified lift_definition Literal :: "bool \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> String.literal \<Rightarrow> String.literal"
   is "\<lambda>b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 cs. Char b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 False # cs"
   by auto
 
 qualified lemma Literal_eq_iff [simp]:
   "Literal b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 s = Literal c0 c1 c2 c3 c4 c5 c6 t
      \<longleftrightarrow> (b0 \<longleftrightarrow> c0) \<and> (b1 \<longleftrightarrow> c1) \<and> (b2 \<longleftrightarrow> c2) \<and> (b3 \<longleftrightarrow> c3)
          \<and> (b4 \<longleftrightarrow> c4) \<and> (b5 \<longleftrightarrow> c5) \<and> (b6 \<longleftrightarrow> c6) \<and> s = t"
   by transfer simp
 
 qualified lemma empty_neq_Literal [simp]:
   "empty_literal \<noteq> Literal b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 s"
   by transfer simp
 
 qualified lemma Literal_neq_empty [simp]:
   "Literal b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 s \<noteq> empty_literal"
   by transfer simp
 
 end
 
 code_datatype "0 :: String.literal" String.Literal
 
 syntax
   "_Literal" :: "str_position \<Rightarrow> String.literal"   ("STR _")
   "_Ascii" :: "num_const \<Rightarrow> String.literal"        ("STR _")
 
 ML_file \<open>Tools/literal.ML\<close>
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Operations\<close>
 
 instantiation String.literal :: plus
 begin
 
 context
 begin
 
 qualified lift_definition plus_literal :: "String.literal \<Rightarrow> String.literal \<Rightarrow> String.literal"
   is "(@)"
   by auto
 
 instance ..
 
 end
 
 end
 
 instance String.literal :: monoid_add
   by (standard; transfer) simp_all
 
 instantiation String.literal :: size
 begin
 
 context
   includes literal.lifting
 begin
 
 lift_definition size_literal :: "String.literal \<Rightarrow> nat"
   is length .
 
 end
 
 instance ..
 
 end
 
 instantiation String.literal :: equal
 begin
 
 context
 begin
 
 qualified lift_definition equal_literal :: "String.literal \<Rightarrow> String.literal \<Rightarrow> bool"
   is HOL.equal .
 
 instance
   by (standard; transfer) (simp add: equal)
 
 end
 
 end
 
 instantiation String.literal :: linorder
 begin
 
 context
 begin
 
 qualified lift_definition less_eq_literal :: "String.literal \<Rightarrow> String.literal \<Rightarrow> bool"
   is "ord.lexordp_eq (\<lambda>c d. of_char c < (of_char d :: nat))"
   .
 
 qualified lift_definition less_literal :: "String.literal \<Rightarrow> String.literal \<Rightarrow> bool"
   is "ord.lexordp (\<lambda>c d. of_char c < (of_char d :: nat))"
   .
 
 instance proof -
   from linorder_char interpret linorder "ord.lexordp_eq (\<lambda>c d. of_char c < (of_char d :: nat))"
     "ord.lexordp (\<lambda>c d. of_char c < (of_char d :: nat)) :: string \<Rightarrow> string \<Rightarrow> bool"
     by (rule linorder.lexordp_linorder)
   show "PROP ?thesis"
     by (standard; transfer) (simp_all add: less_le_not_le linear)
 qed
 
 end
 
 end
 
 lemma infinite_literal:
   "infinite (UNIV :: String.literal set)"
 proof -
   define S where "S = range (\<lambda>n. replicate n CHR ''A'')"
   have "inj_on String.implode S"
   proof (rule inj_onI)
     fix cs ds
     assume "String.implode cs = String.implode ds"
     then have "String.explode (String.implode cs) = String.explode (String.implode ds)"
       by simp
     moreover assume "cs \<in> S" and "ds \<in> S"
     ultimately show "cs = ds"
       by (auto simp add: S_def)
   qed
   moreover have "infinite S"
     by (auto simp add: S_def dest: finite_range_imageI [of _ length])
   ultimately have "infinite (String.implode ` S)"
     by (simp add: finite_image_iff)
   then show ?thesis
     by (auto intro: finite_subset)
 qed
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Executable conversions\<close>
 
 context
 begin
 
 qualified lift_definition asciis_of_literal :: "String.literal \<Rightarrow> integer list"
   is "map of_char"
   .
 
 qualified lemma asciis_of_zero [simp, code]:
   "asciis_of_literal 0 = []"
   by transfer simp
 
 qualified lemma asciis_of_Literal [simp, code]:
   "asciis_of_literal (String.Literal b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 s) =
     of_char (Char b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 False) # asciis_of_literal s "
   by transfer simp
 
 qualified lift_definition literal_of_asciis :: "integer list \<Rightarrow> String.literal"
   is "map (String.ascii_of \<circ> char_of)"
   by auto
 
 qualified lemma literal_of_asciis_Nil [simp, code]:
   "literal_of_asciis [] = 0"
   by transfer simp
 
 qualified lemma literal_of_asciis_Cons [simp, code]:
   "literal_of_asciis (k # ks) = (case char_of k
     of Char b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 b7 \<Rightarrow> String.Literal b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 (literal_of_asciis ks))"
   by (simp add: char_of_def) (transfer, simp add: char_of_def)
 
 qualified lemma literal_of_asciis_of_literal [simp]:
   "literal_of_asciis (asciis_of_literal s) = s"
 proof transfer
   fix cs
   assume "\<forall>c\<in>set cs. \<not> digit7 c"
   then show "map (String.ascii_of \<circ> char_of) (map of_char cs) = cs"
     by (induction cs) (simp_all add: String.ascii_of_idem) 
 qed
 
 qualified lemma explode_code [code]:
   "String.explode s = map char_of (asciis_of_literal s)"
   by transfer simp
 
 qualified lemma implode_code [code]:
   "String.implode cs = literal_of_asciis (map of_char cs)"
   by transfer simp
 
 qualified lemma equal_literal [code]:
   "HOL.equal (String.Literal b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 s)
     (String.Literal a0 a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 a6 r)
     \<longleftrightarrow> (b0 \<longleftrightarrow> a0) \<and> (b1 \<longleftrightarrow> a1) \<and> (b2 \<longleftrightarrow> a2) \<and> (b3 \<longleftrightarrow> a3)
       \<and> (b4 \<longleftrightarrow> a4) \<and> (b5 \<longleftrightarrow> a5) \<and> (b6 \<longleftrightarrow> a6) \<and> (s = r)"
   by (simp add: equal)
 
 end
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Technical code generation setup\<close>
 
 text \<open>Alternative constructor for generated computations\<close>
 
 context
 begin  
 
 qualified definition Literal' :: "bool \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> String.literal \<Rightarrow> String.literal"
   where [simp]: "Literal' = String.Literal"
 
 lemma [code]:
   \<open>Literal' b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 s = String.literal_of_asciis
     [foldr (\<lambda>b k. of_bool b + k * 2) [b0, b1, b2, b3, b4, b5, b6] 0] + s\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>foldr (\<lambda>b k. of_bool b + k * 2) [b0, b1, b2, b3, b4, b5, b6] 0 = of_char (Char b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 False)\<close>
     by simp
   moreover have \<open>Literal' b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 s = String.literal_of_asciis
     [of_char (Char b0 b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 False)] + s\<close>
     by (unfold Literal'_def) (transfer, simp only: list.simps comp_apply char_of_char, simp)
   ultimately show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma [code_computation_unfold]:
   "String.Literal = Literal'"
   by simp
 
 end
 
 code_reserved SML string String Char List
 code_reserved OCaml string String Char List
 code_reserved Haskell Prelude
 code_reserved Scala string
 
 code_printing
   type_constructor String.literal \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "string"
     and (OCaml) "string"
     and (Haskell) "String"
     and (Scala) "String"
 | constant "STR ''''" \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "\"\""
     and (OCaml) "\"\""
     and (Haskell) "\"\""
     and (Scala) "\"\""
 
 setup \<open>
   fold Literal.add_code ["SML", "OCaml", "Haskell", "Scala"]
 \<close>
 
 code_printing
   constant "(+) :: String.literal \<Rightarrow> String.literal \<Rightarrow> String.literal" \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) infixl 18 "^"
     and (OCaml) infixr 6 "^"
     and (Haskell) infixr 5 "++"
     and (Scala) infixl 7 "+"
 | constant String.literal_of_asciis \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "!(String.implode/ o List.map (fn k => if 0 <= k andalso k < 128 then (Char.chr o IntInf.toInt) k else raise Fail \"Non-ASCII character in literal\"))"
     and (OCaml) "!(let xs = _
       and chr k =
         let l = Z.to'_int k
           in if 0 <= l && l < 128
           then Char.chr l
           else failwith \"Non-ASCII character in literal\"
       in String.init (List.length xs) (List.nth (List.map chr xs)))"
     and (Haskell) "map/ (let chr k | (0 <= k && k < 128) = Prelude.toEnum k :: Prelude.Char in chr . Prelude.fromInteger)"
     and (Scala) "\"\"/ ++/ _.map((k: BigInt) => if (BigInt(0) <= k && k < BigInt(128)) k.charValue else sys.error(\"Non-ASCII character in literal\"))"
 | constant String.asciis_of_literal \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "!(List.map (fn c => let val k = Char.ord c in if k < 128 then IntInf.fromInt k else raise Fail \"Non-ASCII character in literal\" end) /o String.explode)"
     and (OCaml) "!(let s = _ in let rec exp i l = if i < 0 then l else exp (i - 1) (let k = Char.code (String.get s i) in
       if k < 128 then Z.of'_int k :: l else failwith \"Non-ASCII character in literal\") in exp (String.length s - 1) [])"
     and (Haskell) "map/ (let ord k | (k < 128) = Prelude.toInteger k in ord . (Prelude.fromEnum :: Prelude.Char -> Prelude.Int))"
     and (Scala) "!(_.toList.map(c => { val k: Int = c.toInt; if (k < 128) BigInt(k) else sys.error(\"Non-ASCII character in literal\") }))"
 | class_instance String.literal :: equal \<rightharpoonup>
     (Haskell) -
 | constant "HOL.equal :: String.literal \<Rightarrow> String.literal \<Rightarrow> bool" \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "!((_ : string) = _)"
     and (OCaml) "!((_ : string) = _)"
     and (Haskell) infix 4 "=="
     and (Scala) infixl 5 "=="
 | constant "(\<le>) :: String.literal \<Rightarrow> String.literal \<Rightarrow> bool" \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "!((_ : string) <= _)"
     and (OCaml) "!((_ : string) <= _)"
     and (Haskell) infix 4 "<="
     \<comment> \<open>Order operations for \<^typ>\<open>String.literal\<close> work in Haskell only
           if no type class instance needs to be generated, because String = [Char] in Haskell
           and \<^typ>\<open>char list\<close> need not have the same order as \<^typ>\<open>String.literal\<close>.\<close>
     and (Scala) infixl 4 "<="
     and (Eval) infixl 6 "<="
 | constant "(<) :: String.literal \<Rightarrow> String.literal \<Rightarrow> bool" \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "!((_ : string) < _)"
     and (OCaml) "!((_ : string) < _)"
     and (Haskell) infix 4 "<"
     and (Scala) infixl 4 "<"
     and (Eval) infixl 6 "<"
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Code generation utility\<close>
 
 setup \<open>Sign.map_naming (Name_Space.mandatory_path "Code")\<close>
 
 definition abort :: "String.literal \<Rightarrow> (unit \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow> 'a"
   where [simp]: "abort _ f = f ()"
 
 declare [[code drop: Code.abort]]
 
 lemma abort_cong:
   "msg = msg' \<Longrightarrow> Code.abort msg f = Code.abort msg' f"
   by simp
 
 setup \<open>Sign.map_naming Name_Space.parent_path\<close>
 
 setup \<open>Code_Simp.map_ss (Simplifier.add_cong @{thm Code.abort_cong})\<close>
 
 code_printing
   constant Code.abort \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "!(raise/ Fail/ _)"
     and (OCaml) "failwith"
     and (Haskell) "!(error/ ::/ forall a./ String -> (() -> a) -> a)"
     and (Scala) "!{/ sys.error((_));/ ((_)).apply(())/ }"
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Finally\<close>
 
 lifting_update literal.lifting
 lifting_forget literal.lifting
 
 end
diff --git a/src/HOL/ex/Bit_Operations.thy b/src/HOL/ex/Bit_Operations.thy
--- a/src/HOL/ex/Bit_Operations.thy
+++ b/src/HOL/ex/Bit_Operations.thy
@@ -1,705 +1,705 @@
 (*  Author:  Florian Haftmann, TUM
 *)
 
 section \<open>Proof of concept for purely algebraically founded lists of bits\<close>
 
 theory Bit_Operations
   imports
     "HOL-Library.Boolean_Algebra"
     Main
 begin
 
 subsection \<open>Bit operations in suitable algebraic structures\<close>
 
 class semiring_bit_operations = semiring_bit_shifts +
   fixes "and" :: \<open>'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>  (infixr \<open>AND\<close> 64)
     and or :: \<open>'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>  (infixr \<open>OR\<close>  59)
     and xor :: \<open>'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>  (infixr \<open>XOR\<close> 59)
   assumes bit_and_iff: \<open>\<And>n. bit (a AND b) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit a n \<and> bit b n\<close>
     and bit_or_iff: \<open>\<And>n. bit (a OR b) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit a n \<or> bit b n\<close>
     and bit_xor_iff: \<open>\<And>n. bit (a XOR b) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit a n \<noteq> bit b n\<close>
 begin
 
 text \<open>
   We want the bitwise operations to bind slightly weaker
   than \<open>+\<close> and \<open>-\<close>.
   For the sake of code generation
   the operations \<^const>\<open>and\<close>, \<^const>\<open>or\<close> and \<^const>\<open>xor\<close>
   are specified as definitional class operations.
 \<close>
 
 sublocale "and": semilattice \<open>(AND)\<close>
   by standard (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_and_iff)
 
 sublocale or: semilattice_neutr \<open>(OR)\<close> 0
   by standard (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_or_iff)
 
 sublocale xor: comm_monoid \<open>(XOR)\<close> 0
   by standard (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_xor_iff)
 
 lemma zero_and_eq [simp]:
   "0 AND a = 0"
   by (simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_and_iff)
 
 lemma and_zero_eq [simp]:
   "a AND 0 = 0"
   by (simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_and_iff)
 
 lemma one_and_eq [simp]:
-  "1 AND a = of_bool (odd a)"
+  "1 AND a = a mod 2"
   by (simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_and_iff) (auto simp add: bit_1_iff)
 
 lemma and_one_eq [simp]:
-  "a AND 1 = of_bool (odd a)"
+  "a AND 1 = a mod 2"
   using one_and_eq [of a] by (simp add: ac_simps)
 
-lemma one_or_eq [simp]:
+lemma one_or_eq:
   "1 OR a = a + of_bool (even a)"
   by (simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_or_iff add.commute [of _ 1] even_bit_succ_iff) (auto simp add: bit_1_iff)
 
-lemma or_one_eq [simp]:
+lemma or_one_eq:
   "a OR 1 = a + of_bool (even a)"
   using one_or_eq [of a] by (simp add: ac_simps)
 
-lemma one_xor_eq [simp]:
+lemma one_xor_eq:
   "1 XOR a = a + of_bool (even a) - of_bool (odd a)"
   by (simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_xor_iff add.commute [of _ 1] even_bit_succ_iff) (auto simp add: bit_1_iff odd_bit_iff_bit_pred elim: oddE)
 
-lemma xor_one_eq [simp]:
+lemma xor_one_eq:
   "a XOR 1 = a + of_bool (even a) - of_bool (odd a)"
   using one_xor_eq [of a] by (simp add: ac_simps)
 
 lemma take_bit_and [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit n (a AND b) = take_bit n a AND take_bit n b\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_take_bit_iff bit_and_iff)
 
 lemma take_bit_or [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit n (a OR b) = take_bit n a OR take_bit n b\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_take_bit_iff bit_or_iff)
 
 lemma take_bit_xor [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit n (a XOR b) = take_bit n a XOR take_bit n b\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_take_bit_iff bit_xor_iff)
 
 end
 
 class ring_bit_operations = semiring_bit_operations + ring_parity +
   fixes not :: \<open>'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>  (\<open>NOT\<close>)
   assumes bit_not_iff: \<open>\<And>n. bit (NOT a) n \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ n \<noteq> 0 \<and> \<not> bit a n\<close>
   assumes minus_eq_not_minus_1: \<open>- a = NOT (a - 1)\<close>
 begin
 
 text \<open>
   For the sake of code generation \<^const>\<open>not\<close> is specified as
   definitional class operation.  Note that \<^const>\<open>not\<close> has no
   sensible definition for unlimited but only positive bit strings
   (type \<^typ>\<open>nat\<close>).
 \<close>
 
 lemma bits_minus_1_mod_2_eq [simp]:
   \<open>(- 1) mod 2 = 1\<close>
   by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma not_eq_complement:
   \<open>NOT a = - a - 1\<close>
   using minus_eq_not_minus_1 [of \<open>a + 1\<close>] by simp
 
 lemma minus_eq_not_plus_1:
   \<open>- a = NOT a + 1\<close>
   using not_eq_complement [of a] by simp
 
 lemma bit_minus_iff:
   \<open>bit (- a) n \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ n \<noteq> 0 \<and> \<not> bit (a - 1) n\<close>
   by (simp add: minus_eq_not_minus_1 bit_not_iff)
 
 lemma even_not_iff [simp]:
   "even (NOT a) \<longleftrightarrow> odd a"
   using bit_not_iff [of a 0] by auto
 
 lemma bit_not_exp_iff:
   \<open>bit (NOT (2 ^ m)) n \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ n \<noteq> 0 \<and> n \<noteq> m\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_not_iff bit_exp_iff)
 
 lemma bit_minus_1_iff [simp]:
   \<open>bit (- 1) n \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ n \<noteq> 0\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_minus_iff)
 
 lemma bit_minus_exp_iff:
   \<open>bit (- (2 ^ m)) n \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ n \<noteq> 0 \<and> n \<ge> m\<close>
   oops
 
 lemma bit_minus_2_iff [simp]:
   \<open>bit (- 2) n \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ n \<noteq> 0 \<and> n > 0\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_minus_iff bit_1_iff)
 
 lemma not_one [simp]:
   "NOT 1 = - 2"
   by (simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_not_iff) (simp add: bit_1_iff)
 
 sublocale "and": semilattice_neutr \<open>(AND)\<close> \<open>- 1\<close>
   apply standard
   apply (simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_and_iff)
   apply (auto simp add: exp_eq_0_imp_not_bit bit_exp_iff)
   done
 
 sublocale bit: boolean_algebra \<open>(AND)\<close> \<open>(OR)\<close> NOT 0 \<open>- 1\<close>
   rewrites \<open>bit.xor = (XOR)\<close>
 proof -
   interpret bit: boolean_algebra \<open>(AND)\<close> \<open>(OR)\<close> NOT 0 \<open>- 1\<close>
     apply standard
          apply (simp_all add: bit_eq_iff bit_and_iff bit_or_iff bit_not_iff)
       apply (auto simp add: exp_eq_0_imp_not_bit bit_exp_iff)
     done
   show \<open>boolean_algebra (AND) (OR) NOT 0 (- 1)\<close>
     by standard
   show \<open>boolean_algebra.xor (AND) (OR) NOT = (XOR)\<close>
     apply (auto simp add: fun_eq_iff bit.xor_def bit_eq_iff bit_and_iff bit_or_iff bit_not_iff bit_xor_iff)
          apply (simp_all add: bit_exp_iff, simp_all add: bit_def)
         apply (metis local.bit_exp_iff local.bits_div_by_0)
        apply (metis local.bit_exp_iff local.bits_div_by_0)
     done
 qed
 
 lemma and_eq_not_not_or:
   \<open>a AND b = NOT (NOT a OR NOT b)\<close>
   by simp
 
 lemma or_eq_not_not_and:
   \<open>a OR b = NOT (NOT a AND NOT b)\<close>
   by simp
 
 lemma push_bit_minus:
   \<open>push_bit n (- a) = - push_bit n a\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult)
 
 lemma take_bit_not_take_bit:
   \<open>take_bit n (NOT (take_bit n a)) = take_bit n (NOT a)\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_take_bit_iff bit_not_iff)
 
 lemma take_bit_not_iff:
   "take_bit n (NOT a) = take_bit n (NOT b) \<longleftrightarrow> take_bit n a = take_bit n b"
   apply (simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_not_iff bit_take_bit_iff)
   apply (simp add: bit_exp_iff)
   apply (use local.exp_eq_0_imp_not_bit in blast)
   done
 
 definition set_bit :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>
   where \<open>set_bit n a = a OR 2 ^ n\<close>
 
 definition unset_bit :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>
   where \<open>unset_bit n a = a AND NOT (2 ^ n)\<close>
 
 definition flip_bit :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>
   where \<open>flip_bit n a = a XOR 2 ^ n\<close>
 
 lemma bit_set_bit_iff:
   \<open>bit (set_bit m a) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit a n \<or> (m = n \<and> 2 ^ n \<noteq> 0)\<close>
   by (auto simp add: set_bit_def bit_or_iff bit_exp_iff)
 
 lemma even_set_bit_iff:
   \<open>even (set_bit m a) \<longleftrightarrow> even a \<and> m \<noteq> 0\<close>
   using bit_set_bit_iff [of m a 0] by auto
 
 lemma bit_unset_bit_iff:
   \<open>bit (unset_bit m a) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit a n \<and> m \<noteq> n\<close>
   by (auto simp add: unset_bit_def bit_and_iff bit_not_iff bit_exp_iff exp_eq_0_imp_not_bit)
 
 lemma even_unset_bit_iff:
   \<open>even (unset_bit m a) \<longleftrightarrow> even a \<or> m = 0\<close>
   using bit_unset_bit_iff [of m a 0] by auto
 
 lemma bit_flip_bit_iff:
   \<open>bit (flip_bit m a) n \<longleftrightarrow> (m = n \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> bit a n) \<and> 2 ^ n \<noteq> 0\<close>
   by (auto simp add: flip_bit_def bit_xor_iff bit_exp_iff exp_eq_0_imp_not_bit)
 
 lemma even_flip_bit_iff:
   \<open>even (flip_bit m a) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> (even a \<longleftrightarrow> m = 0)\<close>
   using bit_flip_bit_iff [of m a 0] by auto
 
 lemma set_bit_0 [simp]:
   \<open>set_bit 0 a = 1 + 2 * (a div 2)\<close>
 proof (rule bit_eqI)
   fix m
   assume *: \<open>2 ^ m \<noteq> 0\<close>
   then show \<open>bit (set_bit 0 a) m = bit (1 + 2 * (a div 2)) m\<close>
     by (simp add: bit_set_bit_iff bit_double_iff even_bit_succ_iff)
       (cases m, simp_all add: bit_Suc)
 qed
 
 lemma set_bit_Suc:
   \<open>set_bit (Suc n) a = a mod 2 + 2 * set_bit n (a div 2)\<close>
 proof (rule bit_eqI)
   fix m
   assume *: \<open>2 ^ m \<noteq> 0\<close>
   show \<open>bit (set_bit (Suc n) a) m \<longleftrightarrow> bit (a mod 2 + 2 * set_bit n (a div 2)) m\<close>
   proof (cases m)
     case 0
     then show ?thesis
       by (simp add: even_set_bit_iff)
   next
     case (Suc m)
     with * have \<open>2 ^ m \<noteq> 0\<close>
       using mult_2 by auto
     show ?thesis
       by (cases a rule: parity_cases)
         (simp_all add: bit_set_bit_iff bit_double_iff even_bit_succ_iff *,
         simp_all add: Suc \<open>2 ^ m \<noteq> 0\<close> bit_Suc)
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma unset_bit_0 [simp]:
   \<open>unset_bit 0 a = 2 * (a div 2)\<close>
 proof (rule bit_eqI)
   fix m
   assume *: \<open>2 ^ m \<noteq> 0\<close>
   then show \<open>bit (unset_bit 0 a) m = bit (2 * (a div 2)) m\<close>
     by (simp add: bit_unset_bit_iff bit_double_iff)
       (cases m, simp_all add: bit_Suc)
 qed
 
 lemma unset_bit_Suc:
   \<open>unset_bit (Suc n) a = a mod 2 + 2 * unset_bit n (a div 2)\<close>
 proof (rule bit_eqI)
   fix m
   assume *: \<open>2 ^ m \<noteq> 0\<close>
   then show \<open>bit (unset_bit (Suc n) a) m \<longleftrightarrow> bit (a mod 2 + 2 * unset_bit n (a div 2)) m\<close>
   proof (cases m)
     case 0
     then show ?thesis
       by (simp add: even_unset_bit_iff)
   next
     case (Suc m)
     show ?thesis
       by (cases a rule: parity_cases)
         (simp_all add: bit_unset_bit_iff bit_double_iff even_bit_succ_iff *,
          simp_all add: Suc bit_Suc)
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma flip_bit_0 [simp]:
   \<open>flip_bit 0 a = of_bool (even a) + 2 * (a div 2)\<close>
 proof (rule bit_eqI)
   fix m
   assume *: \<open>2 ^ m \<noteq> 0\<close>
   then show \<open>bit (flip_bit 0 a) m = bit (of_bool (even a) + 2 * (a div 2)) m\<close>
     by (simp add: bit_flip_bit_iff bit_double_iff even_bit_succ_iff)
       (cases m, simp_all add: bit_Suc)
 qed
 
 lemma flip_bit_Suc:
   \<open>flip_bit (Suc n) a = a mod 2 + 2 * flip_bit n (a div 2)\<close>
 proof (rule bit_eqI)
   fix m
   assume *: \<open>2 ^ m \<noteq> 0\<close>
   show \<open>bit (flip_bit (Suc n) a) m \<longleftrightarrow> bit (a mod 2 + 2 * flip_bit n (a div 2)) m\<close>
   proof (cases m)
     case 0
     then show ?thesis
       by (simp add: even_flip_bit_iff)
   next
     case (Suc m)
     with * have \<open>2 ^ m \<noteq> 0\<close>
       using mult_2 by auto
     show ?thesis
       by (cases a rule: parity_cases)
         (simp_all add: bit_flip_bit_iff bit_double_iff even_bit_succ_iff,
         simp_all add: Suc \<open>2 ^ m \<noteq> 0\<close> bit_Suc)
   qed
 qed
 
 end
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Instance \<^typ>\<open>int\<close>\<close>
 
 instantiation int :: ring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 definition not_int :: \<open>int \<Rightarrow> int\<close>
   where \<open>not_int k = - k - 1\<close>
 
 lemma not_int_rec:
   "NOT k = of_bool (even k) + 2 * NOT (k div 2)" for k :: int
   by (auto simp add: not_int_def elim: oddE)
 
 lemma even_not_iff_int:
   \<open>even (NOT k) \<longleftrightarrow> odd k\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: not_int_def)
 
 lemma not_int_div_2:
   \<open>NOT k div 2 = NOT (k div 2)\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: not_int_def)
 
 lemma bit_not_int_iff:
   \<open>bit (NOT k) n \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> bit k n\<close>
     for k :: int
   by (induction n arbitrary: k) (simp_all add: not_int_div_2 even_not_iff_int bit_Suc)
 
 function and_int :: \<open>int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int\<close>
   where \<open>(k::int) AND l = (if k \<in> {0, - 1} \<and> l \<in> {0, - 1}
     then - of_bool (odd k \<and> odd l)
     else of_bool (odd k \<and> odd l) + 2 * ((k div 2) AND (l div 2)))\<close>
   by auto
 
 termination
   by (relation \<open>measure (\<lambda>(k, l). nat (\<bar>k\<bar> + \<bar>l\<bar>))\<close>) auto
 
 declare and_int.simps [simp del]
 
 lemma and_int_rec:
   \<open>k AND l = of_bool (odd k \<and> odd l) + 2 * ((k div 2) AND (l div 2))\<close>
     for k l :: int
 proof (cases \<open>k \<in> {0, - 1} \<and> l \<in> {0, - 1}\<close>)
   case True
   then show ?thesis
     by auto (simp_all add: and_int.simps)
 next
   case False
   then show ?thesis
     by (auto simp add: ac_simps and_int.simps [of k l])
 qed
 
 lemma bit_and_int_iff:
   \<open>bit (k AND l) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit k n \<and> bit l n\<close> for k l :: int
 proof (induction n arbitrary: k l)
   case 0
   then show ?case
     by (simp add: and_int_rec [of k l])
 next
   case (Suc n)
   then show ?case
     by (simp add: and_int_rec [of k l] bit_Suc)
 qed
 
 lemma even_and_iff_int:
   \<open>even (k AND l) \<longleftrightarrow> even k \<or> even l\<close> for k l :: int
   using bit_and_int_iff [of k l 0] by auto
 
 definition or_int :: \<open>int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int\<close>
   where \<open>k OR l = NOT (NOT k AND NOT l)\<close> for k l :: int
 
 lemma or_int_rec:
   \<open>k OR l = of_bool (odd k \<or> odd l) + 2 * ((k div 2) OR (l div 2))\<close>
   for k l :: int
   using and_int_rec [of \<open>NOT k\<close> \<open>NOT l\<close>]
   by (simp add: or_int_def even_not_iff_int not_int_div_2)
     (simp add: not_int_def)
 
 lemma bit_or_int_iff:
   \<open>bit (k OR l) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit k n \<or> bit l n\<close> for k l :: int
   by (simp add: or_int_def bit_not_int_iff bit_and_int_iff)
 
 definition xor_int :: \<open>int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int\<close>
   where \<open>k XOR l = k AND NOT l OR NOT k AND l\<close> for k l :: int
 
 lemma xor_int_rec:
   \<open>k XOR l = of_bool (odd k \<noteq> odd l) + 2 * ((k div 2) XOR (l div 2))\<close>
   for k l :: int
   by (simp add: xor_int_def or_int_rec [of \<open>k AND NOT l\<close> \<open>NOT k AND l\<close>] even_and_iff_int even_not_iff_int)
     (simp add: and_int_rec [of \<open>NOT k\<close> \<open>l\<close>] and_int_rec [of \<open>k\<close> \<open>NOT l\<close>] not_int_div_2)
 
 lemma bit_xor_int_iff:
   \<open>bit (k XOR l) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit k n \<noteq> bit l n\<close> for k l :: int
   by (auto simp add: xor_int_def bit_or_int_iff bit_and_int_iff bit_not_int_iff)
 
 instance proof
   fix k l :: int and n :: nat
   show \<open>- k = NOT (k - 1)\<close>
     by (simp add: not_int_def)
   show \<open>bit (k AND l) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit k n \<and> bit l n\<close>
     by (fact bit_and_int_iff)
   show \<open>bit (k OR l) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit k n \<or> bit l n\<close>
     by (fact bit_or_int_iff)
   show \<open>bit (k XOR l) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit k n \<noteq> bit l n\<close>
     by (fact bit_xor_int_iff)
 qed (simp_all add: bit_not_int_iff)
 
 end
 
 lemma not_nonnegative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>NOT k \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k < 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: not_int_def)
 
 lemma not_negative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>NOT k < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k \<ge> 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (subst Not_eq_iff [symmetric]) (simp add: not_less not_le)
 
 lemma and_nonnegative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>k AND l \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k \<ge> 0 \<or> l \<ge> 0\<close> for k l :: int
 proof (induction k arbitrary: l rule: int_bit_induct)
   case zero
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case minus
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case (even k)
   then show ?case
     using and_int_rec [of \<open>k * 2\<close> l] by (simp add: pos_imp_zdiv_nonneg_iff)
 next
   case (odd k)
   from odd have \<open>0 \<le> k AND l div 2 \<longleftrightarrow> 0 \<le> k \<or> 0 \<le> l div 2\<close>
     by simp
   then have \<open>0 \<le> (1 + k * 2) div 2 AND l div 2 \<longleftrightarrow> 0 \<le> (1 + k * 2) div 2\<or> 0 \<le> l div 2\<close>
     by simp
   with and_int_rec [of \<open>1 + k * 2\<close> l]
   show ?case
     by auto
 qed
 
 lemma and_negative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>k AND l < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k < 0 \<and> l < 0\<close> for k l :: int
   by (subst Not_eq_iff [symmetric]) (simp add: not_less)
 
 lemma or_nonnegative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>k OR l \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k \<ge> 0 \<and> l \<ge> 0\<close> for k l :: int
   by (simp only: or_eq_not_not_and not_nonnegative_int_iff) simp
 
 lemma or_negative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>k OR l < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k < 0 \<or> l < 0\<close> for k l :: int
   by (subst Not_eq_iff [symmetric]) (simp add: not_less)
 
 lemma xor_nonnegative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>k XOR l \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> (k \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> l \<ge> 0)\<close> for k l :: int
   by (simp only: bit.xor_def or_nonnegative_int_iff) auto
 
 lemma xor_negative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>k XOR l < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> (k < 0) \<noteq> (l < 0)\<close> for k l :: int
   by (subst Not_eq_iff [symmetric]) (auto simp add: not_less)
 
 lemma set_bit_nonnegative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>set_bit n k \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k \<ge> 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: set_bit_def)
 
 lemma set_bit_negative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>set_bit n k < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k < 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: set_bit_def)
 
 lemma unset_bit_nonnegative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>unset_bit n k \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k \<ge> 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: unset_bit_def)
 
 lemma unset_bit_negative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>unset_bit n k < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k < 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: unset_bit_def)
 
 lemma flip_bit_nonnegative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>flip_bit n k \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k \<ge> 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: flip_bit_def)
 
 lemma flip_bit_negative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>flip_bit n k < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k < 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: flip_bit_def)
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Instance \<^typ>\<open>nat\<close>\<close>
 
 instantiation nat :: semiring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 definition and_nat :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat\<close>
   where \<open>m AND n = nat (int m AND int n)\<close> for m n :: nat
 
 definition or_nat :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat\<close>
   where \<open>m OR n = nat (int m OR int n)\<close> for m n :: nat
 
 definition xor_nat :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat\<close>
   where \<open>m XOR n = nat (int m XOR int n)\<close> for m n :: nat
 
 instance proof
   fix m n q :: nat
   show \<open>bit (m AND n) q \<longleftrightarrow> bit m q \<and> bit n q\<close>
     by (auto simp add: and_nat_def bit_and_iff less_le bit_eq_iff)
   show \<open>bit (m OR n) q \<longleftrightarrow> bit m q \<or> bit n q\<close>
     by (auto simp add: or_nat_def bit_or_iff less_le bit_eq_iff)
   show \<open>bit (m XOR n) q \<longleftrightarrow> bit m q \<noteq> bit n q\<close>
     by (auto simp add: xor_nat_def bit_xor_iff less_le bit_eq_iff)
 qed
 
 end
 
 lemma and_nat_rec:
   \<open>m AND n = of_bool (odd m \<and> odd n) + 2 * ((m div 2) AND (n div 2))\<close> for m n :: nat
   by (simp add: and_nat_def and_int_rec [of \<open>int m\<close> \<open>int n\<close>] zdiv_int nat_add_distrib nat_mult_distrib)
 
 lemma or_nat_rec:
   \<open>m OR n = of_bool (odd m \<or> odd n) + 2 * ((m div 2) OR (n div 2))\<close> for m n :: nat
   by (simp add: or_nat_def or_int_rec [of \<open>int m\<close> \<open>int n\<close>] zdiv_int nat_add_distrib nat_mult_distrib)
 
 lemma xor_nat_rec:
   \<open>m XOR n = of_bool (odd m \<noteq> odd n) + 2 * ((m div 2) XOR (n div 2))\<close> for m n :: nat
   by (simp add: xor_nat_def xor_int_rec [of \<open>int m\<close> \<open>int n\<close>] zdiv_int nat_add_distrib nat_mult_distrib)
 
 lemma Suc_0_and_eq [simp]:
-  \<open>Suc 0 AND n = of_bool (odd n)\<close>
+  \<open>Suc 0 AND n = n mod 2\<close>
   using one_and_eq [of n] by simp
 
 lemma and_Suc_0_eq [simp]:
-  \<open>n AND Suc 0 = of_bool (odd n)\<close>
+  \<open>n AND Suc 0 = n mod 2\<close>
   using and_one_eq [of n] by simp
 
-lemma Suc_0_or_eq [simp]:
+lemma Suc_0_or_eq:
   \<open>Suc 0 OR n = n + of_bool (even n)\<close>
   using one_or_eq [of n] by simp
 
-lemma or_Suc_0_eq [simp]:
+lemma or_Suc_0_eq:
   \<open>n OR Suc 0 = n + of_bool (even n)\<close>
   using or_one_eq [of n] by simp
 
-lemma Suc_0_xor_eq [simp]:
+lemma Suc_0_xor_eq:
   \<open>Suc 0 XOR n = n + of_bool (even n) - of_bool (odd n)\<close>
   using one_xor_eq [of n] by simp
 
-lemma xor_Suc_0_eq [simp]:
+lemma xor_Suc_0_eq:
   \<open>n XOR Suc 0 = n + of_bool (even n) - of_bool (odd n)\<close>
   using xor_one_eq [of n] by simp
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Instances for \<^typ>\<open>integer\<close> and \<^typ>\<open>natural\<close>\<close>
 
 unbundle integer.lifting natural.lifting
 
 context
   includes lifting_syntax
 begin
 
 lemma transfer_rule_bit_integer [transfer_rule]:
   \<open>((pcr_integer :: int \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> bool) ===> (=)) bit bit\<close>
   by (unfold bit_def) transfer_prover
 
 lemma transfer_rule_bit_natural [transfer_rule]:
   \<open>((pcr_natural :: nat \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> bool) ===> (=)) bit bit\<close>
   by (unfold bit_def) transfer_prover
 
 end
 
 instantiation integer :: ring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 lift_definition not_integer :: \<open>integer \<Rightarrow> integer\<close>
   is not .
 
 lift_definition and_integer :: \<open>integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer\<close>
   is \<open>and\<close> .
 
 lift_definition or_integer :: \<open>integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer\<close>
   is or .
 
 lift_definition xor_integer ::  \<open>integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer\<close>
   is xor .
 
 instance proof
   fix k l :: \<open>integer\<close> and n :: nat
   show \<open>- k = NOT (k - 1)\<close>
     by transfer (simp add: minus_eq_not_minus_1)
   show \<open>bit (NOT k) n \<longleftrightarrow> (2 :: integer) ^ n \<noteq> 0 \<and> \<not> bit k n\<close>
     by transfer (fact bit_not_iff)
   show \<open>bit (k AND l) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit k n \<and> bit l n\<close>
     by transfer (fact bit_and_iff)
   show \<open>bit (k OR l) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit k n \<or> bit l n\<close>
     by transfer (fact bit_or_iff)
   show \<open>bit (k XOR l) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit k n \<noteq> bit l n\<close>
     by transfer (fact bit_xor_iff)
 qed
 
 end
 
 instantiation natural :: semiring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 lift_definition and_natural :: \<open>natural \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> natural\<close>
   is \<open>and\<close> .
 
 lift_definition or_natural :: \<open>natural \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> natural\<close>
   is or .
 
 lift_definition xor_natural ::  \<open>natural \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> natural\<close>
   is xor .
 
 instance proof
   fix m n :: \<open>natural\<close> and q :: nat
   show \<open>bit (m AND n) q \<longleftrightarrow> bit m q \<and> bit n q\<close>
     by transfer (fact bit_and_iff)
   show \<open>bit (m OR n) q \<longleftrightarrow> bit m q \<or> bit n q\<close>
     by transfer (fact bit_or_iff)
   show \<open>bit (m XOR n) q \<longleftrightarrow> bit m q \<noteq> bit n q\<close>
     by transfer (fact bit_xor_iff)
 qed
 
 end
 
 lifting_update integer.lifting
 lifting_forget integer.lifting
 
 lifting_update natural.lifting
 lifting_forget natural.lifting
 
 
 subsection \<open>Key ideas of bit operations\<close>
 
 text \<open>
   When formalizing bit operations, it is tempting to represent
   bit values as explicit lists over a binary type. This however
   is a bad idea, mainly due to the inherent ambiguities in
   representation concerning repeating leading bits.
 
   Hence this approach avoids such explicit lists altogether
   following an algebraic path:
 
   \<^item> Bit values are represented by numeric types: idealized
     unbounded bit values can be represented by type \<^typ>\<open>int\<close>,
     bounded bit values by quotient types over \<^typ>\<open>int\<close>.
 
   \<^item> (A special case are idealized unbounded bit values ending
     in @{term [source] 0} which can be represented by type \<^typ>\<open>nat\<close> but
     only support a restricted set of operations).
 
   \<^item> From this idea follows that
 
       \<^item> multiplication by \<^term>\<open>2 :: int\<close> is a bit shift to the left and
 
       \<^item> division by \<^term>\<open>2 :: int\<close> is a bit shift to the right.
 
   \<^item> Concerning bounded bit values, iterated shifts to the left
     may result in eliminating all bits by shifting them all
     beyond the boundary.  The property \<^prop>\<open>(2 :: int) ^ n \<noteq> 0\<close>
     represents that \<^term>\<open>n\<close> is \<^emph>\<open>not\<close> beyond that boundary.
 
   \<^item> The projection on a single bit is then @{thm bit_def [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}.
 
   \<^item> This leads to the most fundamental properties of bit values:
 
       \<^item> Equality rule: @{thm bit_eqI [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Induction rule: @{thm bits_induct [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
   \<^item> Typical operations are characterized as follows:
 
       \<^item> Singleton \<^term>\<open>n\<close>th bit: \<^term>\<open>(2 :: int) ^ n\<close>
 
       \<^item> Bit mask upto bit \<^term>\<open>n\<close>: \<^term>\<open>(2 :: int) ^ n - 1\<close>
 
       \<^item> Left shift: @{thm push_bit_eq_mult [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Right shift: @{thm drop_bit_eq_div [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Truncation: @{thm take_bit_eq_mod [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Negation: @{thm bit_not_iff [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> And: @{thm bit_and_iff [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Or: @{thm bit_or_iff [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Xor: @{thm bit_xor_iff [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Set a single bit: @{thm set_bit_def [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Unset a single bit: @{thm unset_bit_def [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Flip a single bit: @{thm flip_bit_def [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 \<close>
 
 end
diff --git a/src/HOL/ex/Word.thy b/src/HOL/ex/Word.thy
--- a/src/HOL/ex/Word.thy
+++ b/src/HOL/ex/Word.thy
@@ -1,721 +1,722 @@
 (*  Author:  Florian Haftmann, TUM
 *)
 
 section \<open>Proof of concept for algebraically founded bit word types\<close>
 
 theory Word
   imports
     Main
     "HOL-Library.Type_Length"
     "HOL-ex.Bit_Operations"
 begin
 
 subsection \<open>Preliminaries\<close>
 
 definition signed_take_bit :: "nat \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"
   where signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit:
     "signed_take_bit n k = take_bit (Suc n) (k + 2 ^ n) - 2 ^ n"
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit':
   "signed_take_bit (n - Suc 0) k = take_bit n (k + 2 ^ (n - 1)) - 2 ^ (n - 1)" if "n > 0"
   using that by (simp add: signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_0 [simp]:
   "signed_take_bit 0 k = - (k mod 2)"
 proof (cases "even k")
   case True
   then have "odd (k + 1)"
     by simp
   then have "(k + 1) mod 2 = 1"
     by (simp add: even_iff_mod_2_eq_zero)
   with True show ?thesis
     by (simp add: signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit take_bit_Suc)
 next
   case False
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit odd_iff_mod_2_eq_one take_bit_Suc)
 qed
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_Suc:
   "signed_take_bit (Suc n) k = signed_take_bit n (k div 2) * 2 + k mod 2"
   by (simp add: odd_iff_mod_2_eq_one signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit algebra_simps take_bit_Suc)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_of_0 [simp]:
   "signed_take_bit n 0 = 0"
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit take_bit_eq_mod)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_of_minus_1 [simp]:
   "signed_take_bit n (- 1) = - 1"
   by (induct n) (simp_all add: signed_take_bit_Suc)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_eq_iff_take_bit_eq:
   "signed_take_bit (n - Suc 0) k = signed_take_bit (n - Suc 0) l \<longleftrightarrow> take_bit n k = take_bit n l" (is "?P \<longleftrightarrow> ?Q")
   if "n > 0"
 proof -
   from that obtain m where m: "n = Suc m"
     by (cases n) auto
   show ?thesis
   proof
     assume ?Q
     have "take_bit (Suc m) (k + 2 ^ m) =
       take_bit (Suc m) (take_bit (Suc m) k + take_bit (Suc m) (2 ^ m))"
       by (simp only: take_bit_add)
     also have "\<dots> =
       take_bit (Suc m) (take_bit (Suc m) l + take_bit (Suc m) (2 ^ m))"
       by (simp only: \<open>?Q\<close> m [symmetric])
     also have "\<dots> = take_bit (Suc m) (l + 2 ^ m)"
       by (simp only: take_bit_add)
     finally show ?P
       by (simp only: signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit m) simp
   next
     assume ?P
     with that have "(k + 2 ^ (n - Suc 0)) mod 2 ^ n = (l + 2 ^ (n - Suc 0)) mod 2 ^ n"
       by (simp add: signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit' take_bit_eq_mod)
     then have "(i + (k + 2 ^ (n - Suc 0))) mod 2 ^ n = (i + (l + 2 ^ (n - Suc 0))) mod 2 ^ n" for i
       by (metis mod_add_eq)
     then have "k mod 2 ^ n = l mod 2 ^ n"
       by (metis add_diff_cancel_right' uminus_add_conv_diff)
     then show ?Q
       by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
   qed
 qed
 
 
 subsection \<open>Bit strings as quotient type\<close>
 
 subsubsection \<open>Basic properties\<close>
 
 quotient_type (overloaded) 'a word = int / "\<lambda>k l. take_bit LENGTH('a) k = take_bit LENGTH('a::len0) l"
   by (auto intro!: equivpI reflpI sympI transpI)
 
 instantiation word :: (len0) "{semiring_numeral, comm_semiring_0, comm_ring}"
 begin
 
 lift_definition zero_word :: "'a word"
   is 0
   .
 
 lift_definition one_word :: "'a word"
   is 1
   .
 
 lift_definition plus_word :: "'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word"
   is plus
   by (subst take_bit_add [symmetric]) (simp add: take_bit_add)
 
 lift_definition uminus_word :: "'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word"
   is uminus
   by (subst take_bit_minus [symmetric]) (simp add: take_bit_minus)
 
 lift_definition minus_word :: "'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word"
   is minus
   by (subst take_bit_diff [symmetric]) (simp add: take_bit_diff)
 
 lift_definition times_word :: "'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word"
   is times
   by (auto simp add: take_bit_eq_mod intro: mod_mult_cong)
 
 instance
   by standard (transfer; simp add: algebra_simps)+
 
 end
 
 instance word :: (len) comm_ring_1
   by standard (transfer; simp)+
 
 quickcheck_generator word
   constructors:
     "zero_class.zero :: ('a::len0) word",
     "numeral :: num \<Rightarrow> ('a::len0) word",
     "uminus :: ('a::len0) word \<Rightarrow> ('a::len0) word"
 
 context
   includes lifting_syntax
   notes power_transfer [transfer_rule]
 begin
 
 lemma power_transfer_word [transfer_rule]:
   \<open>(pcr_word ===> (=) ===> pcr_word) (^) (^)\<close>
   by transfer_prover
 
 end
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Conversions\<close>
 
 context
   includes lifting_syntax
   notes 
     transfer_rule_of_bool [transfer_rule]
     transfer_rule_numeral [transfer_rule]
     transfer_rule_of_nat [transfer_rule]
     transfer_rule_of_int [transfer_rule]
 begin
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   "((=) ===> (pcr_word :: int \<Rightarrow> 'a::len word \<Rightarrow> bool)) of_bool of_bool"
   by transfer_prover
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   "((=) ===> (pcr_word :: int \<Rightarrow> 'a::len0 word \<Rightarrow> bool)) numeral numeral"
   by transfer_prover
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   "((=) ===> pcr_word) int of_nat"
   by transfer_prover
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   "((=) ===> pcr_word) (\<lambda>k. k) of_int"
 proof -
   have "((=) ===> pcr_word) of_int of_int"
     by transfer_prover
   then show ?thesis by (simp add: id_def)
 qed
 
 end
 
 lemma abs_word_eq:
   "abs_word = of_int"
   by (rule ext) (transfer, rule)
 
 context semiring_1
 begin
 
 lift_definition unsigned :: "'b::len0 word \<Rightarrow> 'a"
   is "of_nat \<circ> nat \<circ> take_bit LENGTH('b)"
   by simp
 
 lemma unsigned_0 [simp]:
   "unsigned 0 = 0"
   by transfer simp
 
 end
 
 context semiring_char_0
 begin
 
 lemma word_eq_iff_unsigned:
   "a = b \<longleftrightarrow> unsigned a = unsigned b"
   by safe (transfer; simp add: eq_nat_nat_iff)
 
 end
 
 instantiation word :: (len0) equal
 begin
 
 definition equal_word :: "'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word \<Rightarrow> bool"
   where "equal_word a b \<longleftrightarrow> (unsigned a :: int) = unsigned b"
 
 instance proof
   fix a b :: "'a word"
   show "HOL.equal a b \<longleftrightarrow> a = b"
     using word_eq_iff_unsigned [of a b] by (auto simp add: equal_word_def)
 qed
 
 end
 
 context ring_1
 begin
 
 lift_definition signed :: "'b::len word \<Rightarrow> 'a"
   is "of_int \<circ> signed_take_bit (LENGTH('b) - 1)"
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_eq_iff_take_bit_eq [symmetric])
 
 lemma signed_0 [simp]:
   "signed 0 = 0"
   by transfer simp
 
 end
 
 lemma unsigned_of_nat [simp]:
   "unsigned (of_nat n :: 'a word) = take_bit LENGTH('a::len) n"
   by transfer (simp add: nat_eq_iff take_bit_eq_mod zmod_int)
 
 lemma of_nat_unsigned [simp]:
   "of_nat (unsigned a) = a"
   by transfer simp
 
 lemma of_int_unsigned [simp]:
   "of_int (unsigned a) = a"
   by transfer simp
 
 lemma unsigned_nat_less:
   \<open>unsigned a < (2 ^ LENGTH('a) :: nat)\<close> for a :: \<open>'a::len0 word\<close>
   by transfer (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 
 lemma unsigned_int_less:
   \<open>unsigned a < (2 ^ LENGTH('a) :: int)\<close> for a :: \<open>'a::len0 word\<close>
   by transfer (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 
 context ring_char_0
 begin
 
 lemma word_eq_iff_signed:
   "a = b \<longleftrightarrow> signed a = signed b"
   by safe (transfer; auto simp add: signed_take_bit_eq_iff_take_bit_eq)
 
 end
 
 lemma signed_of_int [simp]:
   "signed (of_int k :: 'a word) = signed_take_bit (LENGTH('a::len) - 1) k"
   by transfer simp
 
 lemma of_int_signed [simp]:
   "of_int (signed a) = a"
   by transfer (simp add: signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit take_bit_eq_mod mod_simps)
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Properties\<close>
 
 lemma exp_eq_zero_iff:
   \<open>(2 :: 'a::len word) ^ n = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> LENGTH('a) \<le> n\<close>
   by transfer simp
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Division\<close>
 
 instantiation word :: (len0) modulo
 begin
 
 lift_definition divide_word :: "'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word"
   is "\<lambda>a b. take_bit LENGTH('a) a div take_bit LENGTH('a) b"
   by simp
 
 lift_definition modulo_word :: "'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word"
   is "\<lambda>a b. take_bit LENGTH('a) a mod take_bit LENGTH('a) b"
   by simp
 
 instance ..
 
 end
 
 lemma zero_word_div_eq [simp]:
   \<open>0 div a = 0\<close> for a :: \<open>'a::len0 word\<close>
   by transfer simp
 
 lemma div_zero_word_eq [simp]:
   \<open>a div 0 = 0\<close> for a :: \<open>'a::len0 word\<close>
   by transfer simp
 
 context
   includes lifting_syntax
 begin
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   "(pcr_word ===> (\<longleftrightarrow>)) even ((dvd) 2 :: 'a::len word \<Rightarrow> bool)"
 proof -
   have even_word_unfold: "even k \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>l. take_bit LENGTH('a) k = take_bit LENGTH('a) (2 * l))" (is "?P \<longleftrightarrow> ?Q")
     for k :: int
   proof
     assume ?P
     then show ?Q
       by auto
   next
     assume ?Q
     then obtain l where "take_bit LENGTH('a) k = take_bit LENGTH('a) (2 * l)" ..
     then have "even (take_bit LENGTH('a) k)"
       by simp
     then show ?P
       by simp
   qed
   show ?thesis by (simp only: even_word_unfold [abs_def] dvd_def [where ?'a = "'a word", abs_def])
     transfer_prover
 qed
 
 end
 
 instance word :: (len) semiring_modulo
 proof
   show "a div b * b + a mod b = a" for a b :: "'a word"
   proof transfer
     fix k l :: int
     define r :: int where "r = 2 ^ LENGTH('a)"
     then have r: "take_bit LENGTH('a) k = k mod r" for k
       by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
     have "k mod r = ((k mod r) div (l mod r) * (l mod r)
       + (k mod r) mod (l mod r)) mod r"
       by (simp add: div_mult_mod_eq)
     also have "... = (((k mod r) div (l mod r) * (l mod r)) mod r
       + (k mod r) mod (l mod r)) mod r"
       by (simp add: mod_add_left_eq)
     also have "... = (((k mod r) div (l mod r) * l) mod r
       + (k mod r) mod (l mod r)) mod r"
       by (simp add: mod_mult_right_eq)
     finally have "k mod r = ((k mod r) div (l mod r) * l
       + (k mod r) mod (l mod r)) mod r"
       by (simp add: mod_simps)
     with r show "take_bit LENGTH('a) (take_bit LENGTH('a) k div take_bit LENGTH('a) l * l
       + take_bit LENGTH('a) k mod take_bit LENGTH('a) l) = take_bit LENGTH('a) k"
       by simp
   qed
 qed
 
 instance word :: (len) semiring_parity
 proof
   show "\<not> 2 dvd (1::'a word)"
     by transfer simp
   show even_iff_mod_2_eq_0: "2 dvd a \<longleftrightarrow> a mod 2 = 0"
     for a :: "'a word"
     by transfer (simp_all add: mod_2_eq_odd take_bit_Suc)
   show "\<not> 2 dvd a \<longleftrightarrow> a mod 2 = 1"
     for a :: "'a word"
     by transfer (simp_all add: mod_2_eq_odd take_bit_Suc)
 qed
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Orderings\<close>
 
 instantiation word :: (len0) linorder
 begin
 
 lift_definition less_eq_word :: "'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word \<Rightarrow> bool"
   is "\<lambda>a b. take_bit LENGTH('a) a \<le> take_bit LENGTH('a) b"
   by simp
 
 lift_definition less_word :: "'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word \<Rightarrow> bool"
   is "\<lambda>a b. take_bit LENGTH('a) a < take_bit LENGTH('a) b"
   by simp
 
 instance
   by standard (transfer; auto)+
 
 end
 
 context linordered_semidom
 begin
 
 lemma word_less_eq_iff_unsigned:
   "a \<le> b \<longleftrightarrow> unsigned a \<le> unsigned b"
   by (transfer fixing: less_eq) (simp add: nat_le_eq_zle)
 
 lemma word_less_iff_unsigned:
   "a < b \<longleftrightarrow> unsigned a < unsigned b"
   by (transfer fixing: less) (auto dest: preorder_class.le_less_trans [OF take_bit_nonnegative])
 
 end
 
 lemma word_greater_zero_iff:
   \<open>a > 0 \<longleftrightarrow> a \<noteq> 0\<close> for a :: \<open>'a::len0 word\<close>
   by transfer (simp add: less_le)
 
 lemma of_nat_word_eq_iff:
   \<open>of_nat m = (of_nat n :: 'a::len word) \<longleftrightarrow> take_bit LENGTH('a) m = take_bit LENGTH('a) n\<close>
   by transfer (simp add: take_bit_of_nat)
 
 lemma of_nat_word_less_eq_iff:
   \<open>of_nat m \<le> (of_nat n :: 'a::len word) \<longleftrightarrow> take_bit LENGTH('a) m \<le> take_bit LENGTH('a) n\<close>
   by transfer (simp add: take_bit_of_nat)
 
 lemma of_nat_word_less_iff:
   \<open>of_nat m < (of_nat n :: 'a::len word) \<longleftrightarrow> take_bit LENGTH('a) m < take_bit LENGTH('a) n\<close>
   by transfer (simp add: take_bit_of_nat)
 
 lemma of_nat_word_eq_0_iff:
   \<open>of_nat n = (0 :: 'a::len word) \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ LENGTH('a) dvd n\<close>
   using of_nat_word_eq_iff [where ?'a = 'a, of n 0] by (simp add: take_bit_eq_0_iff)
 
 lemma of_int_word_eq_iff:
   \<open>of_int k = (of_int l :: 'a::len word) \<longleftrightarrow> take_bit LENGTH('a) k = take_bit LENGTH('a) l\<close>
   by transfer rule
 
 lemma of_int_word_less_eq_iff:
   \<open>of_int k \<le> (of_int l :: 'a::len word) \<longleftrightarrow> take_bit LENGTH('a) k \<le> take_bit LENGTH('a) l\<close>
   by transfer rule
 
 lemma of_int_word_less_iff:
   \<open>of_int k < (of_int l :: 'a::len word) \<longleftrightarrow> take_bit LENGTH('a) k < take_bit LENGTH('a) l\<close>
   by transfer rule
 
 lemma of_int_word_eq_0_iff:
   \<open>of_int k = (0 :: 'a::len word) \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ LENGTH('a) dvd k\<close>
   using of_int_word_eq_iff [where ?'a = 'a, of k 0] by (simp add: take_bit_eq_0_iff)
 
 
 subsection \<open>Bit structure on \<^typ>\<open>'a word\<close>\<close>
 
 lemma word_bit_induct [case_names zero even odd]:
   \<open>P a\<close> if word_zero: \<open>P 0\<close>
     and word_even: \<open>\<And>a. P a \<Longrightarrow> 0 < a \<Longrightarrow> a < 2 ^ (LENGTH('a) - 1) \<Longrightarrow> P (2 * a)\<close>
     and word_odd: \<open>\<And>a. P a \<Longrightarrow> a < 2 ^ (LENGTH('a) - 1) \<Longrightarrow> P (1 + 2 * a)\<close>
   for P and a :: \<open>'a::len word\<close>
 proof -
   define m :: nat where \<open>m = LENGTH('a) - 1\<close>
   then have l: \<open>LENGTH('a) = Suc m\<close>
     by simp
   define n :: nat where \<open>n = unsigned a\<close>
   then have \<open>n < 2 ^ LENGTH('a)\<close>
     by (simp add: unsigned_nat_less)
   then have \<open>n < 2 * 2 ^ m\<close>
     by (simp add: l)
   then have \<open>P (of_nat n)\<close>
   proof (induction n rule: nat_bit_induct)
     case zero
     show ?case
       by simp (rule word_zero)
   next
     case (even n)
     then have \<open>n < 2 ^ m\<close>
       by simp
     with even.IH have \<open>P (of_nat n)\<close>
       by simp
     moreover from \<open>n < 2 ^ m\<close> even.hyps have \<open>0 < (of_nat n :: 'a word)\<close>
       by (auto simp add: word_greater_zero_iff of_nat_word_eq_0_iff l)
     moreover from \<open>n < 2 ^ m\<close> have \<open>(of_nat n :: 'a word) < 2 ^ (LENGTH('a) - 1)\<close>
       using of_nat_word_less_iff [where ?'a = 'a, of n \<open>2 ^ m\<close>]
       by (cases \<open>m = 0\<close>) (simp_all add: not_less take_bit_eq_self ac_simps l)
     ultimately have \<open>P (2 * of_nat n)\<close>
       by (rule word_even)
     then show ?case
       by simp
   next
     case (odd n)
     then have \<open>Suc n \<le> 2 ^ m\<close>
       by simp
     with odd.IH have \<open>P (of_nat n)\<close>
       by simp
     moreover from \<open>Suc n \<le> 2 ^ m\<close> have \<open>(of_nat n :: 'a word) < 2 ^ (LENGTH('a) - 1)\<close>
       using of_nat_word_less_iff [where ?'a = 'a, of n \<open>2 ^ m\<close>]
       by (cases \<open>m = 0\<close>) (simp_all add: not_less take_bit_eq_self ac_simps l)
     ultimately have \<open>P (1 + 2 * of_nat n)\<close>
       by (rule word_odd)
     then show ?case
       by simp
   qed
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: n_def)
 qed
 
 lemma bit_word_half_eq:
   \<open>(of_bool b + a * 2) div 2 = a\<close>
     if \<open>a < 2 ^ (LENGTH('a) - Suc 0)\<close>
     for a :: \<open>'a::len word\<close>
 proof (cases \<open>2 \<le> LENGTH('a::len)\<close>)
   case False
   have \<open>of_bool (odd k) < (1 :: int) \<longleftrightarrow> even k\<close> for k :: int
     by auto
   with False that show ?thesis
     by transfer (simp add: eq_iff)
 next
   case True
   obtain n where length: \<open>LENGTH('a) = Suc n\<close>
     by (cases \<open>LENGTH('a)\<close>) simp_all
   show ?thesis proof (cases b)
     case False
     moreover have \<open>a * 2 div 2 = a\<close>
     using that proof transfer
       fix k :: int
       from length have \<open>k * 2 mod 2 ^ LENGTH('a) = (k mod 2 ^ n) * 2\<close>
         by simp
       moreover assume \<open>take_bit LENGTH('a) k < take_bit LENGTH('a) (2 ^ (LENGTH('a) - Suc 0))\<close>
       with \<open>LENGTH('a) = Suc n\<close>
       have \<open>k mod 2 ^ LENGTH('a) = k mod 2 ^ n\<close>
         by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod divmod_digit_0)
       ultimately have \<open>take_bit LENGTH('a) (k * 2) = take_bit LENGTH('a) k * 2\<close>
         by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
       with True show \<open>take_bit LENGTH('a) (take_bit LENGTH('a) (k * 2) div take_bit LENGTH('a) 2)
         = take_bit LENGTH('a) k\<close>
         by simp
     qed
     ultimately show ?thesis
       by simp
   next
     case True
     moreover have \<open>(1 + a * 2) div 2 = a\<close>
     using that proof transfer
       fix k :: int
       from length have \<open>(1 + k * 2) mod 2 ^ LENGTH('a) = 1 + (k mod 2 ^ n) * 2\<close>
         using pos_zmod_mult_2 [of \<open>2 ^ n\<close> k] by (simp add: ac_simps)
       moreover assume \<open>take_bit LENGTH('a) k < take_bit LENGTH('a) (2 ^ (LENGTH('a) - Suc 0))\<close>
       with \<open>LENGTH('a) = Suc n\<close>
       have \<open>k mod 2 ^ LENGTH('a) = k mod 2 ^ n\<close>
         by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod divmod_digit_0)
       ultimately have \<open>take_bit LENGTH('a) (1 + k * 2) = 1 + take_bit LENGTH('a) k * 2\<close>
         by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
       with True show \<open>take_bit LENGTH('a) (take_bit LENGTH('a) (1 + k * 2) div take_bit LENGTH('a) 2)
         = take_bit LENGTH('a) k\<close>
         by (auto simp add: take_bit_Suc)
     qed
     ultimately show ?thesis
       by simp
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma even_mult_exp_div_word_iff:
   \<open>even (a * 2 ^ m div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> (
     m \<le> n \<and>
     n < LENGTH('a) \<and> odd (a div 2 ^ (n - m)))\<close> for a :: \<open>'a::len word\<close>
   by transfer
     (auto simp flip: drop_bit_eq_div simp add: even_drop_bit_iff_not_bit bit_take_bit_iff,
       simp_all flip: push_bit_eq_mult add: bit_push_bit_iff_int)
 
 instance word :: (len) semiring_bits
 proof
   show \<open>P a\<close> if stable: \<open>\<And>a. a div 2 = a \<Longrightarrow> P a\<close>
     and rec: \<open>\<And>a b. P a \<Longrightarrow> (of_bool b + 2 * a) div 2 = a \<Longrightarrow> P (of_bool b + 2 * a)\<close>
   for P and a :: \<open>'a word\<close>
   proof (induction a rule: word_bit_induct)
     case zero
     from stable [of 0] show ?case
       by simp
   next
     case (even a)
     with rec [of a False] show ?case
       using bit_word_half_eq [of a False] by (simp add: ac_simps)
   next
     case (odd a)
     with rec [of a True] show ?case
       using bit_word_half_eq [of a True] by (simp add: ac_simps)
   qed
   show \<open>0 div a = 0\<close>
     for a :: \<open>'a word\<close>
     by transfer simp
   show \<open>a div 1 = a\<close>
     for a :: \<open>'a word\<close>
     by transfer simp
   show \<open>a mod b div b = 0\<close>
     for a b :: \<open>'a word\<close>
     apply transfer
     apply (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
     apply (subst (3) mod_pos_pos_trivial [of _ \<open>2 ^ LENGTH('a)\<close>])
       apply simp_all
      apply (metis le_less mod_by_0 pos_mod_conj zero_less_numeral zero_less_power)
     using pos_mod_bound [of \<open>2 ^ LENGTH('a)\<close>] apply simp
   proof -
     fix aa :: int and ba :: int
     have f1: "\<And>i n. (i::int) mod 2 ^ n = 0 \<or> 0 < i mod 2 ^ n"
       by (metis le_less take_bit_eq_mod take_bit_nonnegative)
     have "(0::int) < 2 ^ len_of (TYPE('a)::'a itself) \<and> ba mod 2 ^ len_of (TYPE('a)::'a itself) \<noteq> 0 \<or> aa mod 2 ^ len_of (TYPE('a)::'a itself) mod (ba mod 2 ^ len_of (TYPE('a)::'a itself)) < 2 ^ len_of (TYPE('a)::'a itself)"
       by (metis (no_types) mod_by_0 unique_euclidean_semiring_numeral_class.pos_mod_bound zero_less_numeral zero_less_power)
     then show "aa mod 2 ^ len_of (TYPE('a)::'a itself) mod (ba mod 2 ^ len_of (TYPE('a)::'a itself)) < 2 ^ len_of (TYPE('a)::'a itself)"
       using f1 by (meson le_less less_le_trans unique_euclidean_semiring_numeral_class.pos_mod_bound)
   qed
   show \<open>(1 + a) div 2 = a div 2\<close>
     if \<open>even a\<close>
     for a :: \<open>'a word\<close>
-    using that by transfer (auto dest: le_Suc_ex simp add: take_bit_Suc)
+    using that by transfer
+      (auto dest: le_Suc_ex simp add: mod_2_eq_odd take_bit_Suc elim!: evenE)
   show \<open>(2 :: 'a word) ^ m div 2 ^ n = of_bool ((2 :: 'a word) ^ m \<noteq> 0 \<and> n \<le> m) * 2 ^ (m - n)\<close>
     for m n :: nat
     by transfer (simp, simp add: exp_div_exp_eq)
   show "a div 2 ^ m div 2 ^ n = a div 2 ^ (m + n)"
     for a :: "'a word" and m n :: nat
     apply transfer
     apply (auto simp add: not_less take_bit_drop_bit ac_simps simp flip: drop_bit_eq_div)
     apply (simp add: drop_bit_take_bit)
     done
   show "a mod 2 ^ m mod 2 ^ n = a mod 2 ^ min m n"
     for a :: "'a word" and m n :: nat
     by transfer (auto simp flip: take_bit_eq_mod simp add: ac_simps)
   show \<open>a * 2 ^ m mod 2 ^ n = a mod 2 ^ (n - m) * 2 ^ m\<close>
     if \<open>m \<le> n\<close> for a :: "'a word" and m n :: nat
     using that apply transfer
     apply (auto simp flip: take_bit_eq_mod)
            apply (auto simp flip: push_bit_eq_mult simp add: push_bit_take_bit split: split_min_lin)
     done
   show \<open>a div 2 ^ n mod 2 ^ m = a mod (2 ^ (n + m)) div 2 ^ n\<close>
     for a :: "'a word" and m n :: nat
     by transfer (auto simp add: not_less take_bit_drop_bit ac_simps simp flip: take_bit_eq_mod drop_bit_eq_div split: split_min_lin)
   show \<open>even ((2 ^ m - 1) div (2::'a word) ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ n = (0::'a word) \<or> m \<le> n\<close>
     for m n :: nat
     by transfer (auto simp add: take_bit_of_mask even_mask_div_iff)
   show \<open>even (a * 2 ^ m div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> n < m \<or> (2::'a word) ^ n = 0 \<or> m \<le> n \<and> even (a div 2 ^ (n - m))\<close>
     for a :: \<open>'a word\<close> and m n :: nat
   proof transfer
     show \<open>even (take_bit LENGTH('a) (k * 2 ^ m) div take_bit LENGTH('a) (2 ^ n)) \<longleftrightarrow>
       n < m
       \<or> take_bit LENGTH('a) ((2::int) ^ n) = take_bit LENGTH('a) 0
       \<or> (m \<le> n \<and> even (take_bit LENGTH('a) k div take_bit LENGTH('a) (2 ^ (n - m))))\<close>
     for m n :: nat and k l :: int
       by (auto simp flip: take_bit_eq_mod drop_bit_eq_div push_bit_eq_mult
         simp add: div_push_bit_of_1_eq_drop_bit drop_bit_take_bit drop_bit_push_bit_int [of n m])
   qed
 qed
 
 context
   includes lifting_syntax
 begin
 
 lemma transfer_rule_bit_word [transfer_rule]:
   \<open>((pcr_word :: int \<Rightarrow> 'a::len word \<Rightarrow> bool) ===> (=)) (\<lambda>k n. n < LENGTH('a) \<and> bit k n) bit\<close>
 proof -
   let ?t = \<open>\<lambda>a n. odd (take_bit LENGTH('a) a div take_bit LENGTH('a) ((2::int) ^ n))\<close>
   have \<open>((pcr_word :: int \<Rightarrow> 'a word \<Rightarrow> bool) ===> (=)) ?t bit\<close>
     by (unfold bit_def) transfer_prover
   also have \<open>?t = (\<lambda>k n. n < LENGTH('a) \<and> bit k n)\<close>
     by (simp add: fun_eq_iff bit_take_bit_iff flip: bit_def)
   finally show ?thesis .
 qed
 
 end
 
 instantiation word :: (len) semiring_bit_shifts
 begin
 
 lift_definition push_bit_word :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> 'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word\<close>
   is push_bit
 proof -
   show \<open>take_bit LENGTH('a) (push_bit n k) = take_bit LENGTH('a) (push_bit n l)\<close>
     if \<open>take_bit LENGTH('a) k = take_bit LENGTH('a) l\<close> for k l :: int and n :: nat
   proof -
     from that
     have \<open>take_bit (LENGTH('a) - n) (take_bit LENGTH('a) k)
       = take_bit (LENGTH('a) - n) (take_bit LENGTH('a) l)\<close>
       by simp
     moreover have \<open>min (LENGTH('a) - n) LENGTH('a) = LENGTH('a) - n\<close>
       by simp
     ultimately show ?thesis
       by (simp add: take_bit_push_bit)
   qed
 qed
 
 lift_definition drop_bit_word :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> 'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word\<close>
   is \<open>\<lambda>n. drop_bit n \<circ> take_bit LENGTH('a)\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 
 instance proof
   show \<open>push_bit n a = a * 2 ^ n\<close> for n :: nat and a :: "'a word"
     by transfer (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult)
   show \<open>drop_bit n a = a div 2 ^ n\<close> for n :: nat and a :: "'a word"
     by transfer (simp flip: drop_bit_eq_div add: drop_bit_take_bit)
 qed
 
 end
 
 instantiation word :: (len) ring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 lift_definition not_word :: "'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word"
   is not
   by (simp add: take_bit_not_iff)
 
 lift_definition and_word :: "'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word"
   is \<open>and\<close>
   by simp
 
 lift_definition or_word :: "'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word"
   is or
   by simp
 
 lift_definition xor_word ::  "'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word \<Rightarrow> 'a word"
   is xor
   by simp
 
 instance proof
   fix a b :: \<open>'a word\<close> and n :: nat
   show \<open>- a = NOT (a - 1)\<close>
     by transfer (simp add: minus_eq_not_minus_1)
   show \<open>bit (NOT a) n \<longleftrightarrow> (2 :: 'a word) ^ n \<noteq> 0 \<and> \<not> bit a n\<close>
     by transfer (simp add: bit_not_iff)
   show \<open>bit (a AND b) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit a n \<and> bit b n\<close>
     by transfer (auto simp add: bit_and_iff)
   show \<open>bit (a OR b) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit a n \<or> bit b n\<close>
     by transfer (auto simp add: bit_or_iff)
   show \<open>bit (a XOR b) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit a n \<noteq> bit b n\<close>
     by transfer (auto simp add: bit_xor_iff)
 qed
 
 end
 
 lifting_update word.lifting
 lifting_forget word.lifting
 
 end