diff --git a/src/HOL/Bit_Operations.thy b/src/HOL/Bit_Operations.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Bit_Operations.thy
+++ b/src/HOL/Bit_Operations.thy
@@ -1,3860 +1,3860 @@
 (*  Author:  Florian Haftmann, TUM
 *)
 
 section \<open>Bit operations in suitable algebraic structures\<close>
 
 theory Bit_Operations
   imports Presburger Groups_List
 begin
 
 subsection \<open>Abstract bit structures\<close>
 
 class semiring_bits = semiring_parity + semiring_modulo_trivial +
   assumes bit_induct [case_names stable rec]:
     \<open>(\<And>a. a div 2 = a \<Longrightarrow> P a)
      \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>a b. P a \<Longrightarrow> (of_bool b + 2 * a) div 2 = a \<Longrightarrow> P (of_bool b + 2 * a))
         \<Longrightarrow> P a\<close>
   assumes half_div_exp_eq: \<open>a div 2 div 2 ^ n = a div 2 ^ Suc n\<close>
     and even_double_div_exp_iff: \<open>2 ^ Suc n \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> even (2 * a div 2 ^ Suc n) \<longleftrightarrow> even (a div 2 ^ n)\<close>
     and even_decr_exp_div_exp_iff: \<open>2 ^ n \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> even ((2 ^ m - 1) div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n\<close>
-    and even_mod_exp_diff_exp_iff: \<open>even (a mod 2 ^ m div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n \<or> even (a div 2 ^ n)\<close>
+    and even_mod_exp_div_exp_iff: \<open>even (a mod 2 ^ m div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n \<or> even (a div 2 ^ n)\<close>
   fixes bit :: \<open>'a \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> bool\<close>
   assumes bit_iff_odd: \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> odd (a div 2 ^ n)\<close>
 begin
 
 text \<open>
   Having \<^const>\<open>bit\<close> as definitional class operation
   takes into account that specific instances can be implemented
   differently wrt. code generation.
 \<close>
 
 lemma half_1 [simp]:
   \<open>1 div 2 = 0\<close>
   using even_half_succ_eq [of 0] by simp
 
 lemma div_exp_eq_funpow_half:
   \<open>a div 2 ^ n = ((\<lambda>a. a div 2) ^^ n) a\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>((\<lambda>a. a div 2) ^^ n) = (\<lambda>a. a div 2 ^ n)\<close>
     by (induction n)
       (simp_all del: funpow.simps power.simps add: power_0 funpow_Suc_right half_div_exp_eq)
   then show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma div_exp_eq:
   \<open>a div 2 ^ m div 2 ^ n = a div 2 ^ (m + n)\<close>
   by (simp add: div_exp_eq_funpow_half Groups.add.commute [of m] funpow_add)
 
 lemma bit_0:
   \<open>bit a 0 \<longleftrightarrow> odd a\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_iff_odd)
 
 lemma bit_Suc:
   \<open>bit a (Suc n) \<longleftrightarrow> bit (a div 2) n\<close>
   using div_exp_eq [of a 1 n] by (simp add: bit_iff_odd)
 
 lemma bit_rec:
   \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> (if n = 0 then odd a else bit (a div 2) (n - 1))\<close>
   by (cases n) (simp_all add: bit_Suc bit_0)
 
 context
   fixes a
   assumes stable: \<open>a div 2 = a\<close>
 begin
 
 lemma bits_stable_imp_add_self:
   \<open>a + a mod 2 = 0\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>a div 2 * 2 + a mod 2 = a\<close>
     by (fact div_mult_mod_eq)
   then have \<open>a * 2 + a mod 2 = a\<close>
     by (simp add: stable)
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: mult_2_right ac_simps)
 qed
 
 lemma stable_imp_bit_iff_odd:
   \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> odd a\<close>
   by (induction n) (simp_all add: stable bit_Suc bit_0)
 
 end
 
-lemma bit_iff_idd_imp_stable:
+lemma bit_iff_odd_imp_stable:
   \<open>a div 2 = a\<close> if \<open>\<And>n. bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> odd a\<close>
 using that proof (induction a rule: bit_induct)
   case (stable a)
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case (rec a b)
   from rec.prems [of 1] have [simp]: \<open>b = odd a\<close>
     by (simp add: rec.hyps bit_Suc bit_0)
   from rec.hyps have hyp: \<open>(of_bool (odd a) + 2 * a) div 2 = a\<close>
     by simp
   have \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> odd a\<close> for n
     using rec.prems [of \<open>Suc n\<close>] by (simp add: hyp bit_Suc)
   then have \<open>a div 2 = a\<close>
     by (rule rec.IH)
   then have \<open>of_bool (odd a) + 2 * a = 2 * (a div 2) + of_bool (odd a)\<close>
     by (simp add: ac_simps)
   also have \<open>\<dots> = a\<close>
     using mult_div_mod_eq [of 2 a]
     by (simp add: of_bool_odd_eq_mod_2)
   finally show ?case
     using \<open>a div 2 = a\<close> by (simp add: hyp)
 qed
 
 lemma even_succ_div_exp [simp]:
   \<open>(1 + a) div 2 ^ n = a div 2 ^ n\<close> if \<open>even a\<close> and \<open>n > 0\<close>
 proof (cases n)
   case 0
   with that show ?thesis
     by simp
 next
   case (Suc n)
   with \<open>even a\<close> have \<open>(1 + a) div 2 ^ Suc n = a div 2 ^ Suc n\<close>
   proof (induction n)
     case 0
     then show ?case
       by simp
   next
     case (Suc n)
     then show ?case
       using div_exp_eq [of _ 1 \<open>Suc n\<close>, symmetric]
       by simp
   qed
   with Suc show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma even_succ_mod_exp [simp]:
   \<open>(1 + a) mod 2 ^ n = 1 + (a mod 2 ^ n)\<close> if \<open>even a\<close> and \<open>n > 0\<close>
   using div_mult_mod_eq [of \<open>1 + a\<close> \<open>2 ^ n\<close>] div_mult_mod_eq [of a \<open>2 ^ n\<close>] that
   by simp (metis (full_types) add.left_commute add_left_imp_eq)
 
 named_theorems bit_simps \<open>Simplification rules for \<^const>\<open>bit\<close>\<close>
 
 definition possible_bit :: \<open>'a itself \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> bool\<close>
   where \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) n \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ n \<noteq> 0\<close>
   \<comment> \<open>This auxiliary avoids non-termination with extensionality.\<close>
 
 lemma possible_bit_0 [simp]:
   \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) 0\<close>
   by (simp add: possible_bit_def)
 
 lemma fold_possible_bit:
   \<open>2 ^ n = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> possible_bit TYPE('a) n\<close>
   by (simp add: possible_bit_def)
 
 lemma bit_imp_possible_bit:
   \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) n\<close> if \<open>bit a n\<close>
   by (rule ccontr) (use that in \<open>auto simp add: bit_iff_odd possible_bit_def\<close>)
 
 lemma impossible_bit:
   \<open>\<not> bit a n\<close> if \<open>\<not> possible_bit TYPE('a) n\<close>
   using that by (blast dest: bit_imp_possible_bit)
 
 lemma possible_bit_less_imp:
   \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) j\<close> if \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) i\<close> \<open>j \<le> i\<close>
   using power_add [of 2 j \<open>i - j\<close>] that mult_not_zero [of \<open>2 ^ j\<close> \<open>2 ^ (i - j)\<close>]
   by (simp add: possible_bit_def)
 
 lemma possible_bit_min [simp]:
   \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) (min i j) \<longleftrightarrow> possible_bit TYPE('a) i \<or> possible_bit TYPE('a) j\<close>
   by (auto simp add: min_def elim: possible_bit_less_imp)
 
 lemma bit_eqI:
   \<open>a = b\<close> if \<open>\<And>n. possible_bit TYPE('a) n \<Longrightarrow> bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> bit b n\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> bit b n\<close> for n
   proof (cases \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) n\<close>)
     case False
     then show ?thesis
       by (simp add: impossible_bit)
   next
     case True
     then show ?thesis
       by (rule that)
   qed
   then show ?thesis proof (induction a arbitrary: b rule: bit_induct)
     case (stable a)
     from stable(2) [of 0] have **: \<open>even b \<longleftrightarrow> even a\<close>
       by (simp add: bit_0)
     have \<open>b div 2 = b\<close>
-    proof (rule bit_iff_idd_imp_stable)
+    proof (rule bit_iff_odd_imp_stable)
       fix n
       from stable have *: \<open>bit b n \<longleftrightarrow> bit a n\<close>
         by simp
       also have \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> odd a\<close>
         using stable by (simp add: stable_imp_bit_iff_odd)
       finally show \<open>bit b n \<longleftrightarrow> odd b\<close>
         by (simp add: **)
     qed
     from ** have \<open>a mod 2 = b mod 2\<close>
       by (simp add: mod2_eq_if)
     then have \<open>a mod 2 + (a + b) = b mod 2 + (a + b)\<close>
       by simp
     then have \<open>a + a mod 2 + b = b + b mod 2 + a\<close>
       by (simp add: ac_simps)
     with \<open>a div 2 = a\<close> \<open>b div 2 = b\<close> show ?case
       by (simp add: bits_stable_imp_add_self)
   next
     case (rec a p)
     from rec.prems [of 0] have [simp]: \<open>p = odd b\<close>
       by (simp add: bit_0)
     from rec.hyps have \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> bit (b div 2) n\<close> for n
       using rec.prems [of \<open>Suc n\<close>] by (simp add: bit_Suc)
     then have \<open>a = b div 2\<close>
       by (rule rec.IH)
     then have \<open>2 * a = 2 * (b div 2)\<close>
       by simp
     then have \<open>b mod 2 + 2 * a = b mod 2 + 2 * (b div 2)\<close>
       by simp
     also have \<open>\<dots> = b\<close>
       by (fact mod_mult_div_eq)
     finally show ?case
       by (auto simp add: mod2_eq_if)
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma bit_eq_rec:
   \<open>a = b \<longleftrightarrow> (even a \<longleftrightarrow> even b) \<and> a div 2 = b div 2\<close> (is \<open>?P = ?Q\<close>)
 proof
   assume ?P
   then show ?Q
     by simp
 next
   assume ?Q
   then have \<open>even a \<longleftrightarrow> even b\<close> and \<open>a div 2 = b div 2\<close>
     by simp_all
   show ?P
   proof (rule bit_eqI)
     fix n
     show \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> bit b n\<close>
     proof (cases n)
       case 0
       with \<open>even a \<longleftrightarrow> even b\<close> show ?thesis
         by (simp add: bit_0)
     next
       case (Suc n)
       moreover from \<open>a div 2 = b div 2\<close> have \<open>bit (a div 2) n = bit (b div 2) n\<close>
         by simp
       ultimately show ?thesis
         by (simp add: bit_Suc)
     qed
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma bit_eq_iff:
   \<open>a = b \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>n. possible_bit TYPE('a) n \<longrightarrow> bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> bit b n)\<close>
   by (auto intro: bit_eqI simp add: possible_bit_def)
 
 lemma bit_0_eq [simp]:
   \<open>bit 0 = \<bottom>\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>0 div 2 ^ n = 0\<close> for n
     unfolding div_exp_eq_funpow_half by (induction n) simp_all
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: fun_eq_iff bit_iff_odd)
 qed
 
 lemma bit_double_Suc_iff:
   \<open>bit (2 * a) (Suc n) \<longleftrightarrow> possible_bit TYPE('a) (Suc n) \<and> bit a n\<close>
   using even_double_div_exp_iff [of n a]
   by (cases \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) (Suc n)\<close>)
     (auto simp add: bit_iff_odd possible_bit_def)
 
 lemma bit_double_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (2 * a) n \<longleftrightarrow> possible_bit TYPE('a) n \<and> n \<noteq> 0 \<and> bit a (n - 1)\<close>
   by (cases n) (simp_all add: bit_0 bit_double_Suc_iff)
 
 lemma even_bit_succ_iff:
   \<open>bit (1 + a) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit a n \<or> n = 0\<close> if \<open>even a\<close>
   using that by (cases \<open>n = 0\<close>) (simp_all add: bit_iff_odd)
 
 lemma odd_bit_iff_bit_pred:
   \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> bit (a - 1) n \<or> n = 0\<close> if \<open>odd a\<close>
 proof -
   from \<open>odd a\<close> obtain b where \<open>a = 2 * b + 1\<close> ..
   moreover have \<open>bit (2 * b) n \<or> n = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> bit (1 + 2 * b) n\<close>
     using even_bit_succ_iff by simp
   ultimately show ?thesis by (simp add: ac_simps)
 qed
 
 lemma bit_exp_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (2 ^ m) n \<longleftrightarrow> possible_bit TYPE('a) n \<and> n = m\<close>
 proof (cases \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) n\<close>)
   case False
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: impossible_bit)
 next
   case True
   then show ?thesis
   proof (induction n arbitrary: m)
     case 0
     show ?case
       by (simp add: bit_0)
   next
     case (Suc n)
     then have \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) n\<close>
       by (simp add: possible_bit_less_imp)
     show ?case
     proof (cases m)
       case 0
       then show ?thesis
         by (simp add: bit_Suc)
     next
       case (Suc m)
       with Suc.IH [of m] \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) n\<close> show ?thesis
         by (simp add: bit_double_Suc_iff)
     qed
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma bit_1_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit 1 n \<longleftrightarrow> n = 0\<close>
   using bit_exp_iff [of 0 n] by auto
 
 lemma bit_2_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit 2 n \<longleftrightarrow> possible_bit TYPE('a) 1 \<and> n = 1\<close>
   using bit_exp_iff [of 1 n] by auto
 
 lemma bit_of_bool_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (of_bool b) n \<longleftrightarrow> n = 0 \<and> b\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_1_iff)
 
 lemma bit_mod_2_iff [simp]:
   \<open>bit (a mod 2) n \<longleftrightarrow> n = 0 \<and> odd a\<close>
   by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd bit_simps)
 
 lemma bit_disjunctive_add_iff:
   \<open>bit (a + b) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit a n \<or> bit b n\<close>
   if \<open>\<And>n. \<not> bit a n \<or> \<not> bit b n\<close>
 proof (cases \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) n\<close>)
   case False
   then show ?thesis
     by (auto dest: impossible_bit)
 next
   case True
   with that show ?thesis proof (induction n arbitrary: a b)
     case 0
     from "0.prems"(1) [of 0] show ?case
       by (auto simp add: bit_0)
   next
     case (Suc n)
     from Suc.prems(1) [of 0] have even: \<open>even a \<or> even b\<close>
       by (auto simp add: bit_0)
     have bit: \<open>\<not> bit (a div 2) n \<or> \<not> bit (b div 2) n\<close> for n
       using Suc.prems(1) [of \<open>Suc n\<close>] by (simp add: bit_Suc)
     from Suc.prems(2) have \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) (Suc n)\<close> \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) n\<close>
       by (simp_all add: possible_bit_less_imp)
     have \<open>a + b = (a div 2 * 2 + a mod 2) + (b div 2 * 2 + b mod 2)\<close>
       using div_mult_mod_eq [of a 2] div_mult_mod_eq [of b 2] by simp
     also have \<open>\<dots> = of_bool (odd a \<or> odd b) + 2 * (a div 2 + b div 2)\<close>
       using even by (auto simp add: algebra_simps mod2_eq_if)
     finally have \<open>bit ((a + b) div 2) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit (a div 2 + b div 2) n\<close>
       using \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) (Suc n)\<close> by simp (simp_all flip: bit_Suc add: bit_double_iff possible_bit_def)
     also have \<open>\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> bit (a div 2) n \<or> bit (b div 2) n\<close>
       using bit \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) n\<close> by (rule Suc.IH)
     finally show ?case
       by (simp add: bit_Suc)
   qed
 qed
 
 end
 
 lemma nat_bit_induct [case_names zero even odd]:
   \<open>P n\<close> if zero: \<open>P 0\<close>
     and even: \<open>\<And>n. P n \<Longrightarrow> n > 0 \<Longrightarrow> P (2 * n)\<close>
     and odd: \<open>\<And>n. P n \<Longrightarrow> P (Suc (2 * n))\<close>
 proof (induction n rule: less_induct)
   case (less n)
   show \<open>P n\<close>
   proof (cases \<open>n = 0\<close>)
     case True with zero show ?thesis by simp
   next
     case False
     with less have hyp: \<open>P (n div 2)\<close> by simp
     show ?thesis
     proof (cases \<open>even n\<close>)
       case True
       then have \<open>n \<noteq> 1\<close>
         by auto
       with \<open>n \<noteq> 0\<close> have \<open>n div 2 > 0\<close>
         by simp
       with \<open>even n\<close> hyp even [of \<open>n div 2\<close>] show ?thesis
         by simp
     next
       case False
       with hyp odd [of \<open>n div 2\<close>] show ?thesis
         by simp
     qed
   qed
 qed
 
 instantiation nat :: semiring_bits
 begin
 
 definition bit_nat :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> bool\<close>
   where \<open>bit_nat m n \<longleftrightarrow> odd (m div 2 ^ n)\<close>
 
 instance
 proof
   show \<open>P n\<close> if stable: \<open>\<And>n. n div 2 = n \<Longrightarrow> P n\<close>
     and rec: \<open>\<And>n b. P n \<Longrightarrow> (of_bool b + 2 * n) div 2 = n \<Longrightarrow> P (of_bool b + 2 * n)\<close>
     for P and n :: nat
   proof (induction n rule: nat_bit_induct)
     case zero
     from stable [of 0] show ?case
       by simp
   next
     case (even n)
     with rec [of n False] show ?case
       by simp
   next
     case (odd n)
     with rec [of n True] show ?case
       by simp
   qed
   show \<open>even (((2 :: nat) ^ m - 1) div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n\<close> for m n :: nat
     using even_decr_exp_div_exp_iff' [of m n] .
   show \<open>even (q mod 2 ^ m div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n \<or> even (q div 2 ^ n)\<close> for q m n :: nat
   proof (cases \<open>m \<le> n\<close>)
     case True
     moreover define r where \<open>r = n - m\<close>
     ultimately have \<open>n = m + r\<close>
       by simp
     with True show ?thesis
       by (simp add: power_add div_mult2_eq)
   next
     case False
     moreover define r where \<open>r = m - Suc n\<close>
     ultimately have \<open>m = n + Suc r\<close>
       by simp
     moreover have \<open>even (q mod 2 ^ (n + Suc r) div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> even (q div 2 ^ n)\<close>
       by (simp only: power_add) (simp add: mod_mult2_eq dvd_mod_iff)
     ultimately show ?thesis
       by simp
   qed
 qed (auto simp add: div_mult2_eq bit_nat_def)
 
 end
 
 lemma possible_bit_nat [simp]:
   \<open>possible_bit TYPE(nat) n\<close>
   by (simp add: possible_bit_def)
 
 lemma bit_Suc_0_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (Suc 0) n \<longleftrightarrow> n = 0\<close>
   using bit_1_iff [of n, where ?'a = nat] by simp
 
 lemma not_bit_Suc_0_Suc [simp]:
   \<open>\<not> bit (Suc 0) (Suc n)\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_Suc)
 
 lemma not_bit_Suc_0_numeral [simp]:
   \<open>\<not> bit (Suc 0) (numeral n)\<close>
   by (simp add: numeral_eq_Suc)
 
 context semiring_bits
 begin
 
 lemma bit_of_nat_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (of_nat m) n \<longleftrightarrow> possible_bit TYPE('a) n \<and> bit m n\<close>
 proof (cases \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) n\<close>)
   case False
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: impossible_bit)
 next
   case True
   then have \<open>bit (of_nat m) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit m n\<close>
   proof (induction m arbitrary: n rule: nat_bit_induct)
     case zero
     then show ?case
       by simp
   next
     case (even m)
     then show ?case
       by (cases n)
         (auto simp add: bit_double_iff Bit_Operations.bit_double_iff possible_bit_def bit_0 dest: mult_not_zero)
   next
     case (odd m)
     then show ?case
       by (cases n)
         (auto simp add: bit_double_iff even_bit_succ_iff possible_bit_def
           Bit_Operations.bit_Suc Bit_Operations.bit_0 dest: mult_not_zero)
   qed
   with True show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 end
 
 lemma int_bit_induct [case_names zero minus even odd]:
   \<open>P k\<close> if zero_int: \<open>P 0\<close>
     and minus_int: \<open>P (- 1)\<close>
     and even_int: \<open>\<And>k. P k \<Longrightarrow> k \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> P (k * 2)\<close>
     and odd_int: \<open>\<And>k. P k \<Longrightarrow> k \<noteq> - 1 \<Longrightarrow> P (1 + (k * 2))\<close> for k :: int
 proof (cases \<open>k \<ge> 0\<close>)
   case True
   define n where \<open>n = nat k\<close>
   with True have \<open>k = int n\<close>
     by simp
   then show \<open>P k\<close>
   proof (induction n arbitrary: k rule: nat_bit_induct)
     case zero
     then show ?case
       by (simp add: zero_int)
   next
     case (even n)
     have \<open>P (int n * 2)\<close>
       by (rule even_int) (use even in simp_all)
     with even show ?case
       by (simp add: ac_simps)
   next
     case (odd n)
     have \<open>P (1 + (int n * 2))\<close>
       by (rule odd_int) (use odd in simp_all)
     with odd show ?case
       by (simp add: ac_simps)
   qed
 next
   case False
   define n where \<open>n = nat (- k - 1)\<close>
   with False have \<open>k = - int n - 1\<close>
     by simp
   then show \<open>P k\<close>
   proof (induction n arbitrary: k rule: nat_bit_induct)
     case zero
     then show ?case
       by (simp add: minus_int)
   next
     case (even n)
     have \<open>P (1 + (- int (Suc n) * 2))\<close>
       by (rule odd_int) (use even in \<open>simp_all add: algebra_simps\<close>)
     also have \<open>\<dots> = - int (2 * n) - 1\<close>
       by (simp add: algebra_simps)
     finally show ?case
       using even.prems by simp
   next
     case (odd n)
     have \<open>P (- int (Suc n) * 2)\<close>
       by (rule even_int) (use odd in \<open>simp_all add: algebra_simps\<close>)
     also have \<open>\<dots> = - int (Suc (2 * n)) - 1\<close>
       by (simp add: algebra_simps)
     finally show ?case
       using odd.prems by simp
   qed
 qed
 
 instantiation int :: semiring_bits
 begin
 
 definition bit_int :: \<open>int \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> bool\<close>
   where \<open>bit_int k n \<longleftrightarrow> odd (k div 2 ^ n)\<close>
 
 instance
 proof
   show \<open>P k\<close> if stable: \<open>\<And>k. k div 2 = k \<Longrightarrow> P k\<close>
     and rec: \<open>\<And>k b. P k \<Longrightarrow> (of_bool b + 2 * k) div 2 = k \<Longrightarrow> P (of_bool b + 2 * k)\<close>
     for P and k :: int
   proof (induction k rule: int_bit_induct)
     case zero
     from stable [of 0] show ?case
       by simp
   next
     case minus
     from stable [of \<open>- 1\<close>] show ?case
       by simp
   next
     case (even k)
     with rec [of k False] show ?case
       by (simp add: ac_simps)
   next
     case (odd k)
     with rec [of k True] show ?case
       by (simp add: ac_simps)
   qed
   show \<open>even (((2 :: int) ^ m - 1) div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n\<close> for m n :: nat
     using even_decr_exp_div_exp_iff' [of m n] .
   show \<open>even (k mod 2 ^ m div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n \<or> even (k div 2 ^ n)\<close> for k :: int and m n :: nat
   proof (cases \<open>m \<le> n\<close>)
     case True
     moreover define r where \<open>r = n - m\<close>
     ultimately have \<open>n = m + r\<close>
       by simp
     with True show ?thesis
       by (simp add: power_add zdiv_zmult2_eq)
   next
     case False
     moreover define r where \<open>r = m - Suc n\<close>
     ultimately have \<open>m = n + Suc r\<close>
       by simp
     moreover have \<open>even (k mod 2 ^ (n + Suc r) div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> even (k div 2 ^ n)\<close>
       by (simp only: power_add) (simp add: zmod_zmult2_eq dvd_mod_iff)
     ultimately show ?thesis
       by simp
   qed
 qed (auto simp add: zdiv_zmult2_eq bit_int_def)
 
 end
 
 lemma possible_bit_int [simp]:
   \<open>possible_bit TYPE(int) n\<close>
   by (simp add: possible_bit_def)
 
 lemma bit_nat_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (nat k) n \<longleftrightarrow> k \<ge> 0 \<and> bit k n\<close>
 proof (cases \<open>k \<ge> 0\<close>)
   case True
   moreover define m where \<open>m = nat k\<close>
   ultimately have \<open>k = int m\<close>
     by simp
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: bit_simps)
 next
   case False
   then show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 
 subsection \<open>Bit operations\<close>
 
 class semiring_bit_operations = semiring_bits +
   fixes "and" :: \<open>'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>  (infixr \<open>AND\<close> 64)
     and or :: \<open>'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>  (infixr \<open>OR\<close> 59)
     and xor :: \<open>'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>  (infixr \<open>XOR\<close> 59)
     and mask :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>
     and set_bit :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>
     and unset_bit :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>
     and flip_bit :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>
     and push_bit :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>
     and drop_bit :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>
     and take_bit :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>
   assumes and_rec: \<open>a AND b = of_bool (odd a \<and> odd b) + 2 * ((a div 2) AND (b div 2))\<close>
     and or_rec: \<open>a OR b = of_bool (odd a \<or> odd b) + 2 * ((a div 2) OR (b div 2))\<close>
     and xor_rec: \<open>a XOR b = of_bool (odd a \<noteq> odd b) + 2 * ((a div 2) XOR (b div 2))\<close>
     and mask_eq_exp_minus_1: \<open>mask n = 2 ^ n - 1\<close>
     and set_bit_eq_or: \<open>set_bit n a = a OR push_bit n 1\<close>
     and unset_bit_eq_or_xor: \<open>unset_bit n a = (a OR push_bit n 1) XOR push_bit n 1\<close>
     and flip_bit_eq_xor: \<open>flip_bit n a = a XOR push_bit n 1\<close>
     and push_bit_eq_mult: \<open>push_bit n a = a * 2 ^ n\<close>
     and drop_bit_eq_div: \<open>drop_bit n a = a div 2 ^ n\<close>
     and take_bit_eq_mod: \<open>take_bit n a = a mod 2 ^ n\<close>
 begin
 
 text \<open>
   We want the bitwise operations to bind slightly weaker
   than \<open>+\<close> and \<open>-\<close>.
 
   Logically, \<^const>\<open>push_bit\<close>,
   \<^const>\<open>drop_bit\<close> and \<^const>\<open>take_bit\<close> are just aliases; having them
   as separate operations makes proofs easier, otherwise proof automation
   would fiddle with concrete expressions \<^term>\<open>2 ^ n\<close> in a way obfuscating the basic
   algebraic relationships between those operations.
 
   For the sake of code generation operations
   are specified as definitional class operations,
   taking into account that specific instances of these can be implemented
   differently wrt. code generation.
 \<close>
 
 lemma bit_iff_odd_drop_bit:
   \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> odd (drop_bit n a)\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_iff_odd drop_bit_eq_div)
 
 lemma even_drop_bit_iff_not_bit:
   \<open>even (drop_bit n a) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> bit a n\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_iff_odd_drop_bit)
 
 lemma bit_and_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (a AND b) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit a n \<and> bit b n\<close>
 proof (induction n arbitrary: a b)
   case 0
   show ?case
     by (simp add: bit_0 and_rec [of a b] even_bit_succ_iff)
 next
   case (Suc n)
   from Suc [of \<open>a div 2\<close> \<open>b div 2\<close>]
   show ?case
     by (simp add: and_rec [of a b] bit_Suc)
       (auto simp flip: bit_Suc simp add: bit_double_iff dest: bit_imp_possible_bit)
 qed
 
 lemma bit_or_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (a OR b) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit a n \<or> bit b n\<close>
 proof (induction n arbitrary: a b)
   case 0
   show ?case
     by (simp add: bit_0 or_rec [of a b] even_bit_succ_iff)
 next
   case (Suc n)
   from Suc [of \<open>a div 2\<close> \<open>b div 2\<close>]
   show ?case
     by (simp add: or_rec [of a b] bit_Suc)
       (auto simp flip: bit_Suc simp add: bit_double_iff dest: bit_imp_possible_bit)
 qed
 
 lemma bit_xor_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (a XOR b) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit a n \<noteq> bit b n\<close>
 proof (induction n arbitrary: a b)
   case 0
   show ?case
     by (simp add: bit_0 xor_rec [of a b] even_bit_succ_iff)
 next
   case (Suc n)
   from Suc [of \<open>a div 2\<close> \<open>b div 2\<close>]
   show ?case
     by (simp add: xor_rec [of a b] bit_Suc)
       (auto simp flip: bit_Suc simp add: bit_double_iff dest: bit_imp_possible_bit)
 qed
 
 sublocale "and": semilattice \<open>(AND)\<close>
   by standard (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_and_iff)
 
 sublocale or: semilattice_neutr \<open>(OR)\<close> 0
   by standard (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_or_iff)
 
 sublocale xor: comm_monoid \<open>(XOR)\<close> 0
   by standard (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_xor_iff)
 
 lemma even_and_iff:
   \<open>even (a AND b) \<longleftrightarrow> even a \<or> even b\<close>
   using bit_and_iff [of a b 0] by (auto simp add: bit_0)
 
 lemma even_or_iff:
   \<open>even (a OR b) \<longleftrightarrow> even a \<and> even b\<close>
   using bit_or_iff [of a b 0] by (auto simp add: bit_0)
 
 lemma even_xor_iff:
   \<open>even (a XOR b) \<longleftrightarrow> (even a \<longleftrightarrow> even b)\<close>
   using bit_xor_iff [of a b 0] by (auto simp add: bit_0)
 
 lemma zero_and_eq [simp]:
   \<open>0 AND a = 0\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_and_iff)
 
 lemma and_zero_eq [simp]:
   \<open>a AND 0 = 0\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_and_iff)
 
 lemma one_and_eq:
   \<open>1 AND a = a mod 2\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_and_iff) (auto simp add: bit_1_iff bit_0)
 
 lemma and_one_eq:
   \<open>a AND 1 = a mod 2\<close>
   using one_and_eq [of a] by (simp add: ac_simps)
 
 lemma one_or_eq:
   \<open>1 OR a = a + of_bool (even a)\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_or_iff add.commute [of _ 1] even_bit_succ_iff)
     (auto simp add: bit_1_iff bit_0)
 
 lemma or_one_eq:
   \<open>a OR 1 = a + of_bool (even a)\<close>
   using one_or_eq [of a] by (simp add: ac_simps)
 
 lemma one_xor_eq:
   \<open>1 XOR a = a + of_bool (even a) - of_bool (odd a)\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_xor_iff add.commute [of _ 1] even_bit_succ_iff)
     (auto simp add: bit_1_iff odd_bit_iff_bit_pred bit_0 elim: oddE)
 
 lemma xor_one_eq:
   \<open>a XOR 1 = a + of_bool (even a) - of_bool (odd a)\<close>
   using one_xor_eq [of a] by (simp add: ac_simps)
 
 lemma xor_self_eq [simp]:
   \<open>a XOR a = 0\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (simp add: bit_simps)
 
 lemma bit_mask_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (mask m) n \<longleftrightarrow> possible_bit TYPE('a) n \<and> n < m\<close>
   apply (cases \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) n\<close>)
    apply (simp add: bit_iff_odd mask_eq_exp_minus_1 possible_bit_def even_decr_exp_div_exp_iff not_le)
   apply (simp add: impossible_bit)
   done
 
 lemma even_mask_iff:
   \<open>even (mask n) \<longleftrightarrow> n = 0\<close>
   using bit_mask_iff [of n 0] by (auto simp add: bit_0)
 
 lemma mask_0 [simp]:
   \<open>mask 0 = 0\<close>
   by (simp add: mask_eq_exp_minus_1)
 
 lemma mask_Suc_0 [simp]:
   \<open>mask (Suc 0) = 1\<close>
   by (simp add: mask_eq_exp_minus_1 add_implies_diff sym)
 
 lemma mask_Suc_exp:
   \<open>mask (Suc n) = 2 ^ n OR mask n\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps)
 
 lemma mask_Suc_double:
   \<open>mask (Suc n) = 1 OR 2 * mask n\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps elim: possible_bit_less_imp)
 
 lemma mask_numeral:
   \<open>mask (numeral n) = 1 + 2 * mask (pred_numeral n)\<close>
   by (simp add: numeral_eq_Suc mask_Suc_double one_or_eq ac_simps)
 
 lemma push_bit_0_id [simp]:
   \<open>push_bit 0 = id\<close>
   by (simp add: fun_eq_iff push_bit_eq_mult)
 
 lemma push_bit_Suc [simp]:
   \<open>push_bit (Suc n) a = push_bit n (a * 2)\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult ac_simps)
 
 lemma push_bit_double:
   \<open>push_bit n (a * 2) = push_bit n a * 2\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult ac_simps)
 
 lemma bit_push_bit_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (push_bit m a) n \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n \<and> possible_bit TYPE('a) n \<and> bit a (n - m)\<close>
 proof (induction n arbitrary: m)
   case 0
   then show ?case
     by (auto simp add: bit_0 push_bit_eq_mult)
 next
   case (Suc n)
   show ?case
   proof (cases m)
     case 0
     then show ?thesis
       by (auto simp add: bit_imp_possible_bit)
   next
     case (Suc m)
     with Suc.prems Suc.IH [of m] show ?thesis
       apply (simp add: push_bit_double)
       apply (simp add: bit_simps mult.commute [of _ 2])
       apply (auto simp add: possible_bit_less_imp)
       done
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma div_push_bit_of_1_eq_drop_bit:
   \<open>a div push_bit n 1 = drop_bit n a\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult drop_bit_eq_div)
 
 lemma bits_ident:
   \<open>push_bit n (drop_bit n a) + take_bit n a = a\<close>
   using div_mult_mod_eq by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult take_bit_eq_mod drop_bit_eq_div)
 
 lemma push_bit_push_bit [simp]:
   \<open>push_bit m (push_bit n a) = push_bit (m + n) a\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult power_add ac_simps)
 
 lemma push_bit_of_0 [simp]:
   \<open>push_bit n 0 = 0\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult)
 
 lemma push_bit_of_1 [simp]:
   \<open>push_bit n 1 = 2 ^ n\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult)
 
 lemma push_bit_add:
   \<open>push_bit n (a + b) = push_bit n a + push_bit n b\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult algebra_simps)
 
 lemma push_bit_numeral [simp]:
   \<open>push_bit (numeral l) (numeral k) = push_bit (pred_numeral l) (numeral (Num.Bit0 k))\<close>
   by (simp add: numeral_eq_Suc mult_2_right) (simp add: numeral_Bit0)
 
 lemma take_bit_0 [simp]:
   "take_bit 0 a = 0"
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 
 lemma bit_take_bit_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (take_bit m a) n \<longleftrightarrow> n < m \<and> bit a n\<close>
-  by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod bit_iff_odd even_mod_exp_diff_exp_iff not_le)
+  by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod bit_iff_odd even_mod_exp_div_exp_iff not_le)
 
 lemma take_bit_Suc:
   \<open>take_bit (Suc n) a = take_bit n (a div 2) * 2 + a mod 2\<close> (is \<open>?lhs = ?rhs\<close>)
 proof (rule bit_eqI)
   fix m
   assume \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) m\<close>
   then show \<open>bit ?lhs m \<longleftrightarrow> bit ?rhs m\<close>
     apply (cases a rule: parity_cases; cases m)
        apply (simp_all add: bit_simps even_bit_succ_iff mult.commute [of _ 2] add.commute [of _ 1] flip: bit_Suc)
      apply (simp_all add: bit_0)
     done
 qed
 
 lemma take_bit_rec:
   \<open>take_bit n a = (if n = 0 then 0 else take_bit (n - 1) (a div 2) * 2 + a mod 2)\<close>
   by (cases n) (simp_all add: take_bit_Suc)
 
 lemma take_bit_Suc_0 [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit (Suc 0) a = a mod 2\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 
 lemma take_bit_of_0 [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit n 0 = 0\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (simp add: bit_simps)
 
 lemma take_bit_of_1 [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit n 1 = of_bool (n > 0)\<close>
   by (cases n) (simp_all add: take_bit_Suc)
 
 lemma bit_drop_bit_eq [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (drop_bit n a) = bit a \<circ> (+) n\<close>
   by rule (simp add: drop_bit_eq_div bit_iff_odd div_exp_eq)
 
 lemma drop_bit_of_0 [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit n 0 = 0\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (simp add: bit_simps)
 
 lemma drop_bit_of_1 [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit n 1 = of_bool (n = 0)\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (simp add: bit_simps ac_simps)
 
 lemma drop_bit_0 [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit 0 = id\<close>
   by (simp add: fun_eq_iff drop_bit_eq_div)
 
 lemma drop_bit_Suc:
   \<open>drop_bit (Suc n) a = drop_bit n (a div 2)\<close>
   using div_exp_eq [of a 1] by (simp add: drop_bit_eq_div)
 
 lemma drop_bit_rec:
   \<open>drop_bit n a = (if n = 0 then a else drop_bit (n - 1) (a div 2))\<close>
   by (cases n) (simp_all add: drop_bit_Suc)
 
 lemma drop_bit_half:
   \<open>drop_bit n (a div 2) = drop_bit n a div 2\<close>
   by (induction n arbitrary: a) (simp_all add: drop_bit_Suc)
 
 lemma drop_bit_of_bool [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit n (of_bool b) = of_bool (n = 0 \<and> b)\<close>
   by (cases n) simp_all
 
 lemma even_take_bit_eq [simp]:
   \<open>even (take_bit n a) \<longleftrightarrow> n = 0 \<or> even a\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_rec [of n a])
 
 lemma take_bit_take_bit [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit m (take_bit n a) = take_bit (min m n) a\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (simp add: bit_simps)
 
 lemma drop_bit_drop_bit [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit m (drop_bit n a) = drop_bit (m + n) a\<close>
   by (simp add: drop_bit_eq_div power_add div_exp_eq ac_simps)
 
 lemma push_bit_take_bit:
   \<open>push_bit m (take_bit n a) = take_bit (m + n) (push_bit m a)\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (auto simp add: bit_simps)
 
 lemma take_bit_push_bit:
   \<open>take_bit m (push_bit n a) = push_bit n (take_bit (m - n) a)\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (auto simp add: bit_simps)
 
 lemma take_bit_drop_bit:
   \<open>take_bit m (drop_bit n a) = drop_bit n (take_bit (m + n) a)\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (auto simp add: bit_simps)
 
 lemma drop_bit_take_bit:
   \<open>drop_bit m (take_bit n a) = take_bit (n - m) (drop_bit m a)\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (auto simp add: bit_simps)
 
 lemma even_push_bit_iff [simp]:
   \<open>even (push_bit n a) \<longleftrightarrow> n \<noteq> 0 \<or> even a\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult) auto
 
 lemma stable_imp_drop_bit_eq:
   \<open>drop_bit n a = a\<close>
   if \<open>a div 2 = a\<close>
   by (induction n) (simp_all add: that drop_bit_Suc)
 
 lemma stable_imp_take_bit_eq:
   \<open>take_bit n a = (if even a then 0 else mask n)\<close>
     if \<open>a div 2 = a\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (use that in \<open>simp add: bit_simps stable_imp_bit_iff_odd\<close>)
 
 lemma exp_dvdE:
   assumes \<open>2 ^ n dvd a\<close>
   obtains b where \<open>a = push_bit n b\<close>
 proof -
   from assms obtain b where \<open>a = 2 ^ n * b\<close> ..
   then have \<open>a = push_bit n b\<close>
     by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult ac_simps)
   with that show thesis .
 qed
 
 lemma take_bit_eq_0_iff:
   \<open>take_bit n a = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ n dvd a\<close> (is \<open>?P \<longleftrightarrow> ?Q\<close>)
 proof
   assume ?P
   then show ?Q
     by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod mod_0_imp_dvd)
 next
   assume ?Q
   then obtain b where \<open>a = push_bit n b\<close>
     by (rule exp_dvdE)
   then show ?P
     by (simp add: take_bit_push_bit)
 qed
 
 lemma take_bit_tightened:
   \<open>take_bit m a = take_bit m b\<close> if \<open>take_bit n a = take_bit n b\<close> and \<open>m \<le> n\<close>
 proof -
   from that have \<open>take_bit m (take_bit n a) = take_bit m (take_bit n b)\<close>
     by simp
   then have \<open>take_bit (min m n) a = take_bit (min m n) b\<close>
     by simp
   with that show ?thesis
     by (simp add: min_def)
 qed
 
 lemma take_bit_eq_self_iff_drop_bit_eq_0:
   \<open>take_bit n a = a \<longleftrightarrow> drop_bit n a = 0\<close> (is \<open>?P \<longleftrightarrow> ?Q\<close>)
 proof
   assume ?P
   show ?Q
   proof (rule bit_eqI)
     fix m
     from \<open>?P\<close> have \<open>a = take_bit n a\<close> ..
     also have \<open>\<not> bit (take_bit n a) (n + m)\<close>
       unfolding bit_simps
       by (simp add: bit_simps)
     finally show \<open>bit (drop_bit n a) m \<longleftrightarrow> bit 0 m\<close>
       by (simp add: bit_simps)
   qed
 next
   assume ?Q
   show ?P
   proof (rule bit_eqI)
     fix m
     from \<open>?Q\<close> have \<open>\<not> bit (drop_bit n a) (m - n)\<close>
       by simp
     then have \<open> \<not> bit a (n + (m - n))\<close>
       by (simp add: bit_simps)
     then show \<open>bit (take_bit n a) m \<longleftrightarrow> bit a m\<close>
       by (cases \<open>m < n\<close>) (auto simp add: bit_simps)
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma drop_bit_exp_eq:
   \<open>drop_bit m (2 ^ n) = of_bool (m \<le> n \<and> possible_bit TYPE('a) n) * 2 ^ (n - m)\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps)
 
 lemma take_bit_and [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit n (a AND b) = take_bit n a AND take_bit n b\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps)
 
 lemma take_bit_or [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit n (a OR b) = take_bit n a OR take_bit n b\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps)
 
 lemma take_bit_xor [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit n (a XOR b) = take_bit n a XOR take_bit n b\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps)
 
 lemma push_bit_and [simp]:
   \<open>push_bit n (a AND b) = push_bit n a AND push_bit n b\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps)
 
 lemma push_bit_or [simp]:
   \<open>push_bit n (a OR b) = push_bit n a OR push_bit n b\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps)
 
 lemma push_bit_xor [simp]:
   \<open>push_bit n (a XOR b) = push_bit n a XOR push_bit n b\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps)
 
 lemma drop_bit_and [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit n (a AND b) = drop_bit n a AND drop_bit n b\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps)
 
 lemma drop_bit_or [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit n (a OR b) = drop_bit n a OR drop_bit n b\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps)
 
 lemma drop_bit_xor [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit n (a XOR b) = drop_bit n a XOR drop_bit n b\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps)
 
 lemma take_bit_of_mask [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit m (mask n) = mask (min m n)\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (simp add: bit_simps)
 
 lemma take_bit_eq_mask:
   \<open>take_bit n a = a AND mask n\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps)
 
 lemma or_eq_0_iff:
   \<open>a OR b = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> a = 0 \<and> b = 0\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_or_iff)
 
 lemma disjunctive_add:
   \<open>a + b = a OR b\<close> if \<open>\<And>n. \<not> bit a n \<or> \<not> bit b n\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (use that in \<open>simp add: bit_disjunctive_add_iff bit_or_iff\<close>)
 
 lemma bit_iff_and_drop_bit_eq_1:
   \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> drop_bit n a AND 1 = 1\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_iff_odd_drop_bit and_one_eq odd_iff_mod_2_eq_one)
 
 lemma bit_iff_and_push_bit_not_eq_0:
   \<open>bit a n \<longleftrightarrow> a AND push_bit n 1 \<noteq> 0\<close>
   by (cases \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) n\<close>) (simp_all add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps impossible_bit)
 
 lemma bit_set_bit_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (set_bit m a) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit a n \<or> (m = n \<and> possible_bit TYPE('a) n)\<close>
   by (auto simp add: set_bit_eq_or bit_or_iff bit_exp_iff)
 
 lemma even_set_bit_iff:
   \<open>even (set_bit m a) \<longleftrightarrow> even a \<and> m \<noteq> 0\<close>
   using bit_set_bit_iff [of m a 0] by (auto simp add: bit_0)
 
 lemma bit_unset_bit_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (unset_bit m a) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit a n \<and> m \<noteq> n\<close>
   by (auto simp add: unset_bit_eq_or_xor bit_simps dest: bit_imp_possible_bit)
 
 lemma even_unset_bit_iff:
   \<open>even (unset_bit m a) \<longleftrightarrow> even a \<or> m = 0\<close>
   using bit_unset_bit_iff [of m a 0] by (auto simp add: bit_0)
 
 lemma bit_flip_bit_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (flip_bit m a) n \<longleftrightarrow> (m = n \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> bit a n) \<and> possible_bit TYPE('a) n\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps flip_bit_eq_xor bit_imp_possible_bit)
 
 lemma even_flip_bit_iff:
   \<open>even (flip_bit m a) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> (even a \<longleftrightarrow> m = 0)\<close>
   using bit_flip_bit_iff [of m a 0] by (auto simp: possible_bit_def  bit_0)
 
 lemma and_exp_eq_0_iff_not_bit:
   \<open>a AND 2 ^ n = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> bit a n\<close> (is \<open>?P \<longleftrightarrow> ?Q\<close>)
   using bit_imp_possible_bit[of a n]
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps)
 
 lemma bit_sum_mult_2_cases:
   assumes a: \<open>\<forall>j. \<not> bit a (Suc j)\<close>
   shows \<open>bit (a + 2 * b) n = (if n = 0 then odd a else bit (2 * b) n)\<close>
 proof -
   from a have \<open>n = 0\<close> if \<open>bit a n\<close> for n using that
     by (cases n) simp_all
   then have \<open>a = 0 \<or> a = 1\<close>
     by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_1_iff)
   then show ?thesis
     by (cases n) (auto simp add: bit_0 bit_double_iff even_bit_succ_iff)
 qed
 
 lemma set_bit_0 [simp]:
   \<open>set_bit 0 a = 1 + 2 * (a div 2)\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps even_bit_succ_iff simp flip: bit_Suc)
 
 lemma set_bit_Suc:
   \<open>set_bit (Suc n) a = a mod 2 + 2 * set_bit n (a div 2)\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_sum_mult_2_cases bit_simps bit_0 simp flip: bit_Suc
     elim: possible_bit_less_imp)
 
 lemma unset_bit_0 [simp]:
   \<open>unset_bit 0 a = 2 * (a div 2)\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps simp flip: bit_Suc)
 
 lemma unset_bit_Suc:
   \<open>unset_bit (Suc n) a = a mod 2 + 2 * unset_bit n (a div 2)\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_sum_mult_2_cases bit_simps bit_0 simp flip: bit_Suc)
 
 lemma flip_bit_0 [simp]:
   \<open>flip_bit 0 a = of_bool (even a) + 2 * (a div 2)\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps even_bit_succ_iff bit_0 simp flip: bit_Suc)
 
 lemma flip_bit_Suc:
   \<open>flip_bit (Suc n) a = a mod 2 + 2 * flip_bit n (a div 2)\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_sum_mult_2_cases bit_simps bit_0 simp flip: bit_Suc
     elim: possible_bit_less_imp)
 
 lemma flip_bit_eq_if:
   \<open>flip_bit n a = (if bit a n then unset_bit else set_bit) n a\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (auto simp add: bit_set_bit_iff bit_unset_bit_iff bit_flip_bit_iff)
 
 lemma take_bit_set_bit_eq:
   \<open>take_bit n (set_bit m a) = (if n \<le> m then take_bit n a else set_bit m (take_bit n a))\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (auto simp add: bit_take_bit_iff bit_set_bit_iff)
 
 lemma take_bit_unset_bit_eq:
   \<open>take_bit n (unset_bit m a) = (if n \<le> m then take_bit n a else unset_bit m (take_bit n a))\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (auto simp add: bit_take_bit_iff bit_unset_bit_iff)
 
 lemma take_bit_flip_bit_eq:
   \<open>take_bit n (flip_bit m a) = (if n \<le> m then take_bit n a else flip_bit m (take_bit n a))\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (auto simp add: bit_take_bit_iff bit_flip_bit_iff)
 
 lemma bit_1_0 [simp]:
   \<open>bit 1 0\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_0)
 
 lemma not_bit_1_Suc [simp]:
   \<open>\<not> bit 1 (Suc n)\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_Suc)
 
 lemma push_bit_Suc_numeral [simp]:
   \<open>push_bit (Suc n) (numeral k) = push_bit n (numeral (Num.Bit0 k))\<close>
   by (simp add: numeral_eq_Suc mult_2_right) (simp add: numeral_Bit0)
 
 lemma mask_eq_0_iff [simp]:
   \<open>mask n = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> n = 0\<close>
   by (cases n) (simp_all add: mask_Suc_double or_eq_0_iff)
 
 lemma bit_horner_sum_bit_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (horner_sum of_bool 2 bs) n \<longleftrightarrow> possible_bit TYPE('a) n \<and> n < length bs \<and> bs ! n\<close>
 proof (induction bs arbitrary: n)
   case Nil
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case (Cons b bs)
   show ?case
   proof (cases n)
     case 0
     then show ?thesis
       by (simp add: bit_0)
   next
     case (Suc m)
     with bit_rec [of _ n] Cons.prems Cons.IH [of m]
     show ?thesis
       by (simp add: bit_simps)
         (auto simp add: possible_bit_less_imp bit_simps simp flip: bit_Suc)
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma horner_sum_bit_eq_take_bit:
   \<open>horner_sum of_bool 2 (map (bit a) [0..<n]) = take_bit n a\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (auto simp add: bit_simps)
 
 lemma take_bit_horner_sum_bit_eq:
   \<open>take_bit n (horner_sum of_bool 2 bs) = horner_sum of_bool 2 (take n bs)\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_take_bit_iff bit_horner_sum_bit_iff)
 
 lemma take_bit_sum:
   \<open>take_bit n a = (\<Sum>k = 0..<n. push_bit k (of_bool (bit a k)))\<close>
   by (simp flip: horner_sum_bit_eq_take_bit add: horner_sum_eq_sum push_bit_eq_mult)
 
 lemma set_bit_eq:
   \<open>set_bit n a = a + of_bool (\<not> bit a n) * 2 ^ n\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>set_bit n a = a OR of_bool (\<not> bit a n) * 2 ^ n\<close>
     by (rule bit_eqI) (auto simp add: bit_simps)
   then show ?thesis
     by (subst disjunctive_add) (auto simp add: bit_simps)
 qed
 
 end
 
 class ring_bit_operations = semiring_bit_operations + ring_parity +
   fixes not :: \<open>'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>  (\<open>NOT\<close>)
   assumes not_eq_complement: \<open>NOT a = - a - 1\<close>
 begin
 
 text \<open>
   For the sake of code generation \<^const>\<open>not\<close> is specified as
   definitional class operation.  Note that \<^const>\<open>not\<close> has no
   sensible definition for unlimited but only positive bit strings
   (type \<^typ>\<open>nat\<close>).
 \<close>
 
 lemma bits_minus_1_mod_2_eq [simp]:
   \<open>(- 1) mod 2 = 1\<close>
   by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma minus_eq_not_plus_1:
   \<open>- a = NOT a + 1\<close>
   using not_eq_complement [of a] by simp
 
 lemma minus_eq_not_minus_1:
   \<open>- a = NOT (a - 1)\<close>
   using not_eq_complement [of \<open>a - 1\<close>] by simp (simp add: algebra_simps)
 
 lemma not_rec:
   \<open>NOT a = of_bool (even a) + 2 * NOT (a div 2)\<close>
   by (simp add: not_eq_complement algebra_simps mod_2_eq_odd flip: minus_mod_eq_mult_div)
 
 lemma even_not_iff [simp]:
   \<open>even (NOT a) \<longleftrightarrow> odd a\<close>
   by (simp add: not_eq_complement)
 
 lemma bit_not_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (NOT a) n \<longleftrightarrow> possible_bit TYPE('a) n \<and> \<not> bit a n\<close>
 proof (cases \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) n\<close>)
   case False
   then show ?thesis
     by (auto dest: bit_imp_possible_bit)
 next
   case True
   moreover have \<open>bit (NOT a) n \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> bit a n\<close>
   using \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) n\<close> proof (induction n arbitrary: a)
     case 0
     then show ?case
       by (simp add: bit_0)
   next
     case (Suc n)
     from Suc.prems Suc.IH [of \<open>a div 2\<close>]
     show ?case
       by (simp add: impossible_bit possible_bit_less_imp not_rec [of a] even_bit_succ_iff bit_double_iff flip: bit_Suc)
   qed
   ultimately show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma bit_not_exp_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (NOT (2 ^ m)) n \<longleftrightarrow> possible_bit TYPE('a) n \<and> n \<noteq> m\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_not_iff bit_exp_iff)
 
 lemma bit_minus_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (- a) n \<longleftrightarrow> possible_bit TYPE('a) n \<and> \<not> bit (a - 1) n\<close>
   by (simp add: minus_eq_not_minus_1 bit_not_iff)
 
 lemma bit_minus_1_iff [simp]:
   \<open>bit (- 1) n \<longleftrightarrow> possible_bit TYPE('a) n\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_minus_iff)
 
 lemma bit_minus_exp_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (- (2 ^ m)) n \<longleftrightarrow> possible_bit TYPE('a) n \<and> n \<ge> m\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_simps simp flip: mask_eq_exp_minus_1)
 
 lemma bit_minus_2_iff [simp]:
   \<open>bit (- 2) n \<longleftrightarrow> possible_bit TYPE('a) n \<and> n > 0\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_minus_iff bit_1_iff)
 
 lemma bit_not_iff_eq:
   \<open>bit (NOT a) n \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ n \<noteq> 0 \<and> \<not> bit a n\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_simps possible_bit_def)
 
 lemma not_one_eq [simp]:
   \<open>NOT 1 = - 2\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_not_iff) (simp add: bit_1_iff)
 
 sublocale "and": semilattice_neutr \<open>(AND)\<close> \<open>- 1\<close>
   by standard (rule bit_eqI, simp add: bit_and_iff)
 
 sublocale bit: abstract_boolean_algebra \<open>(AND)\<close> \<open>(OR)\<close> NOT 0 \<open>- 1\<close>
   by standard (auto simp add: bit_and_iff bit_or_iff bit_not_iff intro: bit_eqI)
 
 sublocale bit: abstract_boolean_algebra_sym_diff \<open>(AND)\<close> \<open>(OR)\<close> NOT 0 \<open>- 1\<close> \<open>(XOR)\<close>
   apply standard
   apply (rule bit_eqI)
   apply (auto simp add: bit_simps)
   done
 
 lemma and_eq_not_not_or:
   \<open>a AND b = NOT (NOT a OR NOT b)\<close>
   by simp
 
 lemma or_eq_not_not_and:
   \<open>a OR b = NOT (NOT a AND NOT b)\<close>
   by simp
 
 lemma not_add_distrib:
   \<open>NOT (a + b) = NOT a - b\<close>
   by (simp add: not_eq_complement algebra_simps)
 
 lemma not_diff_distrib:
   \<open>NOT (a - b) = NOT a + b\<close>
   using not_add_distrib [of a \<open>- b\<close>] by simp
 
 lemma and_eq_minus_1_iff:
   \<open>a AND b = - 1 \<longleftrightarrow> a = - 1 \<and> b = - 1\<close>
   by (auto simp: bit_eq_iff bit_simps)
 
 lemma disjunctive_diff:
   \<open>a - b = a AND NOT b\<close> if \<open>\<And>n. bit b n \<Longrightarrow> bit a n\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>NOT a + b = NOT a OR b\<close>
     by (rule disjunctive_add) (auto simp add: bit_not_iff dest: that)
   then have \<open>NOT (NOT a + b) = NOT (NOT a OR b)\<close>
     by simp
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: not_add_distrib)
 qed
 
 lemma push_bit_minus:
   \<open>push_bit n (- a) = - push_bit n a\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult)
 
 lemma take_bit_not_take_bit:
   \<open>take_bit n (NOT (take_bit n a)) = take_bit n (NOT a)\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_take_bit_iff bit_not_iff)
 
 lemma take_bit_not_iff:
   \<open>take_bit n (NOT a) = take_bit n (NOT b) \<longleftrightarrow> take_bit n a = take_bit n b\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps)
 
 lemma take_bit_not_eq_mask_diff:
   \<open>take_bit n (NOT a) = mask n - take_bit n a\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>take_bit n (NOT a) = take_bit n (NOT (take_bit n a))\<close>
     by (simp add: take_bit_not_take_bit)
   also have \<open>\<dots> = mask n AND NOT (take_bit n a)\<close>
     by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mask ac_simps)
   also have \<open>\<dots> = mask n - take_bit n a\<close>
     by (subst disjunctive_diff)
       (auto simp add: bit_take_bit_iff bit_mask_iff bit_imp_possible_bit)
   finally show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma mask_eq_take_bit_minus_one:
   \<open>mask n = take_bit n (- 1)\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_mask_iff bit_take_bit_iff conj_commute)
 
 lemma take_bit_minus_one_eq_mask [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit n (- 1) = mask n\<close>
   by (simp add: mask_eq_take_bit_minus_one)
 
 lemma minus_exp_eq_not_mask:
   \<open>- (2 ^ n) = NOT (mask n)\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (simp add: bit_minus_iff bit_not_iff flip: mask_eq_exp_minus_1)
 
 lemma push_bit_minus_one_eq_not_mask [simp]:
   \<open>push_bit n (- 1) = NOT (mask n)\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult minus_exp_eq_not_mask)
 
 lemma take_bit_not_mask_eq_0:
   \<open>take_bit m (NOT (mask n)) = 0\<close> if \<open>n \<ge> m\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (use that in \<open>simp add: bit_take_bit_iff bit_not_iff bit_mask_iff\<close>)
 
 lemma unset_bit_eq_and_not:
   \<open>unset_bit n a = a AND NOT (push_bit n 1)\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (auto simp add: bit_simps)
 
 lemma push_bit_Suc_minus_numeral [simp]:
   \<open>push_bit (Suc n) (- numeral k) = push_bit n (- numeral (Num.Bit0 k))\<close>
   apply (simp only: numeral_Bit0)
   apply simp
   apply (simp only: numeral_mult mult_2_right numeral_add)
   done
 
 lemma push_bit_minus_numeral [simp]:
   \<open>push_bit (numeral l) (- numeral k) = push_bit (pred_numeral l) (- numeral (Num.Bit0 k))\<close>
   by (simp only: numeral_eq_Suc push_bit_Suc_minus_numeral)
 
 lemma take_bit_Suc_minus_1_eq:
   \<open>take_bit (Suc n) (- 1) = 2 ^ Suc n - 1\<close>
   by (simp add: mask_eq_exp_minus_1)
 
 lemma take_bit_numeral_minus_1_eq:
   \<open>take_bit (numeral k) (- 1) = 2 ^ numeral k - 1\<close>
   by (simp add: mask_eq_exp_minus_1)
 
 lemma push_bit_mask_eq:
   \<open>push_bit m (mask n) = mask (n + m) AND NOT (mask m)\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (auto simp add: bit_simps not_less possible_bit_less_imp)
 
 lemma slice_eq_mask:
   \<open>push_bit n (take_bit m (drop_bit n a)) = a AND mask (m + n) AND NOT (mask n)\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (auto simp add: bit_simps)
 
 lemma push_bit_numeral_minus_1 [simp]:
   \<open>push_bit (numeral n) (- 1) = - (2 ^ numeral n)\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult)
 
 lemma unset_bit_eq:
   \<open>unset_bit n a = a - of_bool (bit a n) * 2 ^ n\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>unset_bit n a = a AND NOT (of_bool (bit a n) * 2 ^ n)\<close>
     by (rule bit_eqI) (auto simp add: bit_simps)
   then show ?thesis
     by (subst disjunctive_diff) (auto simp add: bit_simps simp flip: push_bit_eq_mult)
 qed
 
 end
 
 
 subsection \<open>Common algebraic structure\<close>
 
 class linordered_euclidean_semiring_bit_operations =
   linordered_euclidean_semiring + semiring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 lemma possible_bit [simp]:
   \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) n\<close>
   by (simp add: possible_bit_def)
 
 lemma take_bit_of_exp [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit m (2 ^ n) = of_bool (n < m) * 2 ^ n\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod exp_mod_exp)
 
 lemma take_bit_of_2 [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit n 2 = of_bool (2 \<le> n) * 2\<close>
   using take_bit_of_exp [of n 1] by simp
 
 lemma push_bit_eq_0_iff [simp]:
   \<open>push_bit n a = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> a = 0\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult)
 
 lemma take_bit_add:
   \<open>take_bit n (take_bit n a + take_bit n b) = take_bit n (a + b)\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod mod_simps)
 
 lemma take_bit_of_1_eq_0_iff [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit n 1 = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> n = 0\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 
 lemma drop_bit_Suc_bit0 [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit (Suc n) (numeral (Num.Bit0 k)) = drop_bit n (numeral k)\<close>
   by (simp add: drop_bit_Suc numeral_Bit0_div_2)
 
 lemma drop_bit_Suc_bit1 [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit (Suc n) (numeral (Num.Bit1 k)) = drop_bit n (numeral k)\<close>
   by (simp add: drop_bit_Suc numeral_Bit1_div_2)
 
 lemma drop_bit_numeral_bit0 [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit (numeral l) (numeral (Num.Bit0 k)) = drop_bit (pred_numeral l) (numeral k)\<close>
   by (simp add: drop_bit_rec numeral_Bit0_div_2)
 
 lemma drop_bit_numeral_bit1 [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit (numeral l) (numeral (Num.Bit1 k)) = drop_bit (pred_numeral l) (numeral k)\<close>
   by (simp add: drop_bit_rec numeral_Bit1_div_2)
 
 lemma take_bit_Suc_1 [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit (Suc n) 1 = 1\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_Suc)
 
 lemma take_bit_Suc_bit0:
   \<open>take_bit (Suc n) (numeral (Num.Bit0 k)) = take_bit n (numeral k) * 2\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_Suc numeral_Bit0_div_2)
 
 lemma take_bit_Suc_bit1:
   \<open>take_bit (Suc n) (numeral (Num.Bit1 k)) = take_bit n (numeral k) * 2 + 1\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_Suc numeral_Bit1_div_2 mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma take_bit_numeral_1 [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit (numeral l) 1 = 1\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_rec [of \<open>numeral l\<close> 1])
 
 lemma take_bit_numeral_bit0:
   \<open>take_bit (numeral l) (numeral (Num.Bit0 k)) = take_bit (pred_numeral l) (numeral k) * 2\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_rec numeral_Bit0_div_2)
 
 lemma take_bit_numeral_bit1:
   \<open>take_bit (numeral l) (numeral (Num.Bit1 k)) = take_bit (pred_numeral l) (numeral k) * 2 + 1\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_rec numeral_Bit1_div_2 mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma bit_of_nat_iff_bit [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (of_nat m) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit m n\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>even (m div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> even (of_nat (m div 2 ^ n))\<close>
     by simp
   also have \<open>of_nat (m div 2 ^ n) = of_nat m div of_nat (2 ^ n)\<close>
     by (simp add: of_nat_div)
   finally show ?thesis
     by (simp add: bit_iff_odd semiring_bits_class.bit_iff_odd)
 qed
 
 lemma drop_bit_mask_eq:
   \<open>drop_bit m (mask n) = mask (n - m)\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (auto simp add: bit_simps possible_bit_def)
 
 lemma bit_push_bit_iff':
   \<open>bit (push_bit m a) n \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n \<and> bit a (n - m)\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_simps)
 
 lemma mask_half:
   \<open>mask n div 2 = mask (n - 1)\<close>
   by (cases n) (simp_all add: mask_Suc_double one_or_eq)
 
 lemma take_bit_Suc_from_most:
   \<open>take_bit (Suc n) a = 2 ^ n * of_bool (bit a n) + take_bit n a\<close>
   using mod_mult2_eq' [of a \<open>2 ^ n\<close> 2]
   by (simp only: take_bit_eq_mod power_Suc2)
     (simp_all add: bit_iff_odd odd_iff_mod_2_eq_one)
 
 lemma take_bit_nonnegative [simp]:
   \<open>0 \<le> take_bit n a\<close>
   using horner_sum_nonnegative by (simp flip: horner_sum_bit_eq_take_bit)
 
 lemma not_take_bit_negative [simp]:
   \<open>\<not> take_bit n a < 0\<close>
   by (simp add: not_less)
 
 lemma bit_imp_take_bit_positive:
   \<open>0 < take_bit m a\<close> if \<open>n < m\<close> and \<open>bit a n\<close>
 proof (rule ccontr)
   assume \<open>\<not> 0 < take_bit m a\<close>
   then have \<open>take_bit m a = 0\<close>
     by (auto simp add: not_less intro: order_antisym)
   then have \<open>bit (take_bit m a) n = bit 0 n\<close>
     by simp
   with that show False
     by (simp add: bit_take_bit_iff)
 qed
 
 lemma take_bit_mult:
   \<open>take_bit n (take_bit n a * take_bit n b) = take_bit n (a * b)\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod mod_mult_eq)
 
 lemma drop_bit_push_bit:
   \<open>drop_bit m (push_bit n a) = drop_bit (m - n) (push_bit (n - m) a)\<close>
   by (cases \<open>m \<le> n\<close>)
     (auto simp add: mult.left_commute [of _ \<open>2 ^ n\<close>] mult.commute [of _ \<open>2 ^ n\<close>] mult.assoc
     mult.commute [of a] drop_bit_eq_div push_bit_eq_mult not_le power_add Orderings.not_le dest!: le_Suc_ex less_imp_Suc_add)
 
 end
 
 
 subsection \<open>Instance \<^typ>\<open>int\<close>\<close>
 
 locale fold2_bit_int =
   fixes f :: \<open>bool \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> bool\<close>
 begin
 
 context
 begin
 
 function F :: \<open>int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int\<close>
   where \<open>F k l = (if k \<in> {0, - 1} \<and> l \<in> {0, - 1}
     then - of_bool (f (odd k) (odd l))
     else of_bool (f (odd k) (odd l)) + 2 * (F (k div 2) (l div 2)))\<close>
   by auto
 
 private termination proof (relation \<open>measure (\<lambda>(k, l). nat (\<bar>k\<bar> + \<bar>l\<bar>))\<close>)
   have less_eq: \<open>\<bar>k div 2\<bar> \<le> \<bar>k\<bar>\<close> for k :: int
     by (cases k) (simp_all add: divide_int_def nat_add_distrib)
   then have less: \<open>\<bar>k div 2\<bar> < \<bar>k\<bar>\<close> if \<open>k \<notin> {0, - 1}\<close> for k :: int
     using that by (auto simp add: less_le [of k])
   show \<open>wf (measure (\<lambda>(k, l). nat (\<bar>k\<bar> + \<bar>l\<bar>)))\<close>
     by simp
   show \<open>((k div 2, l div 2), k, l) \<in> measure (\<lambda>(k, l). nat (\<bar>k\<bar> + \<bar>l\<bar>))\<close>
     if \<open>\<not> (k \<in> {0, - 1} \<and> l \<in> {0, - 1})\<close> for k l
   proof -
     from that have *: \<open>k \<notin> {0, - 1} \<or> l \<notin> {0, - 1}\<close>
       by simp
     then have \<open>0 < \<bar>k\<bar> + \<bar>l\<bar>\<close>
       by auto
     moreover from * have \<open>\<bar>k div 2\<bar> + \<bar>l div 2\<bar> < \<bar>k\<bar> + \<bar>l\<bar>\<close>
     proof
       assume \<open>k \<notin> {0, - 1}\<close>
       then have \<open>\<bar>k div 2\<bar> < \<bar>k\<bar>\<close>
         by (rule less)
       with less_eq [of l] show ?thesis
         by auto
     next
       assume \<open>l \<notin> {0, - 1}\<close>
       then have \<open>\<bar>l div 2\<bar> < \<bar>l\<bar>\<close>
         by (rule less)
       with less_eq [of k] show ?thesis
         by auto
     qed
     ultimately show ?thesis
       by (simp only: in_measure split_def fst_conv snd_conv nat_mono_iff)
   qed
 qed
 
 declare F.simps [simp del]
 
 lemma rec:
   \<open>F k l = of_bool (f (odd k) (odd l)) + 2 * (F (k div 2) (l div 2))\<close>
     for k l :: int
 proof (cases \<open>k \<in> {0, - 1} \<and> l \<in> {0, - 1}\<close>)
   case True
   then show ?thesis
     by (auto simp add: F.simps [of 0] F.simps [of \<open>- 1\<close>])
 next
   case False
   then show ?thesis
     by (auto simp add: ac_simps F.simps [of k l])
 qed
 
 lemma bit_iff:
   \<open>bit (F k l) n \<longleftrightarrow> f (bit k n) (bit l n)\<close> for k l :: int
 proof (induction n arbitrary: k l)
   case 0
   then show ?case
     by (simp add: rec [of k l] bit_0)
 next
   case (Suc n)
   then show ?case
     by (simp add: rec [of k l] bit_Suc)
 qed
 
 end
 
 end
 
 instantiation int :: ring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 definition not_int :: \<open>int \<Rightarrow> int\<close>
   where \<open>not_int k = - k - 1\<close>
 
 global_interpretation and_int: fold2_bit_int \<open>(\<and>)\<close>
   defines and_int = and_int.F .
 
 global_interpretation or_int: fold2_bit_int \<open>(\<or>)\<close>
   defines or_int = or_int.F .
 
 global_interpretation xor_int: fold2_bit_int \<open>(\<noteq>)\<close>
   defines xor_int = xor_int.F .
 
 definition mask_int :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> int\<close>
   where \<open>mask n = (2 :: int) ^ n - 1\<close>
 
 definition push_bit_int :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int\<close>
   where \<open>push_bit_int n k = k * 2 ^ n\<close>
 
 definition drop_bit_int :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int\<close>
   where \<open>drop_bit_int n k = k div 2 ^ n\<close>
 
 definition take_bit_int :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int\<close>
   where \<open>take_bit_int n k = k mod 2 ^ n\<close>
 
 definition set_bit_int :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int\<close>
   where \<open>set_bit n k = k OR push_bit n 1\<close> for k :: int
 
 definition unset_bit_int :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int\<close>
   where \<open>unset_bit n k = k AND NOT (push_bit n 1)\<close> for k :: int
 
 definition flip_bit_int :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int\<close>
   where \<open>flip_bit n k = k XOR push_bit n 1\<close> for k :: int
 
 lemma not_int_div_2:
   \<open>NOT k div 2 = NOT (k div 2)\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: not_int_def)
 
 lemma bit_not_int_iff:
   \<open>bit (NOT k) n \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> bit k n\<close> for k :: int
 proof (rule sym, induction n arbitrary: k)
   case 0
   then show ?case
     by (simp add: bit_0 not_int_def)
 next
   case (Suc n)
   then show ?case
     by (simp add: bit_Suc not_int_div_2)
 qed
 
 instance proof
   fix k l :: int and m n :: nat
   show \<open>unset_bit n k = (k OR push_bit n 1) XOR push_bit n 1\<close>
     by (rule bit_eqI)
       (auto simp add: unset_bit_int_def
         and_int.bit_iff or_int.bit_iff xor_int.bit_iff bit_not_int_iff push_bit_int_def bit_simps)
 qed (fact and_int.rec or_int.rec xor_int.rec mask_int_def set_bit_int_def flip_bit_int_def
   push_bit_int_def drop_bit_int_def take_bit_int_def not_int_def)+
 
 end
 
 instance int :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_bit_operations ..
 
 context ring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 lemma even_of_int_iff:
   \<open>even (of_int k) \<longleftrightarrow> even k\<close>
   by (induction k rule: int_bit_induct) simp_all
 
 lemma bit_of_int_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (of_int k) n \<longleftrightarrow> possible_bit TYPE('a) n \<and> bit k n\<close>
 proof (cases \<open>possible_bit TYPE('a) n\<close>)
   case False
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: impossible_bit)
 next
   case True
   then have \<open>bit (of_int k) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit k n\<close>
   proof (induction k arbitrary: n rule: int_bit_induct)
     case zero
     then show ?case
       by simp
   next
     case minus
     then show ?case
       by simp
   next
     case (even k)
     then show ?case
       using bit_double_iff [of \<open>of_int k\<close> n] Bit_Operations.bit_double_iff [of k n]
       by (cases n) (auto simp add: ac_simps possible_bit_def dest: mult_not_zero)
   next
     case (odd k)
     then show ?case
       using bit_double_iff [of \<open>of_int k\<close> n]
       by (cases n)
         (auto simp add: ac_simps bit_double_iff even_bit_succ_iff Bit_Operations.bit_0 Bit_Operations.bit_Suc
           possible_bit_def dest: mult_not_zero)
   qed
   with True show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma push_bit_of_int:
   \<open>push_bit n (of_int k) = of_int (push_bit n k)\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult Bit_Operations.push_bit_eq_mult)
 
 lemma of_int_push_bit:
   \<open>of_int (push_bit n k) = push_bit n (of_int k)\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult Bit_Operations.push_bit_eq_mult)
 
 lemma take_bit_of_int:
   \<open>take_bit n (of_int k) = of_int (take_bit n k)\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (simp add: bit_take_bit_iff Bit_Operations.bit_take_bit_iff bit_of_int_iff)
 
 lemma of_int_take_bit:
   \<open>of_int (take_bit n k) = take_bit n (of_int k)\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (simp add: bit_take_bit_iff Bit_Operations.bit_take_bit_iff bit_of_int_iff)
 
 lemma of_int_not_eq:
   \<open>of_int (NOT k) = NOT (of_int k)\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (simp add: bit_not_iff Bit_Operations.bit_not_iff bit_of_int_iff)
 
 lemma of_int_not_numeral:
   \<open>of_int (NOT (numeral k)) = NOT (numeral k)\<close>
   by (simp add: local.of_int_not_eq)
 
 lemma of_int_and_eq:
   \<open>of_int (k AND l) = of_int k AND of_int l\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (simp add: bit_of_int_iff bit_and_iff Bit_Operations.bit_and_iff)
 
 lemma of_int_or_eq:
   \<open>of_int (k OR l) = of_int k OR of_int l\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (simp add: bit_of_int_iff bit_or_iff Bit_Operations.bit_or_iff)
 
 lemma of_int_xor_eq:
   \<open>of_int (k XOR l) = of_int k XOR of_int l\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (simp add: bit_of_int_iff bit_xor_iff Bit_Operations.bit_xor_iff)
 
 lemma of_int_mask_eq:
   \<open>of_int (mask n) = mask n\<close>
   by (induction n) (simp_all add: mask_Suc_double Bit_Operations.mask_Suc_double of_int_or_eq)
 
 end
 
 lemma take_bit_int_less_exp [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit n k < 2 ^ n\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 
 lemma take_bit_int_eq_self_iff:
   \<open>take_bit n k = k \<longleftrightarrow> 0 \<le> k \<and> k < 2 ^ n\<close> (is \<open>?P \<longleftrightarrow> ?Q\<close>)
   for k :: int
 proof
   assume ?P
   moreover note take_bit_int_less_exp [of n k] take_bit_nonnegative [of n k]
   ultimately show ?Q
     by simp
 next
   assume ?Q
   then show ?P
     by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 qed
 
 lemma take_bit_int_eq_self:
   \<open>take_bit n k = k\<close> if \<open>0 \<le> k\<close> \<open>k < 2 ^ n\<close> for k :: int
   using that by (simp add: take_bit_int_eq_self_iff)
 
 lemma mask_nonnegative_int [simp]:
   \<open>mask n \<ge> (0::int)\<close>
   by (simp add: mask_eq_exp_minus_1 add_le_imp_le_diff)
 
 lemma not_mask_negative_int [simp]:
   \<open>\<not> mask n < (0::int)\<close>
   by (simp add: not_less)
 
 lemma not_nonnegative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>NOT k \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k < 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: not_int_def)
 
 lemma not_negative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>NOT k < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k \<ge> 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (subst Not_eq_iff [symmetric]) (simp add: not_less not_le)
 
 lemma and_nonnegative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>k AND l \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k \<ge> 0 \<or> l \<ge> 0\<close> for k l :: int
 proof (induction k arbitrary: l rule: int_bit_induct)
   case zero
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case minus
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case (even k)
   then show ?case
     using and_int.rec [of \<open>k * 2\<close> l]
     by (simp add: pos_imp_zdiv_nonneg_iff zero_le_mult_iff)
 next
   case (odd k)
   from odd have \<open>0 \<le> k AND l div 2 \<longleftrightarrow> 0 \<le> k \<or> 0 \<le> l div 2\<close>
     by simp
   then have \<open>0 \<le> (1 + k * 2) div 2 AND l div 2 \<longleftrightarrow> 0 \<le> (1 + k * 2) div 2 \<or> 0 \<le> l div 2\<close>
     by simp
   with and_int.rec [of \<open>1 + k * 2\<close> l]
   show ?case
     by (auto simp add: zero_le_mult_iff not_le)
 qed
 
 lemma and_negative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>k AND l < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k < 0 \<and> l < 0\<close> for k l :: int
   by (subst Not_eq_iff [symmetric]) (simp add: not_less)
 
 lemma and_less_eq:
   \<open>k AND l \<le> k\<close> if \<open>l < 0\<close> for k l :: int
 using that proof (induction k arbitrary: l rule: int_bit_induct)
   case zero
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case minus
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case (even k)
   from even.IH [of \<open>l div 2\<close>] even.hyps even.prems
   show ?case
     by (simp add: and_int.rec [of _ l])
 next
   case (odd k)
   from odd.IH [of \<open>l div 2\<close>] odd.hyps odd.prems
   show ?case
     by (simp add: and_int.rec [of _ l])
 qed
 
 lemma or_nonnegative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>k OR l \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k \<ge> 0 \<and> l \<ge> 0\<close> for k l :: int
   by (simp only: or_eq_not_not_and not_nonnegative_int_iff) simp
 
 lemma or_negative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>k OR l < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k < 0 \<or> l < 0\<close> for k l :: int
   by (subst Not_eq_iff [symmetric]) (simp add: not_less)
 
 lemma or_greater_eq:
   \<open>k OR l \<ge> k\<close> if \<open>l \<ge> 0\<close> for k l :: int
 using that proof (induction k arbitrary: l rule: int_bit_induct)
   case zero
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case minus
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case (even k)
   from even.IH [of \<open>l div 2\<close>] even.hyps even.prems
   show ?case
     by (simp add: or_int.rec [of _ l])
 next
   case (odd k)
   from odd.IH [of \<open>l div 2\<close>] odd.hyps odd.prems
   show ?case
     by (simp add: or_int.rec [of _ l])
 qed
 
 lemma xor_nonnegative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>k XOR l \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> (k \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> l \<ge> 0)\<close> for k l :: int
   by (simp only: bit.xor_def or_nonnegative_int_iff) auto
 
 lemma xor_negative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>k XOR l < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> (k < 0) \<noteq> (l < 0)\<close> for k l :: int
   by (subst Not_eq_iff [symmetric]) (auto simp add: not_less)
 
 lemma OR_upper: \<^marker>\<open>contributor \<open>Stefan Berghofer\<close>\<close>
   \<open>x OR y < 2 ^ n\<close> if \<open>0 \<le> x\<close> \<open>x < 2 ^ n\<close> \<open>y < 2 ^ n\<close> for x y :: int
 using that proof (induction x arbitrary: y n rule: int_bit_induct)
   case zero
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case minus
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case (even x)
   from even.IH [of \<open>n - 1\<close> \<open>y div 2\<close>] even.prems even.hyps
   show ?case
     by (cases n) (auto simp add: or_int.rec [of \<open>_ * 2\<close>] elim: oddE)
 next
   case (odd x)
   from odd.IH [of \<open>n - 1\<close> \<open>y div 2\<close>] odd.prems odd.hyps
   show ?case
     by (cases n) (auto simp add: or_int.rec [of \<open>1 + _ * 2\<close>], linarith)
 qed
 
 lemma XOR_upper: \<^marker>\<open>contributor \<open>Stefan Berghofer\<close>\<close>
   \<open>x XOR y < 2 ^ n\<close> if \<open>0 \<le> x\<close> \<open>x < 2 ^ n\<close> \<open>y < 2 ^ n\<close> for x y :: int
 using that proof (induction x arbitrary: y n rule: int_bit_induct)
   case zero
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case minus
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case (even x)
   from even.IH [of \<open>n - 1\<close> \<open>y div 2\<close>] even.prems even.hyps
   show ?case
     by (cases n) (auto simp add: xor_int.rec [of \<open>_ * 2\<close>] elim: oddE)
 next
   case (odd x)
   from odd.IH [of \<open>n - 1\<close> \<open>y div 2\<close>] odd.prems odd.hyps
   show ?case
     by (cases n) (auto simp add: xor_int.rec [of \<open>1 + _ * 2\<close>])
 qed
 
 lemma AND_lower [simp]: \<^marker>\<open>contributor \<open>Stefan Berghofer\<close>\<close>
   \<open>0 \<le> x AND y\<close> if \<open>0 \<le> x\<close> for x y :: int
   using that by simp
 
 lemma OR_lower [simp]: \<^marker>\<open>contributor \<open>Stefan Berghofer\<close>\<close>
   \<open>0 \<le> x OR y\<close> if \<open>0 \<le> x\<close> \<open>0 \<le> y\<close> for x y :: int
   using that by simp
 
 lemma XOR_lower [simp]: \<^marker>\<open>contributor \<open>Stefan Berghofer\<close>\<close>
   \<open>0 \<le> x XOR y\<close> if \<open>0 \<le> x\<close> \<open>0 \<le> y\<close> for x y :: int
   using that by simp
 
 lemma AND_upper1 [simp]: \<^marker>\<open>contributor \<open>Stefan Berghofer\<close>\<close>
   \<open>x AND y \<le> x\<close> if \<open>0 \<le> x\<close> for x y :: int
 using that proof (induction x arbitrary: y rule: int_bit_induct)
   case (odd k)
   then have \<open>k AND y div 2 \<le> k\<close>
     by simp
   then show ?case
     by (simp add: and_int.rec [of \<open>1 + _ * 2\<close>])
 qed (simp_all add: and_int.rec [of \<open>_ * 2\<close>])
 
 lemma AND_upper1' [simp]: \<^marker>\<open>contributor \<open>Stefan Berghofer\<close>\<close>
   \<open>y AND x \<le> z\<close> if \<open>0 \<le> y\<close> \<open>y \<le> z\<close> for x y z :: int
   using _ \<open>y \<le> z\<close> by (rule order_trans) (use \<open>0 \<le> y\<close> in simp)
 
 lemma AND_upper1'' [simp]: \<^marker>\<open>contributor \<open>Stefan Berghofer\<close>\<close>
   \<open>y AND x < z\<close> if \<open>0 \<le> y\<close> \<open>y < z\<close> for x y z :: int
   using _ \<open>y < z\<close> by (rule order_le_less_trans) (use \<open>0 \<le> y\<close> in simp)
 
 lemma AND_upper2 [simp]: \<^marker>\<open>contributor \<open>Stefan Berghofer\<close>\<close>
   \<open>x AND y \<le> y\<close> if \<open>0 \<le> y\<close> for x y :: int
   using that AND_upper1 [of y x] by (simp add: ac_simps)
 
 lemma AND_upper2' [simp]: \<^marker>\<open>contributor \<open>Stefan Berghofer\<close>\<close>
   \<open>x AND y \<le> z\<close> if \<open>0 \<le> y\<close> \<open>y \<le> z\<close> for x y :: int
   using that AND_upper1' [of y z x] by (simp add: ac_simps)
 
 lemma AND_upper2'' [simp]: \<^marker>\<open>contributor \<open>Stefan Berghofer\<close>\<close>
   \<open>x AND y < z\<close> if \<open>0 \<le> y\<close> \<open>y < z\<close> for x y :: int
   using that AND_upper1'' [of y z x] by (simp add: ac_simps)
 
 lemma plus_and_or:
   \<open>(x AND y) + (x OR y) = x + y\<close> for x y :: int
 proof (induction x arbitrary: y rule: int_bit_induct)
   case zero
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case minus
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case (even x)
   from even.IH [of \<open>y div 2\<close>]
   show ?case
     by (auto simp add: and_int.rec [of _ y] or_int.rec [of _ y] elim: oddE)
 next
   case (odd x)
   from odd.IH [of \<open>y div 2\<close>]
   show ?case
     by (auto simp add: and_int.rec [of _ y] or_int.rec [of _ y] elim: oddE)
 qed
 
 lemma push_bit_minus_one:
   \<open>push_bit n (- 1 :: int) = - (2 ^ n)\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult)
 
 lemma minus_1_div_exp_eq_int:
   \<open>- 1 div (2 :: int) ^ n = - 1\<close>
   by (induction n) (use div_exp_eq [symmetric, of \<open>- 1 :: int\<close> 1] in \<open>simp_all add: ac_simps\<close>)
 
 lemma drop_bit_minus_one [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit n (- 1 :: int) = - 1\<close>
   by (simp add: drop_bit_eq_div minus_1_div_exp_eq_int)
 
 lemma take_bit_minus:
   \<open>take_bit n (- take_bit n k) = take_bit n (- k)\<close>
     for k :: int
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod mod_minus_eq)
 
 lemma take_bit_diff:
   \<open>take_bit n (take_bit n k - take_bit n l) = take_bit n (k - l)\<close>
     for k l :: int
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod mod_diff_eq)
 
 lemma (in ring_1) of_nat_nat_take_bit_eq [simp]:
   \<open>of_nat (nat (take_bit n k)) = of_int (take_bit n k)\<close>
   by simp
 
 lemma take_bit_minus_small_eq:
   \<open>take_bit n (- k) = 2 ^ n - k\<close> if \<open>0 < k\<close> \<open>k \<le> 2 ^ n\<close> for k :: int
 proof -
   define m where \<open>m = nat k\<close>
   with that have \<open>k = int m\<close> and \<open>0 < m\<close> and \<open>m \<le> 2 ^ n\<close>
     by simp_all
   have \<open>(2 ^ n - m) mod 2 ^ n = 2 ^ n - m\<close>
     using \<open>0 < m\<close> by simp
   then have \<open>int ((2 ^ n - m) mod 2 ^ n) = int (2 ^ n - m)\<close>
     by simp
   then have \<open>(2 ^ n - int m) mod 2 ^ n = 2 ^ n - int m\<close>
     using \<open>m \<le> 2 ^ n\<close> by (simp only: of_nat_mod of_nat_diff) simp
   with \<open>k = int m\<close> have \<open>(2 ^ n - k) mod 2 ^ n = 2 ^ n - k\<close>
     by simp
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 qed
 
 lemma push_bit_nonnegative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>push_bit n k \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k \<ge> 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult zero_le_mult_iff power_le_zero_eq)
 
 lemma push_bit_negative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>push_bit n k < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k < 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (subst Not_eq_iff [symmetric]) (simp add: not_less)
 
 lemma drop_bit_nonnegative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit n k \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k \<ge> 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (induction n) (auto simp add: drop_bit_Suc drop_bit_half)
 
 lemma drop_bit_negative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit n k < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k < 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (subst Not_eq_iff [symmetric]) (simp add: not_less)
 
 lemma set_bit_nonnegative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>set_bit n k \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k \<ge> 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: set_bit_eq_or)
 
 lemma set_bit_negative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>set_bit n k < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k < 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: set_bit_eq_or)
 
 lemma unset_bit_nonnegative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>unset_bit n k \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k \<ge> 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: unset_bit_eq_and_not)
 
 lemma unset_bit_negative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>unset_bit n k < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k < 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: unset_bit_eq_and_not)
 
 lemma flip_bit_nonnegative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>flip_bit n k \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k \<ge> 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: flip_bit_eq_xor)
 
 lemma flip_bit_negative_int_iff [simp]:
   \<open>flip_bit n k < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> k < 0\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: flip_bit_eq_xor)
 
 lemma set_bit_greater_eq:
   \<open>set_bit n k \<ge> k\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: set_bit_eq_or or_greater_eq)
 
 lemma unset_bit_less_eq:
   \<open>unset_bit n k \<le> k\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: unset_bit_eq_and_not and_less_eq)
 
 lemma and_int_unfold:
   \<open>k AND l = (if k = 0 \<or> l = 0 then 0 else if k = - 1 then l else if l = - 1 then k
     else (k mod 2) * (l mod 2) + 2 * ((k div 2) AND (l div 2)))\<close> for k l :: int
   by (auto simp add: and_int.rec [of k l] zmult_eq_1_iff elim: oddE)
 
 lemma or_int_unfold:
   \<open>k OR l = (if k = - 1 \<or> l = - 1 then - 1 else if k = 0 then l else if l = 0 then k
     else max (k mod 2) (l mod 2) + 2 * ((k div 2) OR (l div 2)))\<close> for k l :: int
   by (auto simp add: or_int.rec [of k l] elim: oddE)
 
 lemma xor_int_unfold:
   \<open>k XOR l = (if k = - 1 then NOT l else if l = - 1 then NOT k else if k = 0 then l else if l = 0 then k
     else \<bar>k mod 2 - l mod 2\<bar> + 2 * ((k div 2) XOR (l div 2)))\<close> for k l :: int
   by (auto simp add: xor_int.rec [of k l] not_int_def elim!: oddE)
 
 lemma bit_minus_int_iff:
   \<open>bit (- k) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit (NOT (k - 1)) n\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp add: bit_simps)
 
 lemma take_bit_incr_eq:
   \<open>take_bit n (k + 1) = 1 + take_bit n k\<close> if \<open>take_bit n k \<noteq> 2 ^ n - 1\<close> for k :: int
 proof -
   from that have \<open>2 ^ n \<noteq> k mod 2 ^ n + 1\<close>
     by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
   moreover have \<open>k mod 2 ^ n < 2 ^ n\<close>
     by simp
   ultimately have *: \<open>k mod 2 ^ n + 1 < 2 ^ n\<close>
     by linarith
   have \<open>(k + 1) mod 2 ^ n = (k mod 2 ^ n + 1) mod 2 ^ n\<close>
     by (simp add: mod_simps)
   also have \<open>\<dots> = k mod 2 ^ n + 1\<close>
     using * by (simp add: zmod_trivial_iff)
   finally have \<open>(k + 1) mod 2 ^ n = k mod 2 ^ n + 1\<close> .
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 qed
 
 lemma take_bit_decr_eq:
   \<open>take_bit n (k - 1) = take_bit n k - 1\<close> if \<open>take_bit n k \<noteq> 0\<close> for k :: int
 proof -
   from that have \<open>k mod 2 ^ n \<noteq> 0\<close>
     by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
   moreover have \<open>k mod 2 ^ n \<ge> 0\<close> \<open>k mod 2 ^ n < 2 ^ n\<close>
     by simp_all
   ultimately have *: \<open>k mod 2 ^ n > 0\<close>
     by linarith
   have \<open>(k - 1) mod 2 ^ n = (k mod 2 ^ n - 1) mod 2 ^ n\<close>
     by (simp add: mod_simps)
   also have \<open>\<dots> = k mod 2 ^ n - 1\<close>
     by (simp add: zmod_trivial_iff)
       (use \<open>k mod 2 ^ n < 2 ^ n\<close> * in linarith)
   finally have \<open>(k - 1) mod 2 ^ n = k mod 2 ^ n - 1\<close> .
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 qed
 
 lemma take_bit_int_greater_eq:
   \<open>k + 2 ^ n \<le> take_bit n k\<close> if \<open>k < 0\<close> for k :: int
 proof -
   have \<open>k + 2 ^ n \<le> take_bit n (k + 2 ^ n)\<close>
   proof (cases \<open>k > - (2 ^ n)\<close>)
     case False
     then have \<open>k + 2 ^ n \<le> 0\<close>
       by simp
     also note take_bit_nonnegative
     finally show ?thesis .
   next
     case True
     with that have \<open>0 \<le> k + 2 ^ n\<close> and \<open>k + 2 ^ n < 2 ^ n\<close>
       by simp_all
     then show ?thesis
       by (simp only: take_bit_eq_mod mod_pos_pos_trivial)
   qed
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 qed
 
 lemma take_bit_int_less_eq:
   \<open>take_bit n k \<le> k - 2 ^ n\<close> if \<open>2 ^ n \<le> k\<close> and \<open>n > 0\<close> for k :: int
   using that zmod_le_nonneg_dividend [of \<open>k - 2 ^ n\<close> \<open>2 ^ n\<close>]
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 
 lemma take_bit_int_less_eq_self_iff:
   \<open>take_bit n k \<le> k \<longleftrightarrow> 0 \<le> k\<close> (is \<open>?P \<longleftrightarrow> ?Q\<close>) for k :: int
 proof
   assume ?P
   show ?Q
   proof (rule ccontr)
     assume \<open>\<not> 0 \<le> k\<close>
     then have \<open>k < 0\<close>
       by simp
     with \<open>?P\<close>
     have \<open>take_bit n k < 0\<close>
       by (rule le_less_trans)
     then show False
       by simp
   qed
 next
   assume ?Q
   then show ?P
     by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod zmod_le_nonneg_dividend)
 qed
 
 lemma take_bit_int_less_self_iff:
   \<open>take_bit n k < k \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ n \<le> k\<close> for k :: int
   by (auto simp add: less_le take_bit_int_less_eq_self_iff take_bit_int_eq_self_iff
     intro: order_trans [of 0 \<open>2 ^ n\<close> k])
 
 lemma take_bit_int_greater_self_iff:
   \<open>k < take_bit n k \<longleftrightarrow> k < 0\<close> for k :: int
   using take_bit_int_less_eq_self_iff [of n k] by auto
 
 lemma take_bit_int_greater_eq_self_iff:
   \<open>k \<le> take_bit n k \<longleftrightarrow> k < 2 ^ n\<close> for k :: int
   by (auto simp add: le_less take_bit_int_greater_self_iff take_bit_int_eq_self_iff
     dest: sym not_sym intro: less_trans [of k 0 \<open>2 ^ n\<close>])
 
 lemma take_bit_tightened_less_eq_int:
   \<open>take_bit m k \<le> take_bit n k\<close> if \<open>m \<le> n\<close> for k :: int
 proof -
   have \<open>take_bit m (take_bit n k) \<le> take_bit n k\<close>
     by (simp only: take_bit_int_less_eq_self_iff take_bit_nonnegative)
   with that show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma not_exp_less_eq_0_int [simp]:
   \<open>\<not> 2 ^ n \<le> (0::int)\<close>
   by (simp add: power_le_zero_eq)
 
 lemma int_bit_bound:
   fixes k :: int
   obtains n where \<open>\<And>m. n \<le> m \<Longrightarrow> bit k m \<longleftrightarrow> bit k n\<close>
     and \<open>n > 0 \<Longrightarrow> bit k (n - 1) \<noteq> bit k n\<close>
 proof -
   obtain q where *: \<open>\<And>m. q \<le> m \<Longrightarrow> bit k m \<longleftrightarrow> bit k q\<close>
   proof (cases \<open>k \<ge> 0\<close>)
     case True
     moreover from power_gt_expt [of 2 \<open>nat k\<close>]
     have \<open>nat k < 2 ^ nat k\<close>
       by simp
     then have \<open>int (nat k) < int (2 ^ nat k)\<close>
       by (simp only: of_nat_less_iff)
     ultimately have *: \<open>k div 2 ^ nat k = 0\<close>
       by simp
     show thesis
     proof (rule that [of \<open>nat k\<close>])
       fix m
       assume \<open>nat k \<le> m\<close>
       then show \<open>bit k m \<longleftrightarrow> bit k (nat k)\<close>
         by (auto simp add: * bit_iff_odd power_add zdiv_zmult2_eq dest!: le_Suc_ex)
     qed
   next
     case False
     moreover from power_gt_expt [of 2 \<open>nat (- k)\<close>]
     have \<open>nat (- k) < 2 ^ nat (- k)\<close>
       by simp
     then have \<open>int (nat (- k)) < int (2 ^ nat (- k))\<close>
       by (simp only: of_nat_less_iff)
     ultimately have \<open>- k div - (2 ^ nat (- k)) = - 1\<close>
       by (subst div_pos_neg_trivial) simp_all
     then have *: \<open>k div 2 ^ nat (- k) = - 1\<close>
       by simp
     show thesis
     proof (rule that [of \<open>nat (- k)\<close>])
       fix m
       assume \<open>nat (- k) \<le> m\<close>
       then show \<open>bit k m \<longleftrightarrow> bit k (nat (- k))\<close>
         by (auto simp add: * bit_iff_odd power_add zdiv_zmult2_eq minus_1_div_exp_eq_int dest!: le_Suc_ex)
     qed
   qed
   show thesis
   proof (cases \<open>\<forall>m. bit k m \<longleftrightarrow> bit k q\<close>)
     case True
     then have \<open>bit k 0 \<longleftrightarrow> bit k q\<close>
       by blast
     with True that [of 0] show thesis
       by simp
   next
     case False
     then obtain r where **: \<open>bit k r \<noteq> bit k q\<close>
       by blast
     have \<open>r < q\<close>
       by (rule ccontr) (use * [of r] ** in simp)
     define N where \<open>N = {n. n < q \<and> bit k n \<noteq> bit k q}\<close>
     moreover have \<open>finite N\<close> \<open>r \<in> N\<close>
       using ** N_def \<open>r < q\<close> by auto
     moreover define n where \<open>n = Suc (Max N)\<close>
     ultimately have \<open>\<And>m. n \<le> m \<Longrightarrow> bit k m \<longleftrightarrow> bit k n\<close>
       apply auto
          apply (metis (full_types, lifting) "*" Max_ge_iff Suc_n_not_le_n \<open>finite N\<close> all_not_in_conv mem_Collect_eq not_le)
         apply (metis "*" Max_ge Suc_n_not_le_n \<open>finite N\<close> linorder_not_less mem_Collect_eq)
         apply (metis "*" Max_ge Suc_n_not_le_n \<open>finite N\<close> linorder_not_less mem_Collect_eq)
       apply (metis (full_types, lifting) "*" Max_ge_iff Suc_n_not_le_n \<open>finite N\<close> all_not_in_conv mem_Collect_eq not_le)
       done
     have \<open>bit k (Max N) \<noteq> bit k n\<close>
       by (metis (mono_tags, lifting) "*" Max_in N_def \<open>\<And>m. n \<le> m \<Longrightarrow> bit k m = bit k n\<close> \<open>finite N\<close> \<open>r \<in> N\<close> empty_iff le_cases mem_Collect_eq)
     show thesis apply (rule that [of n])
       using \<open>\<And>m. n \<le> m \<Longrightarrow> bit k m = bit k n\<close> apply blast
       using \<open>bit k (Max N) \<noteq> bit k n\<close> n_def by auto
   qed
 qed
 
 
 subsection \<open>Instance \<^typ>\<open>nat\<close>\<close>
 
 instantiation nat :: semiring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 definition and_nat :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat\<close>
   where \<open>m AND n = nat (int m AND int n)\<close> for m n :: nat
 
 definition or_nat :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat\<close>
   where \<open>m OR n = nat (int m OR int n)\<close> for m n :: nat
 
 definition xor_nat :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat\<close>
   where \<open>m XOR n = nat (int m XOR int n)\<close> for m n :: nat
 
 definition mask_nat :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> nat\<close>
   where \<open>mask n = (2 :: nat) ^ n - 1\<close>
 
 definition push_bit_nat :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat\<close>
   where \<open>push_bit_nat n m = m * 2 ^ n\<close>
 
 definition drop_bit_nat :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat\<close>
   where \<open>drop_bit_nat n m = m div 2 ^ n\<close>
 
 definition take_bit_nat :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat\<close>
   where \<open>take_bit_nat n m = m mod 2 ^ n\<close>
 
 definition set_bit_nat :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat\<close>
   where \<open>set_bit m n = n OR push_bit m 1\<close> for m n :: nat
 
 definition unset_bit_nat :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat\<close>
   where \<open>unset_bit m n = (n OR push_bit m 1) XOR push_bit m 1\<close> for m n :: nat
 
 definition flip_bit_nat :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat\<close>
   where \<open>flip_bit m n = n XOR push_bit m 1\<close> for m n :: nat
 
 instance proof
   fix m n :: nat
   show \<open>m AND n = of_bool (odd m \<and> odd n) + 2 * (m div 2 AND n div 2)\<close>
     by (simp add: and_nat_def and_rec [of \<open>int m\<close> \<open>int n\<close>] nat_add_distrib of_nat_div)
   show \<open>m OR n = of_bool (odd m \<or> odd n) + 2 * (m div 2 OR n div 2)\<close>
     by (simp add: or_nat_def or_rec [of \<open>int m\<close> \<open>int n\<close>] nat_add_distrib of_nat_div)
   show \<open>m XOR n = of_bool (odd m \<noteq> odd n) + 2 * (m div 2 XOR n div 2)\<close>
     by (simp add: xor_nat_def xor_rec [of \<open>int m\<close> \<open>int n\<close>] nat_add_distrib of_nat_div)
 qed (simp_all add: mask_nat_def set_bit_nat_def unset_bit_nat_def flip_bit_nat_def
   push_bit_nat_def drop_bit_nat_def take_bit_nat_def)
 
 end
 
 instance nat :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_bit_operations ..
 
 context semiring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 lemma push_bit_of_nat:
   \<open>push_bit n (of_nat m) = of_nat (push_bit n m)\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult Bit_Operations.push_bit_eq_mult)
 
 lemma of_nat_push_bit:
   \<open>of_nat (push_bit m n) = push_bit m (of_nat n)\<close>
   by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult Bit_Operations.push_bit_eq_mult)
 
 lemma take_bit_of_nat:
   \<open>take_bit n (of_nat m) = of_nat (take_bit n m)\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (simp add: bit_take_bit_iff Bit_Operations.bit_take_bit_iff bit_of_nat_iff)
 
 lemma of_nat_take_bit:
   \<open>of_nat (take_bit n m) = take_bit n (of_nat m)\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (simp add: bit_take_bit_iff Bit_Operations.bit_take_bit_iff bit_of_nat_iff)
 
 lemma of_nat_and_eq:
   \<open>of_nat (m AND n) = of_nat m AND of_nat n\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (simp add: bit_of_nat_iff bit_and_iff Bit_Operations.bit_and_iff)
 
 lemma of_nat_or_eq:
   \<open>of_nat (m OR n) = of_nat m OR of_nat n\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (simp add: bit_of_nat_iff bit_or_iff Bit_Operations.bit_or_iff)
 
 lemma of_nat_xor_eq:
   \<open>of_nat (m XOR n) = of_nat m XOR of_nat n\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (simp add: bit_of_nat_iff bit_xor_iff Bit_Operations.bit_xor_iff)
 
 lemma of_nat_mask_eq:
   \<open>of_nat (mask n) = mask n\<close>
   by (induction n) (simp_all add: mask_Suc_double Bit_Operations.mask_Suc_double of_nat_or_eq)
 
 end
 
 context linordered_euclidean_semiring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 lemma drop_bit_of_nat:
   "drop_bit n (of_nat m) = of_nat (drop_bit n m)"
   by (simp add: drop_bit_eq_div Bit_Operations.drop_bit_eq_div of_nat_div [of m "2 ^ n"])
 
 lemma of_nat_drop_bit:
   \<open>of_nat (drop_bit m n) = drop_bit m (of_nat n)\<close>
   by (simp add: drop_bit_eq_div Bit_Operations.drop_bit_eq_div of_nat_div)
 
 end
 
 lemma take_bit_nat_less_exp [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit n m < 2 ^ n\<close> for n m :: nat
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 
 lemma take_bit_nat_eq_self_iff:
   \<open>take_bit n m = m \<longleftrightarrow> m < 2 ^ n\<close> (is \<open>?P \<longleftrightarrow> ?Q\<close>) for n m :: nat
 proof
   assume ?P
   moreover note take_bit_nat_less_exp [of n m]
   ultimately show ?Q
     by simp
 next
   assume ?Q
   then show ?P
     by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 qed
 
 lemma take_bit_nat_eq_self:
   \<open>take_bit n m = m\<close> if \<open>m < 2 ^ n\<close> for m n :: nat
   using that by (simp add: take_bit_nat_eq_self_iff)
 
 lemma take_bit_nat_less_eq_self [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit n m \<le> m\<close> for n m :: nat
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod)
 
 lemma take_bit_nat_less_self_iff:
   \<open>take_bit n m < m \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ n \<le> m\<close> (is \<open>?P \<longleftrightarrow> ?Q\<close>) for m n :: nat
 proof
   assume ?P
   then have \<open>take_bit n m \<noteq> m\<close>
     by simp
   then show \<open>?Q\<close>
     by (simp add: take_bit_nat_eq_self_iff)
 next
   have \<open>take_bit n m < 2 ^ n\<close>
     by (fact take_bit_nat_less_exp)
   also assume ?Q
   finally show ?P .
 qed
 
 lemma Suc_0_and_eq [simp]:
   \<open>Suc 0 AND n = n mod 2\<close>
   using one_and_eq [of n] by simp
 
 lemma and_Suc_0_eq [simp]:
   \<open>n AND Suc 0 = n mod 2\<close>
   using and_one_eq [of n] by simp
 
 lemma Suc_0_or_eq:
   \<open>Suc 0 OR n = n + of_bool (even n)\<close>
   using one_or_eq [of n] by simp
 
 lemma or_Suc_0_eq:
   \<open>n OR Suc 0 = n + of_bool (even n)\<close>
   using or_one_eq [of n] by simp
 
 lemma Suc_0_xor_eq:
   \<open>Suc 0 XOR n = n + of_bool (even n) - of_bool (odd n)\<close>
   using one_xor_eq [of n] by simp
 
 lemma xor_Suc_0_eq:
   \<open>n XOR Suc 0 = n + of_bool (even n) - of_bool (odd n)\<close>
   using xor_one_eq [of n] by simp
 
 lemma and_nat_unfold [code]:
   \<open>m AND n = (if m = 0 \<or> n = 0 then 0 else (m mod 2) * (n mod 2) + 2 * ((m div 2) AND (n div 2)))\<close>
     for m n :: nat
   by (auto simp add: and_rec [of m n] elim: oddE)
 
 lemma or_nat_unfold [code]:
   \<open>m OR n = (if m = 0 then n else if n = 0 then m
     else max (m mod 2) (n mod 2) + 2 * ((m div 2) OR (n div 2)))\<close> for m n :: nat
   by (auto simp add: or_rec [of m n] elim: oddE)
 
 lemma xor_nat_unfold [code]:
   \<open>m XOR n = (if m = 0 then n else if n = 0 then m
     else (m mod 2 + n mod 2) mod 2 + 2 * ((m div 2) XOR (n div 2)))\<close> for m n :: nat
   by (auto simp add: xor_rec [of m n] elim!: oddE)
 
 lemma [code]:
   \<open>unset_bit 0 m = 2 * (m div 2)\<close>
   \<open>unset_bit (Suc n) m = m mod 2 + 2 * unset_bit n (m div 2)\<close> for m n :: nat
   by (simp_all add: unset_bit_Suc)
 
 lemma push_bit_of_Suc_0 [simp]:
   \<open>push_bit n (Suc 0) = 2 ^ n\<close>
   using push_bit_of_1 [where ?'a = nat] by simp
 
 lemma take_bit_of_Suc_0 [simp]:
   \<open>take_bit n (Suc 0) = of_bool (0 < n)\<close>
   using take_bit_of_1 [where ?'a = nat] by simp
 
 lemma drop_bit_of_Suc_0 [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit n (Suc 0) = of_bool (n = 0)\<close>
   using drop_bit_of_1 [where ?'a = nat] by simp
 
 lemma Suc_mask_eq_exp:
   \<open>Suc (mask n) = 2 ^ n\<close>
   by (simp add: mask_eq_exp_minus_1)
 
 lemma less_eq_mask:
   \<open>n \<le> mask n\<close>
   by (simp add: mask_eq_exp_minus_1 le_diff_conv2)
     (metis Suc_mask_eq_exp diff_Suc_1 diff_le_diff_pow diff_zero le_refl not_less_eq_eq power_0)
 
 lemma less_mask:
   \<open>n < mask n\<close> if \<open>Suc 0 < n\<close>
 proof -
   define m where \<open>m = n - 2\<close>
   with that have *: \<open>n = m + 2\<close>
     by simp
   have \<open>Suc (Suc (Suc m)) < 4 * 2 ^ m\<close>
     by (induction m) simp_all
   then have \<open>Suc (m + 2) < Suc (mask (m + 2))\<close>
     by (simp add: Suc_mask_eq_exp)
   then have \<open>m + 2 < mask (m + 2)\<close>
     by (simp add: less_le)
   with * show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma mask_nat_less_exp [simp]:
   \<open>(mask n :: nat) < 2 ^ n\<close>
   by (simp add: mask_eq_exp_minus_1)
 
 lemma mask_nat_positive_iff [simp]:
   \<open>(0::nat) < mask n \<longleftrightarrow> 0 < n\<close>
 proof (cases \<open>n = 0\<close>)
   case True
   then show ?thesis
     by simp
 next
   case False
   then have \<open>0 < n\<close>
     by simp
   then have \<open>(0::nat) < mask n\<close>
     using less_eq_mask [of n] by (rule order_less_le_trans)
   with \<open>0 < n\<close> show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma take_bit_tightened_less_eq_nat:
   \<open>take_bit m q \<le> take_bit n q\<close> if \<open>m \<le> n\<close> for q :: nat
 proof -
   have \<open>take_bit m (take_bit n q) \<le> take_bit n q\<close>
     by (rule take_bit_nat_less_eq_self)
   with that show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma push_bit_nat_eq:
   \<open>push_bit n (nat k) = nat (push_bit n k)\<close>
   by (cases \<open>k \<ge> 0\<close>) (simp_all add: push_bit_eq_mult nat_mult_distrib not_le mult_nonneg_nonpos2)
 
 lemma drop_bit_nat_eq:
   \<open>drop_bit n (nat k) = nat (drop_bit n k)\<close>
   apply (cases \<open>k \<ge> 0\<close>)
    apply (simp_all add: drop_bit_eq_div nat_div_distrib nat_power_eq not_le)
   apply (simp add: divide_int_def)
   done
 
 lemma take_bit_nat_eq:
   \<open>take_bit n (nat k) = nat (take_bit n k)\<close> if \<open>k \<ge> 0\<close>
   using that by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod nat_mod_distrib nat_power_eq)
 
 lemma nat_take_bit_eq:
   \<open>nat (take_bit n k) = take_bit n (nat k)\<close>
   if \<open>k \<ge> 0\<close>
   using that by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod nat_mod_distrib nat_power_eq)
 
 lemma nat_mask_eq:
   \<open>nat (mask n) = mask n\<close>
   by (simp add: nat_eq_iff of_nat_mask_eq)
 
 
 subsection \<open>Symbolic computations on numeral expressions\<close>
 
 context semiring_bits
 begin
 
 lemma not_bit_numeral_Bit0_0 [simp]:
   \<open>\<not> bit (numeral (Num.Bit0 m)) 0\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_0)
 
 lemma bit_numeral_Bit1_0 [simp]:
   \<open>bit (numeral (Num.Bit1 m)) 0\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_0)
 
 end
 
 context ring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 lemma not_bit_minus_numeral_Bit0_0 [simp]:
   \<open>\<not> bit (- numeral (Num.Bit0 m)) 0\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_0)
 
 lemma bit_minus_numeral_Bit1_0 [simp]:
   \<open>bit (- numeral (Num.Bit1 m)) 0\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_0)
 
 end
 
 context linordered_euclidean_semiring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 lemma bit_numeral_iff:
   \<open>bit (numeral m) n \<longleftrightarrow> bit (numeral m :: nat) n\<close>
   using bit_of_nat_iff_bit [of \<open>numeral m\<close> n] by simp
 
 lemma bit_numeral_Bit0_Suc_iff [simp]:
   \<open>bit (numeral (Num.Bit0 m)) (Suc n) \<longleftrightarrow> bit (numeral m) n\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_Suc numeral_Bit0_div_2)
 
 lemma bit_numeral_Bit1_Suc_iff [simp]:
   \<open>bit (numeral (Num.Bit1 m)) (Suc n) \<longleftrightarrow> bit (numeral m) n\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_Suc numeral_Bit1_div_2)
 
 lemma bit_numeral_rec:
   \<open>bit (numeral (Num.Bit0 w)) n \<longleftrightarrow> (case n of 0 \<Rightarrow> False | Suc m \<Rightarrow> bit (numeral w) m)\<close>
   \<open>bit (numeral (Num.Bit1 w)) n \<longleftrightarrow> (case n of 0 \<Rightarrow> True | Suc m \<Rightarrow> bit (numeral w) m)\<close>
   by (cases n; simp add: bit_0)+
 
 lemma bit_numeral_simps [simp]:
   \<open>\<not> bit 1 (numeral n)\<close>
   \<open>bit (numeral (Num.Bit0 w)) (numeral n) \<longleftrightarrow> bit (numeral w) (pred_numeral n)\<close>
   \<open>bit (numeral (Num.Bit1 w)) (numeral n) \<longleftrightarrow> bit (numeral w) (pred_numeral n)\<close>
   by (simp_all add: bit_1_iff numeral_eq_Suc)
 
 lemma and_numerals [simp]:
   \<open>1 AND numeral (Num.Bit0 y) = 0\<close>
   \<open>1 AND numeral (Num.Bit1 y) = 1\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit0 x) AND numeral (Num.Bit0 y) = 2 * (numeral x AND numeral y)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit0 x) AND numeral (Num.Bit1 y) = 2 * (numeral x AND numeral y)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit0 x) AND 1 = 0\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit1 x) AND numeral (Num.Bit0 y) = 2 * (numeral x AND numeral y)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit1 x) AND numeral (Num.Bit1 y) = 1 + 2 * (numeral x AND numeral y)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit1 x) AND 1 = 1\<close>
   by (simp_all add: bit_eq_iff) (simp_all add: bit_0 bit_simps bit_Suc bit_numeral_rec split: nat.splits)
 
 lemma or_numerals [simp]:
   \<open>1 OR numeral (Num.Bit0 y) = numeral (Num.Bit1 y)\<close>
   \<open>1 OR numeral (Num.Bit1 y) = numeral (Num.Bit1 y)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit0 x) OR numeral (Num.Bit0 y) = 2 * (numeral x OR numeral y)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit0 x) OR numeral (Num.Bit1 y) = 1 + 2 * (numeral x OR numeral y)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit0 x) OR 1 = numeral (Num.Bit1 x)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit1 x) OR numeral (Num.Bit0 y) = 1 + 2 * (numeral x OR numeral y)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit1 x) OR numeral (Num.Bit1 y) = 1 + 2 * (numeral x OR numeral y)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit1 x) OR 1 = numeral (Num.Bit1 x)\<close>
   by (simp_all add: bit_eq_iff) (simp_all add: bit_0 bit_simps bit_Suc bit_numeral_rec split: nat.splits)
 
 lemma xor_numerals [simp]:
   \<open>1 XOR numeral (Num.Bit0 y) = numeral (Num.Bit1 y)\<close>
   \<open>1 XOR numeral (Num.Bit1 y) = numeral (Num.Bit0 y)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit0 x) XOR numeral (Num.Bit0 y) = 2 * (numeral x XOR numeral y)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit0 x) XOR numeral (Num.Bit1 y) = 1 + 2 * (numeral x XOR numeral y)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit0 x) XOR 1 = numeral (Num.Bit1 x)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit1 x) XOR numeral (Num.Bit0 y) = 1 + 2 * (numeral x XOR numeral y)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit1 x) XOR numeral (Num.Bit1 y) = 2 * (numeral x XOR numeral y)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit1 x) XOR 1 = numeral (Num.Bit0 x)\<close>
   by (simp_all add: bit_eq_iff) (simp_all add: bit_0 bit_simps bit_Suc bit_numeral_rec split: nat.splits)
 
 end
 
 lemma drop_bit_Suc_minus_bit0 [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit (Suc n) (- numeral (Num.Bit0 k)) = drop_bit n (- numeral k :: int)\<close>
   by (simp add: drop_bit_Suc numeral_Bit0_div_2)
 
 lemma drop_bit_Suc_minus_bit1 [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit (Suc n) (- numeral (Num.Bit1 k)) = drop_bit n (- numeral (Num.inc k) :: int)\<close>
   by (simp add: drop_bit_Suc numeral_Bit1_div_2 add_One)
 
 lemma drop_bit_numeral_minus_bit0 [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit (numeral l) (- numeral (Num.Bit0 k)) = drop_bit (pred_numeral l) (- numeral k :: int)\<close>
   by (simp add: numeral_eq_Suc numeral_Bit0_div_2)
 
 lemma drop_bit_numeral_minus_bit1 [simp]:
   \<open>drop_bit (numeral l) (- numeral (Num.Bit1 k)) = drop_bit (pred_numeral l) (- numeral (Num.inc k) :: int)\<close>
   by (simp add: numeral_eq_Suc numeral_Bit1_div_2)
 
 lemma take_bit_Suc_minus_bit0:
   \<open>take_bit (Suc n) (- numeral (Num.Bit0 k)) = take_bit n (- numeral k) * (2 :: int)\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_Suc numeral_Bit0_div_2)
 
 lemma take_bit_Suc_minus_bit1:
   \<open>take_bit (Suc n) (- numeral (Num.Bit1 k)) = take_bit n (- numeral (Num.inc k)) * 2 + (1 :: int)\<close>
   by (simp add: take_bit_Suc numeral_Bit1_div_2 add_One)
 
 lemma take_bit_numeral_minus_bit0:
   \<open>take_bit (numeral l) (- numeral (Num.Bit0 k)) = take_bit (pred_numeral l) (- numeral k) * (2 :: int)\<close>
   by (simp add: numeral_eq_Suc numeral_Bit0_div_2 take_bit_Suc_minus_bit0)
 
 lemma take_bit_numeral_minus_bit1:
   \<open>take_bit (numeral l) (- numeral (Num.Bit1 k)) = take_bit (pred_numeral l) (- numeral (Num.inc k)) * 2 + (1 :: int)\<close>
   by (simp add: numeral_eq_Suc numeral_Bit1_div_2 take_bit_Suc_minus_bit1)
 
 lemma and_nat_numerals [simp]:
   \<open>Suc 0 AND numeral (Num.Bit0 y) = 0\<close>
   \<open>Suc 0 AND numeral (Num.Bit1 y) = 1\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit0 x) AND Suc 0 = 0\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit1 x) AND Suc 0 = 1\<close>
   by (simp_all only: and_numerals flip: One_nat_def)
 
 lemma or_nat_numerals [simp]:
   \<open>Suc 0 OR numeral (Num.Bit0 y) = numeral (Num.Bit1 y)\<close>
   \<open>Suc 0 OR numeral (Num.Bit1 y) = numeral (Num.Bit1 y)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit0 x) OR Suc 0 = numeral (Num.Bit1 x)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit1 x) OR Suc 0 = numeral (Num.Bit1 x)\<close>
   by (simp_all only: or_numerals flip: One_nat_def)
 
 lemma xor_nat_numerals [simp]:
   \<open>Suc 0 XOR numeral (Num.Bit0 y) = numeral (Num.Bit1 y)\<close>
   \<open>Suc 0 XOR numeral (Num.Bit1 y) = numeral (Num.Bit0 y)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit0 x) XOR Suc 0 = numeral (Num.Bit1 x)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit1 x) XOR Suc 0 = numeral (Num.Bit0 x)\<close>
   by (simp_all only: xor_numerals flip: One_nat_def)
 
 context ring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 lemma minus_numeral_inc_eq:
   \<open>- numeral (Num.inc n) = NOT (numeral n)\<close>
   by (simp add: not_eq_complement sub_inc_One_eq add_One)
 
 lemma sub_one_eq_not_neg:
   \<open>Num.sub n num.One = NOT (- numeral n)\<close>
   by (simp add: not_eq_complement)
 
 lemma minus_numeral_eq_not_sub_one:
   \<open>- numeral n = NOT (Num.sub n num.One)\<close>
   by (simp add: not_eq_complement)
 
 lemma not_numeral_eq [simp]:
   \<open>NOT (numeral n) = - numeral (Num.inc n)\<close>
   by (simp add: minus_numeral_inc_eq)
 
 lemma not_minus_numeral_eq [simp]:
   \<open>NOT (- numeral n) = Num.sub n num.One\<close>
   by (simp add: sub_one_eq_not_neg)
 
 lemma minus_not_numeral_eq [simp]:
   \<open>- (NOT (numeral n)) = numeral (Num.inc n)\<close>
   by simp
 
 lemma not_numeral_BitM_eq:
   \<open>NOT (numeral (Num.BitM n)) =  - numeral (num.Bit0 n)\<close>
   by (simp add: inc_BitM_eq)
 
 lemma not_numeral_Bit0_eq:
   \<open>NOT (numeral (Num.Bit0 n)) =  - numeral (num.Bit1 n)\<close>
   by simp
 
 end
 
 lemma bit_minus_numeral_int [simp]:
   \<open>bit (- numeral (num.Bit0 w) :: int) (numeral n) \<longleftrightarrow> bit (- numeral w :: int) (pred_numeral n)\<close>
   \<open>bit (- numeral (num.Bit1 w) :: int) (numeral n) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> bit (numeral w :: int) (pred_numeral n)\<close>
   by (simp_all add: bit_minus_iff bit_not_iff numeral_eq_Suc bit_Suc add_One sub_inc_One_eq)
 
 lemma bit_minus_numeral_Bit0_Suc_iff [simp]:
   \<open>bit (- numeral (num.Bit0 w) :: int) (Suc n) \<longleftrightarrow> bit (- numeral w :: int) n\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_Suc)
 
 lemma bit_minus_numeral_Bit1_Suc_iff [simp]:
   \<open>bit (- numeral (num.Bit1 w) :: int) (Suc n) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> bit (numeral w :: int) n\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_Suc add_One flip: bit_not_int_iff)
 
 lemma and_not_numerals:
   \<open>1 AND NOT 1 = (0 :: int)\<close>
   \<open>1 AND NOT (numeral (Num.Bit0 n)) = (1 :: int)\<close>
   \<open>1 AND NOT (numeral (Num.Bit1 n)) = (0 :: int)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit0 m) AND NOT (1 :: int) = numeral (Num.Bit0 m)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit0 m) AND NOT (numeral (Num.Bit0 n)) = (2 :: int) * (numeral m AND NOT (numeral n))\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit0 m) AND NOT (numeral (Num.Bit1 n)) = (2 :: int) * (numeral m AND NOT (numeral n))\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit1 m) AND NOT (1 :: int) = numeral (Num.Bit0 m)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit1 m) AND NOT (numeral (Num.Bit0 n)) = 1 + (2 :: int) * (numeral m AND NOT (numeral n))\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit1 m) AND NOT (numeral (Num.Bit1 n)) = (2 :: int) * (numeral m AND NOT (numeral n))\<close>
   by (simp_all add: bit_eq_iff) (auto simp add: bit_0 bit_simps bit_Suc bit_numeral_rec BitM_inc_eq sub_inc_One_eq split: nat.split)
 
 fun and_not_num :: \<open>num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> num option\<close> \<^marker>\<open>contributor \<open>Andreas Lochbihler\<close>\<close>
 where
   \<open>and_not_num num.One num.One = None\<close>
 | \<open>and_not_num num.One (num.Bit0 n) = Some num.One\<close>
 | \<open>and_not_num num.One (num.Bit1 n) = None\<close>
 | \<open>and_not_num (num.Bit0 m) num.One = Some (num.Bit0 m)\<close>
 | \<open>and_not_num (num.Bit0 m) (num.Bit0 n) = map_option num.Bit0 (and_not_num m n)\<close>
 | \<open>and_not_num (num.Bit0 m) (num.Bit1 n) = map_option num.Bit0 (and_not_num m n)\<close>
 | \<open>and_not_num (num.Bit1 m) num.One = Some (num.Bit0 m)\<close>
 | \<open>and_not_num (num.Bit1 m) (num.Bit0 n) = (case and_not_num m n of None \<Rightarrow> Some num.One | Some n' \<Rightarrow> Some (num.Bit1 n'))\<close>
 | \<open>and_not_num (num.Bit1 m) (num.Bit1 n) = map_option num.Bit0 (and_not_num m n)\<close>
 
 lemma int_numeral_and_not_num:
   \<open>numeral m AND NOT (numeral n) = (case and_not_num m n of None \<Rightarrow> 0 :: int | Some n' \<Rightarrow> numeral n')\<close>
   by (induction m n rule: and_not_num.induct) (simp_all del: not_numeral_eq not_one_eq add: and_not_numerals split: option.splits)
 
 lemma int_numeral_not_and_num:
   \<open>NOT (numeral m) AND numeral n = (case and_not_num n m of None \<Rightarrow> 0 :: int | Some n' \<Rightarrow> numeral n')\<close>
   using int_numeral_and_not_num [of n m] by (simp add: ac_simps)
 
 lemma and_not_num_eq_None_iff:
   \<open>and_not_num m n = None \<longleftrightarrow> numeral m AND NOT (numeral n) = (0 :: int)\<close>
   by (simp del: not_numeral_eq add: int_numeral_and_not_num split: option.split)
 
 lemma and_not_num_eq_Some_iff:
   \<open>and_not_num m n = Some q \<longleftrightarrow> numeral m AND NOT (numeral n) = (numeral q :: int)\<close>
   by (simp del: not_numeral_eq add: int_numeral_and_not_num split: option.split)
 
 lemma and_minus_numerals [simp]:
   \<open>1 AND - (numeral (num.Bit0 n)) = (0::int)\<close>
   \<open>1 AND - (numeral (num.Bit1 n)) = (1::int)\<close>
   \<open>numeral m AND - (numeral (num.Bit0 n)) = (case and_not_num m (Num.BitM n) of None \<Rightarrow> 0 :: int | Some n' \<Rightarrow> numeral n')\<close>
   \<open>numeral m AND - (numeral (num.Bit1 n)) = (case and_not_num m (Num.Bit0 n) of None \<Rightarrow> 0 :: int | Some n' \<Rightarrow> numeral n')\<close>
   \<open>- (numeral (num.Bit0 n)) AND 1 = (0::int)\<close>
   \<open>- (numeral (num.Bit1 n)) AND 1 = (1::int)\<close>
   \<open>- (numeral (num.Bit0 n)) AND numeral m = (case and_not_num m (Num.BitM n) of None \<Rightarrow> 0 :: int | Some n' \<Rightarrow> numeral n')\<close>
   \<open>- (numeral (num.Bit1 n)) AND numeral m = (case and_not_num m (Num.Bit0 n) of None \<Rightarrow> 0 :: int | Some n' \<Rightarrow> numeral n')\<close>
   by (simp_all del: not_numeral_eq add: ac_simps
     and_not_numerals one_and_eq not_numeral_BitM_eq not_numeral_Bit0_eq and_not_num_eq_None_iff and_not_num_eq_Some_iff split: option.split)
 
 lemma and_minus_minus_numerals [simp]:
   \<open>- (numeral m :: int) AND - (numeral n :: int) = NOT ((numeral m - 1) OR (numeral n - 1))\<close>
   by (simp add: minus_numeral_eq_not_sub_one)
 
 lemma or_not_numerals:
   \<open>1 OR NOT 1 = NOT (0 :: int)\<close>
   \<open>1 OR NOT (numeral (Num.Bit0 n)) = NOT (numeral (Num.Bit0 n) :: int)\<close>
   \<open>1 OR NOT (numeral (Num.Bit1 n)) = NOT (numeral (Num.Bit0 n) :: int)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit0 m) OR NOT (1 :: int) = NOT (1 :: int)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit0 m) OR NOT (numeral (Num.Bit0 n)) = 1 + (2 :: int) * (numeral m OR NOT (numeral n))\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit0 m) OR NOT (numeral (Num.Bit1 n)) = (2 :: int) * (numeral m OR NOT (numeral n))\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit1 m) OR NOT (1 :: int) = NOT (0 :: int)\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit1 m) OR NOT (numeral (Num.Bit0 n)) = 1 + (2 :: int) * (numeral m OR NOT (numeral n))\<close>
   \<open>numeral (Num.Bit1 m) OR NOT (numeral (Num.Bit1 n)) = 1 + (2 :: int) * (numeral m OR NOT (numeral n))\<close>
   by (simp_all add: bit_eq_iff)
     (auto simp add: bit_0 bit_simps bit_Suc bit_numeral_rec sub_inc_One_eq split: nat.split)
 
 fun or_not_num_neg :: \<open>num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> num\<close> \<^marker>\<open>contributor \<open>Andreas Lochbihler\<close>\<close>
 where
   \<open>or_not_num_neg num.One num.One = num.One\<close>
 | \<open>or_not_num_neg num.One (num.Bit0 m) = num.Bit1 m\<close>
 | \<open>or_not_num_neg num.One (num.Bit1 m) = num.Bit1 m\<close>
 | \<open>or_not_num_neg (num.Bit0 n) num.One = num.Bit0 num.One\<close>
 | \<open>or_not_num_neg (num.Bit0 n) (num.Bit0 m) = Num.BitM (or_not_num_neg n m)\<close>
 | \<open>or_not_num_neg (num.Bit0 n) (num.Bit1 m) = num.Bit0 (or_not_num_neg n m)\<close>
 | \<open>or_not_num_neg (num.Bit1 n) num.One = num.One\<close>
 | \<open>or_not_num_neg (num.Bit1 n) (num.Bit0 m) = Num.BitM (or_not_num_neg n m)\<close>
 | \<open>or_not_num_neg (num.Bit1 n) (num.Bit1 m) = Num.BitM (or_not_num_neg n m)\<close>
 
 lemma int_numeral_or_not_num_neg:
   \<open>numeral m OR NOT (numeral n :: int) = - numeral (or_not_num_neg m n)\<close>
   by (induction m n rule: or_not_num_neg.induct) (simp_all del: not_numeral_eq not_one_eq add: or_not_numerals, simp_all)
 
 lemma int_numeral_not_or_num_neg:
   \<open>NOT (numeral m) OR (numeral n :: int) = - numeral (or_not_num_neg n m)\<close>
   using int_numeral_or_not_num_neg [of n m] by (simp add: ac_simps)
 
 lemma numeral_or_not_num_eq:
   \<open>numeral (or_not_num_neg m n) = - (numeral m OR NOT (numeral n :: int))\<close>
   using int_numeral_or_not_num_neg [of m n] by simp
 
 lemma or_minus_numerals [simp]:
   \<open>1 OR - (numeral (num.Bit0 n)) = - (numeral (or_not_num_neg num.One (Num.BitM n)) :: int)\<close>
   \<open>1 OR - (numeral (num.Bit1 n)) = - (numeral (num.Bit1 n) :: int)\<close>
   \<open>numeral m OR - (numeral (num.Bit0 n)) = - (numeral (or_not_num_neg m (Num.BitM n)) :: int)\<close>
   \<open>numeral m OR - (numeral (num.Bit1 n)) = - (numeral (or_not_num_neg m (Num.Bit0 n)) :: int)\<close>
   \<open>- (numeral (num.Bit0 n)) OR 1 = - (numeral (or_not_num_neg num.One (Num.BitM n)) :: int)\<close>
   \<open>- (numeral (num.Bit1 n)) OR 1 = - (numeral (num.Bit1 n) :: int)\<close>
   \<open>- (numeral (num.Bit0 n)) OR numeral m = - (numeral (or_not_num_neg m (Num.BitM n)) :: int)\<close>
   \<open>- (numeral (num.Bit1 n)) OR numeral m = - (numeral (or_not_num_neg m (Num.Bit0 n)) :: int)\<close>
   by (simp_all only: or.commute [of _ 1] or.commute [of _ \<open>numeral m\<close>]
     minus_numeral_eq_not_sub_one or_not_numerals
     numeral_or_not_num_eq arith_simps minus_minus numeral_One)
 
 lemma or_minus_minus_numerals [simp]:
   \<open>- (numeral m :: int) OR - (numeral n :: int) = NOT ((numeral m - 1) AND (numeral n - 1))\<close>
   by (simp add: minus_numeral_eq_not_sub_one)
 
 lemma xor_minus_numerals [simp]:
   \<open>- numeral n XOR k = NOT (neg_numeral_class.sub n num.One XOR k)\<close>
   \<open>k XOR - numeral n = NOT (k XOR (neg_numeral_class.sub n num.One))\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp_all add: minus_numeral_eq_not_sub_one)
 
 definition take_bit_num :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> num option\<close>
   where \<open>take_bit_num n m =
     (if take_bit n (numeral m :: nat) = 0 then None else Some (num_of_nat (take_bit n (numeral m :: nat))))\<close>
 
 lemma take_bit_num_simps:
   \<open>take_bit_num 0 m = None\<close>
   \<open>take_bit_num (Suc n) Num.One =
     Some Num.One\<close>
   \<open>take_bit_num (Suc n) (Num.Bit0 m) =
     (case take_bit_num n m of None \<Rightarrow> None | Some q \<Rightarrow> Some (Num.Bit0 q))\<close>
   \<open>take_bit_num (Suc n) (Num.Bit1 m) =
     Some (case take_bit_num n m of None \<Rightarrow> Num.One | Some q \<Rightarrow> Num.Bit1 q)\<close>
   \<open>take_bit_num (numeral r) Num.One =
     Some Num.One\<close>
   \<open>take_bit_num (numeral r) (Num.Bit0 m) =
     (case take_bit_num (pred_numeral r) m of None \<Rightarrow> None | Some q \<Rightarrow> Some (Num.Bit0 q))\<close>
   \<open>take_bit_num (numeral r) (Num.Bit1 m) =
     Some (case take_bit_num (pred_numeral r) m of None \<Rightarrow> Num.One | Some q \<Rightarrow> Num.Bit1 q)\<close>
   by (auto simp add: take_bit_num_def ac_simps mult_2 num_of_nat_double
     take_bit_Suc_bit0 take_bit_Suc_bit1 take_bit_numeral_bit0 take_bit_numeral_bit1)
 
 lemma take_bit_num_code [code]:
   \<comment> \<open>Ocaml-style pattern matching is more robust wrt. different representations of \<^typ>\<open>nat\<close>\<close>
   \<open>take_bit_num n m = (case (n, m)
    of (0, _) \<Rightarrow> None
     | (Suc n, Num.One) \<Rightarrow> Some Num.One
     | (Suc n, Num.Bit0 m) \<Rightarrow> (case take_bit_num n m of None \<Rightarrow> None | Some q \<Rightarrow> Some (Num.Bit0 q))
     | (Suc n, Num.Bit1 m) \<Rightarrow> Some (case take_bit_num n m of None \<Rightarrow> Num.One | Some q \<Rightarrow> Num.Bit1 q))\<close>
   by (cases n; cases m) (simp_all add: take_bit_num_simps)
 
 context semiring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 lemma take_bit_num_eq_None_imp:
   \<open>take_bit m (numeral n) = 0\<close> if \<open>take_bit_num m n = None\<close>
 proof -
   from that have \<open>take_bit m (numeral n :: nat) = 0\<close>
     by (simp add: take_bit_num_def split: if_splits)
   then have \<open>of_nat (take_bit m (numeral n)) = of_nat 0\<close>
     by simp
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: of_nat_take_bit)
 qed
 
 lemma take_bit_num_eq_Some_imp:
   \<open>take_bit m (numeral n) = numeral q\<close> if \<open>take_bit_num m n = Some q\<close>
 proof -
   from that have \<open>take_bit m (numeral n :: nat) = numeral q\<close>
     by (auto simp add: take_bit_num_def Num.numeral_num_of_nat_unfold split: if_splits)
   then have \<open>of_nat (take_bit m (numeral n)) = of_nat (numeral q)\<close>
     by simp
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: of_nat_take_bit)
 qed
 
 lemma take_bit_numeral_numeral:
   \<open>take_bit (numeral m) (numeral n) =
     (case take_bit_num (numeral m) n of None \<Rightarrow> 0 | Some q \<Rightarrow> numeral q)\<close>
   by (auto split: option.split dest: take_bit_num_eq_None_imp take_bit_num_eq_Some_imp)
 
 end
 
 lemma take_bit_numeral_minus_numeral_int:
   \<open>take_bit (numeral m) (- numeral n :: int) =
     (case take_bit_num (numeral m) n of None \<Rightarrow> 0 | Some q \<Rightarrow> take_bit (numeral m) (2 ^ numeral m - numeral q))\<close> (is \<open>?lhs = ?rhs\<close>)
 proof (cases \<open>take_bit_num (numeral m) n\<close>)
   case None
   then show ?thesis
     by (auto dest: take_bit_num_eq_None_imp [where ?'a = int] simp add: take_bit_eq_0_iff)
 next
   case (Some q)
   then have q: \<open>take_bit (numeral m) (numeral n :: int) = numeral q\<close>
     by (auto dest: take_bit_num_eq_Some_imp)
   let ?T = \<open>take_bit (numeral m) :: int \<Rightarrow> int\<close>
   have *: \<open>?T (2 ^ numeral m) = ?T (?T 0)\<close>
     by (simp add: take_bit_eq_0_iff)
   have \<open>?lhs = ?T (0 - numeral n)\<close>
     by simp
   also have \<open>\<dots> = ?T (?T (?T 0) - ?T (?T (numeral n)))\<close>
     by (simp only: take_bit_diff)
   also have \<open>\<dots> = ?T (2 ^ numeral m - ?T (numeral n))\<close>
     by (simp only: take_bit_diff flip: *)
   also have \<open>\<dots> = ?rhs\<close>
     by (simp add: q Some)
   finally show ?thesis .
 qed
 
 declare take_bit_num_simps [simp]
   take_bit_numeral_numeral [simp]
   take_bit_numeral_minus_numeral_int [simp]
 
 
 subsection \<open>Symbolic computations for code generation\<close>
 
 lemma bit_int_code [code]:
   \<open>bit (0::int)               n      \<longleftrightarrow> False\<close>
   \<open>bit (Int.Neg num.One)      n      \<longleftrightarrow> True\<close>
   \<open>bit (Int.Pos num.One)      0      \<longleftrightarrow> True\<close>
   \<open>bit (Int.Pos (num.Bit0 m)) 0      \<longleftrightarrow> False\<close>
   \<open>bit (Int.Pos (num.Bit1 m)) 0      \<longleftrightarrow> True\<close>
   \<open>bit (Int.Neg (num.Bit0 m)) 0      \<longleftrightarrow> False\<close>
   \<open>bit (Int.Neg (num.Bit1 m)) 0      \<longleftrightarrow> True\<close>
   \<open>bit (Int.Pos num.One)      (Suc n) \<longleftrightarrow> False\<close>
   \<open>bit (Int.Pos (num.Bit0 m)) (Suc n) \<longleftrightarrow> bit (Int.Pos m) n\<close>
   \<open>bit (Int.Pos (num.Bit1 m)) (Suc n) \<longleftrightarrow> bit (Int.Pos m) n\<close>
   \<open>bit (Int.Neg (num.Bit0 m)) (Suc n) \<longleftrightarrow> bit (Int.Neg m) n\<close>
   \<open>bit (Int.Neg (num.Bit1 m)) (Suc n) \<longleftrightarrow> bit (Int.Neg (Num.inc m)) n\<close>
   by (simp_all add: Num.add_One bit_0 bit_Suc)
 
 lemma not_int_code [code]:
   \<open>NOT (0 :: int) = - 1\<close>
   \<open>NOT (Int.Pos n) = Int.Neg (Num.inc n)\<close>
   \<open>NOT (Int.Neg n) = Num.sub n num.One\<close>
   by (simp_all add: Num.add_One not_int_def)
 
 fun and_num :: \<open>num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> num option\<close> \<^marker>\<open>contributor \<open>Andreas Lochbihler\<close>\<close>
 where
   \<open>and_num num.One num.One = Some num.One\<close>
 | \<open>and_num num.One (num.Bit0 n) = None\<close>
 | \<open>and_num num.One (num.Bit1 n) = Some num.One\<close>
 | \<open>and_num (num.Bit0 m) num.One = None\<close>
 | \<open>and_num (num.Bit0 m) (num.Bit0 n) = map_option num.Bit0 (and_num m n)\<close>
 | \<open>and_num (num.Bit0 m) (num.Bit1 n) = map_option num.Bit0 (and_num m n)\<close>
 | \<open>and_num (num.Bit1 m) num.One = Some num.One\<close>
 | \<open>and_num (num.Bit1 m) (num.Bit0 n) = map_option num.Bit0 (and_num m n)\<close>
 | \<open>and_num (num.Bit1 m) (num.Bit1 n) = (case and_num m n of None \<Rightarrow> Some num.One | Some n' \<Rightarrow> Some (num.Bit1 n'))\<close>
 
 context linordered_euclidean_semiring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 lemma numeral_and_num:
   \<open>numeral m AND numeral n = (case and_num m n of None \<Rightarrow> 0 | Some n' \<Rightarrow> numeral n')\<close>
   by (induction m n rule: and_num.induct) (simp_all add: split: option.split)
 
 lemma and_num_eq_None_iff:
   \<open>and_num m n = None \<longleftrightarrow> numeral m AND numeral n = 0\<close>
   by (simp add: numeral_and_num split: option.split)
 
 lemma and_num_eq_Some_iff:
   \<open>and_num m n = Some q \<longleftrightarrow> numeral m AND numeral n = numeral q\<close>
   by (simp add: numeral_and_num split: option.split)
 
 end
 
 lemma and_int_code [code]:
   fixes i j :: int shows
   \<open>0 AND j = 0\<close>
   \<open>i AND 0 = 0\<close>
   \<open>Int.Pos n AND Int.Pos m = (case and_num n m of None \<Rightarrow> 0 | Some n' \<Rightarrow> Int.Pos n')\<close>
   \<open>Int.Neg n AND Int.Neg m = NOT (Num.sub n num.One OR Num.sub m num.One)\<close>
   \<open>Int.Pos n AND Int.Neg num.One = Int.Pos n\<close>
   \<open>Int.Pos n AND Int.Neg (num.Bit0 m) = Num.sub (or_not_num_neg (Num.BitM m) n) num.One\<close>
   \<open>Int.Pos n AND Int.Neg (num.Bit1 m) = Num.sub (or_not_num_neg (num.Bit0 m) n) num.One\<close>
   \<open>Int.Neg num.One AND Int.Pos m = Int.Pos m\<close>
   \<open>Int.Neg (num.Bit0 n) AND Int.Pos m = Num.sub (or_not_num_neg (Num.BitM n) m) num.One\<close>
   \<open>Int.Neg (num.Bit1 n) AND Int.Pos m = Num.sub (or_not_num_neg (num.Bit0 n) m) num.One\<close>
   apply (auto simp add: and_num_eq_None_iff [where ?'a = int] and_num_eq_Some_iff [where ?'a = int]
     split: option.split)
      apply (simp_all only: sub_one_eq_not_neg numeral_or_not_num_eq minus_minus and_not_numerals
        bit.de_Morgan_disj bit.double_compl and_not_num_eq_None_iff and_not_num_eq_Some_iff ac_simps)
   done
 
 context linordered_euclidean_semiring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 fun or_num :: \<open>num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> num\<close> \<^marker>\<open>contributor \<open>Andreas Lochbihler\<close>\<close>
 where
   \<open>or_num num.One num.One = num.One\<close>
 | \<open>or_num num.One (num.Bit0 n) = num.Bit1 n\<close>
 | \<open>or_num num.One (num.Bit1 n) = num.Bit1 n\<close>
 | \<open>or_num (num.Bit0 m) num.One = num.Bit1 m\<close>
 | \<open>or_num (num.Bit0 m) (num.Bit0 n) = num.Bit0 (or_num m n)\<close>
 | \<open>or_num (num.Bit0 m) (num.Bit1 n) = num.Bit1 (or_num m n)\<close>
 | \<open>or_num (num.Bit1 m) num.One = num.Bit1 m\<close>
 | \<open>or_num (num.Bit1 m) (num.Bit0 n) = num.Bit1 (or_num m n)\<close>
 | \<open>or_num (num.Bit1 m) (num.Bit1 n) = num.Bit1 (or_num m n)\<close>
 
 lemma numeral_or_num:
   \<open>numeral m OR numeral n = numeral (or_num m n)\<close>
   by (induction m n rule: or_num.induct) simp_all
 
 lemma numeral_or_num_eq:
   \<open>numeral (or_num m n) = numeral m OR numeral n\<close>
   by (simp add: numeral_or_num)
 
 end
 
 lemma or_int_code [code]:
   fixes i j :: int shows
   \<open>0 OR j = j\<close>
   \<open>i OR 0 = i\<close>
   \<open>Int.Pos n OR Int.Pos m = Int.Pos (or_num n m)\<close>
   \<open>Int.Neg n OR Int.Neg m = NOT (Num.sub n num.One AND Num.sub m num.One)\<close>
   \<open>Int.Pos n OR Int.Neg num.One = Int.Neg num.One\<close>
   \<open>Int.Pos n OR Int.Neg (num.Bit0 m) = (case and_not_num (Num.BitM m) n of None \<Rightarrow> -1 | Some n' \<Rightarrow> Int.Neg (Num.inc n'))\<close>
   \<open>Int.Pos n OR Int.Neg (num.Bit1 m) = (case and_not_num (num.Bit0 m) n of None \<Rightarrow> -1 | Some n' \<Rightarrow> Int.Neg (Num.inc n'))\<close>
   \<open>Int.Neg num.One OR Int.Pos m = Int.Neg num.One\<close>
   \<open>Int.Neg (num.Bit0 n) OR Int.Pos m = (case and_not_num (Num.BitM n) m of None \<Rightarrow> -1 | Some n' \<Rightarrow> Int.Neg (Num.inc n'))\<close>
   \<open>Int.Neg (num.Bit1 n) OR Int.Pos m = (case and_not_num (num.Bit0 n) m of None \<Rightarrow> -1 | Some n' \<Rightarrow> Int.Neg (Num.inc n'))\<close>
   apply (auto simp add: numeral_or_num_eq split: option.splits)
          apply (simp_all only: and_not_num_eq_None_iff and_not_num_eq_Some_iff and_not_numerals
            numeral_or_not_num_eq or_eq_not_not_and bit.double_compl ac_simps flip: numeral_eq_iff [where ?'a = int])
          apply simp_all
   done
 
 fun xor_num :: \<open>num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> num option\<close> \<^marker>\<open>contributor \<open>Andreas Lochbihler\<close>\<close>
 where
   \<open>xor_num num.One num.One = None\<close>
 | \<open>xor_num num.One (num.Bit0 n) = Some (num.Bit1 n)\<close>
 | \<open>xor_num num.One (num.Bit1 n) = Some (num.Bit0 n)\<close>
 | \<open>xor_num (num.Bit0 m) num.One = Some (num.Bit1 m)\<close>
 | \<open>xor_num (num.Bit0 m) (num.Bit0 n) = map_option num.Bit0 (xor_num m n)\<close>
 | \<open>xor_num (num.Bit0 m) (num.Bit1 n) = Some (case xor_num m n of None \<Rightarrow> num.One | Some n' \<Rightarrow> num.Bit1 n')\<close>
 | \<open>xor_num (num.Bit1 m) num.One = Some (num.Bit0 m)\<close>
 | \<open>xor_num (num.Bit1 m) (num.Bit0 n) = Some (case xor_num m n of None \<Rightarrow> num.One | Some n' \<Rightarrow> num.Bit1 n')\<close>
 | \<open>xor_num (num.Bit1 m) (num.Bit1 n) = map_option num.Bit0 (xor_num m n)\<close>
 
 context linordered_euclidean_semiring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 lemma numeral_xor_num:
   \<open>numeral m XOR numeral n = (case xor_num m n of None \<Rightarrow> 0 | Some n' \<Rightarrow> numeral n')\<close>
   by (induction m n rule: xor_num.induct) (simp_all split: option.split)
 
 lemma xor_num_eq_None_iff:
   \<open>xor_num m n = None \<longleftrightarrow> numeral m XOR numeral n = 0\<close>
   by (simp add: numeral_xor_num split: option.split)
 
 lemma xor_num_eq_Some_iff:
   \<open>xor_num m n = Some q \<longleftrightarrow> numeral m XOR numeral n = numeral q\<close>
   by (simp add: numeral_xor_num split: option.split)
 
 end
 
 lemma xor_int_code [code]:
   fixes i j :: int shows
   \<open>0 XOR j = j\<close>
   \<open>i XOR 0 = i\<close>
   \<open>Int.Pos n XOR Int.Pos m = (case xor_num n m of None \<Rightarrow> 0 | Some n' \<Rightarrow> Int.Pos n')\<close>
   \<open>Int.Neg n XOR Int.Neg m = Num.sub n num.One XOR Num.sub m num.One\<close>
   \<open>Int.Neg n XOR Int.Pos m = NOT (Num.sub n num.One XOR Int.Pos m)\<close>
   \<open>Int.Pos n XOR Int.Neg m = NOT (Int.Pos n XOR Num.sub m num.One)\<close>
   by (simp_all add: xor_num_eq_None_iff [where ?'a = int] xor_num_eq_Some_iff [where ?'a = int] split: option.split)
 
 lemma push_bit_int_code [code]:
   \<open>push_bit 0 i = i\<close>
   \<open>push_bit (Suc n) i = push_bit n (Int.dup i)\<close>
   by (simp_all add: ac_simps)
 
 lemma drop_bit_int_code [code]:
   fixes i :: int shows
   \<open>drop_bit 0 i = i\<close>
   \<open>drop_bit (Suc n) 0 = (0 :: int)\<close>
   \<open>drop_bit (Suc n) (Int.Pos num.One) = 0\<close>
   \<open>drop_bit (Suc n) (Int.Pos (num.Bit0 m)) = drop_bit n (Int.Pos m)\<close>
   \<open>drop_bit (Suc n) (Int.Pos (num.Bit1 m)) = drop_bit n (Int.Pos m)\<close>
   \<open>drop_bit (Suc n) (Int.Neg num.One) = - 1\<close>
   \<open>drop_bit (Suc n) (Int.Neg (num.Bit0 m)) = drop_bit n (Int.Neg m)\<close>
   \<open>drop_bit (Suc n) (Int.Neg (num.Bit1 m)) = drop_bit n (Int.Neg (Num.inc m))\<close>
   by (simp_all add: drop_bit_Suc add_One)
 
 
 subsection \<open>More properties\<close>
 
 lemma take_bit_eq_mask_iff:
   \<open>take_bit n k = mask n \<longleftrightarrow> take_bit n (k + 1) = 0\<close> (is \<open>?P \<longleftrightarrow> ?Q\<close>)
   for k :: int
 proof
   assume ?P
   then have \<open>take_bit n (take_bit n k + take_bit n 1) = 0\<close>
     by (simp add: mask_eq_exp_minus_1 take_bit_eq_0_iff)
   then show ?Q
     by (simp only: take_bit_add)
 next
   assume ?Q
   then have \<open>take_bit n (k + 1) - 1 = - 1\<close>
     by simp
   then have \<open>take_bit n (take_bit n (k + 1) - 1) = take_bit n (- 1)\<close>
     by simp
   moreover have \<open>take_bit n (take_bit n (k + 1) - 1) = take_bit n k\<close>
     by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mod mod_simps)
   ultimately show ?P
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma take_bit_eq_mask_iff_exp_dvd:
   \<open>take_bit n k = mask n \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ n dvd k + 1\<close>
   for k :: int
   by (simp add: take_bit_eq_mask_iff flip: take_bit_eq_0_iff)
 
 
 subsection \<open>Bit concatenation\<close>
 
 definition concat_bit :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int\<close>
   where \<open>concat_bit n k l = take_bit n k OR push_bit n l\<close>
 
 lemma bit_concat_bit_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (concat_bit m k l) n \<longleftrightarrow> n < m \<and> bit k n \<or> m \<le> n \<and> bit l (n - m)\<close>
   by (simp add: concat_bit_def bit_or_iff bit_and_iff bit_take_bit_iff bit_push_bit_iff ac_simps)
 
 lemma concat_bit_eq:
   \<open>concat_bit n k l = take_bit n k + push_bit n l\<close>
   by (simp add: concat_bit_def take_bit_eq_mask
     bit_and_iff bit_mask_iff bit_push_bit_iff disjunctive_add)
 
 lemma concat_bit_0 [simp]:
   \<open>concat_bit 0 k l = l\<close>
   by (simp add: concat_bit_def)
 
 lemma concat_bit_Suc:
   \<open>concat_bit (Suc n) k l = k mod 2 + 2 * concat_bit n (k div 2) l\<close>
   by (simp add: concat_bit_eq take_bit_Suc push_bit_double)
 
 lemma concat_bit_of_zero_1 [simp]:
   \<open>concat_bit n 0 l = push_bit n l\<close>
   by (simp add: concat_bit_def)
 
 lemma concat_bit_of_zero_2 [simp]:
   \<open>concat_bit n k 0 = take_bit n k\<close>
   by (simp add: concat_bit_def take_bit_eq_mask)
 
 lemma concat_bit_nonnegative_iff [simp]:
   \<open>concat_bit n k l \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> l \<ge> 0\<close>
   by (simp add: concat_bit_def)
 
 lemma concat_bit_negative_iff [simp]:
   \<open>concat_bit n k l < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> l < 0\<close>
   by (simp add: concat_bit_def)
 
 lemma concat_bit_assoc:
   \<open>concat_bit n k (concat_bit m l r) = concat_bit (m + n) (concat_bit n k l) r\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (auto simp add: bit_concat_bit_iff ac_simps)
 
 lemma concat_bit_assoc_sym:
   \<open>concat_bit m (concat_bit n k l) r = concat_bit (min m n) k (concat_bit (m - n) l r)\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (auto simp add: bit_concat_bit_iff ac_simps min_def)
 
 lemma concat_bit_eq_iff:
   \<open>concat_bit n k l = concat_bit n r s
     \<longleftrightarrow> take_bit n k = take_bit n r \<and> l = s\<close> (is \<open>?P \<longleftrightarrow> ?Q\<close>)
 proof
   assume ?Q
   then show ?P
     by (simp add: concat_bit_def)
 next
   assume ?P
   then have *: \<open>bit (concat_bit n k l) m = bit (concat_bit n r s) m\<close> for m
     by (simp add: bit_eq_iff)
   have \<open>take_bit n k = take_bit n r\<close>
   proof (rule bit_eqI)
     fix m
     from * [of m]
     show \<open>bit (take_bit n k) m \<longleftrightarrow> bit (take_bit n r) m\<close>
       by (auto simp add: bit_take_bit_iff bit_concat_bit_iff)
   qed
   moreover have \<open>push_bit n l = push_bit n s\<close>
   proof (rule bit_eqI)
     fix m
     from * [of m]
     show \<open>bit (push_bit n l) m \<longleftrightarrow> bit (push_bit n s) m\<close>
       by (auto simp add: bit_push_bit_iff bit_concat_bit_iff)
   qed
   then have \<open>l = s\<close>
     by (simp add: push_bit_eq_mult)
   ultimately show ?Q
     by (simp add: concat_bit_def)
 qed
 
 lemma take_bit_concat_bit_eq:
   \<open>take_bit m (concat_bit n k l) = concat_bit (min m n) k (take_bit (m - n) l)\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI)
     (auto simp add: bit_take_bit_iff bit_concat_bit_iff min_def)
 
 lemma concat_bit_take_bit_eq:
   \<open>concat_bit n (take_bit n b) = concat_bit n b\<close>
   by (simp add: concat_bit_def [abs_def])
 
 
 subsection \<open>Taking bits with sign propagation\<close>
 
 context ring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 definition signed_take_bit :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a\<close>
   where \<open>signed_take_bit n a = take_bit n a OR (of_bool (bit a n) * NOT (mask n))\<close>
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_eq_if_positive:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n a = take_bit n a\<close> if \<open>\<not> bit a n\<close>
   using that by (simp add: signed_take_bit_def)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_eq_if_negative:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n a = take_bit n a OR NOT (mask n)\<close> if \<open>bit a n\<close>
   using that by (simp add: signed_take_bit_def)
 
 lemma even_signed_take_bit_iff:
   \<open>even (signed_take_bit m a) \<longleftrightarrow> even a\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_0 signed_take_bit_def even_or_iff even_mask_iff bit_double_iff)
 
 lemma bit_signed_take_bit_iff [bit_simps]:
   \<open>bit (signed_take_bit m a) n \<longleftrightarrow> possible_bit TYPE('a) n \<and> bit a (min m n)\<close>
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_def bit_take_bit_iff bit_or_iff bit_not_iff bit_mask_iff min_def not_le)
     (blast dest: bit_imp_possible_bit)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_0 [simp]:
   \<open>signed_take_bit 0 a = - (a mod 2)\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_0 signed_take_bit_def odd_iff_mod_2_eq_one)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_Suc:
   \<open>signed_take_bit (Suc n) a = a mod 2 + 2 * signed_take_bit n (a div 2)\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_sum_mult_2_cases bit_simps bit_0 possible_bit_less_imp flip: bit_Suc min_Suc_Suc)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_of_0 [simp]:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n 0 = 0\<close>
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_def)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_of_minus_1 [simp]:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n (- 1) = - 1\<close>
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_def mask_eq_exp_minus_1 possible_bit_def)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_Suc_1 [simp]:
   \<open>signed_take_bit (Suc n) 1 = 1\<close>
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_Suc)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_numeral_of_1 [simp]:
   \<open>signed_take_bit (numeral k) 1 = 1\<close>
   by (simp add: bit_1_iff signed_take_bit_eq_if_positive)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_rec:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n a = (if n = 0 then - (a mod 2) else a mod 2 + 2 * signed_take_bit (n - 1) (a div 2))\<close>
   by (cases n) (simp_all add: signed_take_bit_Suc)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_eq_iff_take_bit_eq:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n a = signed_take_bit n b \<longleftrightarrow> take_bit (Suc n) a = take_bit (Suc n) b\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>bit (signed_take_bit n a) = bit (signed_take_bit n b) \<longleftrightarrow> bit (take_bit (Suc n) a) = bit (take_bit (Suc n) b)\<close>
     by (simp add: fun_eq_iff bit_signed_take_bit_iff bit_take_bit_iff not_le less_Suc_eq_le min_def)
       (use bit_imp_possible_bit in fastforce)
   then show ?thesis
     by (auto simp add: fun_eq_iff intro: bit_eqI)
 qed
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_signed_take_bit [simp]:
   \<open>signed_take_bit m (signed_take_bit n a) = signed_take_bit (min m n) a\<close>
   by (auto simp add: bit_eq_iff bit_simps ac_simps)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_take_bit:
   \<open>signed_take_bit m (take_bit n a) = (if n \<le> m then take_bit n else signed_take_bit m) a\<close>
   by (rule bit_eqI) (auto simp add: bit_signed_take_bit_iff min_def bit_take_bit_iff)
 
 lemma take_bit_signed_take_bit:
   \<open>take_bit m (signed_take_bit n a) = take_bit m a\<close> if \<open>m \<le> Suc n\<close>
   using that by (rule le_SucE; intro bit_eqI)
    (auto simp add: bit_take_bit_iff bit_signed_take_bit_iff min_def less_Suc_eq)
 
 end
 
 text \<open>Modulus centered around 0\<close>
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_eq_concat_bit:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n k = concat_bit n k (- of_bool (bit k n))\<close>
   by (simp add: concat_bit_def signed_take_bit_def)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_add:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n (signed_take_bit n k + signed_take_bit n l) = signed_take_bit n (k + l)\<close>
   for k l :: int
 proof -
   have \<open>take_bit (Suc n)
      (take_bit (Suc n) (signed_take_bit n k) +
       take_bit (Suc n) (signed_take_bit n l)) =
     take_bit (Suc n) (k + l)\<close>
     by (simp add: take_bit_signed_take_bit take_bit_add)
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp only: signed_take_bit_eq_iff_take_bit_eq take_bit_add)
 qed
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_diff:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n (signed_take_bit n k - signed_take_bit n l) = signed_take_bit n (k - l)\<close>
   for k l :: int
 proof -
   have \<open>take_bit (Suc n)
      (take_bit (Suc n) (signed_take_bit n k) -
       take_bit (Suc n) (signed_take_bit n l)) =
     take_bit (Suc n) (k - l)\<close>
     by (simp add: take_bit_signed_take_bit take_bit_diff)
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp only: signed_take_bit_eq_iff_take_bit_eq take_bit_diff)
 qed
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_minus:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n (- signed_take_bit n k) = signed_take_bit n (- k)\<close>
   for k :: int
 proof -
   have \<open>take_bit (Suc n)
      (- take_bit (Suc n) (signed_take_bit n k)) =
     take_bit (Suc n) (- k)\<close>
     by (simp add: take_bit_signed_take_bit take_bit_minus)
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp only: signed_take_bit_eq_iff_take_bit_eq take_bit_minus)
 qed
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_mult:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n (signed_take_bit n k * signed_take_bit n l) = signed_take_bit n (k * l)\<close>
   for k l :: int
 proof -
   have \<open>take_bit (Suc n)
      (take_bit (Suc n) (signed_take_bit n k) *
       take_bit (Suc n) (signed_take_bit n l)) =
     take_bit (Suc n) (k * l)\<close>
     by (simp add: take_bit_signed_take_bit take_bit_mult)
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp only: signed_take_bit_eq_iff_take_bit_eq take_bit_mult)
 qed
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit_minus:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n k = take_bit (Suc n) k - 2 ^ Suc n * of_bool (bit k n)\<close>
   for k :: int
 proof (cases \<open>bit k n\<close>)
   case True
   have \<open>signed_take_bit n k = take_bit (Suc n) k OR NOT (mask (Suc n))\<close>
     by (rule bit_eqI) (auto simp add: bit_signed_take_bit_iff min_def bit_take_bit_iff bit_or_iff bit_not_iff bit_mask_iff less_Suc_eq True)
   then have \<open>signed_take_bit n k = take_bit (Suc n) k + NOT (mask (Suc n))\<close>
     by (simp add: disjunctive_add bit_take_bit_iff bit_not_iff bit_mask_iff)
   with True show ?thesis
     by (simp flip: minus_exp_eq_not_mask)
 next
   case False
   show ?thesis
     by (rule bit_eqI) (simp add: False bit_signed_take_bit_iff bit_take_bit_iff min_def less_Suc_eq)
 qed
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit_shift:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n k = take_bit (Suc n) (k + 2 ^ n) - 2 ^ n\<close>
   for k :: int
 proof -
   have *: \<open>take_bit n k OR 2 ^ n = take_bit n k + 2 ^ n\<close>
     by (simp add: disjunctive_add bit_exp_iff bit_take_bit_iff)
   have \<open>take_bit n k - 2 ^ n = take_bit n k + NOT (mask n)\<close>
     by (simp add: minus_exp_eq_not_mask)
   also have \<open>\<dots> = take_bit n k OR NOT (mask n)\<close>
     by (rule disjunctive_add)
       (simp add: bit_exp_iff bit_take_bit_iff bit_not_iff bit_mask_iff)
   finally have **: \<open>take_bit n k - 2 ^ n = take_bit n k OR NOT (mask n)\<close> .
   have \<open>take_bit (Suc n) (k + 2 ^ n) = take_bit (Suc n) (take_bit (Suc n) k + take_bit (Suc n) (2 ^ n))\<close>
     by (simp only: take_bit_add)
   also have \<open>take_bit (Suc n) k = 2 ^ n * of_bool (bit k n) + take_bit n k\<close>
     by (simp add: take_bit_Suc_from_most)
   finally have \<open>take_bit (Suc n) (k + 2 ^ n) = take_bit (Suc n) (2 ^ (n + of_bool (bit k n)) + take_bit n k)\<close>
     by (simp add: ac_simps)
   also have \<open>2 ^ (n + of_bool (bit k n)) + take_bit n k = 2 ^ (n + of_bool (bit k n)) OR take_bit n k\<close>
     by (rule disjunctive_add)
       (auto simp add: disjunctive_add bit_take_bit_iff bit_double_iff bit_exp_iff)
   finally show ?thesis
     using * ** by (simp add: signed_take_bit_def concat_bit_Suc min_def ac_simps)
 qed
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_nonnegative_iff [simp]:
   \<open>0 \<le> signed_take_bit n k \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> bit k n\<close>
   for k :: int
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_def not_less concat_bit_def)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_negative_iff [simp]:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n k < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> bit k n\<close>
   for k :: int
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_def not_less concat_bit_def)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_int_greater_eq_minus_exp [simp]:
   \<open>- (2 ^ n) \<le> signed_take_bit n k\<close>
   for k :: int
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit_shift)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_int_less_exp [simp]:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n k < 2 ^ n\<close>
   for k :: int
   using take_bit_int_less_exp [of \<open>Suc n\<close>]
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit_shift)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_int_eq_self_iff:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n k = k \<longleftrightarrow> - (2 ^ n) \<le> k \<and> k < 2 ^ n\<close>
   for k :: int
   by (auto simp add: signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit_shift take_bit_int_eq_self_iff algebra_simps)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_int_eq_self:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n k = k\<close> if \<open>- (2 ^ n) \<le> k\<close> \<open>k < 2 ^ n\<close>
   for k :: int
   using that by (simp add: signed_take_bit_int_eq_self_iff)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_int_less_eq_self_iff:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n k \<le> k \<longleftrightarrow> - (2 ^ n) \<le> k\<close>
   for k :: int
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit_shift take_bit_int_less_eq_self_iff algebra_simps)
     linarith
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_int_less_self_iff:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n k < k \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ n \<le> k\<close>
   for k :: int
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit_shift take_bit_int_less_self_iff algebra_simps)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_int_greater_self_iff:
   \<open>k < signed_take_bit n k \<longleftrightarrow> k < - (2 ^ n)\<close>
   for k :: int
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit_shift take_bit_int_greater_self_iff algebra_simps)
     linarith
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_int_greater_eq_self_iff:
   \<open>k \<le> signed_take_bit n k \<longleftrightarrow> k < 2 ^ n\<close>
   for k :: int
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit_shift take_bit_int_greater_eq_self_iff algebra_simps)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_int_greater_eq:
   \<open>k + 2 ^ Suc n \<le> signed_take_bit n k\<close> if \<open>k < - (2 ^ n)\<close>
   for k :: int
   using that take_bit_int_greater_eq [of \<open>k + 2 ^ n\<close> \<open>Suc n\<close>]
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit_shift)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_int_less_eq:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n k \<le> k - 2 ^ Suc n\<close> if \<open>k \<ge> 2 ^ n\<close>
   for k :: int
   using that take_bit_int_less_eq [of \<open>Suc n\<close> \<open>k + 2 ^ n\<close>]
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_eq_take_bit_shift)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_Suc_bit0 [simp]:
   \<open>signed_take_bit (Suc n) (numeral (Num.Bit0 k)) = signed_take_bit n (numeral k) * (2 :: int)\<close>
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_Suc)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_Suc_bit1 [simp]:
   \<open>signed_take_bit (Suc n) (numeral (Num.Bit1 k)) = signed_take_bit n (numeral k) * 2 + (1 :: int)\<close>
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_Suc)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_Suc_minus_bit0 [simp]:
   \<open>signed_take_bit (Suc n) (- numeral (Num.Bit0 k)) = signed_take_bit n (- numeral k) * (2 :: int)\<close>
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_Suc)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_Suc_minus_bit1 [simp]:
   \<open>signed_take_bit (Suc n) (- numeral (Num.Bit1 k)) = signed_take_bit n (- numeral k - 1) * 2 + (1 :: int)\<close>
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_Suc)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_numeral_bit0 [simp]:
   \<open>signed_take_bit (numeral l) (numeral (Num.Bit0 k)) = signed_take_bit (pred_numeral l) (numeral k) * (2 :: int)\<close>
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_rec)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_numeral_bit1 [simp]:
   \<open>signed_take_bit (numeral l) (numeral (Num.Bit1 k)) = signed_take_bit (pred_numeral l) (numeral k) * 2 + (1 :: int)\<close>
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_rec)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_numeral_minus_bit0 [simp]:
   \<open>signed_take_bit (numeral l) (- numeral (Num.Bit0 k)) = signed_take_bit (pred_numeral l) (- numeral k) * (2 :: int)\<close>
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_rec)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_numeral_minus_bit1 [simp]:
   \<open>signed_take_bit (numeral l) (- numeral (Num.Bit1 k)) = signed_take_bit (pred_numeral l) (- numeral k - 1) * 2 + (1 :: int)\<close>
   by (simp add: signed_take_bit_rec)
 
 lemma signed_take_bit_code [code]:
   \<open>signed_take_bit n a =
   (let l = take_bit (Suc n) a
    in if bit l n then l + push_bit (Suc n) (- 1) else l)\<close>
 proof -
   have *: \<open>take_bit (Suc n) a + push_bit n (- 2) =
     take_bit (Suc n) a OR NOT (mask (Suc n))\<close>
     by (auto simp add: bit_take_bit_iff bit_push_bit_iff bit_not_iff bit_mask_iff disjunctive_add
        simp flip: push_bit_minus_one_eq_not_mask)
   show ?thesis
     by (rule bit_eqI)
       (auto simp add: Let_def * bit_signed_take_bit_iff bit_take_bit_iff min_def less_Suc_eq bit_not_iff
         bit_mask_iff bit_or_iff simp del: push_bit_minus_one_eq_not_mask)
 qed
 
 
 subsection \<open>Key ideas of bit operations\<close>
 
 text \<open>
   When formalizing bit operations, it is tempting to represent
   bit values as explicit lists over a binary type. This however
   is a bad idea, mainly due to the inherent ambiguities in
   representation concerning repeating leading bits.
 
   Hence this approach avoids such explicit lists altogether
   following an algebraic path:
 
   \<^item> Bit values are represented by numeric types: idealized
     unbounded bit values can be represented by type \<^typ>\<open>int\<close>,
     bounded bit values by quotient types over \<^typ>\<open>int\<close>.
 
   \<^item> (A special case are idealized unbounded bit values ending
     in @{term [source] 0} which can be represented by type \<^typ>\<open>nat\<close> but
     only support a restricted set of operations).
 
   \<^item> From this idea follows that
 
       \<^item> multiplication by \<^term>\<open>2 :: int\<close> is a bit shift to the left and
 
       \<^item> division by \<^term>\<open>2 :: int\<close> is a bit shift to the right.
 
   \<^item> Concerning bounded bit values, iterated shifts to the left
     may result in eliminating all bits by shifting them all
     beyond the boundary.  The property \<^prop>\<open>(2 :: int) ^ n \<noteq> 0\<close>
     represents that \<^term>\<open>n\<close> is \<^emph>\<open>not\<close> beyond that boundary.
 
   \<^item> The projection on a single bit is then @{thm bit_iff_odd [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}.
 
   \<^item> This leads to the most fundamental properties of bit values:
 
       \<^item> Equality rule: @{thm bit_eqI [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Induction rule: @{thm bit_induct [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
   \<^item> Typical operations are characterized as follows:
 
       \<^item> Singleton \<^term>\<open>n\<close>th bit: \<^term>\<open>(2 :: int) ^ n\<close>
 
       \<^item> Bit mask upto bit \<^term>\<open>n\<close>: @{thm mask_eq_exp_minus_1 [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Left shift: @{thm push_bit_eq_mult [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Right shift: @{thm drop_bit_eq_div [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Truncation: @{thm take_bit_eq_mod [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Negation: @{thm bit_not_iff [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> And: @{thm bit_and_iff [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Or: @{thm bit_or_iff [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Xor: @{thm bit_xor_iff [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Set a single bit: @{thm set_bit_eq_or [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Unset a single bit: @{thm unset_bit_eq_and_not [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Flip a single bit: @{thm flip_bit_eq_xor [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Signed truncation, or modulus centered around \<^term>\<open>0::int\<close>: @{thm signed_take_bit_def [no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> Bit concatenation: @{thm concat_bit_def [no_vars]}
 
       \<^item> (Bounded) conversion from and to a list of bits: @{thm horner_sum_bit_eq_take_bit [where ?'a = int, no_vars]}
 \<close>
 
 
 subsection \<open>Lemma duplicates and other\<close>
 
 context semiring_bits
 begin
 
 lemma even_mask_div_iff [no_atp]:
   \<open>even ((2 ^ m - 1) div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> 2 ^ n = 0 \<or> m \<le> n\<close>
   by (cases \<open>2 ^ n = 0\<close>) (simp_all add: even_decr_exp_div_exp_iff)
 
 lemma exp_div_exp_eq [no_atp]:
   \<open>2 ^ m div 2 ^ n = of_bool (2 ^ m \<noteq> 0 \<and> m \<ge> n) * 2 ^ (m - n)\<close>
   apply (rule bit_eqI)
   using bit_exp_iff div_exp_eq apply (auto simp add: bit_iff_odd possible_bit_def)
   done
 
 lemma bits_1_div_2 [no_atp]:
   \<open>1 div 2 = 0\<close>
   by (fact half_1)
 
 lemma bits_1_div_exp [no_atp]:
   \<open>1 div 2 ^ n = of_bool (n = 0)\<close>
   using div_exp_eq [of 1 1] by (cases n) simp_all
 
 lemma exp_add_not_zero_imp [no_atp]:
   \<open>2 ^ m \<noteq> 0\<close> and \<open>2 ^ n \<noteq> 0\<close> if \<open>2 ^ (m + n) \<noteq> 0\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>\<not> (2 ^ m = 0 \<or> 2 ^ n = 0)\<close>
   proof (rule notI)
     assume \<open>2 ^ m = 0 \<or> 2 ^ n = 0\<close>
     then have \<open>2 ^ (m + n) = 0\<close>
       by (rule disjE) (simp_all add: power_add)
     with that show False ..
   qed
   then show \<open>2 ^ m \<noteq> 0\<close> and \<open>2 ^ n \<noteq> 0\<close>
     by simp_all
 qed
 
 lemma
   exp_add_not_zero_imp_left [no_atp]: \<open>2 ^ m \<noteq> 0\<close>
   and exp_add_not_zero_imp_right [no_atp]: \<open>2 ^ n \<noteq> 0\<close>
   if \<open>2 ^ (m + n) \<noteq> 0\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>\<not> (2 ^ m = 0 \<or> 2 ^ n = 0)\<close>
   proof (rule notI)
     assume \<open>2 ^ m = 0 \<or> 2 ^ n = 0\<close>
     then have \<open>2 ^ (m + n) = 0\<close>
       by (rule disjE) (simp_all add: power_add)
     with that show False ..
   qed
   then show \<open>2 ^ m \<noteq> 0\<close> and \<open>2 ^ n \<noteq> 0\<close>
     by simp_all
 qed
 
 lemma exp_not_zero_imp_exp_diff_not_zero [no_atp]:
   \<open>2 ^ (n - m) \<noteq> 0\<close> if \<open>2 ^ n \<noteq> 0\<close>
 proof (cases \<open>m \<le> n\<close>)
   case True
   moreover define q where \<open>q = n - m\<close>
   ultimately have \<open>n = m + q\<close>
     by simp
   with that show ?thesis
     by (simp add: exp_add_not_zero_imp_right)
 next
   case False
   with that show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma exp_eq_0_imp_not_bit [no_atp]:
   \<open>\<not> bit a n\<close> if \<open>2 ^ n = 0\<close>
   using that by (simp add: bit_iff_odd)
 
 end
 
 context semiring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 lemma mod_exp_eq [no_atp]:
   \<open>a mod 2 ^ m mod 2 ^ n = a mod 2 ^ min m n\<close>
   by (simp flip: take_bit_eq_mod add: ac_simps)
 
 lemma mult_exp_mod_exp_eq [no_atp]:
   \<open>m \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> (a * 2 ^ m) mod (2 ^ n) = (a mod 2 ^ (n - m)) * 2 ^ m\<close>
   by (simp flip: push_bit_eq_mult take_bit_eq_mod add: push_bit_take_bit)
 
 lemma div_exp_mod_exp_eq [no_atp]:
   \<open>a div 2 ^ n mod 2 ^ m = a mod (2 ^ (n + m)) div 2 ^ n\<close>
   by (simp flip: drop_bit_eq_div take_bit_eq_mod add: drop_bit_take_bit)
 
 lemma even_mult_exp_div_exp_iff [no_atp]:
   \<open>even (a * 2 ^ m div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> m > n \<or> 2 ^ n = 0 \<or> (m \<le> n \<and> even (a div 2 ^ (n - m)))\<close>
   by (simp flip: push_bit_eq_mult drop_bit_eq_div add: even_drop_bit_iff_not_bit bit_simps possible_bit_def) auto
 
 lemma mod_exp_div_exp_eq_0 [no_atp]:
   \<open>a mod 2 ^ n div 2 ^ n = 0\<close>
   by (simp flip: take_bit_eq_mod drop_bit_eq_div add: drop_bit_take_bit)
 
 lemmas bits_one_mod_two_eq_one [no_atp] = one_mod_two_eq_one
 
 lemmas set_bit_def [no_atp] = set_bit_eq_or
 
 lemmas unset_bit_def [no_atp] = unset_bit_eq_and_not
 
 lemmas flip_bit_def [no_atp] = flip_bit_eq_xor
 
 end
 
 lemma and_nat_rec [no_atp]:
   \<open>m AND n = of_bool (odd m \<and> odd n) + 2 * ((m div 2) AND (n div 2))\<close> for m n :: nat
   by (fact and_rec)
 
 lemma or_nat_rec [no_atp]:
   \<open>m OR n = of_bool (odd m \<or> odd n) + 2 * ((m div 2) OR (n div 2))\<close> for m n :: nat
   by (fact or_rec)
 
 lemma xor_nat_rec [no_atp]:
   \<open>m XOR n = of_bool (odd m \<noteq> odd n) + 2 * ((m div 2) XOR (n div 2))\<close> for m n :: nat
   by (fact xor_rec)
 
 lemma bit_push_bit_iff_nat [no_atp]:
   \<open>bit (push_bit m q) n \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n \<and> bit q (n - m)\<close> for q :: nat
   by (fact bit_push_bit_iff')
 
 lemma mask_half_int [no_atp]:
   \<open>mask n div 2 = (mask (n - 1) :: int)\<close>
   by (fact mask_half)
 
 lemma not_int_rec [no_atp]:
   \<open>NOT k = of_bool (even k) + 2 * NOT (k div 2)\<close> for k :: int
   by (fact not_rec)
 
 lemma even_not_iff_int [no_atp]:
   \<open>even (NOT k) \<longleftrightarrow> odd k\<close> for k :: int
   by (fact even_not_iff)
 
 lemma bit_not_int_iff':
   \<open>bit (- k - 1) n \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> bit k n\<close> for k :: int
   by (simp flip: not_eq_complement add: bit_simps)
 
 lemmas and_int_rec [no_atp] = and_int.rec
 
 lemma even_and_iff_int [no_atp]:
   \<open>even (k AND l) \<longleftrightarrow> even k \<or> even l\<close> for k l :: int
   by (fact even_and_iff)
 
 lemmas bit_and_int_iff [no_atp] = and_int.bit_iff
 
 lemmas or_int_rec [no_atp] = or_int.rec
 
 lemmas bit_or_int_iff [no_atp] = or_int.bit_iff
 
 lemmas xor_int_rec [no_atp] = xor_int.rec
 
 lemmas bit_xor_int_iff [no_atp] = xor_int.bit_iff
 
 lemma drop_bit_push_bit_int [no_atp]:
   \<open>drop_bit m (push_bit n k) = drop_bit (m - n) (push_bit (n - m) k)\<close> for k :: int
   by (fact drop_bit_push_bit)
 
 lemma bit_push_bit_iff_int [no_atp] :
   \<open>bit (push_bit m k) n \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n \<and> bit k (n - m)\<close> for k :: int
   by (fact bit_push_bit_iff')
 
 no_notation
   not  (\<open>NOT\<close>)
     and "and"  (infixr \<open>AND\<close> 64)
     and or  (infixr \<open>OR\<close>  59)
     and xor  (infixr \<open>XOR\<close> 59)
 
 bundle bit_operations_syntax
 begin
 
 notation
   not  (\<open>NOT\<close>)
     and "and"  (infixr \<open>AND\<close> 64)
     and or  (infixr \<open>OR\<close>  59)
     and xor  (infixr \<open>XOR\<close> 59)
 
 end
 
 end
diff --git a/src/HOL/Code_Numeral.thy b/src/HOL/Code_Numeral.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Code_Numeral.thy
+++ b/src/HOL/Code_Numeral.thy
@@ -1,1329 +1,1329 @@
 (*  Title:      HOL/Code_Numeral.thy
     Author:     Florian Haftmann, TU Muenchen
 *)
 
 section \<open>Numeric types for code generation onto target language numerals only\<close>
 
 theory Code_Numeral
 imports Lifting Bit_Operations
 begin
 
 subsection \<open>Type of target language integers\<close>
 
 typedef integer = "UNIV :: int set"
   morphisms int_of_integer integer_of_int ..
 
 setup_lifting type_definition_integer
 
 lemma integer_eq_iff:
   "k = l \<longleftrightarrow> int_of_integer k = int_of_integer l"
   by transfer rule
 
 lemma integer_eqI:
   "int_of_integer k = int_of_integer l \<Longrightarrow> k = l"
   using integer_eq_iff [of k l] by simp
 
 lemma int_of_integer_integer_of_int [simp]:
   "int_of_integer (integer_of_int k) = k"
   by transfer rule
 
 lemma integer_of_int_int_of_integer [simp]:
   "integer_of_int (int_of_integer k) = k"
   by transfer rule
 
 instantiation integer :: ring_1
 begin
 
 lift_definition zero_integer :: integer
   is "0 :: int"
   .
 
 declare zero_integer.rep_eq [simp]
 
 lift_definition one_integer :: integer
   is "1 :: int"
   .
 
 declare one_integer.rep_eq [simp]
 
 lift_definition plus_integer :: "integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer"
   is "plus :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"
   .
 
 declare plus_integer.rep_eq [simp]
 
 lift_definition uminus_integer :: "integer \<Rightarrow> integer"
   is "uminus :: int \<Rightarrow> int"
   .
 
 declare uminus_integer.rep_eq [simp]
 
 lift_definition minus_integer :: "integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer"
   is "minus :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"
   .
 
 declare minus_integer.rep_eq [simp]
 
 lift_definition times_integer :: "integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer"
   is "times :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"
   .
 
 declare times_integer.rep_eq [simp]
 
 instance proof
 qed (transfer, simp add: algebra_simps)+
 
 end
 
 instance integer :: Rings.dvd ..
 
 context
   includes lifting_syntax
   notes transfer_rule_numeral [transfer_rule]
 begin
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   "(pcr_integer ===> pcr_integer ===> (\<longleftrightarrow>)) (dvd) (dvd)"
   by (unfold dvd_def) transfer_prover
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   "((\<longleftrightarrow>) ===> pcr_integer) of_bool of_bool"
   by (unfold of_bool_def) transfer_prover
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   "((=) ===> pcr_integer) int of_nat"
   by (rule transfer_rule_of_nat) transfer_prover+
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   "((=) ===> pcr_integer) (\<lambda>k. k) of_int"
 proof -
   have "((=) ===> pcr_integer) of_int of_int"
     by (rule transfer_rule_of_int) transfer_prover+
   then show ?thesis by (simp add: id_def)
 qed
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   "((=) ===> pcr_integer) numeral numeral"
   by transfer_prover
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   "((=) ===> (=) ===> pcr_integer) Num.sub Num.sub"
   by (unfold Num.sub_def) transfer_prover
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   "(pcr_integer ===> (=) ===> pcr_integer) (^) (^)"
   by (unfold power_def) transfer_prover
 
 end
 
 lemma int_of_integer_of_nat [simp]:
   "int_of_integer (of_nat n) = of_nat n"
   by transfer rule
 
 lift_definition integer_of_nat :: "nat \<Rightarrow> integer"
   is "of_nat :: nat \<Rightarrow> int"
   .
 
 lemma integer_of_nat_eq_of_nat [code]:
   "integer_of_nat = of_nat"
   by transfer rule
 
 lemma int_of_integer_integer_of_nat [simp]:
   "int_of_integer (integer_of_nat n) = of_nat n"
   by transfer rule
 
 lift_definition nat_of_integer :: "integer \<Rightarrow> nat"
   is Int.nat
   .
 
 lemma nat_of_integer_of_nat [simp]:
   "nat_of_integer (of_nat n) = n"
   by transfer simp
 
 lemma int_of_integer_of_int [simp]:
   "int_of_integer (of_int k) = k"
   by transfer simp
 
 lemma nat_of_integer_integer_of_nat [simp]:
   "nat_of_integer (integer_of_nat n) = n"
   by transfer simp
 
 lemma integer_of_int_eq_of_int [simp, code_abbrev]:
   "integer_of_int = of_int"
   by transfer (simp add: fun_eq_iff)
 
 lemma of_int_integer_of [simp]:
   "of_int (int_of_integer k) = (k :: integer)"
   by transfer rule
 
 lemma int_of_integer_numeral [simp]:
   "int_of_integer (numeral k) = numeral k"
   by transfer rule
 
 lemma int_of_integer_sub [simp]:
   "int_of_integer (Num.sub k l) = Num.sub k l"
   by transfer rule
 
 definition integer_of_num :: "num \<Rightarrow> integer"
   where [simp]: "integer_of_num = numeral"
 
 lemma integer_of_num [code]:
   "integer_of_num Num.One = 1"
   "integer_of_num (Num.Bit0 n) = (let k = integer_of_num n in k + k)"
   "integer_of_num (Num.Bit1 n) = (let k = integer_of_num n in k + k + 1)"
   by (simp_all only: integer_of_num_def numeral.simps Let_def)
 
 lemma integer_of_num_triv:
   "integer_of_num Num.One = 1"
   "integer_of_num (Num.Bit0 Num.One) = 2"
   by simp_all
 
 instantiation integer :: equal
 begin
 
 lift_definition equal_integer :: \<open>integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> bool\<close>
   is \<open>HOL.equal :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool\<close>
   .
 
 instance
   by (standard; transfer) (fact equal_eq)
 
 end
 
 instantiation integer :: linordered_idom
 begin
 
 lift_definition abs_integer :: \<open>integer \<Rightarrow> integer\<close>
   is \<open>abs :: int \<Rightarrow> int\<close>
   .
 
 declare abs_integer.rep_eq [simp]
 
 lift_definition sgn_integer :: \<open>integer \<Rightarrow> integer\<close>
   is \<open>sgn :: int \<Rightarrow> int\<close>
   .
 
 declare sgn_integer.rep_eq [simp]
 
 lift_definition less_eq_integer :: \<open>integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> bool\<close>
   is \<open>less_eq :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool\<close>
   .
 
 lemma integer_less_eq_iff:
   \<open>k \<le> l \<longleftrightarrow> int_of_integer k \<le> int_of_integer l\<close>
   by (fact less_eq_integer.rep_eq)
 
 lift_definition less_integer :: \<open>integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> bool\<close>
   is \<open>less :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool\<close>
   .
 
 lemma integer_less_iff:
   \<open>k < l \<longleftrightarrow> int_of_integer k < int_of_integer l\<close>
   by (fact less_integer.rep_eq)
 
 instance
   by (standard; transfer)
     (simp_all add: algebra_simps less_le_not_le [symmetric] mult_strict_right_mono linear)
 
 end
 
 instance integer :: discrete_linordered_semidom
   by (standard; transfer)
     (fact less_iff_succ_less_eq)
 
 context
   includes lifting_syntax
 begin
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   \<open>(pcr_integer ===> pcr_integer ===> pcr_integer) min min\<close>
   by (unfold min_def) transfer_prover
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   \<open>(pcr_integer ===> pcr_integer ===> pcr_integer) max max\<close>
   by (unfold max_def) transfer_prover
 
 end
 
 lemma int_of_integer_min [simp]:
   "int_of_integer (min k l) = min (int_of_integer k) (int_of_integer l)"
   by transfer rule
 
 lemma int_of_integer_max [simp]:
   "int_of_integer (max k l) = max (int_of_integer k) (int_of_integer l)"
   by transfer rule
 
 lemma nat_of_integer_non_positive [simp]:
   "k \<le> 0 \<Longrightarrow> nat_of_integer k = 0"
   by transfer simp
 
 lemma of_nat_of_integer [simp]:
   "of_nat (nat_of_integer k) = max 0 k"
   by transfer auto
 
 instantiation integer :: unique_euclidean_ring
 begin
 
 lift_definition divide_integer :: "integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer"
   is "divide :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"
   .
 
 declare divide_integer.rep_eq [simp]
 
 lift_definition modulo_integer :: "integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer"
   is "modulo :: int \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"
   .
 
 declare modulo_integer.rep_eq [simp]
 
 lift_definition euclidean_size_integer :: "integer \<Rightarrow> nat"
   is "euclidean_size :: int \<Rightarrow> nat"
   .
 
 declare euclidean_size_integer.rep_eq [simp]
 
 lift_definition division_segment_integer :: "integer \<Rightarrow> integer"
   is "division_segment :: int \<Rightarrow> int"
   .
 
 declare division_segment_integer.rep_eq [simp]
 
 instance
   apply (standard; transfer)
   apply (use mult_le_mono2 [of 1] in \<open>auto simp add: sgn_mult_abs abs_mult sgn_mult abs_mod_less sgn_mod nat_mult_distrib
      division_segment_mult division_segment_mod\<close>)
   apply (simp add: division_segment_int_def split: if_splits)
   done
 
 end
 
 lemma [code]:
   "euclidean_size = nat_of_integer \<circ> abs"
   by (simp add: fun_eq_iff nat_of_integer.rep_eq)
 
 lemma [code]:
   "division_segment (k :: integer) = (if k \<ge> 0 then 1 else - 1)"
   by transfer (simp add: division_segment_int_def)
 
 instance integer :: linordered_euclidean_semiring
   by (standard; transfer) (simp_all add: of_nat_div division_segment_int_def)
 
 instantiation integer :: ring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 lift_definition bit_integer :: \<open>integer \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> bool\<close>
   is bit .
 
 lift_definition not_integer :: \<open>integer \<Rightarrow> integer\<close>
   is not .
 
 lift_definition and_integer :: \<open>integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer\<close>
   is \<open>and\<close> .
 
 lift_definition or_integer :: \<open>integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer\<close>
   is or .
 
 lift_definition xor_integer ::  \<open>integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer\<close>
   is xor .
 
 lift_definition mask_integer :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> integer\<close>
   is mask .
 
 lift_definition set_bit_integer :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer\<close>
   is set_bit .
 
 lift_definition unset_bit_integer :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer\<close>
   is unset_bit .
 
 lift_definition flip_bit_integer :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer\<close>
   is flip_bit .
 
 lift_definition push_bit_integer :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer\<close>
   is push_bit .
 
 lift_definition drop_bit_integer :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer\<close>
   is drop_bit .
 
 lift_definition take_bit_integer :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer\<close>
   is take_bit .
 
 instance by (standard; transfer)
   (fact bit_induct div_by_0 div_by_1 div_0 even_half_succ_eq
-    half_div_exp_eq even_double_div_exp_iff even_decr_exp_div_exp_iff even_mod_exp_diff_exp_iff
+    half_div_exp_eq even_double_div_exp_iff even_decr_exp_div_exp_iff even_mod_exp_div_exp_iff
     bit_iff_odd push_bit_eq_mult drop_bit_eq_div take_bit_eq_mod
     and_rec or_rec xor_rec mask_eq_exp_minus_1
     set_bit_eq_or unset_bit_eq_or_xor flip_bit_eq_xor not_eq_complement)+
 
 end
 
 
 
 instance integer :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_bit_operations ..
 
 context
   includes bit_operations_syntax
 begin
 
 lemma [code]:
   \<open>bit k n \<longleftrightarrow> odd (drop_bit n k)\<close>
   \<open>NOT k = - k - 1\<close>
   \<open>mask n = 2 ^ n - (1 :: integer)\<close>
   \<open>set_bit n k = k OR push_bit n 1\<close>
   \<open>unset_bit n k = k AND NOT (push_bit n 1)\<close>
   \<open>flip_bit n k = k XOR push_bit n 1\<close>
   \<open>push_bit n k = k * 2 ^ n\<close>
   \<open>drop_bit n k = k div 2 ^ n\<close>
   \<open>take_bit n k = k mod 2 ^ n\<close> for k :: integer
   by (fact bit_iff_odd_drop_bit not_eq_complement mask_eq_exp_minus_1
     set_bit_eq_or unset_bit_eq_and_not flip_bit_eq_xor push_bit_eq_mult drop_bit_eq_div take_bit_eq_mod)+
 
 lemma [code]:
   \<open>k AND l = (if k = 0 \<or> l = 0 then 0 else if k = - 1 then l else if l = - 1 then k
     else (k mod 2) * (l mod 2) + 2 * ((k div 2) AND (l div 2)))\<close> for k l :: integer
   by transfer (fact and_int_unfold) 
 
 lemma [code]:
   \<open>k OR l = (if k = - 1 \<or> l = - 1 then - 1 else if k = 0 then l else if l = 0 then k
     else max (k mod 2) (l mod 2) + 2 * ((k div 2) OR (l div 2)))\<close> for k l :: integer
   by transfer (fact or_int_unfold)
 
 lemma [code]:
   \<open>k XOR l = (if k = - 1 then NOT l else if l = - 1 then NOT k else if k = 0 then l else if l = 0 then k
     else \<bar>k mod 2 - l mod 2\<bar> + 2 * ((k div 2) XOR (l div 2)))\<close> for k l :: integer
   by transfer (fact xor_int_unfold)
 
 end
 
 instantiation integer :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division
 begin
 
 definition divmod_integer :: "num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> integer \<times> integer"
 where
   divmod_integer'_def: "divmod_integer m n = (numeral m div numeral n, numeral m mod numeral n)"
 
 definition divmod_step_integer :: "integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<times> integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<times> integer"
 where
   "divmod_step_integer l qr = (let (q, r) = qr
     in if \<bar>l\<bar> \<le> \<bar>r\<bar> then (2 * q + 1, r - l)
     else (2 * q, r))"
 
 instance by standard
   (auto simp add: divmod_integer'_def divmod_step_integer_def integer_less_eq_iff)
 
 end
 
 declare divmod_algorithm_code [where ?'a = integer,
   folded integer_of_num_def, unfolded integer_of_num_triv,
   code]
 
 lemma integer_of_nat_0: "integer_of_nat 0 = 0"
 by transfer simp
 
 lemma integer_of_nat_1: "integer_of_nat 1 = 1"
 by transfer simp
 
 lemma integer_of_nat_numeral:
   "integer_of_nat (numeral n) = numeral n"
 by transfer simp
 
 
 subsection \<open>Code theorems for target language integers\<close>
 
 text \<open>Constructors\<close>
 
 definition Pos :: "num \<Rightarrow> integer"
 where
   [simp, code_post]: "Pos = numeral"
 
 context
   includes lifting_syntax
 begin
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   \<open>((=) ===> pcr_integer) numeral Pos\<close>
   by simp transfer_prover
 
 end
 
 lemma Pos_fold [code_unfold]:
   "numeral Num.One = Pos Num.One"
   "numeral (Num.Bit0 k) = Pos (Num.Bit0 k)"
   "numeral (Num.Bit1 k) = Pos (Num.Bit1 k)"
   by simp_all
 
 definition Neg :: "num \<Rightarrow> integer"
 where
   [simp, code_abbrev]: "Neg n = - Pos n"
 
 context
   includes lifting_syntax
 begin
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   \<open>((=) ===> pcr_integer) (\<lambda>n. - numeral n) Neg\<close>
   by (unfold Neg_def) transfer_prover
 
 end
 
 code_datatype "0::integer" Pos Neg
 
   
 text \<open>A further pair of constructors for generated computations\<close>
 
 context
 begin  
 
 qualified definition positive :: "num \<Rightarrow> integer"
   where [simp]: "positive = numeral"
 
 qualified definition negative :: "num \<Rightarrow> integer"
   where [simp]: "negative = uminus \<circ> numeral"
 
 lemma [code_computation_unfold]:
   "numeral = positive"
   "Pos = positive"
   "Neg = negative"
   by (simp_all add: fun_eq_iff)
 
 end
 
 
 text \<open>Auxiliary operations\<close>
 
 lift_definition dup :: "integer \<Rightarrow> integer"
   is "\<lambda>k::int. k + k"
   .
 
 lemma dup_code [code]:
   "dup 0 = 0"
   "dup (Pos n) = Pos (Num.Bit0 n)"
   "dup (Neg n) = Neg (Num.Bit0 n)"
   by (transfer, simp only: numeral_Bit0 minus_add_distrib)+
 
 lift_definition sub :: "num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> integer"
   is "\<lambda>m n. numeral m - numeral n :: int"
   .
 
 lemma sub_code [code]:
   "sub Num.One Num.One = 0"
   "sub (Num.Bit0 m) Num.One = Pos (Num.BitM m)"
   "sub (Num.Bit1 m) Num.One = Pos (Num.Bit0 m)"
   "sub Num.One (Num.Bit0 n) = Neg (Num.BitM n)"
   "sub Num.One (Num.Bit1 n) = Neg (Num.Bit0 n)"
   "sub (Num.Bit0 m) (Num.Bit0 n) = dup (sub m n)"
   "sub (Num.Bit1 m) (Num.Bit1 n) = dup (sub m n)"
   "sub (Num.Bit1 m) (Num.Bit0 n) = dup (sub m n) + 1"
   "sub (Num.Bit0 m) (Num.Bit1 n) = dup (sub m n) - 1"
   by (transfer, simp add: dbl_def dbl_inc_def dbl_dec_def)+
 
 
 text \<open>Implementations\<close>
 
 lemma one_integer_code [code, code_unfold]:
   "1 = Pos Num.One"
   by simp
 
 lemma plus_integer_code [code]:
   "k + 0 = (k::integer)"
   "0 + l = (l::integer)"
   "Pos m + Pos n = Pos (m + n)"
   "Pos m + Neg n = sub m n"
   "Neg m + Pos n = sub n m"
   "Neg m + Neg n = Neg (m + n)"
   by (transfer, simp)+
 
 lemma uminus_integer_code [code]:
   "uminus 0 = (0::integer)"
   "uminus (Pos m) = Neg m"
   "uminus (Neg m) = Pos m"
   by simp_all
 
 lemma minus_integer_code [code]:
   "k - 0 = (k::integer)"
   "0 - l = uminus (l::integer)"
   "Pos m - Pos n = sub m n"
   "Pos m - Neg n = Pos (m + n)"
   "Neg m - Pos n = Neg (m + n)"
   "Neg m - Neg n = sub n m"
   by (transfer, simp)+
 
 lemma abs_integer_code [code]:
   "\<bar>k\<bar> = (if (k::integer) < 0 then - k else k)"
   by simp
 
 lemma sgn_integer_code [code]:
   "sgn k = (if k = 0 then 0 else if (k::integer) < 0 then - 1 else 1)"
   by simp
 
 lemma times_integer_code [code]:
   "k * 0 = (0::integer)"
   "0 * l = (0::integer)"
   "Pos m * Pos n = Pos (m * n)"
   "Pos m * Neg n = Neg (m * n)"
   "Neg m * Pos n = Neg (m * n)"
   "Neg m * Neg n = Pos (m * n)"
   by simp_all
 
 definition divmod_integer :: "integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<times> integer"
 where
   "divmod_integer k l = (k div l, k mod l)"
 
 lemma fst_divmod_integer [simp]:
   "fst (divmod_integer k l) = k div l"
   by (simp add: divmod_integer_def)
 
 lemma snd_divmod_integer [simp]:
   "snd (divmod_integer k l) = k mod l"
   by (simp add: divmod_integer_def)
 
 definition divmod_abs :: "integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<times> integer"
 where
   "divmod_abs k l = (\<bar>k\<bar> div \<bar>l\<bar>, \<bar>k\<bar> mod \<bar>l\<bar>)"
 
 lemma fst_divmod_abs [simp]:
   "fst (divmod_abs k l) = \<bar>k\<bar> div \<bar>l\<bar>"
   by (simp add: divmod_abs_def)
 
 lemma snd_divmod_abs [simp]:
   "snd (divmod_abs k l) = \<bar>k\<bar> mod \<bar>l\<bar>"
   by (simp add: divmod_abs_def)
 
 lemma divmod_abs_code [code]:
   "divmod_abs (Pos k) (Pos l) = divmod k l"
   "divmod_abs (Neg k) (Neg l) = divmod k l"
   "divmod_abs (Neg k) (Pos l) = divmod k l"
   "divmod_abs (Pos k) (Neg l) = divmod k l"
   "divmod_abs j 0 = (0, \<bar>j\<bar>)"
   "divmod_abs 0 j = (0, 0)"
   by (simp_all add: prod_eq_iff)
 
 lemma divmod_integer_eq_cases:
   "divmod_integer k l =
     (if k = 0 then (0, 0) else if l = 0 then (0, k) else
     (apsnd \<circ> times \<circ> sgn) l (if sgn k = sgn l
       then divmod_abs k l
       else (let (r, s) = divmod_abs k l in
         if s = 0 then (- r, 0) else (- r - 1, \<bar>l\<bar> - s))))"
 proof -
   have *: "sgn k = sgn l \<longleftrightarrow> k = 0 \<and> l = 0 \<or> 0 < l \<and> 0 < k \<or> l < 0 \<and> k < 0" for k l :: int
     by (auto simp add: sgn_if)
   have **: "- k = l * q \<longleftrightarrow> k = - (l * q)" for k l q :: int
     by auto
   show ?thesis
     by (simp add: divmod_integer_def divmod_abs_def)
       (transfer, auto simp add: * ** not_less zdiv_zminus1_eq_if zmod_zminus1_eq_if div_minus_right mod_minus_right)
 qed
 
 lemma divmod_integer_code [code]: \<^marker>\<open>contributor \<open>René Thiemann\<close>\<close> \<^marker>\<open>contributor \<open>Akihisa Yamada\<close>\<close>
   "divmod_integer k l =
    (if k = 0 then (0, 0)
     else if l > 0 then
             (if k > 0 then Code_Numeral.divmod_abs k l
              else case Code_Numeral.divmod_abs k l of (r, s) \<Rightarrow>
                   if s = 0 then (- r, 0) else (- r - 1, l - s))
     else if l = 0 then (0, k)
     else apsnd uminus
             (if k < 0 then Code_Numeral.divmod_abs k l
              else case Code_Numeral.divmod_abs k l of (r, s) \<Rightarrow>
                   if s = 0 then (- r, 0) else (- r - 1, - l - s)))"
   by (cases l "0 :: integer" rule: linorder_cases)
     (auto split: prod.splits simp add: divmod_integer_eq_cases)
 
 lemma div_integer_code [code]:
   "k div l = fst (divmod_integer k l)"
   by simp
 
 lemma mod_integer_code [code]:
   "k mod l = snd (divmod_integer k l)"
   by simp
 
 definition bit_cut_integer :: "integer \<Rightarrow> integer \<times> bool"
   where "bit_cut_integer k = (k div 2, odd k)"
 
 lemma bit_cut_integer_code [code]:
   "bit_cut_integer k = (if k = 0 then (0, False)
      else let (r, s) = Code_Numeral.divmod_abs k 2
        in (if k > 0 then r else - r - s, s = 1))"
 proof -
   have "bit_cut_integer k = (let (r, s) = divmod_integer k 2 in (r, s = 1))"
     by (simp add: divmod_integer_def bit_cut_integer_def odd_iff_mod_2_eq_one)
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: divmod_integer_code) (auto simp add: split_def)
 qed
 
 lemma equal_integer_code [code]:
   "HOL.equal 0 (0::integer) \<longleftrightarrow> True"
   "HOL.equal 0 (Pos l) \<longleftrightarrow> False"
   "HOL.equal 0 (Neg l) \<longleftrightarrow> False"
   "HOL.equal (Pos k) 0 \<longleftrightarrow> False"
   "HOL.equal (Pos k) (Pos l) \<longleftrightarrow> HOL.equal k l"
   "HOL.equal (Pos k) (Neg l) \<longleftrightarrow> False"
   "HOL.equal (Neg k) 0 \<longleftrightarrow> False"
   "HOL.equal (Neg k) (Pos l) \<longleftrightarrow> False"
   "HOL.equal (Neg k) (Neg l) \<longleftrightarrow> HOL.equal k l"
   by (simp_all add: equal)
 
 lemma equal_integer_refl [code nbe]:
   "HOL.equal (k::integer) k \<longleftrightarrow> True"
   by (fact equal_refl)
 
 lemma less_eq_integer_code [code]:
   "0 \<le> (0::integer) \<longleftrightarrow> True"
   "0 \<le> Pos l \<longleftrightarrow> True"
   "0 \<le> Neg l \<longleftrightarrow> False"
   "Pos k \<le> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> False"
   "Pos k \<le> Pos l \<longleftrightarrow> k \<le> l"
   "Pos k \<le> Neg l \<longleftrightarrow> False"
   "Neg k \<le> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> True"
   "Neg k \<le> Pos l \<longleftrightarrow> True"
   "Neg k \<le> Neg l \<longleftrightarrow> l \<le> k"
   by simp_all
 
 lemma less_integer_code [code]:
   "0 < (0::integer) \<longleftrightarrow> False"
   "0 < Pos l \<longleftrightarrow> True"
   "0 < Neg l \<longleftrightarrow> False"
   "Pos k < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> False"
   "Pos k < Pos l \<longleftrightarrow> k < l"
   "Pos k < Neg l \<longleftrightarrow> False"
   "Neg k < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> True"
   "Neg k < Pos l \<longleftrightarrow> True"
   "Neg k < Neg l \<longleftrightarrow> l < k"
   by simp_all
 
 lift_definition num_of_integer :: "integer \<Rightarrow> num"
   is "num_of_nat \<circ> nat"
   .
 
 lemma num_of_integer_code [code]:
   "num_of_integer k = (if k \<le> 1 then Num.One
      else let
        (l, j) = divmod_integer k 2;
        l' = num_of_integer l;
        l'' = l' + l'
      in if j = 0 then l'' else l'' + Num.One)"
 proof -
   {
     assume "int_of_integer k mod 2 = 1"
     then have "nat (int_of_integer k mod 2) = nat 1" by simp
     moreover assume *: "1 < int_of_integer k"
     ultimately have **: "nat (int_of_integer k) mod 2 = 1" by (simp add: nat_mod_distrib)
     have "num_of_nat (nat (int_of_integer k)) =
       num_of_nat (2 * (nat (int_of_integer k) div 2) + nat (int_of_integer k) mod 2)"
       by simp
     then have "num_of_nat (nat (int_of_integer k)) =
       num_of_nat (nat (int_of_integer k) div 2 + nat (int_of_integer k) div 2 + nat (int_of_integer k) mod 2)"
       by (simp add: mult_2)
     with ** have "num_of_nat (nat (int_of_integer k)) =
       num_of_nat (nat (int_of_integer k) div 2 + nat (int_of_integer k) div 2 + 1)"
       by simp
   }
   note aux = this
   show ?thesis
     by (auto simp add: num_of_integer_def nat_of_integer_def Let_def case_prod_beta
       not_le integer_eq_iff less_eq_integer_def
       nat_mult_distrib nat_div_distrib num_of_nat_One num_of_nat_plus_distrib
        mult_2 [where 'a=nat] aux add_One)
 qed
 
 lemma nat_of_integer_code [code]:
   "nat_of_integer k = (if k \<le> 0 then 0
      else let
        (l, j) = divmod_integer k 2;
        l' = nat_of_integer l;
        l'' = l' + l'
      in if j = 0 then l'' else l'' + 1)"
 proof -
   obtain j where k: "k = integer_of_int j"
   proof
     show "k = integer_of_int (int_of_integer k)" by simp
   qed
   have *: "nat j mod 2 = nat_of_integer (of_int j mod 2)" if "j \<ge> 0"
     using that by transfer (simp add: nat_mod_distrib)
   from k show ?thesis
     by (auto simp add: split_def Let_def nat_of_integer_def nat_div_distrib mult_2 [symmetric]
       minus_mod_eq_mult_div [symmetric] *)
 qed
 
 lemma int_of_integer_code [code]:
   "int_of_integer k = (if k < 0 then - (int_of_integer (- k))
      else if k = 0 then 0
      else let
        (l, j) = divmod_integer k 2;
        l' = 2 * int_of_integer l
      in if j = 0 then l' else l' + 1)"
   by (auto simp add: split_def Let_def integer_eq_iff minus_mod_eq_mult_div [symmetric])
 
 lemma integer_of_int_code [code]:
   "integer_of_int k = (if k < 0 then - (integer_of_int (- k))
      else if k = 0 then 0
      else let
        l = 2 * integer_of_int (k div 2);
        j = k mod 2
      in if j = 0 then l else l + 1)"
   by (auto simp add: split_def Let_def integer_eq_iff minus_mod_eq_mult_div [symmetric])
 
 hide_const (open) Pos Neg sub dup divmod_abs
 
 
 subsection \<open>Serializer setup for target language integers\<close>
 
 code_reserved Eval int Integer abs
 
 code_printing
   type_constructor integer \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "IntInf.int"
     and (OCaml) "Z.t"
     and (Haskell) "Integer"
     and (Scala) "BigInt"
     and (Eval) "int"
 | class_instance integer :: equal \<rightharpoonup>
     (Haskell) -
 
 code_printing
   constant "0::integer" \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "!(0/ :/ IntInf.int)"
     and (OCaml) "Z.zero"
     and (Haskell) "!(0/ ::/ Integer)"
     and (Scala) "BigInt(0)"
 
 setup \<open>
   fold (fn target =>
     Numeral.add_code \<^const_name>\<open>Code_Numeral.Pos\<close> I Code_Printer.literal_numeral target
     #> Numeral.add_code \<^const_name>\<open>Code_Numeral.Neg\<close> (~) Code_Printer.literal_numeral target)
     ["SML", "OCaml", "Haskell", "Scala"]
 \<close>
 
 code_printing
   constant "plus :: integer \<Rightarrow> _ \<Rightarrow> _" \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "IntInf.+ ((_), (_))"
     and (OCaml) "Z.add"
     and (Haskell) infixl 6 "+"
     and (Scala) infixl 7 "+"
     and (Eval) infixl 8 "+"
 | constant "uminus :: integer \<Rightarrow> _" \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "IntInf.~"
     and (OCaml) "Z.neg"
     and (Haskell) "negate"
     and (Scala) "!(- _)"
     and (Eval) "~/ _"
 | constant "minus :: integer \<Rightarrow> _" \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "IntInf.- ((_), (_))"
     and (OCaml) "Z.sub"
     and (Haskell) infixl 6 "-"
     and (Scala) infixl 7 "-"
     and (Eval) infixl 8 "-"
 | constant Code_Numeral.dup \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "IntInf.*/ (2,/ (_))"
     and (OCaml) "Z.shift'_left/ _/ 1"
     and (Haskell) "!(2 * _)"
     and (Scala) "!(2 * _)"
     and (Eval) "!(2 * _)"
 | constant Code_Numeral.sub \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "!(raise/ Fail/ \"sub\")"
     and (OCaml) "failwith/ \"sub\""
     and (Haskell) "error/ \"sub\""
     and (Scala) "!sys.error(\"sub\")"
 | constant "times :: integer \<Rightarrow> _ \<Rightarrow> _" \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "IntInf.* ((_), (_))"
     and (OCaml) "Z.mul"
     and (Haskell) infixl 7 "*"
     and (Scala) infixl 8 "*"
     and (Eval) infixl 9 "*"
 | constant Code_Numeral.divmod_abs \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "IntInf.divMod/ (IntInf.abs _,/ IntInf.abs _)"
     and (OCaml) "!(fun k l ->/ if Z.equal Z.zero l then/ (Z.zero, l) else/ Z.div'_rem/ (Z.abs k)/ (Z.abs l))"
     and (Haskell) "divMod/ (abs _)/ (abs _)"
     and (Scala) "!((k: BigInt) => (l: BigInt) =>/ if (l == 0)/ (BigInt(0), k) else/ (k.abs '/% l.abs))"
     and (Eval) "Integer.div'_mod/ (abs _)/ (abs _)"
 | constant "HOL.equal :: integer \<Rightarrow> _ \<Rightarrow> bool" \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "!((_ : IntInf.int) = _)"
     and (OCaml) "Z.equal"
     and (Haskell) infix 4 "=="
     and (Scala) infixl 5 "=="
     and (Eval) infixl 6 "="
 | constant "less_eq :: integer \<Rightarrow> _ \<Rightarrow> bool" \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "IntInf.<= ((_), (_))"
     and (OCaml) "Z.leq"
     and (Haskell) infix 4 "<="
     and (Scala) infixl 4 "<="
     and (Eval) infixl 6 "<="
 | constant "less :: integer \<Rightarrow> _ \<Rightarrow> bool" \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "IntInf.< ((_), (_))"
     and (OCaml) "Z.lt"
     and (Haskell) infix 4 "<"
     and (Scala) infixl 4 "<"
     and (Eval) infixl 6 "<"
 | constant "abs :: integer \<Rightarrow> _" \<rightharpoonup>
     (SML) "IntInf.abs"
     and (OCaml) "Z.abs"
     and (Haskell) "Prelude.abs"
     and (Scala) "_.abs"
     and (Eval) "abs"
 
 code_identifier
   code_module Code_Numeral \<rightharpoonup> (SML) Arith and (OCaml) Arith and (Haskell) Arith
 
 
 subsection \<open>Type of target language naturals\<close>
 
 typedef natural = "UNIV :: nat set"
   morphisms nat_of_natural natural_of_nat ..
 
 setup_lifting type_definition_natural
 
 lemma natural_eq_iff [termination_simp]:
   "m = n \<longleftrightarrow> nat_of_natural m = nat_of_natural n"
   by transfer rule
 
 lemma natural_eqI:
   "nat_of_natural m = nat_of_natural n \<Longrightarrow> m = n"
   using natural_eq_iff [of m n] by simp
 
 lemma nat_of_natural_of_nat_inverse [simp]:
   "nat_of_natural (natural_of_nat n) = n"
   by transfer rule
 
 lemma natural_of_nat_of_natural_inverse [simp]:
   "natural_of_nat (nat_of_natural n) = n"
   by transfer rule
 
 instantiation natural :: "{comm_monoid_diff, semiring_1}"
 begin
 
 lift_definition zero_natural :: natural
   is "0 :: nat"
   .
 
 declare zero_natural.rep_eq [simp]
 
 lift_definition one_natural :: natural
   is "1 :: nat"
   .
 
 declare one_natural.rep_eq [simp]
 
 lift_definition plus_natural :: "natural \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> natural"
   is "plus :: nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
   .
 
 declare plus_natural.rep_eq [simp]
 
 lift_definition minus_natural :: "natural \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> natural"
   is "minus :: nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
   .
 
 declare minus_natural.rep_eq [simp]
 
 lift_definition times_natural :: "natural \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> natural"
   is "times :: nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
   .
 
 declare times_natural.rep_eq [simp]
 
 instance proof
 qed (transfer, simp add: algebra_simps)+
 
 end
 
 instance natural :: Rings.dvd ..
 
 context
   includes lifting_syntax
 begin
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   \<open>(pcr_natural ===> pcr_natural ===> (\<longleftrightarrow>)) (dvd) (dvd)\<close>
   by (unfold dvd_def) transfer_prover
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   \<open>((\<longleftrightarrow>) ===> pcr_natural) of_bool of_bool\<close>
   by (unfold of_bool_def) transfer_prover
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   \<open>((=) ===> pcr_natural) (\<lambda>n. n) of_nat\<close>
 proof -
   have "rel_fun HOL.eq pcr_natural (of_nat :: nat \<Rightarrow> nat) (of_nat :: nat \<Rightarrow> natural)"
     by (unfold of_nat_def) transfer_prover
   then show ?thesis by (simp add: id_def)
 qed
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   \<open>((=) ===> pcr_natural) numeral numeral\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>((=) ===> pcr_natural) numeral (\<lambda>n. of_nat (numeral n))\<close>
     by transfer_prover
   then show ?thesis by simp
 qed
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   \<open>(pcr_natural ===> (=) ===> pcr_natural) (^) (^)\<close>
   by (unfold power_def) transfer_prover
 
 end
 
 lemma nat_of_natural_of_nat [simp]:
   "nat_of_natural (of_nat n) = n"
   by transfer rule
 
 lemma natural_of_nat_of_nat [simp, code_abbrev]:
   "natural_of_nat = of_nat"
   by transfer rule
 
 lemma of_nat_of_natural [simp]:
   "of_nat (nat_of_natural n) = n"
   by transfer rule
 
 lemma nat_of_natural_numeral [simp]:
   "nat_of_natural (numeral k) = numeral k"
   by transfer rule
 
 instantiation natural :: "{linordered_semiring, equal}"
 begin
 
 lift_definition less_eq_natural :: "natural \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> bool"
   is "less_eq :: nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> bool"
   .
 
 declare less_eq_natural.rep_eq [termination_simp]
 
 lift_definition less_natural :: "natural \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> bool"
   is "less :: nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> bool"
   .
 
 declare less_natural.rep_eq [termination_simp]
 
 lift_definition equal_natural :: "natural \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> bool"
   is "HOL.equal :: nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> bool"
   .
 
 instance proof
 qed (transfer, simp add: algebra_simps equal less_le_not_le [symmetric] linear)+
 
 end
 
 context
   includes lifting_syntax
 begin
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   \<open>(pcr_natural ===> pcr_natural ===> pcr_natural) min min\<close>
   by (unfold min_def) transfer_prover
 
 lemma [transfer_rule]:
   \<open>(pcr_natural ===> pcr_natural ===> pcr_natural) max max\<close>
   by (unfold max_def) transfer_prover
 
 end
 
 lemma nat_of_natural_min [simp]:
   "nat_of_natural (min k l) = min (nat_of_natural k) (nat_of_natural l)"
   by transfer rule
 
 lemma nat_of_natural_max [simp]:
   "nat_of_natural (max k l) = max (nat_of_natural k) (nat_of_natural l)"
   by transfer rule
 
 instantiation natural :: unique_euclidean_semiring
 begin
 
 lift_definition divide_natural :: "natural \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> natural"
   is "divide :: nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
   .
 
 declare divide_natural.rep_eq [simp]
 
 lift_definition modulo_natural :: "natural \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> natural"
   is "modulo :: nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
   .
 
 declare modulo_natural.rep_eq [simp]
 
 lift_definition euclidean_size_natural :: "natural \<Rightarrow> nat"
   is "euclidean_size :: nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
   .
 
 declare euclidean_size_natural.rep_eq [simp]
 
 lift_definition division_segment_natural :: "natural \<Rightarrow> natural"
   is "division_segment :: nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
   .
 
 declare division_segment_natural.rep_eq [simp]
 
 instance
   by (standard; transfer)
     (auto simp add: algebra_simps unit_factor_nat_def gr0_conv_Suc)
 
 end
 
 lemma [code]:
   "euclidean_size = nat_of_natural"
   by (simp add: fun_eq_iff)
 
 lemma [code]:
   "division_segment (n::natural) = 1"
   by (simp add: natural_eq_iff)
 
 instance natural :: discrete_linordered_semidom
   by (standard; transfer) (simp_all add: Suc_le_eq)
 
 instance natural :: linordered_euclidean_semiring
   by (standard; transfer) simp_all
 
 instantiation natural :: semiring_bit_operations
 begin
 
 lift_definition bit_natural :: \<open>natural \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> bool\<close>
   is bit .
 
 lift_definition and_natural :: \<open>natural \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> natural\<close>
   is \<open>and\<close> .
 
 lift_definition or_natural :: \<open>natural \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> natural\<close>
   is or .
 
 lift_definition xor_natural ::  \<open>natural \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> natural\<close>
   is xor .
 
 lift_definition mask_natural :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> natural\<close>
   is mask .
 
 lift_definition set_bit_natural :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> natural\<close>
   is set_bit .
 
 lift_definition unset_bit_natural :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> natural\<close>
   is unset_bit .
 
 lift_definition flip_bit_natural :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> natural\<close>
   is flip_bit .
 
 lift_definition push_bit_natural :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> natural\<close>
   is push_bit .
 
 lift_definition drop_bit_natural :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> natural\<close>
   is drop_bit .
 
 lift_definition take_bit_natural :: \<open>nat \<Rightarrow> natural \<Rightarrow> natural\<close>
   is take_bit .
 
 instance by (standard; transfer)
   (fact bit_induct div_by_0 div_by_1 div_0 even_half_succ_eq
-    half_div_exp_eq even_double_div_exp_iff even_decr_exp_div_exp_iff even_mod_exp_diff_exp_iff
+    half_div_exp_eq even_double_div_exp_iff even_decr_exp_div_exp_iff even_mod_exp_div_exp_iff
     bit_iff_odd push_bit_eq_mult drop_bit_eq_div take_bit_eq_mod
     and_rec or_rec xor_rec mask_eq_exp_minus_1
     set_bit_eq_or unset_bit_eq_or_xor flip_bit_eq_xor not_eq_complement)+
 
 end
 
 instance natural :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_bit_operations ..
 
 context
   includes bit_operations_syntax
 begin
 
 lemma [code]:
   \<open>bit m n \<longleftrightarrow> odd (drop_bit n m)\<close>
   \<open>mask n = 2 ^ n - (1 :: natural)\<close>
   \<open>set_bit n m = m OR push_bit n 1\<close>
   \<open>flip_bit n m = m XOR push_bit n 1\<close>
   \<open>push_bit n m = m * 2 ^ n\<close>
   \<open>drop_bit n m = m div 2 ^ n\<close>
   \<open>take_bit n m = m mod 2 ^ n\<close> for m :: natural
   by (fact bit_iff_odd_drop_bit mask_eq_exp_minus_1
     set_bit_eq_or flip_bit_eq_xor push_bit_eq_mult drop_bit_eq_div take_bit_eq_mod)+
 
 lemma [code]:
   \<open>m AND n = (if m = 0 \<or> n = 0 then 0
     else (m mod 2) * (n mod 2) + 2 * ((m div 2) AND (n div 2)))\<close> for m n :: natural
   by transfer (fact and_nat_unfold)
 
 lemma [code]:
   \<open>m OR n = (if m = 0 then n else if n = 0 then m
     else max (m mod 2) (n mod 2) + 2 * ((m div 2) OR (n div 2)))\<close> for m n :: natural
   by transfer (fact or_nat_unfold)
 
 lemma [code]:
   \<open>m XOR n = (if m = 0 then n else if n = 0 then m
     else (m mod 2 + n mod 2) mod 2 + 2 * ((m div 2) XOR (n div 2)))\<close> for m n :: natural
   by transfer (fact xor_nat_unfold)
 
 lemma [code]:
   \<open>unset_bit 0 m = 2 * (m div 2)\<close>
   \<open>unset_bit (Suc n) m = m mod 2 + 2 * unset_bit n (m div 2)\<close> for m :: natural
   by (transfer; simp add: unset_bit_Suc)+
 
 end
 
 lift_definition natural_of_integer :: "integer \<Rightarrow> natural"
   is "nat :: int \<Rightarrow> nat"
   .
 
 lift_definition integer_of_natural :: "natural \<Rightarrow> integer"
   is "of_nat :: nat \<Rightarrow> int"
   .
 
 lemma natural_of_integer_of_natural [simp]:
   "natural_of_integer (integer_of_natural n) = n"
   by transfer simp
 
 lemma integer_of_natural_of_integer [simp]:
   "integer_of_natural (natural_of_integer k) = max 0 k"
   by transfer auto
 
 lemma int_of_integer_of_natural [simp]:
   "int_of_integer (integer_of_natural n) = of_nat (nat_of_natural n)"
   by transfer rule
 
 lemma integer_of_natural_of_nat [simp]:
   "integer_of_natural (of_nat n) = of_nat n"
   by transfer rule
 
 lemma [measure_function]:
   "is_measure nat_of_natural"
   by (rule is_measure_trivial)
 
 
 subsection \<open>Inductive representation of target language naturals\<close>
 
 lift_definition Suc :: "natural \<Rightarrow> natural"
   is Nat.Suc
   .
 
 declare Suc.rep_eq [simp]
 
 old_rep_datatype "0::natural" Suc
   by (transfer, fact nat.induct nat.inject nat.distinct)+
 
 lemma natural_cases [case_names nat, cases type: natural]:
   fixes m :: natural
   assumes "\<And>n. m = of_nat n \<Longrightarrow> P"
   shows P
   using assms by transfer blast
 
 instantiation natural :: size
 begin
 
 definition size_nat where [simp, code]: "size_nat = nat_of_natural"
 
 instance ..
 
 end
 
 lemma natural_decr [termination_simp]:
   "n \<noteq> 0 \<Longrightarrow> nat_of_natural n - Nat.Suc 0 < nat_of_natural n"
   by transfer simp
 
 lemma natural_zero_minus_one: "(0::natural) - 1 = 0"
   by (rule zero_diff)
 
 lemma Suc_natural_minus_one: "Suc n - 1 = n"
   by transfer simp
 
 hide_const (open) Suc
 
 
 subsection \<open>Code refinement for target language naturals\<close>
 
 lift_definition Nat :: "integer \<Rightarrow> natural"
   is nat
   .
 
 lemma [code_post]:
   "Nat 0 = 0"
   "Nat 1 = 1"
   "Nat (numeral k) = numeral k"
   by (transfer, simp)+
 
 lemma [code abstype]:
   "Nat (integer_of_natural n) = n"
   by transfer simp
 
 lemma [code]:
   "natural_of_nat n = natural_of_integer (integer_of_nat n)"
   by transfer simp
 
 lemma [code abstract]:
   "integer_of_natural (natural_of_integer k) = max 0 k"
   by simp
 
 lemma [code]:
   \<open>integer_of_natural (mask n) = mask n\<close>
   by transfer (simp add: mask_eq_exp_minus_1 of_nat_diff)
 
 lemma [code_abbrev]:
   "natural_of_integer (Code_Numeral.Pos k) = numeral k"
   by transfer simp
 
 lemma [code abstract]:
   "integer_of_natural 0 = 0"
   by transfer simp
 
 lemma [code abstract]:
   "integer_of_natural 1 = 1"
   by transfer simp
 
 lemma [code abstract]:
   "integer_of_natural (Code_Numeral.Suc n) = integer_of_natural n + 1"
   by transfer simp
 
 lemma [code]:
   "nat_of_natural = nat_of_integer \<circ> integer_of_natural"
   by transfer (simp add: fun_eq_iff)
 
 lemma [code, code_unfold]:
   "case_natural f g n = (if n = 0 then f else g (n - 1))"
   by (cases n rule: natural.exhaust) (simp_all, simp add: Suc_def)
 
 declare natural.rec [code del]
 
 lemma [code abstract]:
   "integer_of_natural (m + n) = integer_of_natural m + integer_of_natural n"
   by transfer simp
 
 lemma [code abstract]:
   "integer_of_natural (m - n) = max 0 (integer_of_natural m - integer_of_natural n)"
   by transfer simp
 
 lemma [code abstract]:
   "integer_of_natural (m * n) = integer_of_natural m * integer_of_natural n"
   by transfer simp
 
 lemma [code abstract]:
   "integer_of_natural (m div n) = integer_of_natural m div integer_of_natural n"
   by transfer (simp add: zdiv_int)
 
 lemma [code abstract]:
   "integer_of_natural (m mod n) = integer_of_natural m mod integer_of_natural n"
   by transfer (simp add: zmod_int)
 
 lemma [code]:
   "HOL.equal m n \<longleftrightarrow> HOL.equal (integer_of_natural m) (integer_of_natural n)"
   by transfer (simp add: equal)
 
 lemma [code nbe]: "HOL.equal n (n::natural) \<longleftrightarrow> True"
   by (rule equal_class.equal_refl)
 
 lemma [code]: "m \<le> n \<longleftrightarrow> integer_of_natural m \<le> integer_of_natural n"
   by transfer simp
 
 lemma [code]: "m < n \<longleftrightarrow> integer_of_natural m < integer_of_natural n"
   by transfer simp
 
 hide_const (open) Nat
 
 code_reflect Code_Numeral
   datatypes natural
   functions "Code_Numeral.Suc" "0 :: natural" "1 :: natural"
     "plus :: natural \<Rightarrow> _" "minus :: natural \<Rightarrow> _"
     "times :: natural \<Rightarrow> _" "divide :: natural \<Rightarrow> _"
     "modulo :: natural \<Rightarrow> _"
     integer_of_natural natural_of_integer
 
 lifting_update integer.lifting
 lifting_forget integer.lifting
 
 lifting_update natural.lifting
 lifting_forget natural.lifting
 
 end
diff --git a/src/HOL/Parity.thy b/src/HOL/Parity.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Parity.thy
+++ b/src/HOL/Parity.thy
@@ -1,1384 +1,1392 @@
 (*  Title:      HOL/Parity.thy
     Author:     Jeremy Avigad
     Author:     Jacques D. Fleuriot
 *)
 
 section \<open>Parity in rings and semirings\<close>
 
 theory Parity
   imports Euclidean_Rings
 begin
 
 subsection \<open>Ring structures with parity and \<open>even\<close>/\<open>odd\<close> predicates\<close>
 
 class semiring_parity = comm_semiring_1 + semiring_modulo +
   assumes mod_2_eq_odd: \<open>a mod 2 = of_bool (\<not> 2 dvd a)\<close>
     and odd_one [simp]: \<open>\<not> 2 dvd 1\<close>
     and even_half_succ_eq [simp]: \<open>2 dvd a \<Longrightarrow> (1 + a) div 2 = a div 2\<close>
 begin
 
 abbreviation even :: "'a \<Rightarrow> bool"
   where \<open>even a \<equiv> 2 dvd a\<close>
 
 abbreviation odd :: "'a \<Rightarrow> bool"
   where \<open>odd a \<equiv> \<not> 2 dvd a\<close>
 
 end
 
 class ring_parity = ring + semiring_parity
 begin
 
 subclass comm_ring_1 ..
 
 end
 
 instance nat :: semiring_parity
   by standard (auto simp add: dvd_eq_mod_eq_0)
 
 instance int :: ring_parity
   by standard (auto simp add: dvd_eq_mod_eq_0)
 
 context semiring_parity
 begin
 
 lemma evenE [elim?]:
   assumes \<open>even a\<close>
   obtains b where \<open>a = 2 * b\<close>
   using assms by (rule dvdE)
 
 lemma oddE [elim?]:
   assumes \<open>odd a\<close>
   obtains b where \<open>a = 2 * b + 1\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>a = 2 * (a div 2) + a mod 2\<close>
     by (simp add: mult_div_mod_eq)
   with assms have \<open>a = 2 * (a div 2) + 1\<close>
     by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
   then show thesis ..
 qed
 
 lemma of_bool_odd_eq_mod_2:
   \<open>of_bool (odd a) = a mod 2\<close>
   by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma odd_of_bool_self [simp]:
   \<open>odd (of_bool p) \<longleftrightarrow> p\<close>
   by (cases p) simp_all
 
 lemma not_mod_2_eq_0_eq_1 [simp]:
   \<open>a mod 2 \<noteq> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> a mod 2 = 1\<close>
   by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma not_mod_2_eq_1_eq_0 [simp]:
   \<open>a mod 2 \<noteq> 1 \<longleftrightarrow> a mod 2 = 0\<close>
   by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma even_iff_mod_2_eq_zero:
   \<open>2 dvd a \<longleftrightarrow> a mod 2 = 0\<close>
   by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma odd_iff_mod_2_eq_one:
   \<open>\<not> 2 dvd a \<longleftrightarrow> a mod 2 = 1\<close>
   by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma even_mod_2_iff [simp]:
   \<open>even (a mod 2) \<longleftrightarrow> even a\<close>
   by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma mod2_eq_if:
   "a mod 2 = (if even a then 0 else 1)"
   by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma zero_mod_two_eq_zero [simp]:
   \<open>0 mod 2 = 0\<close>
   by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma one_mod_two_eq_one [simp]:
   \<open>1 mod 2 = 1\<close>
   by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma parity_cases [case_names even odd]:
   assumes \<open>even a \<Longrightarrow> a mod 2 = 0 \<Longrightarrow> P\<close>
   assumes \<open>odd a \<Longrightarrow> a mod 2 = 1 \<Longrightarrow> P\<close>
   shows P
   using assms by (auto simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma even_zero [simp]:
   \<open>even 0\<close>
   by (fact dvd_0_right)
 
 lemma odd_even_add:
   "even (a + b)" if "odd a" and "odd b"
 proof -
   from that obtain c d where "a = 2 * c + 1" and "b = 2 * d + 1"
     by (blast elim: oddE)
   then have "a + b = 2 * c + 2 * d + (1 + 1)"
     by (simp only: ac_simps)
   also have "\<dots> = 2 * (c + d + 1)"
     by (simp add: algebra_simps)
   finally show ?thesis ..
 qed
 
 lemma even_add [simp]:
   "even (a + b) \<longleftrightarrow> (even a \<longleftrightarrow> even b)"
   by (auto simp add: dvd_add_right_iff dvd_add_left_iff odd_even_add)
 
 lemma odd_add [simp]:
   "odd (a + b) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> (odd a \<longleftrightarrow> odd b)"
   by simp
 
 lemma even_plus_one_iff [simp]:
   "even (a + 1) \<longleftrightarrow> odd a"
   by (auto simp add: dvd_add_right_iff intro: odd_even_add)
 
 lemma even_mult_iff [simp]:
   "even (a * b) \<longleftrightarrow> even a \<or> even b" (is "?P \<longleftrightarrow> ?Q")
 proof
   assume ?Q
   then show ?P
     by auto
 next
   assume ?P
   show ?Q
   proof (rule ccontr)
     assume "\<not> (even a \<or> even b)"
     then have "odd a" and "odd b"
       by auto
     then obtain r s where "a = 2 * r + 1" and "b = 2 * s + 1"
       by (blast elim: oddE)
     then have "a * b = (2 * r + 1) * (2 * s + 1)"
       by simp
     also have "\<dots> = 2 * (2 * r * s + r + s) + 1"
       by (simp add: algebra_simps)
     finally have "odd (a * b)"
       by simp
     with \<open>?P\<close> show False
       by auto
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma even_numeral [simp]: "even (numeral (Num.Bit0 n))"
 proof -
   have "even (2 * numeral n)"
     unfolding even_mult_iff by simp
   then have "even (numeral n + numeral n)"
     unfolding mult_2 .
   then show ?thesis
     unfolding numeral.simps .
 qed
 
 lemma odd_numeral [simp]: "odd (numeral (Num.Bit1 n))"
 proof
   assume "even (numeral (num.Bit1 n))"
   then have "even (numeral n + numeral n + 1)"
     unfolding numeral.simps .
   then have "even (2 * numeral n + 1)"
     unfolding mult_2 .
   then have "2 dvd numeral n * 2 + 1"
     by (simp add: ac_simps)
   then have "2 dvd 1"
     using dvd_add_times_triv_left_iff [of 2 "numeral n" 1] by simp
   then show False by simp
 qed
 
 lemma odd_numeral_BitM [simp]:
   \<open>odd (numeral (Num.BitM w))\<close>
   by (cases w) simp_all
 
 lemma even_power [simp]: "even (a ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> even a \<and> n > 0"
   by (induct n) auto
 
 lemma even_prod_iff:
   \<open>even (prod f A) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>a\<in>A. even (f a))\<close> if \<open>finite A\<close>
   using that by (induction A) simp_all
 
+lemma even_half_maybe_succ_eq [simp]:
+  \<open>even a \<Longrightarrow> (of_bool b + a) div 2 = a div 2\<close>
+  by simp
+
+lemma even_half_maybe_succ'_eq [simp]:
+  \<open>even a \<Longrightarrow> (b mod 2 + a) div 2 = a div 2\<close>
+  by (simp add: mod2_eq_if)
+
 lemma mask_eq_sum_exp:
   \<open>2 ^ n - 1 = (\<Sum>m\<in>{q. q < n}. 2 ^ m)\<close>
 proof -
   have *: \<open>{q. q < Suc m} = insert m {q. q < m}\<close> for m
     by auto
   have \<open>2 ^ n = (\<Sum>m\<in>{q. q < n}. 2 ^ m) + 1\<close>
     by (induction n) (simp_all add: ac_simps mult_2 *)
   then have \<open>2 ^ n - 1 = (\<Sum>m\<in>{q. q < n}. 2 ^ m) + 1 - 1\<close>
     by simp
   then show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma (in -) mask_eq_sum_exp_nat:
   \<open>2 ^ n - Suc 0 = (\<Sum>m\<in>{q. q < n}. 2 ^ m)\<close>
   using mask_eq_sum_exp [where ?'a = nat] by simp
 
 end
 
 context ring_parity
 begin
 
 lemma even_minus:
   "even (- a) \<longleftrightarrow> even a"
   by (fact dvd_minus_iff)
 
 lemma even_diff [simp]:
   "even (a - b) \<longleftrightarrow> even (a + b)"
   using even_add [of a "- b"] by simp
 
 end
 
 
 subsection \<open>Instance for \<^typ>\<open>nat\<close>\<close>
 
 lemma even_Suc_Suc_iff [simp]:
   "even (Suc (Suc n)) \<longleftrightarrow> even n"
   using dvd_add_triv_right_iff [of 2 n] by simp
 
 lemma even_Suc [simp]: "even (Suc n) \<longleftrightarrow> odd n"
   using even_plus_one_iff [of n] by simp
 
 lemma even_diff_nat [simp]:
   "even (m - n) \<longleftrightarrow> m < n \<or> even (m + n)" for m n :: nat
 proof (cases "n \<le> m")
   case True
   then have "m - n + n * 2 = m + n" by (simp add: mult_2_right)
   moreover have "even (m - n) \<longleftrightarrow> even (m - n + n * 2)" by simp
   ultimately have "even (m - n) \<longleftrightarrow> even (m + n)" by (simp only:)
   then show ?thesis by auto
 next
   case False
   then show ?thesis by simp
 qed
 
 lemma odd_pos:
   "odd n \<Longrightarrow> 0 < n" for n :: nat
   by (auto elim: oddE)
 
 lemma Suc_double_not_eq_double:
   "Suc (2 * m) \<noteq> 2 * n"
 proof
   assume "Suc (2 * m) = 2 * n"
   moreover have "odd (Suc (2 * m))" and "even (2 * n)"
     by simp_all
   ultimately show False by simp
 qed
 
 lemma double_not_eq_Suc_double:
   "2 * m \<noteq> Suc (2 * n)"
   using Suc_double_not_eq_double [of n m] by simp
 
 lemma odd_Suc_minus_one [simp]: "odd n \<Longrightarrow> Suc (n - Suc 0) = n"
   by (auto elim: oddE)
 
 lemma even_Suc_div_two [simp]:
   "even n \<Longrightarrow> Suc n div 2 = n div 2"
   by auto
 
 lemma odd_Suc_div_two [simp]:
   "odd n \<Longrightarrow> Suc n div 2 = Suc (n div 2)"
   by (auto elim: oddE)
 
 lemma odd_two_times_div_two_nat [simp]:
   assumes "odd n"
   shows "2 * (n div 2) = n - (1 :: nat)"
 proof -
   from assms have "2 * (n div 2) + 1 = n"
     by (auto elim: oddE)
   then have "Suc (2 * (n div 2)) - 1 = n - 1"
     by simp
   then show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma not_mod2_eq_Suc_0_eq_0 [simp]:
   "n mod 2 \<noteq> Suc 0 \<longleftrightarrow> n mod 2 = 0"
   using not_mod_2_eq_1_eq_0 [of n] by simp
 
 lemma odd_card_imp_not_empty:
   \<open>A \<noteq> {}\<close> if \<open>odd (card A)\<close>
   using that by auto
 
 lemma nat_induct2 [case_names 0 1 step]:
   assumes "P 0" "P 1" and step: "\<And>n::nat. P n \<Longrightarrow> P (n + 2)"
   shows "P n"
 proof (induct n rule: less_induct)
   case (less n)
   show ?case
   proof (cases "n < Suc (Suc 0)")
     case True
     then show ?thesis
       using assms by (auto simp: less_Suc_eq)
   next
     case False
     then obtain k where k: "n = Suc (Suc k)"
       by (force simp: not_less nat_le_iff_add)
     then have "k<n"
       by simp
     with less assms have "P (k+2)"
       by blast
     then show ?thesis
       by (simp add: k)
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma mod_double_nat:
   \<open>n mod (2 * m) = n mod m \<or> n mod (2 * m) = n mod m + m\<close>
   for m n :: nat
   by (cases \<open>even (n div m)\<close>)
     (simp_all add: mod_mult2_eq ac_simps even_iff_mod_2_eq_zero)
 
 context semiring_parity
 begin
 
 lemma even_sum_iff:
   \<open>even (sum f A) \<longleftrightarrow> even (card {a\<in>A. odd (f a)})\<close> if \<open>finite A\<close>
 using that proof (induction A)
   case empty
   then show ?case
     by simp
 next
   case (insert a A)
   moreover have \<open>{b \<in> insert a A. odd (f b)} = (if odd (f a) then {a} else {}) \<union> {b \<in> A. odd (f b)}\<close>
     by auto
   ultimately show ?case
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma even_mask_iff [simp]:
   \<open>even (2 ^ n - 1) \<longleftrightarrow> n = 0\<close>
 proof (cases \<open>n = 0\<close>)
   case True
   then show ?thesis
     by simp
 next
   case False
   then have \<open>{a. a = 0 \<and> a < n} = {0}\<close>
     by auto
   then show ?thesis
     by (auto simp add: mask_eq_sum_exp even_sum_iff)
 qed
 
 lemma even_of_nat_iff [simp]:
   "even (of_nat n) \<longleftrightarrow> even n"
   by (induction n) simp_all
 
 end
 
 
 subsection \<open>Parity and powers\<close>
 
 context ring_1
 begin
 
 lemma power_minus_even [simp]: "even n \<Longrightarrow> (- a) ^ n = a ^ n"
   by (auto elim: evenE)
 
 lemma power_minus_odd [simp]: "odd n \<Longrightarrow> (- a) ^ n = - (a ^ n)"
   by (auto elim: oddE)
 
 lemma uminus_power_if:
   "(- a) ^ n = (if even n then a ^ n else - (a ^ n))"
   by auto
 
 lemma neg_one_even_power [simp]: "even n \<Longrightarrow> (- 1) ^ n = 1"
   by simp
 
 lemma neg_one_odd_power [simp]: "odd n \<Longrightarrow> (- 1) ^ n = - 1"
   by simp
 
 lemma neg_one_power_add_eq_neg_one_power_diff: "k \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> (- 1) ^ (n + k) = (- 1) ^ (n - k)"
   by (cases "even (n + k)") auto
 
 lemma minus_one_power_iff: "(- 1) ^ n = (if even n then 1 else - 1)"
   by (induct n) auto
 
 end
 
 context linordered_idom
 begin
 
 lemma zero_le_even_power: "even n \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> a ^ n"
   by (auto elim: evenE)
 
 lemma zero_le_odd_power: "odd n \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> a ^ n \<longleftrightarrow> 0 \<le> a"
   by (auto simp add: power_even_eq zero_le_mult_iff elim: oddE)
 
 lemma zero_le_power_eq: "0 \<le> a ^ n \<longleftrightarrow> even n \<or> odd n \<and> 0 \<le> a"
   by (auto simp add: zero_le_even_power zero_le_odd_power)
 
 lemma zero_less_power_eq: "0 < a ^ n \<longleftrightarrow> n = 0 \<or> even n \<and> a \<noteq> 0 \<or> odd n \<and> 0 < a"
 proof -
   have [simp]: "0 = a ^ n \<longleftrightarrow> a = 0 \<and> n > 0"
     unfolding power_eq_0_iff [of a n, symmetric] by blast
   show ?thesis
     unfolding less_le zero_le_power_eq by auto
 qed
 
 lemma power_less_zero_eq [simp]: "a ^ n < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> odd n \<and> a < 0"
   unfolding not_le [symmetric] zero_le_power_eq by auto
 
 lemma power_le_zero_eq: "a ^ n \<le> 0 \<longleftrightarrow> n > 0 \<and> (odd n \<and> a \<le> 0 \<or> even n \<and> a = 0)"
   unfolding not_less [symmetric] zero_less_power_eq by auto
 
 lemma power_even_abs: "even n \<Longrightarrow> \<bar>a\<bar> ^ n = a ^ n"
   using power_abs [of a n] by (simp add: zero_le_even_power)
 
 lemma power_mono_even:
   assumes "even n" and "\<bar>a\<bar> \<le> \<bar>b\<bar>"
   shows "a ^ n \<le> b ^ n"
 proof -
   have "0 \<le> \<bar>a\<bar>" by auto
   with \<open>\<bar>a\<bar> \<le> \<bar>b\<bar>\<close> have "\<bar>a\<bar> ^ n \<le> \<bar>b\<bar> ^ n"
     by (rule power_mono)
   with \<open>even n\<close> show ?thesis
     by (simp add: power_even_abs)
 qed
 
 lemma power_mono_odd:
   assumes "odd n" and "a \<le> b"
   shows "a ^ n \<le> b ^ n"
 proof (cases "b < 0")
   case True
   with \<open>a \<le> b\<close> have "- b \<le> - a" and "0 \<le> - b" by auto
   then have "(- b) ^ n \<le> (- a) ^ n" by (rule power_mono)
   with \<open>odd n\<close> show ?thesis by simp
 next
   case False
   then have "0 \<le> b" by auto
   show ?thesis
   proof (cases "a < 0")
     case True
     then have "n \<noteq> 0" and "a \<le> 0" using \<open>odd n\<close> [THEN odd_pos] by auto
     then have "a ^ n \<le> 0" unfolding power_le_zero_eq using \<open>odd n\<close> by auto
     moreover from \<open>0 \<le> b\<close> have "0 \<le> b ^ n" by auto
     ultimately show ?thesis by auto
   next
     case False
     then have "0 \<le> a" by auto
     with \<open>a \<le> b\<close> show ?thesis
       using power_mono by auto
   qed
 qed
 
 text \<open>Simplify, when the exponent is a numeral\<close>
 
 lemma zero_le_power_eq_numeral [simp]:
   "0 \<le> a ^ numeral w \<longleftrightarrow> even (numeral w :: nat) \<or> odd (numeral w :: nat) \<and> 0 \<le> a"
   by (fact zero_le_power_eq)
 
 lemma zero_less_power_eq_numeral [simp]:
   "0 < a ^ numeral w \<longleftrightarrow>
     numeral w = (0 :: nat) \<or>
     even (numeral w :: nat) \<and> a \<noteq> 0 \<or>
     odd (numeral w :: nat) \<and> 0 < a"
   by (fact zero_less_power_eq)
 
 lemma power_le_zero_eq_numeral [simp]:
   "a ^ numeral w \<le> 0 \<longleftrightarrow>
     (0 :: nat) < numeral w \<and>
     (odd (numeral w :: nat) \<and> a \<le> 0 \<or> even (numeral w :: nat) \<and> a = 0)"
   by (fact power_le_zero_eq)
 
 lemma power_less_zero_eq_numeral [simp]:
   "a ^ numeral w < 0 \<longleftrightarrow> odd (numeral w :: nat) \<and> a < 0"
   by (fact power_less_zero_eq)
 
 lemma power_even_abs_numeral [simp]:
   "even (numeral w :: nat) \<Longrightarrow> \<bar>a\<bar> ^ numeral w = a ^ numeral w"
   by (fact power_even_abs)
 
 end
 
 
 subsection \<open>Instance for \<^typ>\<open>int\<close>\<close>
   
 lemma even_diff_iff:
   "even (k - l) \<longleftrightarrow> even (k + l)" for k l :: int
   by (fact even_diff)
 
 lemma even_abs_add_iff:
   "even (\<bar>k\<bar> + l) \<longleftrightarrow> even (k + l)" for k l :: int
   by simp
 
 lemma even_add_abs_iff:
   "even (k + \<bar>l\<bar>) \<longleftrightarrow> even (k + l)" for k l :: int
   by simp
 
 lemma even_nat_iff: "0 \<le> k \<Longrightarrow> even (nat k) \<longleftrightarrow> even k"
   by (simp add: even_of_nat_iff [of "nat k", where ?'a = int, symmetric])
 
 context
   assumes "SORT_CONSTRAINT('a::division_ring)"
 begin
 
 lemma power_int_minus_left:
   "power_int (-a :: 'a) n = (if even n then power_int a n else -power_int a n)"
   by (auto simp: power_int_def minus_one_power_iff even_nat_iff)
 
 lemma power_int_minus_left_even [simp]: "even n \<Longrightarrow> power_int (-a :: 'a) n = power_int a n"
   by (simp add: power_int_minus_left)
 
 lemma power_int_minus_left_odd [simp]: "odd n \<Longrightarrow> power_int (-a :: 'a) n = -power_int a n"
   by (simp add: power_int_minus_left)
 
 lemma power_int_minus_left_distrib:
   "NO_MATCH (-1) x \<Longrightarrow> power_int (-a :: 'a) n = power_int (-1) n * power_int a n"
   by (simp add: power_int_minus_left)
 
 lemma power_int_minus_one_minus: "power_int (-1 :: 'a) (-n) = power_int (-1) n"
   by (simp add: power_int_minus_left)
 
 lemma power_int_minus_one_diff_commute: "power_int (-1 :: 'a) (a - b) = power_int (-1) (b - a)"
   by (subst power_int_minus_one_minus [symmetric]) auto
 
 lemma power_int_minus_one_mult_self [simp]:
   "power_int (-1 :: 'a) m * power_int (-1) m = 1"
   by (simp add: power_int_minus_left)
 
 lemma power_int_minus_one_mult_self' [simp]:
   "power_int (-1 :: 'a) m * (power_int (-1) m * b) = b"
   by (simp add: power_int_minus_left)
 
 end
 
 
 subsection \<open>Special case: euclidean rings structurally containing the natural numbers\<close>
 
 class linordered_euclidean_semiring = discrete_linordered_semidom + unique_euclidean_semiring +
   assumes of_nat_div: "of_nat (m div n) = of_nat m div of_nat n"
     and division_segment_of_nat [simp]: "division_segment (of_nat n) = 1"
     and division_segment_euclidean_size [simp]: "division_segment a * of_nat (euclidean_size a) = a"
 begin
 
 lemma division_segment_eq_iff:
   "a = b" if "division_segment a = division_segment b"
     and "euclidean_size a = euclidean_size b"
   using that division_segment_euclidean_size [of a] by simp
 
 lemma euclidean_size_of_nat [simp]:
   "euclidean_size (of_nat n) = n"
 proof -
   have "division_segment (of_nat n) * of_nat (euclidean_size (of_nat n)) = of_nat n"
     by (fact division_segment_euclidean_size)
   then show ?thesis by simp
 qed
 
 lemma of_nat_euclidean_size:
   "of_nat (euclidean_size a) = a div division_segment a"
 proof -
   have "of_nat (euclidean_size a) = division_segment a * of_nat (euclidean_size a) div division_segment a"
     by (subst nonzero_mult_div_cancel_left) simp_all
   also have "\<dots> = a div division_segment a"
     by simp
   finally show ?thesis .
 qed
 
 lemma division_segment_1 [simp]:
   "division_segment 1 = 1"
   using division_segment_of_nat [of 1] by simp
 
 lemma division_segment_numeral [simp]:
   "division_segment (numeral k) = 1"
   using division_segment_of_nat [of "numeral k"] by simp
 
 lemma euclidean_size_1 [simp]:
   "euclidean_size 1 = 1"
   using euclidean_size_of_nat [of 1] by simp
 
 lemma euclidean_size_numeral [simp]:
   "euclidean_size (numeral k) = numeral k"
   using euclidean_size_of_nat [of "numeral k"] by simp
 
 lemma of_nat_dvd_iff:
   "of_nat m dvd of_nat n \<longleftrightarrow> m dvd n" (is "?P \<longleftrightarrow> ?Q")
 proof (cases "m = 0")
   case True
   then show ?thesis
     by simp
 next
   case False
   show ?thesis
   proof
     assume ?Q
     then show ?P
       by auto
   next
     assume ?P
     with False have "of_nat n = of_nat n div of_nat m * of_nat m"
       by simp
     then have "of_nat n = of_nat (n div m * m)"
       by (simp add: of_nat_div)
     then have "n = n div m * m"
       by (simp only: of_nat_eq_iff)
     then have "n = m * (n div m)"
       by (simp add: ac_simps)
     then show ?Q ..
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma of_nat_mod:
   "of_nat (m mod n) = of_nat m mod of_nat n"
 proof -
   have "of_nat m div of_nat n * of_nat n + of_nat m mod of_nat n = of_nat m"
     by (simp add: div_mult_mod_eq)
   also have "of_nat m = of_nat (m div n * n + m mod n)"
     by simp
   finally show ?thesis
     by (simp only: of_nat_div of_nat_mult of_nat_add) simp
 qed
 
 lemma one_div_two_eq_zero [simp]:
   "1 div 2 = 0"
 proof -
   from of_nat_div [symmetric] have "of_nat 1 div of_nat 2 = of_nat 0"
     by (simp only:) simp
   then show ?thesis
     by simp
 qed
 
 lemma one_mod_2_pow_eq [simp]:
   "1 mod (2 ^ n) = of_bool (n > 0)"
 proof -
   have "1 mod (2 ^ n) = of_nat (1 mod (2 ^ n))"
     using of_nat_mod [of 1 "2 ^ n"] by simp
   also have "\<dots> = of_bool (n > 0)"
     by simp
   finally show ?thesis .
 qed
 
 lemma one_div_2_pow_eq [simp]:
   "1 div (2 ^ n) = of_bool (n = 0)"
   using div_mult_mod_eq [of 1 "2 ^ n"] by auto
 
 lemma div_mult2_eq':
   \<open>a div (of_nat m * of_nat n) = a div of_nat m div of_nat n\<close>
 proof (cases \<open>m = 0 \<or> n = 0\<close>)
   case True
   then show ?thesis
     by auto
 next
   case False
   then have \<open>m > 0\<close> \<open>n > 0\<close>
     by simp_all
   show ?thesis
   proof (cases \<open>of_nat m * of_nat n dvd a\<close>)
     case True
     then obtain b where \<open>a = (of_nat m * of_nat n) * b\<close> ..
     then have \<open>a = of_nat m * (of_nat n * b)\<close>
       by (simp add: ac_simps)
     then show ?thesis
       by simp
   next
     case False
     define q where \<open>q = a div (of_nat m * of_nat n)\<close>
     define r where \<open>r = a mod (of_nat m * of_nat n)\<close>
     from \<open>m > 0\<close> \<open>n > 0\<close> \<open>\<not> of_nat m * of_nat n dvd a\<close> r_def have "division_segment r = 1"
       using division_segment_of_nat [of "m * n"] by (simp add: division_segment_mod)
     with division_segment_euclidean_size [of r]
     have "of_nat (euclidean_size r) = r"
       by simp
     have "a mod (of_nat m * of_nat n) div (of_nat m * of_nat n) = 0"
       by simp
     with \<open>m > 0\<close> \<open>n > 0\<close> r_def have "r div (of_nat m * of_nat n) = 0"
       by simp
     with \<open>of_nat (euclidean_size r) = r\<close>
     have "of_nat (euclidean_size r) div (of_nat m * of_nat n) = 0"
       by simp
     then have "of_nat (euclidean_size r div (m * n)) = 0"
       by (simp add: of_nat_div)
     then have "of_nat (euclidean_size r div m div n) = 0"
       by (simp add: div_mult2_eq)
     with \<open>of_nat (euclidean_size r) = r\<close> have "r div of_nat m div of_nat n = 0"
       by (simp add: of_nat_div)
     with \<open>m > 0\<close> \<open>n > 0\<close> q_def
     have "q = (r div of_nat m + q * of_nat n * of_nat m div of_nat m) div of_nat n"
       by simp
     moreover have \<open>a = q * (of_nat m * of_nat n) + r\<close>
       by (simp add: q_def r_def div_mult_mod_eq)
     ultimately show \<open>a div (of_nat m * of_nat n) = a div of_nat m div of_nat n\<close>
       using q_def [symmetric] div_plus_div_distrib_dvd_right [of \<open>of_nat m\<close> \<open>q * (of_nat m * of_nat n)\<close> r]
       by (simp add: ac_simps)
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma mod_mult2_eq':
   "a mod (of_nat m * of_nat n) = of_nat m * (a div of_nat m mod of_nat n) + a mod of_nat m"
 proof -
   have "a div (of_nat m * of_nat n) * (of_nat m * of_nat n) + a mod (of_nat m * of_nat n) = a div of_nat m div of_nat n * of_nat n * of_nat m + (a div of_nat m mod of_nat n * of_nat m + a mod of_nat m)"
     by (simp add: combine_common_factor div_mult_mod_eq)
   moreover have "a div of_nat m div of_nat n * of_nat n * of_nat m = of_nat n * of_nat m * (a div of_nat m div of_nat n)"
     by (simp add: ac_simps)
   ultimately show ?thesis
     by (simp add: div_mult2_eq' mult_commute)
 qed
 
 lemma div_mult2_numeral_eq:
   "a div numeral k div numeral l = a div numeral (k * l)" (is "?A = ?B")
 proof -
   have "?A = a div of_nat (numeral k) div of_nat (numeral l)"
     by simp
   also have "\<dots> = a div (of_nat (numeral k) * of_nat (numeral l))"
     by (fact div_mult2_eq' [symmetric])
   also have "\<dots> = ?B"
     by simp
   finally show ?thesis .
 qed
 
 lemma numeral_Bit0_div_2:
   "numeral (num.Bit0 n) div 2 = numeral n"
 proof -
   have "numeral (num.Bit0 n) = numeral n + numeral n"
     by (simp only: numeral.simps)
   also have "\<dots> = numeral n * 2"
     by (simp add: mult_2_right)
   finally have "numeral (num.Bit0 n) div 2 = numeral n * 2 div 2"
     by simp
   also have "\<dots> = numeral n"
     by (rule nonzero_mult_div_cancel_right) simp
   finally show ?thesis .
 qed
 
 lemma numeral_Bit1_div_2:
   "numeral (num.Bit1 n) div 2 = numeral n"
 proof -
   have "numeral (num.Bit1 n) = numeral n + numeral n + 1"
     by (simp only: numeral.simps)
   also have "\<dots> = numeral n * 2 + 1"
     by (simp add: mult_2_right)
   finally have "numeral (num.Bit1 n) div 2 = (numeral n * 2 + 1) div 2"
     by simp
   also have "\<dots> = numeral n * 2 div 2 + 1 div 2"
     using dvd_triv_right by (rule div_plus_div_distrib_dvd_left)
   also have "\<dots> = numeral n * 2 div 2"
     by simp
   also have "\<dots> = numeral n"
     by (rule nonzero_mult_div_cancel_right) simp
   finally show ?thesis .
 qed
 
 lemma exp_mod_exp:
   \<open>2 ^ m mod 2 ^ n = of_bool (m < n) * 2 ^ m\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>(2::nat) ^ m mod 2 ^ n = of_bool (m < n) * 2 ^ m\<close> (is \<open>?lhs = ?rhs\<close>)
     by (auto simp add: linorder_class.not_less monoid_mult_class.power_add dest!: le_Suc_ex)
   then have \<open>of_nat ?lhs = of_nat ?rhs\<close>
     by simp
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: of_nat_mod)
 qed
 
 lemma mask_mod_exp:
   \<open>(2 ^ n - 1) mod 2 ^ m = 2 ^ min m n - 1\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>(2 ^ n - 1) mod 2 ^ m = 2 ^ min m n - (1::nat)\<close> (is \<open>?lhs = ?rhs\<close>)
   proof (cases \<open>n \<le> m\<close>)
     case True
     then show ?thesis
       by (simp add: Suc_le_lessD)
   next
     case False
     then have \<open>m < n\<close>
       by simp
     then obtain q where n: \<open>n = Suc q + m\<close>
       by (auto dest: less_imp_Suc_add)
     then have \<open>min m n = m\<close>
       by simp
     moreover have \<open>(2::nat) ^ m \<le> 2 * 2 ^ q * 2 ^ m\<close>
       using mult_le_mono1 [of 1 \<open>2 * 2 ^ q\<close> \<open>2 ^ m\<close>] by simp
     with n have \<open>2 ^ n - 1 = (2 ^ Suc q - 1) * 2 ^ m + (2 ^ m - (1::nat))\<close>
       by (simp add: monoid_mult_class.power_add algebra_simps)
     ultimately show ?thesis
       by (simp only: euclidean_semiring_cancel_class.mod_mult_self3) simp
   qed
   then have \<open>of_nat ?lhs = of_nat ?rhs\<close>
     by simp
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: of_nat_mod of_nat_diff)
 qed
 
 lemma of_bool_half_eq_0 [simp]:
   \<open>of_bool b div 2 = 0\<close>
   by simp
 
 lemma of_nat_mod_double:
   \<open>of_nat n mod (2 * of_nat m) = of_nat n mod of_nat m \<or> of_nat n mod (2 * of_nat m) = of_nat n mod of_nat m + of_nat m\<close>
   by (simp add: mod_double_nat flip: of_nat_mod of_nat_add of_nat_mult of_nat_numeral)
 
 end
 
 instance nat :: linordered_euclidean_semiring
   by standard simp_all
 
 instance int :: linordered_euclidean_semiring
   by standard (auto simp add: divide_int_def division_segment_int_def elim: contrapos_np)
 
 context linordered_euclidean_semiring
 begin
 
 subclass semiring_parity
 proof
   show \<open>a mod 2 = of_bool (\<not> 2 dvd a)\<close> for a
   proof (cases \<open>2 dvd a\<close>)
     case True
     then show ?thesis
       by (simp add: dvd_eq_mod_eq_0)
   next
     case False
     have eucl: "euclidean_size (a mod 2) = 1"
     proof (rule Orderings.order_antisym)
       show "euclidean_size (a mod 2) \<le> 1"
         using mod_size_less [of 2 a] by simp
       show "1 \<le> euclidean_size (a mod 2)"
         using \<open>\<not> 2 dvd a\<close> by (simp add: Suc_le_eq dvd_eq_mod_eq_0)
     qed 
     from \<open>\<not> 2 dvd a\<close> have "\<not> of_nat 2 dvd division_segment a * of_nat (euclidean_size a)"
       by simp
     then have "\<not> of_nat 2 dvd of_nat (euclidean_size a)"
       by (auto simp only: dvd_mult_unit_iff' is_unit_division_segment)
     then have "\<not> 2 dvd euclidean_size a"
       using of_nat_dvd_iff [of 2] by simp
     then have "euclidean_size a mod 2 = 1"
       by (simp add: semidom_modulo_class.dvd_eq_mod_eq_0)
     then have "of_nat (euclidean_size a mod 2) = of_nat 1"
       by simp
     then have "of_nat (euclidean_size a) mod 2 = 1"
       by (simp add: of_nat_mod)
     from \<open>\<not> 2 dvd a\<close> eucl
     have "a mod 2 = 1"
       by (auto intro: division_segment_eq_iff simp add: division_segment_mod)
     with \<open>\<not> 2 dvd a\<close> show ?thesis
       by simp
   qed
   show \<open>\<not> is_unit 2\<close>
   proof
     assume \<open>is_unit 2\<close>
     then have \<open>of_nat 2 dvd of_nat 1\<close>
       by simp
     then have \<open>is_unit (2::nat)\<close>
       by (simp only: of_nat_dvd_iff)
     then show False
       by simp
   qed
   show \<open>(1 + a) div 2 = a div 2\<close> if \<open>2 dvd a\<close> for a
     using that by auto
 qed
 
 lemma even_succ_div_two [simp]:
   "even a \<Longrightarrow> (a + 1) div 2 = a div 2"
   by (cases "a = 0") (auto elim!: evenE dest: mult_not_zero)
 
 lemma odd_succ_div_two [simp]:
   "odd a \<Longrightarrow> (a + 1) div 2 = a div 2 + 1"
   by (auto elim!: oddE simp add: add.assoc)
 
 lemma even_two_times_div_two:
   "even a \<Longrightarrow> 2 * (a div 2) = a"
   by (fact dvd_mult_div_cancel)
 
 lemma odd_two_times_div_two_succ [simp]:
   "odd a \<Longrightarrow> 2 * (a div 2) + 1 = a"
   using mult_div_mod_eq [of 2 a]
   by (simp add: even_iff_mod_2_eq_zero)
 
 lemma coprime_left_2_iff_odd [simp]:
   "coprime 2 a \<longleftrightarrow> odd a"
 proof
   assume "odd a"
   show "coprime 2 a"
   proof (rule coprimeI)
     fix b
     assume "b dvd 2" "b dvd a"
     then have "b dvd a mod 2"
       by (auto intro: dvd_mod)
     with \<open>odd a\<close> show "is_unit b"
       by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
   qed
 next
   assume "coprime 2 a"
   show "odd a"
   proof (rule notI)
     assume "even a"
     then obtain b where "a = 2 * b" ..
     with \<open>coprime 2 a\<close> have "coprime 2 (2 * b)"
       by simp
     moreover have "\<not> coprime 2 (2 * b)"
       by (rule not_coprimeI [of 2]) simp_all
     ultimately show False
       by blast
   qed
 qed
 
 lemma coprime_right_2_iff_odd [simp]:
   "coprime a 2 \<longleftrightarrow> odd a"
   using coprime_left_2_iff_odd [of a] by (simp add: ac_simps)
 
 end
 
 lemma minus_1_mod_2_eq [simp]:
   \<open>- 1 mod 2 = (1::int)\<close>
   by (simp add: mod_2_eq_odd)
 
 lemma minus_1_div_2_eq [simp]:
   "- 1 div 2 = - (1::int)"
 proof -
   from div_mult_mod_eq [of "- 1 :: int" 2]
   have "- 1 div 2 * 2 = - 1 * (2 :: int)"
     using add_implies_diff by fastforce
   then show ?thesis
     using mult_right_cancel [of 2 "- 1 div 2" "- (1 :: int)"] by simp
 qed
 
 context linordered_euclidean_semiring
 begin
 
 lemma even_decr_exp_div_exp_iff':
   \<open>even ((2 ^ m - 1) div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n\<close>
 proof -
   have \<open>even ((2 ^ m - 1) div 2 ^ n) \<longleftrightarrow> even (of_nat ((2 ^ m - Suc 0) div 2 ^ n))\<close>
     by (simp only: of_nat_div) (simp add: of_nat_diff)
   also have \<open>\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> even ((2 ^ m - Suc 0) div 2 ^ n)\<close>
     by simp
   also have \<open>\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n\<close>
   proof (cases \<open>m \<le> n\<close>)
     case True
     then show ?thesis
       by (simp add: Suc_le_lessD)
   next
     case False
     then obtain r where r: \<open>m = n + Suc r\<close>
       using less_imp_Suc_add by fastforce
     from r have \<open>{q. q < m} \<inter> {q. 2 ^ n dvd (2::nat) ^ q} = {q. n \<le> q \<and> q < m}\<close>
       by (auto simp add: dvd_power_iff_le)
     moreover from r have \<open>{q. q < m} \<inter> {q. \<not> 2 ^ n dvd (2::nat) ^ q} = {q. q < n}\<close>
       by (auto simp add: dvd_power_iff_le)
     moreover from False have \<open>{q. n \<le> q \<and> q < m \<and> q \<le> n} = {n}\<close>
       by auto
     then have \<open>odd ((\<Sum>a\<in>{q. n \<le> q \<and> q < m}. 2 ^ a div (2::nat) ^ n) + sum ((^) 2) {q. q < n} div 2 ^ n)\<close>
       by (simp_all add: euclidean_semiring_cancel_class.power_diff_power_eq semiring_parity_class.even_sum_iff
         linorder_class.not_less mask_eq_sum_exp_nat [symmetric])
     ultimately have \<open>odd (sum ((^) (2::nat)) {q. q < m} div 2 ^ n)\<close>
       by (subst euclidean_semiring_cancel_class.sum_div_partition) simp_all
     with False show ?thesis
       by (simp add: mask_eq_sum_exp_nat)
   qed
   finally show ?thesis .
 qed
 
 end
 
 
 subsection \<open>Generic symbolic computations\<close>
 
 text \<open>
   The following type class contains everything necessary to formulate
   a division algorithm in ring structures with numerals, restricted
   to its positive segments.
 \<close>
 
 class linordered_euclidean_semiring_division = linordered_euclidean_semiring +
   fixes divmod :: \<open>num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> 'a \<times> 'a\<close>
     and divmod_step :: \<open>'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<times> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a \<times> 'a\<close> \<comment> \<open>
       These are conceptually definitions but force generated code
       to be monomorphic wrt. particular instances of this class which
       yields a significant speedup.\<close>
   assumes divmod_def: \<open>divmod m n = (numeral m div numeral n, numeral m mod numeral n)\<close>
     and divmod_step_def [simp]: \<open>divmod_step l (q, r) =
       (if euclidean_size l \<le> euclidean_size r then (2 * q + 1, r - l)
        else (2 * q, r))\<close> \<comment> \<open>
          This is a formulation of one step (referring to one digit position)
          in school-method division: compare the dividend at the current
          digit position with the remainder from previous division steps
          and evaluate accordingly.\<close>
 begin
 
 lemma fst_divmod:
   \<open>fst (divmod m n) = numeral m div numeral n\<close>
   by (simp add: divmod_def)
 
 lemma snd_divmod:
   \<open>snd (divmod m n) = numeral m mod numeral n\<close>
   by (simp add: divmod_def)
 
 text \<open>
   Following a formulation of school-method division.
   If the divisor is smaller than the dividend, terminate.
   If not, shift the dividend to the right until termination
   occurs and then reiterate single division steps in the
   opposite direction.
 \<close>
 
 lemma divmod_divmod_step:
   \<open>divmod m n = (if m < n then (0, numeral m)
     else divmod_step (numeral n) (divmod m (Num.Bit0 n)))\<close>
 proof (cases \<open>m < n\<close>)
   case True
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: prod_eq_iff fst_divmod snd_divmod flip: of_nat_numeral of_nat_div of_nat_mod)
 next
   case False
   define r s t where \<open>r = (numeral m :: nat)\<close> \<open>s = (numeral n :: nat)\<close> \<open>t = 2 * s\<close>
   then have *: \<open>numeral m = of_nat r\<close> \<open>numeral n = of_nat s\<close> \<open>numeral (num.Bit0 n) = of_nat t\<close>
     and \<open>\<not> s \<le> r mod s\<close>
     by (simp_all add: linorder_class.not_le)
   have t: \<open>2 * (r div t) = r div s - r div s mod 2\<close>
     \<open>r mod t = s * (r div s mod 2) + r mod s\<close>
     by (simp add: Rings.minus_mod_eq_mult_div Groups.mult.commute [of 2] Euclidean_Rings.div_mult2_eq \<open>t = 2 * s\<close>)
       (use mod_mult2_eq [of r s 2] in \<open>simp add: ac_simps \<open>t = 2 * s\<close>\<close>)
   have rs: \<open>r div s mod 2 = 0 \<or> r div s mod 2 = Suc 0\<close>
     by auto
   from \<open>\<not> s \<le> r mod s\<close> have \<open>s \<le> r mod t \<Longrightarrow>
      r div s = Suc (2 * (r div t)) \<and>
      r mod s = r mod t - s\<close>
     using rs
     by (auto simp add: t)
   moreover have \<open>r mod t < s \<Longrightarrow>
      r div s = 2 * (r div t) \<and>
      r mod s = r mod t\<close>
     using rs
     by (auto simp add: t)
   ultimately show ?thesis
     by (simp add: divmod_def prod_eq_iff split_def Let_def
         not_less mod_eq_0_iff_dvd Rings.mod_eq_0_iff_dvd False not_le *)
     (simp add: flip: of_nat_numeral of_nat_mult add.commute [of 1] of_nat_div of_nat_mod of_nat_Suc of_nat_diff)
 qed
 
 text \<open>The division rewrite proper -- first, trivial results involving \<open>1\<close>\<close>
 
 lemma divmod_trivial [simp]:
   "divmod m Num.One = (numeral m, 0)"
   "divmod num.One (num.Bit0 n) = (0, Numeral1)"
   "divmod num.One (num.Bit1 n) = (0, Numeral1)"
   using divmod_divmod_step [of "Num.One"] by (simp_all add: divmod_def)
 
 text \<open>Division by an even number is a right-shift\<close>
 
 lemma divmod_cancel [simp]:
   \<open>divmod (Num.Bit0 m) (Num.Bit0 n) = (case divmod m n of (q, r) \<Rightarrow> (q, 2 * r))\<close> (is ?P)
   \<open>divmod (Num.Bit1 m) (Num.Bit0 n) = (case divmod m n of (q, r) \<Rightarrow> (q, 2 * r + 1))\<close> (is ?Q)
 proof -
   define r s where \<open>r = (numeral m :: nat)\<close> \<open>s = (numeral n :: nat)\<close>
   then have *: \<open>numeral m = of_nat r\<close> \<open>numeral n = of_nat s\<close>
     \<open>numeral (num.Bit0 m) = of_nat (2 * r)\<close> \<open>numeral (num.Bit0 n) = of_nat (2 * s)\<close>
     \<open>numeral (num.Bit1 m) = of_nat (Suc (2 * r))\<close>
     by simp_all
   have **: \<open>Suc (2 * r) div 2 = r\<close>
     by simp
   show ?P and ?Q
     by (simp_all add: divmod_def *)
       (simp_all flip: of_nat_numeral of_nat_div of_nat_mod of_nat_mult add.commute [of 1] of_nat_Suc
        add: Euclidean_Rings.mod_mult_mult1 div_mult2_eq [of _ 2] mod_mult2_eq [of _ 2] **)
 qed
 
 text \<open>The really hard work\<close>
 
 lemma divmod_steps [simp]:
   "divmod (num.Bit0 m) (num.Bit1 n) =
       (if m \<le> n then (0, numeral (num.Bit0 m))
        else divmod_step (numeral (num.Bit1 n))
              (divmod (num.Bit0 m)
                (num.Bit0 (num.Bit1 n))))"
   "divmod (num.Bit1 m) (num.Bit1 n) =
       (if m < n then (0, numeral (num.Bit1 m))
        else divmod_step (numeral (num.Bit1 n))
              (divmod (num.Bit1 m)
                (num.Bit0 (num.Bit1 n))))"
   by (simp_all add: divmod_divmod_step)
 
 lemmas divmod_algorithm_code = divmod_trivial divmod_cancel divmod_steps
 
 text \<open>Special case: divisibility\<close>
 
 definition divides_aux :: "'a \<times> 'a \<Rightarrow> bool"
 where
   "divides_aux qr \<longleftrightarrow> snd qr = 0"
 
 lemma divides_aux_eq [simp]:
   "divides_aux (q, r) \<longleftrightarrow> r = 0"
   by (simp add: divides_aux_def)
 
 lemma dvd_numeral_simp [simp]:
   "numeral m dvd numeral n \<longleftrightarrow> divides_aux (divmod n m)"
   by (simp add: divmod_def mod_eq_0_iff_dvd)
 
 text \<open>Generic computation of quotient and remainder\<close>
 
 lemma numeral_div_numeral [simp]:
   "numeral k div numeral l = fst (divmod k l)"
   by (simp add: fst_divmod)
 
 lemma numeral_mod_numeral [simp]:
   "numeral k mod numeral l = snd (divmod k l)"
   by (simp add: snd_divmod)
 
 lemma one_div_numeral [simp]:
   "1 div numeral n = fst (divmod num.One n)"
   by (simp add: fst_divmod)
 
 lemma one_mod_numeral [simp]:
   "1 mod numeral n = snd (divmod num.One n)"
   by (simp add: snd_divmod)
 
 end
 
 instantiation nat :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division
 begin
 
 definition divmod_nat :: "num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> nat \<times> nat"
 where
   divmod'_nat_def: "divmod_nat m n = (numeral m div numeral n, numeral m mod numeral n)"
 
 definition divmod_step_nat :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<times> nat \<Rightarrow> nat \<times> nat"
 where
   "divmod_step_nat l qr = (let (q, r) = qr
     in if r \<ge> l then (2 * q + 1, r - l)
     else (2 * q, r))"
 
 instance
   by standard (simp_all add: divmod'_nat_def divmod_step_nat_def)
 
 end
 
 declare divmod_algorithm_code [where ?'a = nat, code]
 
 lemma Suc_0_div_numeral [simp]:
   \<open>Suc 0 div numeral Num.One = 1\<close>
   \<open>Suc 0 div numeral (Num.Bit0 n) = 0\<close>
   \<open>Suc 0 div numeral (Num.Bit1 n) = 0\<close>
   by simp_all
 
 lemma Suc_0_mod_numeral [simp]:
   \<open>Suc 0 mod numeral Num.One = 0\<close>
   \<open>Suc 0 mod numeral (Num.Bit0 n) = 1\<close>
   \<open>Suc 0 mod numeral (Num.Bit1 n) = 1\<close>
   by simp_all
 
 instantiation int :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division
 begin
 
 definition divmod_int :: "num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> int \<times> int"
 where
   "divmod_int m n = (numeral m div numeral n, numeral m mod numeral n)"
 
 definition divmod_step_int :: "int \<Rightarrow> int \<times> int \<Rightarrow> int \<times> int"
 where
   "divmod_step_int l qr = (let (q, r) = qr
     in if \<bar>l\<bar> \<le> \<bar>r\<bar> then (2 * q + 1, r - l)
     else (2 * q, r))"
 
 instance
   by standard (auto simp add: divmod_int_def divmod_step_int_def)
 
 end
 
 declare divmod_algorithm_code [where ?'a = int, code]
 
 context
 begin
 
 qualified definition adjust_div :: "int \<times> int \<Rightarrow> int"
 where
   "adjust_div qr = (let (q, r) = qr in q + of_bool (r \<noteq> 0))"
 
 qualified lemma adjust_div_eq [simp, code]:
   "adjust_div (q, r) = q + of_bool (r \<noteq> 0)"
   by (simp add: adjust_div_def)
 
 qualified definition adjust_mod :: "num \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> int"
 where
   [simp]: "adjust_mod l r = (if r = 0 then 0 else numeral l - r)"
 
 lemma minus_numeral_div_numeral [simp]:
   "- numeral m div numeral n = - (adjust_div (divmod m n) :: int)"
 proof -
   have "int (fst (divmod m n)) = fst (divmod m n)"
     by (simp only: fst_divmod divide_int_def) auto
   then show ?thesis
     by (auto simp add: split_def Let_def adjust_div_def divides_aux_def divide_int_def)
 qed
 
 lemma minus_numeral_mod_numeral [simp]:
   "- numeral m mod numeral n = adjust_mod n (snd (divmod m n) :: int)"
 proof (cases "snd (divmod m n) = (0::int)")
   case True
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: mod_eq_0_iff_dvd divides_aux_def)
 next
   case False
   then have "int (snd (divmod m n)) = snd (divmod m n)" if "snd (divmod m n) \<noteq> (0::int)"
     by (simp only: snd_divmod modulo_int_def) auto
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: divides_aux_def adjust_div_def)
       (simp add: divides_aux_def modulo_int_def)
 qed
 
 lemma numeral_div_minus_numeral [simp]:
   "numeral m div - numeral n = - (adjust_div (divmod m n) :: int)"
 proof -
   have "int (fst (divmod m n)) = fst (divmod m n)"
     by (simp only: fst_divmod divide_int_def) auto
   then show ?thesis
     by (auto simp add: split_def Let_def adjust_div_def divides_aux_def divide_int_def)
 qed
 
 lemma numeral_mod_minus_numeral [simp]:
   "numeral m mod - numeral n = - adjust_mod n (snd (divmod m n) :: int)"
 proof (cases "snd (divmod m n) = (0::int)")
   case True
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: mod_eq_0_iff_dvd divides_aux_def)
 next
   case False
   then have "int (snd (divmod m n)) = snd (divmod m n)" if "snd (divmod m n) \<noteq> (0::int)"
     by (simp only: snd_divmod modulo_int_def) auto
   then show ?thesis
     by (simp add: divides_aux_def adjust_div_def)
       (simp add: divides_aux_def modulo_int_def)
 qed
 
 lemma minus_one_div_numeral [simp]:
   "- 1 div numeral n = - (adjust_div (divmod Num.One n) :: int)"
   using minus_numeral_div_numeral [of Num.One n] by simp
 
 lemma minus_one_mod_numeral [simp]:
   "- 1 mod numeral n = adjust_mod n (snd (divmod Num.One n) :: int)"
   using minus_numeral_mod_numeral [of Num.One n] by simp
 
 lemma one_div_minus_numeral [simp]:
   "1 div - numeral n = - (adjust_div (divmod Num.One n) :: int)"
   using numeral_div_minus_numeral [of Num.One n] by simp
 
 lemma one_mod_minus_numeral [simp]:
   "1 mod - numeral n = - adjust_mod n (snd (divmod Num.One n) :: int)"
   using numeral_mod_minus_numeral [of Num.One n] by simp
 
 lemma [code]:
   fixes k :: int
   shows
     "k div 0 = 0"
     "k mod 0 = k"
     "0 div k = 0"
     "0 mod k = 0"
     "k div Int.Pos Num.One = k"
     "k mod Int.Pos Num.One = 0"
     "k div Int.Neg Num.One = - k"
     "k mod Int.Neg Num.One = 0"
     "Int.Pos m div Int.Pos n = (fst (divmod m n) :: int)"
     "Int.Pos m mod Int.Pos n = (snd (divmod m n) :: int)"
     "Int.Neg m div Int.Pos n = - (adjust_div (divmod m n) :: int)"
     "Int.Neg m mod Int.Pos n = adjust_mod n (snd (divmod m n) :: int)"
     "Int.Pos m div Int.Neg n = - (adjust_div (divmod m n) :: int)"
     "Int.Pos m mod Int.Neg n = - adjust_mod n (snd (divmod m n) :: int)"
     "Int.Neg m div Int.Neg n = (fst (divmod m n) :: int)"
     "Int.Neg m mod Int.Neg n = - (snd (divmod m n) :: int)"
   by simp_all
 
 end
 
 lemma divmod_BitM_2_eq [simp]:
   \<open>divmod (Num.BitM m) (Num.Bit0 Num.One) = (numeral m - 1, (1 :: int))\<close>
   by (cases m) simp_all
 
 
 subsubsection \<open>Computation by simplification\<close>
 
 lemma euclidean_size_nat_less_eq_iff:
   \<open>euclidean_size m \<le> euclidean_size n \<longleftrightarrow> m \<le> n\<close> for m n :: nat
   by simp
 
 lemma euclidean_size_int_less_eq_iff:
   \<open>euclidean_size k \<le> euclidean_size l \<longleftrightarrow> \<bar>k\<bar> \<le> \<bar>l\<bar>\<close> for k l :: int
   by auto
 
 simproc_setup numeral_divmod
   ("0 div 0 :: 'a :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division" | "0 mod 0 :: 'a :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division" |
    "0 div 1 :: 'a :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division" | "0 mod 1 :: 'a :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division" |
    "0 div - 1 :: int" | "0 mod - 1 :: int" |
    "0 div numeral b :: 'a :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division" | "0 mod numeral b :: 'a :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division" |
    "0 div - numeral b :: int" | "0 mod - numeral b :: int" |
    "1 div 0 :: 'a :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division" | "1 mod 0 :: 'a :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division" |
    "1 div 1 :: 'a :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division" | "1 mod 1 :: 'a :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division" |
    "1 div - 1 :: int" | "1 mod - 1 :: int" |
    "1 div numeral b :: 'a :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division" | "1 mod numeral b :: 'a :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division" |
    "1 div - numeral b :: int" |"1 mod - numeral b :: int" |
    "- 1 div 0 :: int" | "- 1 mod 0 :: int" | "- 1 div 1 :: int" | "- 1 mod 1 :: int" |
    "- 1 div - 1 :: int" | "- 1 mod - 1 :: int" | "- 1 div numeral b :: int" | "- 1 mod numeral b :: int" |
    "- 1 div - numeral b :: int" | "- 1 mod - numeral b :: int" |
    "numeral a div 0 :: 'a :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division" | "numeral a mod 0 :: 'a :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division" |
    "numeral a div 1 :: 'a :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division" | "numeral a mod 1 :: 'a :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division" |
    "numeral a div - 1 :: int" | "numeral a mod - 1 :: int" |
    "numeral a div numeral b :: 'a :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division" | "numeral a mod numeral b :: 'a :: linordered_euclidean_semiring_division" |
    "numeral a div - numeral b :: int" | "numeral a mod - numeral b :: int" |
    "- numeral a div 0 :: int" | "- numeral a mod 0 :: int" |
    "- numeral a div 1 :: int" | "- numeral a mod 1 :: int" |
    "- numeral a div - 1 :: int" | "- numeral a mod - 1 :: int" |
    "- numeral a div numeral b :: int" | "- numeral a mod numeral b :: int" |
    "- numeral a div - numeral b :: int" | "- numeral a mod - numeral b :: int") = \<open>
   let
     val if_cong = the (Code.get_case_cong \<^theory> \<^const_name>\<open>If\<close>);
     fun successful_rewrite ctxt ct =
       let
         val thm = Simplifier.rewrite ctxt ct
       in if Thm.is_reflexive thm then NONE else SOME thm end;
     val simps = @{thms div_0 mod_0 div_by_0 mod_by_0 div_by_1 mod_by_1
       one_div_numeral one_mod_numeral minus_one_div_numeral minus_one_mod_numeral
       one_div_minus_numeral one_mod_minus_numeral
       numeral_div_numeral numeral_mod_numeral minus_numeral_div_numeral minus_numeral_mod_numeral
       numeral_div_minus_numeral numeral_mod_minus_numeral
       div_minus_minus mod_minus_minus Parity.adjust_div_eq of_bool_eq one_neq_zero
       numeral_neq_zero neg_equal_0_iff_equal arith_simps arith_special divmod_trivial
       divmod_cancel divmod_steps divmod_step_def fst_conv snd_conv numeral_One
       case_prod_beta rel_simps Parity.adjust_mod_def div_minus1_right mod_minus1_right
       minus_minus numeral_times_numeral mult_zero_right mult_1_right
       euclidean_size_nat_less_eq_iff euclidean_size_int_less_eq_iff diff_nat_numeral nat_numeral}
       @ [@{lemma "0 = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> True" by simp}];
     val simpset =
       HOL_ss |> Simplifier.simpset_map \<^context>
         (Simplifier.add_cong if_cong #> fold Simplifier.add_simp simps);
   in K (fn ctxt => successful_rewrite (Simplifier.put_simpset simpset ctxt)) end
 \<close> \<comment> \<open>
   There is space for improvement here: the calculation itself
   could be carried out outside the logic, and a generic simproc
   (simplifier setup) for generic calculation would be helpful.
 \<close>
 
 
 subsection \<open>Computing congruences modulo \<open>2 ^ q\<close>\<close>
 
 context linordered_euclidean_semiring_division
 begin
 
 lemma cong_exp_iff_simps:
   "numeral n mod numeral Num.One = 0
     \<longleftrightarrow> True"
   "numeral (Num.Bit0 n) mod numeral (Num.Bit0 q) = 0
     \<longleftrightarrow> numeral n mod numeral q = 0"
   "numeral (Num.Bit1 n) mod numeral (Num.Bit0 q) = 0
     \<longleftrightarrow> False"
   "numeral m mod numeral Num.One = (numeral n mod numeral Num.One)
     \<longleftrightarrow> True"
   "numeral Num.One mod numeral (Num.Bit0 q) = (numeral Num.One mod numeral (Num.Bit0 q))
     \<longleftrightarrow> True"
   "numeral Num.One mod numeral (Num.Bit0 q) = (numeral (Num.Bit0 n) mod numeral (Num.Bit0 q))
     \<longleftrightarrow> False"
   "numeral Num.One mod numeral (Num.Bit0 q) = (numeral (Num.Bit1 n) mod numeral (Num.Bit0 q))
     \<longleftrightarrow> (numeral n mod numeral q) = 0"
   "numeral (Num.Bit0 m) mod numeral (Num.Bit0 q) = (numeral Num.One mod numeral (Num.Bit0 q))
     \<longleftrightarrow> False"
   "numeral (Num.Bit0 m) mod numeral (Num.Bit0 q) = (numeral (Num.Bit0 n) mod numeral (Num.Bit0 q))
     \<longleftrightarrow> numeral m mod numeral q = (numeral n mod numeral q)"
   "numeral (Num.Bit0 m) mod numeral (Num.Bit0 q) = (numeral (Num.Bit1 n) mod numeral (Num.Bit0 q))
     \<longleftrightarrow> False"
   "numeral (Num.Bit1 m) mod numeral (Num.Bit0 q) = (numeral Num.One mod numeral (Num.Bit0 q))
     \<longleftrightarrow> (numeral m mod numeral q) = 0"
   "numeral (Num.Bit1 m) mod numeral (Num.Bit0 q) = (numeral (Num.Bit0 n) mod numeral (Num.Bit0 q))
     \<longleftrightarrow> False"
   "numeral (Num.Bit1 m) mod numeral (Num.Bit0 q) = (numeral (Num.Bit1 n) mod numeral (Num.Bit0 q))
     \<longleftrightarrow> numeral m mod numeral q = (numeral n mod numeral q)"
   by (auto simp add: case_prod_beta dest: arg_cong [of _ _ even])
 
 end
 
 
 code_identifier
   code_module Parity \<rightharpoonup> (SML) Arith and (OCaml) Arith and (Haskell) Arith
 
 lemmas even_of_nat = even_of_nat_iff
 
 end