diff --git a/src/HOL/Map.thy b/src/HOL/Map.thy --- a/src/HOL/Map.thy +++ b/src/HOL/Map.thy @@ -1,947 +1,947 @@ (* Title: HOL/Map.thy Author: Tobias Nipkow, based on a theory by David von Oheimb Copyright 1997-2003 TU Muenchen The datatype of "maps"; strongly resembles maps in VDM. *) section \Maps\ theory Map imports List abbrevs "(=" = "\\<^sub>m" begin type_synonym ('a, 'b) "map" = "'a \ 'b option" (infixr "\" 0) abbreviation (input) empty :: "'a \ 'b" where "empty \ \x. None" definition map_comp :: "('b \ 'c) \ ('a \ 'b) \ ('a \ 'c)" (infixl "\\<^sub>m" 55) where "f \\<^sub>m g = (\k. case g k of None \ None | Some v \ f v)" definition map_add :: "('a \ 'b) \ ('a \ 'b) \ ('a \ 'b)" (infixl "++" 100) where "m1 ++ m2 = (\x. case m2 x of None \ m1 x | Some y \ Some y)" definition restrict_map :: "('a \ 'b) \ 'a set \ ('a \ 'b)" (infixl "|`" 110) where "m|`A = (\x. if x \ A then m x else None)" notation (latex output) restrict_map ("_\\<^bsub>_\<^esub>" [111,110] 110) definition dom :: "('a \ 'b) \ 'a set" where "dom m = {a. m a \ None}" definition ran :: "('a \ 'b) \ 'b set" where "ran m = {b. \a. m a = Some b}" definition graph :: "('a \ 'b) \ ('a \ 'b) set" where "graph m = {(a, b) | a b. m a = Some b}" definition map_le :: "('a \ 'b) \ ('a \ 'b) \ bool" (infix "\\<^sub>m" 50) where "(m\<^sub>1 \\<^sub>m m\<^sub>2) \ (\a \ dom m\<^sub>1. m\<^sub>1 a = m\<^sub>2 a)" nonterminal maplets and maplet syntax "_maplet" :: "['a, 'a] \ maplet" ("_ /\/ _") "_maplets" :: "['a, 'a] \ maplet" ("_ /[\]/ _") "" :: "maplet \ maplets" ("_") "_Maplets" :: "[maplet, maplets] \ maplets" ("_,/ _") - "_MapUpd" :: "['a \ 'b, maplets] \ 'a \ 'b" ("_/'(_')" [900, 0] 900) + "_MapUpd" :: "['a \ 'b, maplets] \ 'a \ 'b" ("_/'(_')" [1000, 0] 900) "_Map" :: "maplets \ 'a \ 'b" ("(1[_])") syntax (ASCII) "_maplet" :: "['a, 'a] \ maplet" ("_ /|->/ _") "_maplets" :: "['a, 'a] \ maplet" ("_ /[|->]/ _") translations "_MapUpd m (_Maplets xy ms)" \ "_MapUpd (_MapUpd m xy) ms" "_MapUpd m (_maplet x y)" \ "m(x := CONST Some y)" "_Map ms" \ "_MapUpd (CONST empty) ms" "_Map ms" \ "_MapUpd (\x. CONST None) ms" \\both are needed\ "_Map (_Maplets ms1 ms2)" \ "_MapUpd (_Map ms1) ms2" "_Maplets ms1 (_Maplets ms2 ms3)" \ "_Maplets (_Maplets ms1 ms2) ms3" primrec map_of :: "('a \ 'b) list \ 'a \ 'b" where "map_of [] = empty" | "map_of (p # ps) = (map_of ps)(fst p \ snd p)" definition map_upds :: "('a \ 'b) \ 'a list \ 'b list \ 'a \ 'b" where "map_upds m xs ys = m ++ map_of (rev (zip xs ys))" translations "_MapUpd m (_maplets x y)" \ "CONST map_upds m x y" lemma map_of_Cons_code [code]: "map_of [] k = None" "map_of ((l, v) # ps) k = (if l = k then Some v else map_of ps k)" by simp_all subsection \@{term [source] empty}\ lemma empty_upd_none [simp]: "empty(x := None) = empty" by (rule ext) simp subsection \@{term [source] map_upd}\ lemma map_upd_triv: "t k = Some x \ t(k\x) = t" by (rule ext) simp lemma map_upd_nonempty [simp]: "t(k\x) \ empty" proof assume "t(k \ x) = empty" then have "(t(k \ x)) k = None" by simp then show False by simp qed lemma map_upd_eqD1: assumes "m(a\x) = n(a\y)" shows "x = y" proof - from assms have "(m(a\x)) a = (n(a\y)) a" by simp then show ?thesis by simp qed lemma map_upd_Some_unfold: "((m(a\b)) x = Some y) = (x = a \ b = y \ x \ a \ m x = Some y)" by auto lemma image_map_upd [simp]: "x \ A \ m(x \ y) ` A = m ` A" by auto lemma finite_range_updI: assumes "finite (range f)" shows "finite (range (f(a\b)))" proof - have "range (f(a\b)) \ insert (Some b) (range f)" by auto then show ?thesis by (rule finite_subset) (use assms in auto) qed subsection \@{term [source] map_of}\ lemma map_of_eq_empty_iff [simp]: "map_of xys = empty \ xys = []" proof show "map_of xys = empty \ xys = []" by (induction xys) simp_all qed simp lemma empty_eq_map_of_iff [simp]: "empty = map_of xys \ xys = []" by(subst eq_commute) simp lemma map_of_eq_None_iff: "(map_of xys x = None) = (x \ fst ` (set xys))" by (induct xys) simp_all lemma map_of_eq_Some_iff [simp]: "distinct(map fst xys) \ (map_of xys x = Some y) = ((x,y) \ set xys)" proof (induct xys) case (Cons xy xys) then show ?case by (cases xy) (auto simp flip: map_of_eq_None_iff) qed auto lemma Some_eq_map_of_iff [simp]: "distinct(map fst xys) \ (Some y = map_of xys x) = ((x,y) \ set xys)" by (auto simp del: map_of_eq_Some_iff simp: map_of_eq_Some_iff [symmetric]) lemma map_of_is_SomeI [simp]: "\distinct(map fst xys); (x,y) \ set xys\ \ map_of xys x = Some y" by simp lemma map_of_zip_is_None [simp]: "length xs = length ys \ (map_of (zip xs ys) x = None) = (x \ set xs)" by (induct rule: list_induct2) simp_all lemma map_of_zip_is_Some: assumes "length xs = length ys" shows "x \ set xs \ (\y. map_of (zip xs ys) x = Some y)" using assms by (induct rule: list_induct2) simp_all lemma map_of_zip_upd: fixes x :: 'a and xs :: "'a list" and ys zs :: "'b list" assumes "length ys = length xs" and "length zs = length xs" and "x \ set xs" - and "map_of (zip xs ys)(x \ y) = map_of (zip xs zs)(x \ z)" + and "(map_of (zip xs ys))(x \ y) = (map_of (zip xs zs))(x \ z)" shows "map_of (zip xs ys) = map_of (zip xs zs)" proof fix x' :: 'a show "map_of (zip xs ys) x' = map_of (zip xs zs) x'" proof (cases "x = x'") case True from assms True map_of_zip_is_None [of xs ys x'] have "map_of (zip xs ys) x' = None" by simp moreover from assms True map_of_zip_is_None [of xs zs x'] have "map_of (zip xs zs) x' = None" by simp ultimately show ?thesis by simp next case False from assms - have "(map_of (zip xs ys)(x \ y)) x' = (map_of (zip xs zs)(x \ z)) x'" by auto + have "((map_of (zip xs ys))(x \ y)) x' = ((map_of (zip xs zs))(x \ z)) x'" by auto with False show ?thesis by simp qed qed lemma map_of_zip_inject: assumes "length ys = length xs" and "length zs = length xs" and dist: "distinct xs" and map_of: "map_of (zip xs ys) = map_of (zip xs zs)" shows "ys = zs" using assms(1) assms(2)[symmetric] using dist map_of proof (induct ys xs zs rule: list_induct3) case Nil show ?case by simp next case (Cons y ys x xs z zs) from \map_of (zip (x#xs) (y#ys)) = map_of (zip (x#xs) (z#zs))\ - have map_of: "map_of (zip xs ys)(x \ y) = map_of (zip xs zs)(x \ z)" by simp + have map_of: "(map_of (zip xs ys))(x \ y) = (map_of (zip xs zs))(x \ z)" by simp from Cons have "length ys = length xs" and "length zs = length xs" and "x \ set xs" by simp_all then have "map_of (zip xs ys) = map_of (zip xs zs)" using map_of by (rule map_of_zip_upd) with Cons.hyps \distinct (x # xs)\ have "ys = zs" by simp moreover from map_of have "y = z" by (rule map_upd_eqD1) ultimately show ?case by simp qed lemma map_of_zip_nth: assumes "length xs = length ys" assumes "distinct xs" assumes "i < length ys" shows "map_of (zip xs ys) (xs ! i) = Some (ys ! i)" using assms proof (induct arbitrary: i rule: list_induct2) case Nil then show ?case by simp next case (Cons x xs y ys) then show ?case using less_Suc_eq_0_disj by auto qed lemma map_of_zip_map: "map_of (zip xs (map f xs)) = (\x. if x \ set xs then Some (f x) else None)" by (induct xs) (simp_all add: fun_eq_iff) lemma finite_range_map_of: "finite (range (map_of xys))" proof (induct xys) case (Cons a xys) then show ?case using finite_range_updI by fastforce qed auto lemma map_of_SomeD: "map_of xs k = Some y \ (k, y) \ set xs" by (induct xs) (auto split: if_splits) lemma map_of_mapk_SomeI: "inj f \ map_of t k = Some x \ map_of (map (case_prod (\k. Pair (f k))) t) (f k) = Some x" by (induct t) (auto simp: inj_eq) lemma weak_map_of_SomeI: "(k, x) \ set l \ \x. map_of l k = Some x" by (induct l) auto lemma map_of_filter_in: "map_of xs k = Some z \ P k z \ map_of (filter (case_prod P) xs) k = Some z" by (induct xs) auto lemma map_of_map: "map_of (map (\(k, v). (k, f v)) xs) = map_option f \ map_of xs" by (induct xs) (auto simp: fun_eq_iff) lemma dom_map_option: "dom (\k. map_option (f k) (m k)) = dom m" by (simp add: dom_def) lemma dom_map_option_comp [simp]: "dom (map_option g \ m) = dom m" using dom_map_option [of "\_. g" m] by (simp add: comp_def) subsection \\<^const>\map_option\ related\ lemma map_option_o_empty [simp]: "map_option f \ empty = empty" by (rule ext) simp lemma map_option_o_map_upd [simp]: "map_option f \ m(a\b) = (map_option f \ m)(a\f b)" by (rule ext) simp subsection \@{term [source] map_comp} related\ lemma map_comp_empty [simp]: "m \\<^sub>m empty = empty" "empty \\<^sub>m m = empty" by (auto simp: map_comp_def split: option.splits) lemma map_comp_simps [simp]: "m2 k = None \ (m1 \\<^sub>m m2) k = None" "m2 k = Some k' \ (m1 \\<^sub>m m2) k = m1 k'" by (auto simp: map_comp_def) lemma map_comp_Some_iff: "((m1 \\<^sub>m m2) k = Some v) = (\k'. m2 k = Some k' \ m1 k' = Some v)" by (auto simp: map_comp_def split: option.splits) lemma map_comp_None_iff: "((m1 \\<^sub>m m2) k = None) = (m2 k = None \ (\k'. m2 k = Some k' \ m1 k' = None)) " by (auto simp: map_comp_def split: option.splits) subsection \\++\\ lemma map_add_empty[simp]: "m ++ empty = m" by(simp add: map_add_def) lemma empty_map_add[simp]: "empty ++ m = m" by (rule ext) (simp add: map_add_def split: option.split) lemma map_add_assoc[simp]: "m1 ++ (m2 ++ m3) = (m1 ++ m2) ++ m3" by (rule ext) (simp add: map_add_def split: option.split) lemma map_add_Some_iff: "((m ++ n) k = Some x) = (n k = Some x \ n k = None \ m k = Some x)" by (simp add: map_add_def split: option.split) lemma map_add_SomeD [dest!]: "(m ++ n) k = Some x \ n k = Some x \ n k = None \ m k = Some x" by (rule map_add_Some_iff [THEN iffD1]) lemma map_add_find_right [simp]: "n k = Some xx \ (m ++ n) k = Some xx" by (subst map_add_Some_iff) fast lemma map_add_None [iff]: "((m ++ n) k = None) = (n k = None \ m k = None)" by (simp add: map_add_def split: option.split) lemma map_add_upd[simp]: "f ++ g(x\y) = (f ++ g)(x\y)" by (rule ext) (simp add: map_add_def) lemma map_add_upds[simp]: "m1 ++ (m2(xs[\]ys)) = (m1++m2)(xs[\]ys)" by (simp add: map_upds_def) lemma map_add_upd_left: "m\dom e2 \ e1(m \ u1) ++ e2 = (e1 ++ e2)(m \ u1)" by (rule ext) (auto simp: map_add_def dom_def split: option.split) lemma map_of_append[simp]: "map_of (xs @ ys) = map_of ys ++ map_of xs" unfolding map_add_def proof (induct xs) case (Cons a xs) then show ?case by (force split: option.split) qed auto lemma finite_range_map_of_map_add: "finite (range f) \ finite (range (f ++ map_of l))" proof (induct l) case (Cons a l) then show ?case by (metis finite_range_updI map_add_upd map_of.simps(2)) qed auto lemma inj_on_map_add_dom [iff]: "inj_on (m ++ m') (dom m') = inj_on m' (dom m')" by (fastforce simp: map_add_def dom_def inj_on_def split: option.splits) lemma map_upds_fold_map_upd: "m(ks[\]vs) = foldl (\m (k, v). m(k \ v)) m (zip ks vs)" unfolding map_upds_def proof (rule sym, rule zip_obtain_same_length) fix ks :: "'a list" and vs :: "'b list" assume "length ks = length vs" then show "foldl (\m (k, v). m(k\v)) m (zip ks vs) = m ++ map_of (rev (zip ks vs))" by(induct arbitrary: m rule: list_induct2) simp_all qed lemma map_add_map_of_foldr: "m ++ map_of ps = foldr (\(k, v) m. m(k \ v)) ps m" by (induct ps) (auto simp: fun_eq_iff map_add_def) subsection \@{term [source] restrict_map}\ lemma restrict_map_to_empty [simp]: "m|`{} = empty" by (simp add: restrict_map_def) lemma restrict_map_insert: "f |` (insert a A) = (f |` A)(a := f a)" by (auto simp: restrict_map_def) lemma restrict_map_empty [simp]: "empty|`D = empty" by (simp add: restrict_map_def) lemma restrict_in [simp]: "x \ A \ (m|`A) x = m x" by (simp add: restrict_map_def) lemma restrict_out [simp]: "x \ A \ (m|`A) x = None" by (simp add: restrict_map_def) lemma ran_restrictD: "y \ ran (m|`A) \ \x\A. m x = Some y" by (auto simp: restrict_map_def ran_def split: if_split_asm) lemma dom_restrict [simp]: "dom (m|`A) = dom m \ A" by (auto simp: restrict_map_def dom_def split: if_split_asm) lemma restrict_upd_same [simp]: "m(x\y)|`(-{x}) = m|`(-{x})" by (rule ext) (auto simp: restrict_map_def) lemma restrict_restrict [simp]: "m|`A|`B = m|`(A\B)" by (rule ext) (auto simp: restrict_map_def) lemma restrict_fun_upd [simp]: "m(x := y)|`D = (if x \ D then (m|`(D-{x}))(x := y) else m|`D)" by (simp add: restrict_map_def fun_eq_iff) lemma fun_upd_None_restrict [simp]: "(m|`D)(x := None) = (if x \ D then m|`(D - {x}) else m|`D)" by (simp add: restrict_map_def fun_eq_iff) lemma fun_upd_restrict: "(m|`D)(x := y) = (m|`(D-{x}))(x := y)" by (simp add: restrict_map_def fun_eq_iff) lemma fun_upd_restrict_conv [simp]: "x \ D \ (m|`D)(x := y) = (m|`(D-{x}))(x := y)" by (rule fun_upd_restrict) lemma map_of_map_restrict: "map_of (map (\k. (k, f k)) ks) = (Some \ f) |` set ks" by (induct ks) (simp_all add: fun_eq_iff restrict_map_insert) lemma restrict_complement_singleton_eq: "f |` (- {x}) = f(x := None)" by auto subsection \@{term [source] map_upds}\ lemma map_upds_Nil1 [simp]: "m([] [\] bs) = m" by (simp add: map_upds_def) lemma map_upds_Nil2 [simp]: "m(as [\] []) = m" by (simp add:map_upds_def) lemma map_upds_Cons [simp]: "m(a#as [\] b#bs) = (m(a\b))(as[\]bs)" by (simp add:map_upds_def) lemma map_upds_append1 [simp]: - "size xs < size ys \ m(xs@[x] [\] ys) = m(xs [\] ys)(x \ ys!size xs)" + "size xs < size ys \ m(xs@[x] [\] ys) = m(xs [\] ys, x \ ys!size xs)" proof (induct xs arbitrary: ys m) case Nil then show ?case by (auto simp: neq_Nil_conv) next case (Cons a xs) then show ?case by (cases ys) auto qed lemma map_upds_list_update2_drop [simp]: "size xs \ i \ m(xs[\]ys[i:=y]) = m(xs[\]ys)" proof (induct xs arbitrary: m ys i) case Nil then show ?case by auto next case (Cons a xs) then show ?case by (cases ys) (use Cons in \auto split: nat.split\) qed text \Something weirdly sensitive about this proof, which needs only four lines in apply style\ lemma map_upd_upds_conv_if: "(f(x\y))(xs [\] ys) = (if x \ set(take (length ys) xs) then f(xs [\] ys) else (f(xs [\] ys))(x\y))" proof (induct xs arbitrary: x y ys f) case (Cons a xs) show ?case proof (cases ys) case (Cons z zs) then show ?thesis using Cons.hyps apply (auto split: if_split simp: fun_upd_twist) using Cons.hyps apply fastforce+ done qed auto qed auto lemma map_upds_twist [simp]: - "a \ set as \ m(a\b)(as[\]bs) = m(as[\]bs)(a\b)" + "a \ set as \ m(a\b, as[\]bs) = m(as[\]bs, a\b)" using set_take_subset by (fastforce simp add: map_upd_upds_conv_if) lemma map_upds_apply_nontin [simp]: "x \ set xs \ (f(xs[\]ys)) x = f x" proof (induct xs arbitrary: ys) case (Cons a xs) then show ?case by (cases ys) (auto simp: map_upd_upds_conv_if) qed auto lemma fun_upds_append_drop [simp]: "size xs = size ys \ m(xs@zs[\]ys) = m(xs[\]ys)" proof (induct xs arbitrary: ys) case (Cons a xs) then show ?case by (cases ys) (auto simp: map_upd_upds_conv_if) qed auto lemma fun_upds_append2_drop [simp]: "size xs = size ys \ m(xs[\]ys@zs) = m(xs[\]ys)" proof (induct xs arbitrary: ys) case (Cons a xs) then show ?case by (cases ys) (auto simp: map_upd_upds_conv_if) qed auto lemma restrict_map_upds[simp]: "\ length xs = length ys; set xs \ D \ \ m(xs [\] ys)|`D = (m|`(D - set xs))(xs [\] ys)" proof (induct xs arbitrary: m ys) case (Cons a xs) then show ?case proof (cases ys) case (Cons z zs) with Cons.hyps Cons.prems show ?thesis apply (simp add: insert_absorb flip: Diff_insert) apply (auto simp add: map_upd_upds_conv_if) done qed auto qed auto subsection \@{term [source] dom}\ lemma dom_eq_empty_conv [simp]: "dom f = {} \ f = empty" by (auto simp: dom_def) lemma domI: "m a = Some b \ a \ dom m" by (simp add: dom_def) (* declare domI [intro]? *) lemma domD: "a \ dom m \ \b. m a = Some b" by (cases "m a") (auto simp add: dom_def) lemma domIff [iff, simp del, code_unfold]: "a \ dom m \ m a \ None" by (simp add: dom_def) lemma dom_empty [simp]: "dom empty = {}" by (simp add: dom_def) lemma dom_fun_upd [simp]: "dom(f(x := y)) = (if y = None then dom f - {x} else insert x (dom f))" by (auto simp: dom_def) lemma dom_if: "dom (\x. if P x then f x else g x) = dom f \ {x. P x} \ dom g \ {x. \ P x}" by (auto split: if_splits) lemma dom_map_of_conv_image_fst: "dom (map_of xys) = fst ` set xys" by (induct xys) (auto simp add: dom_if) lemma dom_map_of_zip [simp]: "length xs = length ys \ dom (map_of (zip xs ys)) = set xs" by (induct rule: list_induct2) (auto simp: dom_if) lemma finite_dom_map_of: "finite (dom (map_of l))" by (induct l) (auto simp: dom_def insert_Collect [symmetric]) lemma dom_map_upds [simp]: "dom(m(xs[\]ys)) = set(take (length ys) xs) \ dom m" proof (induct xs arbitrary: ys) case (Cons a xs) then show ?case by (cases ys) (auto simp: map_upd_upds_conv_if) qed auto lemma dom_map_add [simp]: "dom (m ++ n) = dom n \ dom m" by (auto simp: dom_def) lemma dom_override_on [simp]: "dom (override_on f g A) = (dom f - {a. a \ A - dom g}) \ {a. a \ A \ dom g}" by (auto simp: dom_def override_on_def) lemma map_add_comm: "dom m1 \ dom m2 = {} \ m1 ++ m2 = m2 ++ m1" by (rule ext) (force simp: map_add_def dom_def split: option.split) lemma map_add_dom_app_simps: "m \ dom l2 \ (l1 ++ l2) m = l2 m" "m \ dom l1 \ (l1 ++ l2) m = l2 m" "m \ dom l2 \ (l1 ++ l2) m = l1 m" by (auto simp add: map_add_def split: option.split_asm) lemma dom_const [simp]: "dom (\x. Some (f x)) = UNIV" by auto (* Due to John Matthews - could be rephrased with dom *) lemma finite_map_freshness: "finite (dom (f :: 'a \ 'b)) \ \ finite (UNIV :: 'a set) \ \x. f x = None" by (bestsimp dest: ex_new_if_finite) lemma dom_minus: "f x = None \ dom f - insert x A = dom f - A" unfolding dom_def by simp lemma insert_dom: "f x = Some y \ insert x (dom f) = dom f" unfolding dom_def by auto lemma map_of_map_keys: "set xs = dom m \ map_of (map (\k. (k, the (m k))) xs) = m" by (rule ext) (auto simp add: map_of_map_restrict restrict_map_def) lemma map_of_eqI: assumes set_eq: "set (map fst xs) = set (map fst ys)" assumes map_eq: "\k\set (map fst xs). map_of xs k = map_of ys k" shows "map_of xs = map_of ys" proof (rule ext) fix k show "map_of xs k = map_of ys k" proof (cases "map_of xs k") case None then have "k \ set (map fst xs)" by (simp add: map_of_eq_None_iff) with set_eq have "k \ set (map fst ys)" by simp then have "map_of ys k = None" by (simp add: map_of_eq_None_iff) with None show ?thesis by simp next case (Some v) then have "k \ set (map fst xs)" by (auto simp add: dom_map_of_conv_image_fst [symmetric]) with map_eq show ?thesis by auto qed qed lemma map_of_eq_dom: assumes "map_of xs = map_of ys" shows "fst ` set xs = fst ` set ys" proof - from assms have "dom (map_of xs) = dom (map_of ys)" by simp then show ?thesis by (simp add: dom_map_of_conv_image_fst) qed lemma finite_set_of_finite_maps: assumes "finite A" "finite B" shows "finite {m. dom m = A \ ran m \ B}" (is "finite ?S") proof - let ?S' = "{m. \x. (x \ A \ m x \ Some ` B) \ (x \ A \ m x = None)}" have "?S = ?S'" proof show "?S \ ?S'" by (auto simp: dom_def ran_def image_def) show "?S' \ ?S" proof fix m assume "m \ ?S'" hence 1: "dom m = A" by force hence 2: "ran m \ B" using \m \ ?S'\ by (auto simp: dom_def ran_def) from 1 2 show "m \ ?S" by blast qed qed with assms show ?thesis by(simp add: finite_set_of_finite_funs) qed subsection \@{term [source] ran}\ lemma ranI: "m a = Some b \ b \ ran m" by (auto simp: ran_def) (* declare ranI [intro]? *) lemma ran_empty [simp]: "ran empty = {}" by (auto simp: ran_def) lemma ran_map_upd [simp]: "m a = None \ ran(m(a\b)) = insert b (ran m)" unfolding ran_def by force lemma fun_upd_None_if_notin_dom[simp]: "k \ dom m \ m(k := None) = m" by auto lemma ran_map_upd_Some: "\ m x = Some y; inj_on m (dom m); z \ ran m \ \ ran(m(x := Some z)) = ran m - {y} \ {z}" by(force simp add: ran_def domI inj_onD) lemma ran_map_add: assumes "dom m1 \ dom m2 = {}" shows "ran (m1 ++ m2) = ran m1 \ ran m2" proof show "ran (m1 ++ m2) \ ran m1 \ ran m2" unfolding ran_def by auto next show "ran m1 \ ran m2 \ ran (m1 ++ m2)" proof - have "(m1 ++ m2) x = Some y" if "m1 x = Some y" for x y using assms map_add_comm that by fastforce moreover have "(m1 ++ m2) x = Some y" if "m2 x = Some y" for x y using assms that by auto ultimately show ?thesis unfolding ran_def by blast qed qed lemma finite_ran: assumes "finite (dom p)" shows "finite (ran p)" proof - have "ran p = (\x. the (p x)) ` dom p" unfolding ran_def by force from this \finite (dom p)\ show ?thesis by auto qed lemma ran_distinct: assumes dist: "distinct (map fst al)" shows "ran (map_of al) = snd ` set al" using assms proof (induct al) case Nil then show ?case by simp next case (Cons kv al) then have "ran (map_of al) = snd ` set al" by simp moreover from Cons.prems have "map_of al (fst kv) = None" by (simp add: map_of_eq_None_iff) ultimately show ?case by (simp only: map_of.simps ran_map_upd) simp qed lemma ran_map_of_zip: assumes "length xs = length ys" "distinct xs" shows "ran (map_of (zip xs ys)) = set ys" using assms by (simp add: ran_distinct set_map[symmetric]) lemma ran_map_option: "ran (\x. map_option f (m x)) = f ` ran m" by (auto simp add: ran_def) subsection \@{term [source] graph}\ lemma graph_empty[simp]: "graph empty = {}" unfolding graph_def by simp lemma in_graphI: "m k = Some v \ (k, v) \ graph m" unfolding graph_def by blast lemma in_graphD: "(k, v) \ graph m \ m k = Some v" unfolding graph_def by blast lemma graph_map_upd[simp]: "graph (m(k \ v)) = insert (k, v) (graph (m(k := None)))" unfolding graph_def by (auto split: if_splits) lemma graph_fun_upd_None: "graph (m(k := None)) = {e \ graph m. fst e \ k}" unfolding graph_def by (auto split: if_splits) lemma graph_restrictD: assumes "(k, v) \ graph (m |` A)" shows "k \ A" and "m k = Some v" using assms unfolding graph_def by (auto simp: restrict_map_def split: if_splits) lemma graph_map_comp[simp]: "graph (m1 \\<^sub>m m2) = graph m2 O graph m1" unfolding graph_def by (auto simp: map_comp_Some_iff relcomp_unfold) lemma graph_map_add: "dom m1 \ dom m2 = {} \ graph (m1 ++ m2) = graph m1 \ graph m2" unfolding graph_def using map_add_comm by force lemma graph_eq_to_snd_dom: "graph m = (\x. (x, the (m x))) ` dom m" unfolding graph_def dom_def by force lemma fst_graph_eq_dom: "fst ` graph m = dom m" unfolding graph_eq_to_snd_dom by force lemma graph_domD: "x \ graph m \ fst x \ dom m" using fst_graph_eq_dom by (metis imageI) lemma snd_graph_ran: "snd ` graph m = ran m" unfolding graph_def ran_def by force lemma graph_ranD: "x \ graph m \ snd x \ ran m" using snd_graph_ran by (metis imageI) lemma finite_graph_map_of: "finite (graph (map_of al))" unfolding graph_eq_to_snd_dom finite_dom_map_of using finite_dom_map_of by blast lemma graph_map_of_if_distinct_dom: "distinct (map fst al) \ graph (map_of al) = set al" unfolding graph_def by auto lemma finite_graph_iff_finite_dom[simp]: "finite (graph m) = finite (dom m)" by (metis graph_eq_to_snd_dom finite_imageI fst_graph_eq_dom) lemma inj_on_fst_graph: "inj_on fst (graph m)" unfolding graph_def inj_on_def by force subsection \\map_le\\ lemma map_le_empty [simp]: "empty \\<^sub>m g" by (simp add: map_le_def) lemma upd_None_map_le [simp]: "f(x := None) \\<^sub>m f" by (force simp add: map_le_def) lemma map_le_upd[simp]: "f \\<^sub>m g ==> f(a := b) \\<^sub>m g(a := b)" by (fastforce simp add: map_le_def) lemma map_le_imp_upd_le [simp]: "m1 \\<^sub>m m2 \ m1(x := None) \\<^sub>m m2(x \ y)" by (force simp add: map_le_def) lemma map_le_upds [simp]: "f \\<^sub>m g \ f(as [\] bs) \\<^sub>m g(as [\] bs)" proof (induct as arbitrary: f g bs) case (Cons a as) then show ?case by (cases bs) (use Cons in auto) qed auto lemma map_le_implies_dom_le: "(f \\<^sub>m g) \ (dom f \ dom g)" by (fastforce simp add: map_le_def dom_def) lemma map_le_refl [simp]: "f \\<^sub>m f" by (simp add: map_le_def) lemma map_le_trans[trans]: "\ m1 \\<^sub>m m2; m2 \\<^sub>m m3\ \ m1 \\<^sub>m m3" by (auto simp add: map_le_def dom_def) lemma map_le_antisym: "\ f \\<^sub>m g; g \\<^sub>m f \ \ f = g" unfolding map_le_def by (metis ext domIff) lemma map_le_map_add [simp]: "f \\<^sub>m g ++ f" by (fastforce simp: map_le_def) lemma map_le_iff_map_add_commute: "f \\<^sub>m f ++ g \ f ++ g = g ++ f" by (fastforce simp: map_add_def map_le_def fun_eq_iff split: option.splits) lemma map_add_le_mapE: "f ++ g \\<^sub>m h \ g \\<^sub>m h" by (fastforce simp: map_le_def map_add_def dom_def) lemma map_add_le_mapI: "\ f \\<^sub>m h; g \\<^sub>m h \ \ f ++ g \\<^sub>m h" by (auto simp: map_le_def map_add_def dom_def split: option.splits) lemma map_add_subsumed1: "f \\<^sub>m g \ f++g = g" by (simp add: map_add_le_mapI map_le_antisym) lemma map_add_subsumed2: "f \\<^sub>m g \ g++f = g" by (metis map_add_subsumed1 map_le_iff_map_add_commute) lemma dom_eq_singleton_conv: "dom f = {x} \ (\v. f = [x \ v])" (is "?lhs \ ?rhs") proof assume ?rhs then show ?lhs by (auto split: if_split_asm) next assume ?lhs then obtain v where v: "f x = Some v" by auto show ?rhs proof show "f = [x \ v]" proof (rule map_le_antisym) show "[x \ v] \\<^sub>m f" using v by (auto simp add: map_le_def) show "f \\<^sub>m [x \ v]" using \dom f = {x}\ \f x = Some v\ by (auto simp add: map_le_def) qed qed qed lemma map_add_eq_empty_iff[simp]: "(f++g = empty) \ f = empty \ g = empty" by (metis map_add_None) lemma empty_eq_map_add_iff[simp]: "(empty = f++g) \ f = empty \ g = empty" by(subst map_add_eq_empty_iff[symmetric])(rule eq_commute) subsection \Various\ lemma set_map_of_compr: assumes distinct: "distinct (map fst xs)" shows "set xs = {(k, v). map_of xs k = Some v}" using assms proof (induct xs) case Nil then show ?case by simp next case (Cons x xs) obtain k v where "x = (k, v)" by (cases x) blast with Cons.prems have "k \ dom (map_of xs)" by (simp add: dom_map_of_conv_image_fst) then have *: "insert (k, v) {(k, v). map_of xs k = Some v} = - {(k', v'). (map_of xs(k \ v)) k' = Some v'}" + {(k', v'). ((map_of xs)(k \ v)) k' = Some v'}" by (auto split: if_splits) from Cons have "set xs = {(k, v). map_of xs k = Some v}" by simp with * \x = (k, v)\ show ?case by simp qed lemma eq_key_imp_eq_value: "v1 = v2" if "distinct (map fst xs)" "(k, v1) \ set xs" "(k, v2) \ set xs" proof - from that have "inj_on fst (set xs)" by (simp add: distinct_map) moreover have "fst (k, v1) = fst (k, v2)" by simp ultimately have "(k, v1) = (k, v2)" by (rule inj_onD) (fact that)+ then show ?thesis by simp qed lemma map_of_inject_set: assumes distinct: "distinct (map fst xs)" "distinct (map fst ys)" shows "map_of xs = map_of ys \ set xs = set ys" (is "?lhs \ ?rhs") proof assume ?lhs moreover from \distinct (map fst xs)\ have "set xs = {(k, v). map_of xs k = Some v}" by (rule set_map_of_compr) moreover from \distinct (map fst ys)\ have "set ys = {(k, v). map_of ys k = Some v}" by (rule set_map_of_compr) ultimately show ?rhs by simp next assume ?rhs show ?lhs proof fix k show "map_of xs k = map_of ys k" proof (cases "map_of xs k") case None with \?rhs\ have "map_of ys k = None" by (simp add: map_of_eq_None_iff) with None show ?thesis by simp next case (Some v) with distinct \?rhs\ have "map_of ys k = Some v" by simp with Some show ?thesis by simp qed qed qed lemma finite_Map_induct[consumes 1, case_names empty update]: assumes "finite (dom m)" assumes "P Map.empty" assumes "\k v m. finite (dom m) \ k \ dom m \ P m \ P (m(k \ v))" shows "P m" using assms(1) proof(induction "dom m" arbitrary: m rule: finite_induct) case empty then show ?case using assms(2) unfolding dom_def by simp next case (insert x F) then have "finite (dom (m(x:=None)))" "x \ dom (m(x:=None))" "P (m(x:=None))" by (metis Diff_insert_absorb dom_fun_upd)+ with assms(3)[OF this] show ?case by (metis fun_upd_triv fun_upd_upd option.exhaust) qed hide_const (open) Map.empty Map.graph end